...sheeple...this disaster was manufactured by venture capitalists, and shrouded in romantic what ifs. Finger pointing at its best. Titanic was not of MY generation, but investigations into Roswell, Kennedys, 911, and 'shock and awe' all land squarely in the same laps.
This video offers "actual pictures" of the Titanic which are obviously clips and stills from movies about the Titanic. Some of the photos show a white ship with two stacks while the Titanic was primarily black and had four stacks. It shows a photo of a skeleton within the wreckage but the bodies and skeletons would have been decomposed and disintegrated DECADES before the location of the wreckage was discovered. Then it purports to show an interior photograph of the Titanic as it is sinking with a female domestic servant fighting against the rushing waters that were then flooding that area of the ship. All of this shows an utter disregard for actual history and this video can only be classified as entertaining fiction. The owners of this channel should be ashamed of themselves for such blatant sensationalism.
No camera or images on film could have survived over a century in those deep, extreme salt water conditions...it's just impossible. Who dreamed up this absurdity? Years ago, I saw a bumper sticker that said "Titanic: It sank. Deal with it." I agree!
Meet yet another of RU-vid's digital P.T. Barnums. They sucker us in one way or another. I clicked on this one for the comments. Have been an amateur photographer for over 30 years. Knew there was no way this was true. But curiosity suckered me in to see how they'd spin it. Disappointed on all counts. Shame on me. :)
@mikesaccoia5748 It didn't fool me for a minute. I saw that stupid photo, and thought, okay, what kind of twit is going to buy this? It's just a digital fantasy, yet another attempt in the long, dragged out attempt to keep the Titanic disaster playing out. It's silly and it's pathetic. It happened, it's over. I'll never understand why people keep obsessing over it...even to the point of coming up with attempted bamboozles like this one.
@@trishloughman5998the thing is today people do actually take pictures of people in trouble, back then they used to get people to pose falling overboard to not to get a blurry pic
How in the world would a camera survive at those depths? And how was it never mentioned by any of the explorers who visited the site after Ballard? Sounds fishy to me.
What a bunch of rubbish. VHS and VCR weren't even around back then, and even if they did, it would have been totally destroyed by the time they found it. Oh wait, is this a joke? Oh. XD
I had a VCR last for eighteen years, before it starting eating tapes. After that, had to let it go. That was a sad day. Mitsubishi model. Yes, they even made VCRs. Even escalator components. Since the thing lasted that long. If I ever want to own a car again, probably buy one of theirs.
Yes, a camera and its film is going to survive in those conditions, intact for over a century. It wouldn't last five minutes. Ice cold sea water, it would have eroded for a start and that's just one element that would have brought about it's destruction. Don't you ever tire of talking such utter nonsense?
❤️YOU DO NOT HAVE TO FEAR DEATH IF YOU BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST, AND TRUST IN HIM WITH ALL YOUR HEART, BECAUSE HE ATONED FOR YOU FOR ALL YOUR INSULTS, THAT YOU WOULD OBTAIN PEACE WITH ALMIGHTY GOD, AND GO TO HEAVEN BY HIS GRACE!
You said that the Olympic sank, you even emphasized it a bit. It didn't in fact, it ran for 24 years from 1911 to 1935. Her final fate was the scrapyard.
Indeed. Much of its decorative woodwork was repurposed after scrapping and installed in The Marquis Of Granby pub in the upper Hope Valley, Derbyshire, itself now some years demolished.
Yeah, in this obviously life threatening situation, the cameraman took the time to install his camera and take pictures in stead of trying to safe himself. I believe in 1912 it took minutes to prepare the camera to take a picture. And wasn't it nescessary to remain still for a while to get a sharp picture? Imagine how the ship was rocking at that time.
