OMEGA is Better Than ROLEX - 10 Reasons Why Omega are as Good or Better Than ROLEX 

Omega watches are better because you can actually buy one without a lot of hassles and BS and without paying way too much.

Nothing beats the 321 movement in the Speedmaster.

To me it’s not even about Omega going to the moon, it’s more about them being on a mission that saved astronaut’s lives in the Apollo 13 mission by timing 14 second burns with the Speedy. Great video sir! 💯 Edit: if Omega could slim down their case sizes they could be even more of a threat with the co-axial escapement.

My SeaMaster300Professional is so good i think i could stop here. Upvoted!!!!

I own both and really like both brands. I think when comparing each brands watches to their counterpart I prefer Rolex in design by just a bit but my all time favorite watch is the speedmaster. Still have my fingers crossed for a 165.024 reissue from omega though. One of the best looking divers of all time imo. I gotta mention too I have had issues with my GMT master II's movement and have read quite a few people with similar issues on their 32 series movements. Haven't had a single problem with my speedmaster though.

I don't think there's a universal "better" when it comes to Omega vs. Rolex. Both brands sell watches that are 1) well-built and designed 2) super accurate and 3) will last generations if properly maintained. There's only "better for you" as in which watch does an individual prefer and speaks to that person the most. Ultimately, the presence of both brands is a win for us since we have more choices.

HISTORY, INNOVATION, PRICE, STYLE, DESIGN, DEALERSHIP EXPERIENCE

Personally i think a one watch collection should be what you want and will be loved by you. Its a very personal choice. I've been trying to get a rolex since the tenth grade of high-school. Fall of 2011. Worked so hard and saved thousands of dollars. Went to the local dealer and got put on list and still have not got a call. I gave up after several yrs and bought some electronics and restored a vehicle to be my daily driver. Im still on the list and call them once a yr but yeah. Ended up with an omega and absolutely adore this watch.

It helps that you can actually buy an omega unlike a Rolex which you have to pay grey market prices if you want one

My biggest reason I do not wear rolex is because of the cyclops. I can't get past the look and i like a date.

I have the new sub and the new speedy , love both for different reasons but my £200 citizen eco drive GMT world time keeps better time than both of them 🤫

My first luxury was the smp300 and its a fantastic watch which being able to buy 2 years ago was brilliant before the price hikes. I've recently acquired my first Rolex at rrp which is a brilliant watch. I genuinely wouldn't be comfortable with wearing a flashy Rolex sports watch in public. Both fantastic brands.

I love OMEGA 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

For Omega it's the speedmaster professional line and seamaster/po/AQ line that I love.

OMEGA is a realy iconic brand with a realy huge heritage in History and innovation. You can also purchase watches wich are affordable till ultimate high end💪👍.

I personally prefer Omega. My grail watch is the No time to die 300m

I have a Sub & Moonwatch. That's all I will ever need

I agree with all of your points, but the one that was crux to me was that my 3861 Speedy is really under the radar vis-a-vis ANY Rolly.

First a good point for me is that both brands exits, I agree with you for almost all the points, I have both brands and I have to say that I almost always wear Omega, mainly for safety reasons. I don't like small watches so for me the sub and Daytona are too small, I went for sea dweller and sky dweller, for the speedy I went for vintage I have a 1969 pre moon watch and I love it. Also a way to go for a chrono and dive you have the sea master and PO chrono, not so many people talk about them but they are fantastic. Omega give you a lot of choice a lot of different materials (ceramic/titanium/tantalum......) they also offer some complications you can't find on any Rolex watches like tourbillon, and the stunning chrono chime .......

You’re on point!

me too chris. out of the 30+ watches in my collection i am proud that not one of them is a overrated rolex!

I have both and love them both but I dont think Rolex need OEM aftermarket straps because their bracelets are damn good. That said, the Omega OEM Nato is fabulous (have it on a GS) and just got the Milanese bracelet from my planet ocean. Superb.

Excelente video Chris, este canal es de los pocos que hablan con franqueza acerca de las ventajas o desventajas de ciertas casas relojeras!

