Omega Planet Ocean 39.5mm vs Tudor Black Bay 58

Подписаться 15 тыс.

Просмотров 3,9 тыс.

50% 1

Omega Planet Ocean 39.5mm
215.30.40.20.03.001
40.5mm case
14.4mm thick
45.4mm lug to lug
19mm lug width
600m water resistance
Cal. 8800 w/ 55 hours power reserve
187.1 grams
$7,100
Tudor Black Bay 58
M79030N-0001
39.3mm case
12mm thick
47.9mm lug to lug
20mm lug width
200m water resistance
Cal. MT5402 w/ 70 hours power reserve
145.3 grams
$4,000
brentmiller.com/
brad@brentlmiller.com
717-569-5450

Опубликовано:

1 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 34

@robertlock6041 7 месяцев назад

Hi Brad, the Omega is superior by any standard, although these are both excellent watches. I'd balk at paying the asking price for the Omega, so if I was using my own money I'd choose the Tudor. If somebody else was paying I'd go for the Omega. 🙂

@Guitarman2k10 7 месяцев назад

Gotta go with Omega....even with the price difference. l love my black bay but the Omega is a cut above IMO

@Karat6 Месяц назад

I have the BB58 and have been researching the PO 39.5. This video really shows how bulky it is though, compared to the Tudor. I think the BB58 is already close to the biggest I want to wear on my 6.5” wrist. The Omega just seems to wear alot bigger, both the watch and bracelet. 😐

@exvan3571 7 месяцев назад

Had I been able to try on a PO 39.5mm, I would have chosen it over the Diver 300M. It fits very well and wears thinner than 14.4mm, for me anyway. The Tudor BB58 is now what the Speedy was a few years ago, a great entry into luxury watches. Great content as usual, sir.

@maitrehg Месяц назад

PO by a mile. Not in the same league at all.

@dimitrisaltanis4451 3 месяца назад

Better compare the BB58 with the seamaster 300 heritage!!

@brentmillertime8778 2 месяца назад

Did it a while ago here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IznHIZuyQvY.htmlsi=SiMCMGpg2fx8hKws

@dimitrisaltanis4451 2 месяца назад

@brentmillertime8778 I'm between the omega 300 heritage and the Rolex explorer 40mm, I can't decide... Will Omega keep a good retail price in couple of years ??🙄

@Ibowers2 7 месяцев назад

Great comparison. Hard to choose between these two, but agree with you, would happy wear both.

@RabbitWatchShop 7 месяцев назад

I love Tudor’s divers. However, if that Omega P.O had a much thinner case and bracelet, it would spank that BB58 into a fine powder.

@ЛентяйЁпта 7 месяцев назад

Omega case thickness is overstated....it's because of the saphire glass dome

@RabbitWatchShop 7 месяцев назад

@@ЛентяйЁпта yawn 🥱

@gregs.8895 7 месяцев назад

PO all day. I would take the 43.5 over the BB too, course I am bias because I do own that one. Honestly the 39 looked slightly disproportionate when I saw it in person so went with the 43. Wouldn't turn down the BB though either.... ah well, when does that winning lottery ticket arrive?

@Huitzinga 7 месяцев назад

Planet ocean is too blingy and its style is not for everyone, the quality is better but bb58 has a vastly superior design,making it the better watch.

@Lowdowndog 6 месяцев назад

Have both. The thickness of the PO is hidden very well and fits easily under cuff. Love them both and each has their place in my collection. The PO is definitely has more bling but for me the Omega takes it.