Not only that but he was a time traveler using long lasting film that didn't exist yet, AND he took the time to process the film in his dark room in the ship, before it sank and then for some reason put the film back in his camera and then made it watertight. It's insulting when you actually know the bare basics of film photography. Firstly, film wasn't made to last until around the 80s or so, so even developed and perfectly preserved negatives in 1912 would've faded to nothing.. but film inside a camera, that hasn't even been processed yet has absolutely no chance as the images aren't even made permanent yet. And of course there's no way the camera could've protected the film from water damage.
@@shinobione2575 Very different from someone setting up a camera and taking pictures, which back then was 10x more difficult and time consuming, let alone the physical impossibility of the film surviving.
Love the 'old' photo of people supposedly fighting for their lives which is obviously an edited still from the movie. This channel is a good example of why RU-vid is slowly dying.
@15:23 despite numerous mentions of photos from a camera found on the Titanic, we still haven't seen one. I'm quite skeptical that any film or camera could have survived being under 3-4 km of water for 12 months let alone up to 100 years.
Unfun fact: The “women and kids first” was partly a response to 2 prior passenger ship wrecks, where in one, not a single woman or child of the many onboard survived, and the other, only one boy survived. I believe called The Pacific and The Arctic. In one, much of the crew just immediately ran off with the lifeboats and some supplies for themselves, and in the other, the ship was stranded offshore on a rock in frigid Canadian water, and it was mainly just bad luck that the women and kids quarters were flooded while the men’s quarters were held above water for a time, plus that women’s clothing at the time made the stormy swim even more difficult. The stories were huge at their time and led to changes as it was considered shameful that in both, the woman and kids had such a significantly higher casualty rate.
It was known as “The Birkenhead Drill”, following the sinking of HMS Birkenhead, where it was first used. Unfortunately here, on one side of the ship it was “ Women and Children First” confusingly on the other side of the ship, it may well have been interpreted as “ Women and Children only”
Thanks for the insight. I loved how in this video, that guy was genuinely bummed-out by the utter unfairness of the inequality the situation presented him with. Can you imagine living in such an unfair world.....?!
I am at odds if a camera would have survived at that depth with a recognised film intact! Someone is telling Porky's!! If bone's would have disintegrated at that depth and pressure,then the camera must be a phenomenon. Now I am only a consultant engineer and metalergist with ship building experience for 40yrs. No bullshit please.
❤️YOU DO NOT HAVE TO FEAR DEATH IF YOU BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST, AND TRUST IN HIM WITH ALL YOUR HEART, BECAUSE HE ATONED FOR YOU FOR ALL YOUR INSULTS, THAT YOU WOULD OBTAIN PEACE WITH ALMIGHTY GOD, AND GO TO HEAVEN BY HIS GRACE!
If one believes Nasa made perfect pictures with a 1960th camera in conditions with massive temperature changes on the moon (from cooking hot to freezing cold in seconds), one believes everything.
We barely have photos from inside of Twin Towers on 9/11 - in the middle of New York and in an age when everybody had a camera. But we are supposed to believe that we have photos from inside of Titanic - 1912, middle of the ocean, and when most have never even seen a camera.
I call bull pucky. No camera with intact film would have survived for that long to have prints made from the film. Ridiculous. I think that's from the movie. I fast forwarded to that picture so I wouldn't waste my time here. I've unsubscribed.
No. It's how you get hundreds of thousands of monetised views. Not even modern people could believe that a film would last over 100 years in salt water.
There is no way that a camera - especially one from the 1900s could contain intact film of anything after being underwater at 13,000 feet over 120 years ago. Plus, the image you claim is from that camera is from the movie Titanic.
You got to understand oceans have things wnt believe and if you Dnt kw actually hw to bck up your hypothesis it have no base. Got to understand oceans are time capsule.
@@antoinefields611 I understand what you're saying about ocean but there is no way that film would have survived hundred years no way and also it was no accident it's done on purpose after Titanic sank Federal Reserve System was established so they can take your money you can have no doubt about that
@@JamesBond-oe5px it possible you have to understand things survived underground, underwater so forth thousands of yrs why do you think it different? Look at the news things gettin discovered no one thought existed or wondered hw so & so didn’t get destroyed.