I have had an Omega seamster pro Chronometer ....... The bond one...... Got it in 98.......never any issues with it...... I would really love to get the NTTD titanium edition but I now have a family and can't really afford it....... I also love their 60th anniversary Bond seamaster...... I'm not a sucker for the bond association and would be happy if they made it without the limited edition reference, as that pushes their prices higher than their standard seamaster. I do love Rolex as well..... I think if I had one, I would be sucked in with the feeling of being exclusive..... And their Daytona is a beautiful watch....... I can never tell the difference between the Speedmaster series....... They all look the same...... But the Daytona with oyster dial and rubber strap is gorgeous......... Omega is like android, it's innovative, cheaper, and has a lot of choice, Rolex is a bit like apple...... A bit up their own arse, and think of themselves as being superior and charge a higher premium for their product ..... Very similar to how Apple operate. I also prefer the sales experience from Omega....... They don't judge you, and treat you respectfully even if you are browsing...... And when you have finally saved and ready to make the purchase, Omega will have stock to sell you....... Good luck with getting a Rolex from an AD......... I went into my local AD and put my name down to express an interest in a couple of models, the assistant told me the wait time can be up to 5 years....... So if I wanted one, I would need to go via Grey market......... The market is just full of hustlers trying to make a cut...... I can't be arsed with all that hassle...... All Rolex has is its exclusivity..... That's it....... You can't get one even if you have the money. They give them to celebrities as it makes them even more desirable..... Then the actual AD makes you feel that you need to earn the right to be given the opportunity to purchase....... Their design is subjective, their movement is inferior. If I won the lottery, I would like to think, I still wouldn't get a Rolex.......or rather, I wouldn't feel particularly safe wearing one....... Omega is far more invisible to hungry eyes....... I live in London, and i wouldn't want to attract a highly probable robbery.

I agree, Furthermore, Rolex's marketing and choice of precious metals are what make them dangerous to wear as well. ❤

Love and own a couple of both but definitely leaning more towards omega for being less flashy and actually being able to buy most models at retail. Also really like digging through all the limited editions Omega has done to find the hidden treasures that arent on everyones wrist. Was in Miami a few months back and saw a submariner on about 100 wrists over the course of the weekend which really just made it seem less special.

If I chose to spend that much for a watch I could actually walk into a dealer and buy an Omega. Nuff said

Omega is a well kept secret in the industry, if Rolex collectors find out how great Omegas are, all of us will be subject to waitlists, and we not be able to get omegas at retail price anymore. For me, i have been a collector for over 20 years now, I own both Rolex and omegas, but the biggest difference I feel is in the purchasing experience. In omega, I have been treated like a VIP, entitled to get any watch I want, with an incredible experience. On the contrary, for Rolex, I practically had to suck up the my AD and practically beg the sales rep to sell me one of those gold Daytonas.

Well, I have the Daytona and the new Speedy pro moonwatch, the chrono hand jumps when the crown/botton is pressed in the Speedy, never happens to my Daytona

So tell me how the datejust is better quality then the aqua

I own several of both. Love both but Omega wins.

Pretty much agree with the whole show 👍

You can actually buy Omega

Omega beats Rolex any day of the week and twice on Sunday! Better technology (co-axial escapement), higher certification standard (METAS), beautiful designs, build quality that’s at least on par with Rolex, exhibition case backs on many watches, not just one that is insanely expensive. NASA selected Omega after a battery of torture tests to go to the moon. Oh yeah, and you can actually buy them!

I'm neutral on this. I've been fortunate to have had both. I would say go for the watch that works for you regardless of the name on the dial if you are going to wear it. If you're looking for a watch as an asset or something that may gain in value that is not intended to be worn then that's your choice and is fine as well. Personally I wear the watches that I have, they will get scratched and get the odd ding or worse but that is all part of the journey for me.

I own a few Omega's however I really do like the design of Rolex as well. I really got turned off by the fact that Rolex are virtually impossible to buy new from an AD. On the flip side Omega have plenty of gems and great customer service. However many of the grail models are limited editions. Even though you would have to buy some of these grey market at least you know there were only 1k made vs something like a Rolex Batman that 10k+ were made and are selling second hand for double.

I think you’re spot on, but I still love my Rolexes.

Is this guy related to RU-vid personality and channel creator RGT85? Looks like they could be brothers, lol.

