@@SuperCody888 We label forests that have never been industrially logged as 'primary'. In BC, 'old growth' is primary forest that is a few hundred years old. And yes, our agenda is to protect that stuff.
@@conservationnorth6069 so your saying primary forests should never be logged? Where should the logs come from to homes in BC? Where did the logs come from to build the house you live in?
@@SuperCody888 This map shows primary forest in green and previously logged forest in red: consnorth.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=d1620f43f9084a99a4921e5e8b9b98dd The raw material for any wood products ought to come from places in red, which as you can see, is most of BC.
@@conservationnorth6069 your lying. Any logging contractor can bid on BC timber sales. Let's see the actual GPS cords of the block and the GPS deferrals on a map. Using some silly map software that uses cell phone towers for GPS cords isn't accurate. How many of those logs went to sawmills, and how many went to be turned into wood pellets. Your leaving alot of information out.
@@SuperCody888 We put the coordinates of the old growth deferral logging in the video at 4:01. You can use iMap BC to find those lat longs, then overlay the old growth layers (just search 'old growth' in iMap). That's what we did. You can use the Harvest Billing System to find out where the logs go, which is to both sawmills and pellet mills.