The only "near experience" I can add to this has to do with my career. I work in the radio broadcasting industry. Older analog equipment is sturdier and will always last longer than today's digital equipment. That camera did not need electricity/batteries to function. The film was a physical tape that spooled through the camera. Truthfully, surviving that long in the ocean is not LIKELY even for this old school camera. However, the camera could have been, somehow, protected from the current and motion of the water. Again, it's survival is not LIKELY, but not impossible.
19:37 What is this dude talking about/ The Titanic was using the same material that every other ship in the world was using, and it was not built carelessly, they added a double bottom, an extra hull, and it had sixteen watertight compartments! Oh, and in case you are wondering, the ship is not nine inches in length.
It turns out someone had a video camera on the maiden voyage. The tape was found recently and on there’s this footage of a woman in first class, falling in love with a guy in third class. Sadly he died trying to save her, she survived and went on to live a full and happy life. The footage is incredible considering it was shot in 1912, you’d nearly think it was a film!!
"McCormick had a camera and took pictures of the Lusitania sinking, but as he was immersed in the water, his pictures did not come out." That was within a very short time. I find it hard to believe that a camera found on the wreck of the Titanic could have film that was able to be developed.
The Titanic was really it's previously wrecked sister ship, Olympic. There were 3 of them: Titanic, Olympic and Brittanic. The sister ship hit a naval vessel and ruined the hull making it un seaworthy but because it was the ship's fault and not the Navy the insurance would not cover it. So the owner of the 3 sister ships...White Star, repainted and did a "flip style" renovation on the wrecked ship, disguising the damage and changed the name of it with Titanic, it's sister ship. Then they called it "Unsinkable" knowing full well it was doomed to sink. Then collected the insurance!! Also they gave free tickets to all who opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve and eliminate them in one fell swoop. The federal reserve was created in 1913 and was used to finance both sides during WW1. So many evil things going on and we are lied to constantly. I doubt you can find this on google any longer they have scrubbed the truth off the search engines. I found this out years ago.
As someone who has been to Belfast and saw where the Titanic was built and the pictures of what the men went through and then seeing the exhibit in Vegas I will never forget the images. The men worked for unless I am mistaken for .50 cents a day.
In the UK we don't use cents. In those days it would have been pounds, shillings and pence. And money went a lot further so whatever they would have been paid par for the course which wasn't a lot for any manual workman.
Well most images of this video are from the film, maybe 1 old photo but no guarantees it was from the ocean's depths. Most likely from a surviving photographer.
What is really horrifying is the amount of people (me included) that actually bite the bait and clicked. I didn't think for a half a second that this could be valid. Still I'm here writing a comment.
Much evidence exists that these Olympic class ocean liners such as the Titanic were not "built", but were rather found, restored and retro-fitted to work with coal powered turbines. These ships were likely built by the prior civilization and we were never able to get their tech to work property, which is why they needed to be retro-fitted. The SS Great Eastern is another such example. It took them months just to launch it with loss of lives, they were never able to get it work properly, it never made money, and much of the tech on the ship wasn't seen again for another 100 years. I've been on the Queen Mary in Long Beach The level of craftsmanship and opulence is mind-blowing. Simply saying our ancestors were amazing builders doesn't explain it.
@@jasonargonaught8744 Yes brother, it art thou. We have a diaper-wearing president with full-blown dementia leading the country. Who would've thought that day would come to pass? Why is my comment so hard to believe? Look into it. It's not so crazy once you have the facts. The truth will set you free brother.
No matter what you claim the ship still sank. They wanted to sail and had'nt the full amount of life boats in place. The iceberg sliced a huge hole in the hull. The fire in the coal bunker did not cause the ship to sink faster.