I own both omega and Rolex and I can agree that Omega at the very least is on par. Rolex is much better at marketing and creating an aura of prestige, nothing wrong with that but this does not mean better. I love both brands and think they both offer some great quality pieces

PO in titanium vs SD43, I prefer the PO the white gold hands and numerals with the blue dial contrast look astonishing but I still appreciate the classic look of my SD. I bought the SD FOMO driven with worst case of buyers remorse and find it boring. Favorite watch is my Santos Chrono XL black bezel. With so many other watch brands to explore I doubt will buy another Rolex but will likely buy one or two other omegas.

For Me the Omega Seamaster Professional with Grey dial and Blue accents on Steel Band and Blue Rubber Folding Clasp Band (not sold as much as other Omega dials) gives me everything both brands over Great looks, Accuracy, Magnetic protection from this high tech world we live in as well as safety. Best all round watch. Rolex does not make the large available quantities because they thrive off limited availability to justify their higher prices.

I like Omega - but Rolex are better for 3 reasons, 1. More iconic designs (Omega has a few, like moo watch), 2. Slimmer cases (a lot of Omegas are too chunky), 3. Simpler more focused catalogue (a bit linked to 1.).

👍👍👍 Nice Comparison 👍👍👍

Agree!

I prefer the aesthetic of most Rolex models and the movements from Omega. I own only one, a 5513 I've had from new (it was a gift). I don't plan to get another because I can't justify spending Rolex $$$ on any watch.

The main reason for me is that Omega is pound for pound the better watchmaker. The edge in innovation is one thing, but look at the Speedy Chrono Chime or the DeVille Center Tourbillon... Rolex doesn't make anything that comes even close to those calibers. Another reason for me as a vintage collector is that Omega has just more variety. They have some really cool vintage models like the Pie-Pan Constellation, the Memomatic, the Bullhead, the Jedi or the 1601 TC2 that are just so much more interesting to collect than anything Rolex has ever produced.

Rolex is better than Omega because 1- Their bracelets are better and iconic. They tapper and have a quick adjustment, i.e.. Jubilee, Oyster, President, Oysterflex, you just can't go wrong. 2- Their watch cases are slimmer, which make the watch wear better and make it suitable for more occasions. 3- Rolex movements are known to be a workhorse that last many years. Moreover, they are easy to service and loved by all watchmakers. Their current movements have a power reserve of 70 hours, an accuracy of -2/+2, and they beat at 4 Hz. Rolex recommends a 10-year service. 4- Rolex is more consistent with their models. Almost all models are iconic and can be known to people with little knowledge of watches such Submariner, Datejusts, and even Daytona. 5- Rolex remained more fathful to the swiss watch industry by maintaining most of their movements automatic when others, especially Omega, relied more on quartz movements, which cheapened the brand. 6- One word, the Sea. Submariner is the most iconic dive watch period. 7- Rolex always uses the best of materials, and they never made gold plated watches, which Omega kept prodcuing till the nineties. 8- Rolex watches have better resale value and are largely more collectible 9- Rolex is independent while Omega is part of the Swatch Conglomerate, which, as a result they tend to go along with the shareholders even if they are not 100% in agreement. 10- Rolex was a brand of choice they did not need to pay James Bond producers to make the actor wear a Rolex contrary to Omega. 11- Rolex is the number 1 swiss watch producer with over 1.2 million watches per year, and their watches are in high demand that are not readily available. Omega is ranked at number 3 after Cartier.

I'm not necessarily a fanboy of either brand, but I have owned a few of each. Just based on the watches alone, I prefer Rolex. I think they make a more refined watch. There's just not a whole lot that Omega does that excites me. They certainly have a lot going for them as you mentioned.

Sub’s nicer than 300m, should twice the money Aqua Terra VS Datejust AT takes it. Own all 4

I have owned a submariner and a sky dweller sold them both kept my Omega’s. Rolex movements are hard starters!

I agree with all of your reasons. I could afford either brand and my choice is Omega Seamaster 300. The movement in this watch is superior and the design is amazing.

Rolex is all about showing off to others. Its always more about a status symbol than getting a cool watch. The word "Rolex" is the most important feature of the watch. People arent as interested with any other name.

Chris - looking forward to Part II where you explain why Grand Seiko is better than both of them. Spring Drive FTW. Flame suit on - lol...

Closed casebacks for me, it's

Great video Chris. I agree with you. Always a subject that needs to be discussed. I am not a Rolex fanboy but as a collector, I would like one. I will not pay a premium for it. I have the 2222.80 I will not trade it for all the money in the world(almost).

There’s no way to convince me that a given Rolex model is worth twice (or more) a comparable Omega.

Love Omega but Rolex is just better at keeping tolerances tight and produce watches with better dimensions.

I like both, but regarding Omega negatives, I prefer closed casebacks and some of their designs look a little cartoonish to me (some of the beefed up super cases from Rolex do, too). For Rolex, they are so controlling and have awful buying experience and so much baggage... Also, have you seen how Rolex puts ugly notches in the watch case now? They do not want you using any other strap on YOUR watch, so controlling. I won't even go into the latest Daytona design...

I agree that Omega is practically on par with Rolex. As you said, Rolex is king of marketing. I own the current Blue SMP300M and prefer it over the sub. I find most Rolex sport watches over-hyped. However there are certain Rolexes I do love more than omega. I'd take a DJ36 (fluted bezel, jubilee bracelet) over an AT (even tho I love the AT) because I find the DJ just more classic, timeless, iconic, and elegant. I'd take the explorer 2 over any omega GMTs since omega just tries to mesh their seamasters with a gmt function and it doesn't jive well. As for chronographs, I'd take the speedy over the daytona any day. Daytona is so overhyped it's ridiculous.

I am sure no one will have an opinion on this topic.

Great video! I own 3 Rolex sports models and l own 1 Omega it keeps better time keeping than my Rolex watches am definitely adding another Omega to my watch collection

I love Omega and I thought you were doing a serious video until you got to the 10th category. What James Bond wears does not warrant a seperate category. Fictional movie characters come under watch marketing and Rolex trump Omega in that one. Being honest I think too much is made of a Omega having the moon watch. Rolex’s have been taken to the moon and it’s known that the Pepsi was a popular private watch with NASA astronauts. Almost any watch can be used in space. The mantle Omega achieved was that NASA chose the Speedmaster for its offical watch over the Rolex, after extensive testing.

I think Rolex build a better watch however, Rolex does not exist to purchase nullifying the brand, it doesn’t matter if you can’t get one

If you open up the comments, people are free to voice their opinion. To me, the getting mugged disparity between Rolex and Omega is laughable. A criminal won't discriminate. All Omegas have cache and are desirable. So, if in the wrong place and you are wearing an Omega or a Rolex, you are going to get mugged. Some people carry deterrents and know how to fight but that is another OT discussion to dissuade muggers from stealing our stuff. Btw, that applies to all nice watches of several brands. Like many, truthfully, I stay away from Rolex largely because of the stereotype. Btw, I don't begrudge anybody owning one, always been a fan of the Submariner, and if driving a Lambo with gold chains...Its all good. Omegas are nice but the watch industry is very crowded and some good competition from many brands. The recently released '57 Omega Chrono is a compelling watch but one must ask is it is $9K compelling. Btw, if you want to open up the discussion a bit more, Tudor has come to the fore as a worthy competitor to Omega at its price point. Tudor versus Omega IMHO is a worthy conversation. Of course, many will have their preference or bias because high end watches are effectvely art with many ingredients and people have different wrist sizes and aesthetic preferences. For example what Omega watch has been as desirable to collectors as the BB58 at its price point.

I have an Omega Constellation, which nobody (especially in these comparison videos) never talk about. Why are even Omega owners such haters of them? F.Y.I., I have a meteorite.

I don’t think Omega is in the same class as Rolex. Omega is a quality mid tier product. Rolex makes its own movements and even makes its own steel. The finish and build quality is higher with Rolex. I love Omega and own two, but they are a step or two down from Rolex. I put Omega in the same class as Brietling.

I sold my Rolex to get a new Zenith Chrono Sport. I’ve handled tons of Omega and Rolex models and Zenith easily hangs with them both on a quality/finishing level.

I would have rolex in my collection if i could buy at retail. They are losing customers due to the false availability. This is great news for omega and Grand seiko.