Two questions; how did the camera stay waterproofed so deep and under pressure and I heard the captain said, Even God himself can’t sink this ship? Any truth?
The real story for me is that the officials chose to ignore a coal fire raging in Titanic's bowels and sent the ship on its way. Gross incompetence, complete disregard for life, unconscionable.
The Titanic was really it's previously wrecked sister ship, Olympic. There were 3 of them: Titanic, Olympic and Brittanic. The sister ship hit a naval vessel and ruined the hull making it un seaworthy but because it was the ship's fault and not the Navy the insurance would not cover it. So the owner of the 3 sister ships...White Star, repainted and did a "flip style" renovation on the wrecked ship, disguising the damage and changed the name of it with Titanic, it's sister ship. Then they called it "Unsinkable" knowing full well it was doomed to sink. Then collected the insurance!! Also they gave free tickets to all who opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve and eliminate them in one fell swoop. The federal reserve was created in 1913 and was used to finance both sides during WW1. So many evil things going on and we are lied to constantly. I doubt you can find this on google any longer they have scrubbed the truth off the search engines. I found this out years ago.
The Titanic had two sister ships. The Brittanic was lost during WWI. The Olympic was used until 1935 (long after the Titanic's sinking) when it was finally retired and sold for scrap. Also, there were allegations that the Titanic was traveling at an unreasonably high speed, at the time of the collision, because the Captain was trying to put out the coal fire by using up the stores of coal. Captain Smith had a long history of allegations of incompetence prior to being put in charge of the Titanic. While a seafaring organizing normally doesn't put an incompetent captain in charge of its newest and most expensive ship, the White Star Lines was on the verge of bankruptcy at the time of the Titanic sinking. Perhaps, the more highly qualified captains refused to set sail while a fire was roaring aboard the Titanic.
Titanic was suppose to sink. All bankers opposite of the Rockefellers and JP morgan died during that accident and 1 year later the Federal Reserve was created.
The Titanic was really it's previously wrecked sister ship, Olympic. There were 3 of them: Titanic, Olympic and Brittanic. The sister ship hit a naval vessel and ruined the hull making it un seaworthy but because it was the ship's fault and not the Navy the insurance would not cover it. So the owner of the 3 sister ships...White Star, repainted and did a "flip style" renovation on the wrecked ship, disguising the damage and changed the name of it with Titanic, it's sister ship. Then they called it "Unsinkable" knowing full well it was doomed to sink. Then collected the insurance!! Also they gave free tickets to all who opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve and eliminate them in one fell swoop. The federal reserve was created in 1913 and was used to finance both sides during WW1. So many evil things going on and we are lied to constantly. I doubt you can find this on google any longer they have scrubbed the truth off the search engines. I found this out years ago.
8 deaths while building a huge ship with zero health and safety was incredibly small. Its time people stop making absolutely ridiculous videos sharing fake information
My great grandfather gave me a cassette tape before he died. It was obviously very old and a little distorted, but on it you can hear an actual Titanic passenger who recorded the details of that tragic night on his little personal tape recorder. It was sealed in a well wrapped tupperware bowl, and was found floating in the North Atlantic by a German U-boat in WWII...true story...really.
You should be ashamed of yourself for posting this, that ship sinking killing all those poor people. That is a gravesite and should be left alone. No respect for the dead. Rest Peacefully In Heaven to all who lost their lives.
Where...?? Most of the photos are from visitors that left before the final departure. A young girl used a box camera to capture an iceberg, perhaps THE iceberg. other images from underwater are from movies. Without flash back then, the image of the two people floating by the clock are very well lit for slow films of the day. (I collect antique cameras and also shoot tintypes) The woman on the right seems way out of proportion to be sitting on something above the clock level. Possibly ae later. IF this is a real photo from a century underwater, the clarity would not be as good as this one....unlikely to be any image at all. Abox camera could have floated but they are hardly waterproof. Every image shown has never been listed as coming from deep water...most are movie images. I own a number of cameras from before 1900, and I use them...some are cardboard...they would never hold up. Images of the lifeboats approaching the Carpathia were taken by someone on board that ship. I would love to see this mysterious camera from the deep. Nyms.