K

as I commented once on Gringa's channel : "If I have enough money to buy a Submariner, I would by a Seamaster Professional and an Aqua Terra" because I can buy same quality as Rolex but with 2 Omegas at the same price

Omega are a true Swiss company

and you can actually buy an Omega

Omega is heavily discounted. Rolex isn't available. Omega make way too many limited editions.

You are right ❤ !!!

Rolex movement specs are tighter than Omega. No one else does +-2 seconds.

#11 you can actually buy a new Omega

100%

All the matter is design, design and design...Rolex design is "too much" for young people. Omega's design is way much cooler.

When Rolex sets the price on there watches they factor in the the fraud factor that has there watches overpriced coming out of the gate.

If I had the money I'd go for Omega. No question.

6m23s. That strap. Yuck.

If omega is better than Rolex why is their market share so small in comparison to Rolex. Rolex was never a brand that manufacture high horology watches . Their watches are functional, robust practical and reliable nothing superficial. They make watches that consumer have high usage for hence the reason most people want a Rolex . For years people have been crusading to make omega the king but fail miserably

Interesting comparison between Rolex and Omega. Both brands are great. May be Rolex is a more luxurious brand, but it's just my personal opinion. May be Rolex are more desirable because some models are not available, or with a long delay. Omega are less flashy than Rolex, for sure. Rolex are much more an investment than Omega, because their aftermarket price increase.

And Omega is in inventory. Like yourself, I own an Omega Seamaster. Yes, I bought it for James Bond, but now that I’ve owned it for several years, I can’t see myself going backwards to Sean Connery‘s submariner. I’m in sales and I never wear the watch while working, but my sales person mind just drives me crazy, knowing that there’s a Rolex sales person that can’t sell their complete product line of watches. And, the consumer loses as well. Knowing that I can’t get a Rolex on any given day, just absolutely turns me off and makes me want to never buy a Rolex. If I can’t access the product, how in the world can I depend on the company being there for me when my watch needs service? Sound ridiculous? That’s what we said with Mitsubishi and Saturn cars, for example. Think of all the brands that have ever failed and have gone out of business in life and you’re stuck with the product. Bottom line for both watch companies regarding consumers… treat your prospects like customers, and treat your customers like prospects. If these were the only two watch companies on the planet, support, inventory and choice for Omega’s watches will always beat out the little edge that Rolex may have with quality.

Why is the better Omega copying Rolex ???

Rolex started out as marketing company that sold watches. Omega was first and foremost a watch company.

Rolex is a better brand all around, but I own and love both. Only Omegas I like and own are the Speedy, Seamaster GMT600 and the Deville. Only Rolex I like and own are the SD43mm both SS and TT, Skydweller and YM2. Omega is 2nd Rolex will always be 1st 🥇

Rolex makes good watches but is brilliant at marketing; the worst thing about Rolex is the stuck-up lunatic fans who think anyone not wearing a Rolex is sub-par. It really alienates anyone who likes watches

Typical Omega fanboy BS. Yours is better than mine...Who cares. Buy what you like and move on.

Omega is my favorite brand. However, my favorite watches in my collection are Rolex. Love and own both brands. Omega should fire the whole marketing and sales división. They also spend millions in marketing and their market share is ridiculous compared to the guys with the crown.

ROLEX = waste! Why do you have to buy watches you do not want to get close to the one you want.

Forget both of them, buy a Longines! 🤫😜

Have you tried a Rolex Submariner glidelock bracelet? It blows anything by Omega out of the water.

Omega is like Cadillac, classy, and luxurious. Rolex is like Porsche, expensive and more exclusive. Super nice, but not a common man option.

This video is full of biased opinions. Everything you said was not fairly accurate. It seems you actually hate Rolex. You might as well make ranting video why you hate Rolex.

Technically Omega rocks but they don’t have the same amount of icon watches. Rolex has loads. P.s. I don’t own a Rolex

Rolex has more iconic models. The Speedmaster is the one true titan of Omega's lineup. And the Daytona has come along and eaten its lunch. The Seamaster has always played second fiddle to the Sub. And of course, it loses points for the cringey James Bond marketing.

Better movements but worse brand. Omega has fallen off considerably in the last 4 years.

Bond wore a Rolex because Ian Fleming wore one. Bond wore an Omega because Omega paid the producers $3 million.

As I understand it, you can actually buy an Omega simply by walking in to an AD. No silly wait list nonsense.