The truth is nobody who was taken down to them depths would leave any footprint that they were there , they disappeared on the way down to the sea floor , the pressure of the water above saw to that 💯
Glaring error in at least one depiction… There is smoke coming from all four stacks! Only three were actually functional, one for show. As a descendant of one of the men who perished as a Titanic passenger I am offended by this video trying to benefit from this disaster that affected many real people.
See the difference in generations…the captain knew he messed up,and he was never gonna get off that ship( and he was retiring after this cruise)now a days,that cruise ship that fell on its side,and all those people died,the captain was the first one off the boat
@@dfuher968 I know all about it the ship that was in 2 major collisions,was high jacked and had 4 fires on board and sank on the last one….. that’s not the point of my comment….it was about how older generations were different from now….no captain nowadays would go down with a ship, like the captain of the Titanic did
That image (of people in water in the ship) was pretty clear and fairly sharp given its alleged age. The shot of the people in the water is not something a common camera of that timeframe (e.g. a brownie) was capable of.
If u believe this video. But I would recommend against that, since almost all of it are provable falsehoods. If u want real facts about the Titanic, I suggest to check out "Oceanliner Designs".
The Titanic was really it's previously wrecked sister ship, Olympic. There were 3 of them: Titanic, Olympic and Brittanic. The sister ship hit a naval vessel and ruined the hull making it un seaworthy but because it was the ship's fault and not the Navy the insurance would not cover it. So the owner of the 3 sister ships...White Star, repainted and did a "flip style" renovation on the wrecked ship, disguising the damage and changed the name of it with Titanic, it's sister ship. Then they called it "Unsinkable" knowing full well it was doomed to sink. Then collected the insurance!! Also they gave free tickets to all who opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve and eliminate them in one fell swoop. The federal reserve was created in 1913 and was used to finance both sides during WW1. So many evil things going on and we are lied to constantly. I doubt you can find this on google any longer they have scrubbed the truth off the search engines. I found this out years ago.
I am surprised you didn't mention that Cap'n Smith was scheduled to retire when he caused significent damage to the Olympic, & due to the dubious circumstances to said damage, which involved Smith, the insurance company refuse to pay the claim. Nor did you mention that the wrecked Olympic was tied to dock, across the way, from the Titanic. You also failed to mention that it wasn't an iceburg that sank the Titanic, but the fact that a huge section of its hull fell off over a mile from where it sank, long before hitting the iceburg due to the fire, ehich eventually popped the rivets & welds, & when you consider that Whitestar could not recoup their loss of the Olympic, & that Smith needed to somehow prevent them from being forced into retirement, indisgrace, & the fact that the Titanic looked almost identical to the Olympic, save the open verses area of the ship near, as I recall, the front sides of the ship leading to the open deck. It was easy to switch the ships ID markings, & why Cap'n Smith delibrately ignored the iceburg warnings. Smith's family was paid a handsome sum when he died, whitestar recouped the majority of their losses, all by design.What I would be interesting to find out, is if they had life insurances on any of the passengers.
When they say that not even God could sink this ship it's a natural death sentence no respect for the creator what did they expect I know the power of God that's the reason titanic sank 💯
Ah, but the White Star Line actually never called her unsinkable, nor did her designers. They promoted her as the safest ship in the world, and she was at that time. The unsinkable part was the sensation press making crap up, just like most of what ppl believe about the Titanic today is complete fabrications from same "press".
How did they get such a clear picture? Didnt they just have those cameras that the photographer would put that cloth over their heads? Only one picture?
The cma you describe , would havé had glass plates , covered in silver oxide or nitrate . To get an image on those negatives took a while , which s why most early photographs , everyone's counter ance , appears to be quite 'staunch' , due to the exposure time required . The cloth for the photographer , would have been to allow centering , and there was often a length of 'black powder' used as a flash gun , to get a faster image , otherwise , one had to remain stock still for up to 5 minutes , for each shot .
@@juliehamby2689you mean that photographer that took a photo from the Earth to the dark side of the moon? 😁 Or that "actual photo" taken with a smartphone.... To the same dark side of the moon?
@@juliehamby2689 haha I just wrote a comment about that, hadn't seen yours. This is mine: If one believes Nasa made perfect pictures with a 1960th camera in conditions with massive temperature changes on the moon (from cooking hot to freezing cold in seconds), one believes everything.
The fire makes sense, really strange it was in the exact same spot it was hit by the iceberg. I always did wonder how mere ice could break through metal. But if the metal was weakened by fire, I can see it. I bet they didnt tell the passengers about the fire.... I think many would have abandoned the trip if they knew. Tragic to think about.
The fire was not in the same place that the iceberg struck. It had already been dealt with around 24 hours before the collision, and stoker survivors confirmed that the only thing it damaged was paintwork inside the affected bunker.
How true that the Titanic has only a single hull. One victim, Lewis Hickman of England was buried here in Riverside Cemetery in Neepawa, Manitoba, Canada. His two brothers perished on that tragedy.
IT'S IMPOSSIBLE FOR AN OLD CAMERA TO BE FOUND AFTER THE TITANIC HIT AN ICE BERG IN 1914 AND IT WAS FOUND IN 1986 4 MILES DOWN ON THE OCEAN FLOOR BROKEN IN HALF 🙄
What I get out of this story is, as human beings, we dont prepare for possible emergencies. Everytime I review information on the Titanic, I think more people could have been saved if there were more lifeboats, If an emergency announcement and assembly drill had been done right away etc.
The Titanic, despite how it seems, was actually the safest ship in the world at the time. She carried twice the number of lifeboats required, the White Star Line had their own safety regulations, that were far more stringent than the legally required, and the captain complied with them fully, we know this from contemporary records. But yes, we humans are very bad at imagining, what could happen, we apparently have to learn the hard way. At least the maritime laws were completely rewritten after the Titanic sinking, what we have today is in large part thanks to Titanic and her victims.
As a child i was told of the titanic and it was required reading at that time. thank you for giving this new information, such as the coal fire which surely weakened and damaged the hull. its astounding. thank you, and RIP All who lost their lives 🙏😔
There's so much wrong about that.1) No one's going to be standing there taking photographs during a catastrophe. 2) Film won't survive that long in the water, especially that deep. 3) The ship sunk at 2:20. Look at the clock in the background. It shows it's already past 2:00.
A tragic story that never seems to have an ending! you would have to have been party to it all to know the true facts and survive the tragedy itself to believe such a nightmare could happen, and no camera would or could provide that kind of picture in all.
❤️YOU DO NOT HAVE TO FEAR DEATH IF YOU BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST, AND TRUST IN HIM WITH ALL YOUR HEART, BECAUSE HE ATONED FOR YOU FOR ALL YOUR INSULTS, THAT YOU WOULD OBTAIN PEACE WITH ALMIGHTY GOD, AND GO TO HEAVEN BY HIS GRACE!
I’m glad you posted this video about this ship, what did you say its name was, Titanic? Not many people heard about this ship. Me and my buddy Leo are watching this video in horror!!
oh no the ship is sinking and we are in the middle of the ocean, hopefully I will drown rather than freezing. Before I do I just need to take this picture to upload on my social media page.
Whats missing from this about the camera found. The reason the photo was so clear and in such great condition after all this time... It wasnt a camera from that era wanst a camera from our Time on the Titanic rhat voyage was a Time traveler from the future . 3038 he was from.
Yes was thinking the same....they are now saying theses technologies we have today have been in the works for years maybe even for hundreds or more yrs... but was kept a secret... Hence the video that was showing a young ladies on a cell phone in I think it was 1938 was said to be a commercial of some sought and thst she wasn't a time traveler she's was an actress testing that device at that time...I'm thinking maybe scientists and only the very rich may have had access or knowledge about it..
I was there actually,I worked a few blocks away and actually seen the people jumping, my husband was stuck on the roof of his job at Jas in manhattan,and also seen it he was a little closer to, and he tears up every time he hears about 911, it was so scary and dark, and the only good thing was it actually did bring a lot of New Yorkers together that day, absolutely so sad and devastating,the noise and chaos is something that will never leave your mind
The onset of the biggest luxury ship disaster happened because they publicized the Titanic and if it had not went on it's maiden voyage on schedule, there would be some monetary consequences. GREED is why those people died. I'll bet not many knew of the massive fire 🔥. The love of money outweighs the love for people in the hearts of many people. Those who have their hearts full of greed and cold emotion do to the love of money, power, and fame will not like what's coming for them. GOD BLESS ALL PEOPLE. AMEN.
There wasnt a massive fire. There was a smoldering fire in 1 coal bunker, which was very common at the time and could easily be managed. It did not and could not effect the hull or the safety of the ship. And oh, btw, the bunker in question was NOT located, where the mark on the photo claims, it was much further back and nowhere near, where the iceberg hit. The guy, who came up with the ludicrous claim, was not an expert in any of this, nor did he even have the most basic facts right, coz its been known since April 1912, which coal bunker was smoldering, which is, why he was very quickly debunked - and probably deservedly ridiculed in private by all actual experts. Oh, and greed? There was no profit to the sinking, only a huge loss. The Titanic was massively underinsured, and the White Star Line lost millions - in 1912 money.
The Titanic was really it's previously wrecked sister ship, Olympic. There were 3 of them: Titanic, Olympic and Brittanic. The sister ship hit a naval vessel and ruined the hull making it un seaworthy but because it was the ship's fault and not the Navy the insurance would not cover it. So the owner of the 3 sister ships...White Star, repainted and did a "flip style" renovation on the wrecked ship, disguising the damage and changed the name of it with Titanic, it's sister ship. Then they called it "Unsinkable" knowing full well it was doomed to sink. Then collected the insurance!! Also they gave free tickets to all who opposed the creation of the Federal Reserve and eliminate them in one fell swoop. The federal reserve was created in 1913 and was used to finance both sides during WW1. So many evil things going on and we are lied to constantly. I doubt you can find this on google any longer they have scrubbed the truth off the search engines. I found this out years ago.
The tragedy WAS Smith’s fault, (and others) but mostly his. But no amount of drills would’ve meant as much as his heeding the NUMEROUS warnings from other ships.
Yes, Captain Smith can be blamed, but White Star is also to blame. They had a lot hanging on the Titanic and how fast it could cross the sea. White Star was found guilty of many charges and faults that happened during the voyage, and it ultimately brought the firm to bankruptcy.
I find it hard to believe that a camera under water that long would be intact. Given that cameras were not waterproof and the film emulsion of film of that era was extremely sensitive to salt water, I doubt that any picture could have been developed from said film. The purported interior picture of the woman, I seem to remember from the movie Titanic.
Some years before ship was built (1880s i think??) A woman wrote a little known book about the largest ship ever built on Earth hitting an iceberg on its maiden voyage! She called the ship in the book The Titanic! If more people had read that book or knew of it, there's no way people would have ever have gotten on the ship! Or rhey would have changed its name, and possibly its tragic history regarding the danger of icebergs! Makes you think! Maybe that author had a dream or a gift!?😮
Also, the story had many differences from the Titanic sinking, but the author and his publisher being despicable moneygrubbers quickly rewrote all that, renamed the ship in the book and the book itself and republished it, after the Titanic sank, so as to cash in on the tragedy.
