Тёмный

One of the Fastest Strangest Airplanes Ever Built 

Only Planes
Подписаться 7 тыс.
Просмотров 260 тыс.
50% 1

It was a plane that the United States Army Air Forces didn’t even ask for. Yet, the Douglas XB-42 Mixmaster was designed as a vision of the future, and it was such a bold departure from conventional bombers that it was impossible to ignore. As an embodiment of the Douglas Aircraft Company’s aggressive and forward-thinking approach, the XB-42 boasted a radical streamlined design with a unique pusher configuration and inline engines. It was a strange aircraft with an appearance far different from its contemporaries.
But these features were not merely aesthetic. Not only did the XB-42 promise unmatched velocity with top speeds over 100 mph faster than other bombers of the era, but it also offered the possibility of operating at much longer ranges, revolutionizing aerial bombardment strategy by allowing it to penetrate far behind enemy defenses.
While the aircraft's potential was curtailed by the rapid onset of jet technology and the end of the war it was designed to fight in, its legacy endures as a fascinating chapter in the annals of aviation history - a symbol of what could have been and a reminder of the ephemeral nature of progress in the face of unrelenting time.

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

3 апр 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 420   
@dereksollows9783
@dereksollows9783 Месяц назад
Douglas did NOT submit their design to the USAF in 1943 for the obvious reason that the USAF was created in 1947.
@stevetheduck1425
@stevetheduck1425 Месяц назад
United States Army Air Corps, United States Army Air Forces, United States Air Force.
@spacecadet35
@spacecadet35 Месяц назад
That's A.I. for you.
@SteamCrane
@SteamCrane Месяц назад
You mean the "USF", whatever that is.
@runner3033
@runner3033 Месяц назад
@@SteamCrane You-Saf
@thomasneal9291
@thomasneal9291 Месяц назад
there are so many gross errors of fact in this video they daren't actually call it a "documentary".
@jreynii
@jreynii Месяц назад
These AI created story-lines all have the same faults, they can't get number combinations spoken correctly and they all seem to lift images and other material from other real, IE Human, topic creator's works and then collage them into their narrated story-lines. Interesting topics, yes. Original...No. Result: Channel owners of these sites get paid for each view/Like/click/subscribe regardless of how they were created or by whom, and when done by AI, it s effortless and thousand can be created by an AI, generating funds without any real talent or effort by the channel owner...
@badlandskid
@badlandskid Месяц назад
Blocking this channel
@kennethobrien6537
@kennethobrien6537 Месяц назад
I would legit volunteer my time and voice to fix this fubar excuse of a doc
@ridermak4111
@ridermak4111 Месяц назад
Agreed. Garbage. I click right out.
@toomanyhobbies2011
@toomanyhobbies2011 Месяц назад
I just block them.
@GrimReaper-wz9me
@GrimReaper-wz9me Месяц назад
Thanks for the heads up. I will block them as well.
@robbiecox
@robbiecox Месяц назад
Many factual errors.
@gettinghosed
@gettinghosed Месяц назад
The first error wasn't 2 minutes into the story: Both the B24 and B17 had the same engines.
@coultl6556
@coultl6556 Месяц назад
AI reading. Ugh.
@kd4pba
@kd4pba Месяц назад
People are lazy.
@raymondo162
@raymondo162 Месяц назад
hit the dislike button - it's the ONLY way.............................. ??
@beenaplumber8379
@beenaplumber8379 Месяц назад
How clever of you to notice.
@edgarwalk5637
@edgarwalk5637 23 дня назад
Three thous two hoonder 50 miles.
@edgarwalk5637
@edgarwalk5637 23 дня назад
@@kd4pba Not lazy, greedy.
@manuwilson4695
@manuwilson4695 Месяц назад
"...the FOKEY WOLF"...🙄
@kevinblackburn3198
@kevinblackburn3198 Месяц назад
It’s hard to find well narrated channels
@herschelmayo2727
@herschelmayo2727 Месяц назад
It was the Funky Wolf. It played loud disco music to annoy allied pilots.
@manuwilson4695
@manuwilson4695 Месяц назад
@herschelmayo2727 Sorry to disappoint you mate, but Disco came out in the 1970s, not the friggin' 40s! 🙄
@raymondo162
@raymondo162 Месяц назад
hit the dislike button - it's the ONLY way.............................. ??
@gregmead2967
@gregmead2967 Месяц назад
@@manuwilson4695 You have a hard time recognizing a sarcastic post, don't you?
@paulstone472
@paulstone472 Месяц назад
In 1943 "Douglas unveiled their innovative aircraft concept to the USAF". Interesting given that the USAF didn't exist until 1947.
@jasonhamre4036
@jasonhamre4036 Месяц назад
at 16:10 a uniformed female is walking in front of a more modern pickup truck with a more modern fiberglass topper.
@kl0wnkiller912
@kl0wnkiller912 Месяц назад
The text correctly says: USAAF.
@spyridon3089
@spyridon3089 День назад
Look up the german word Haarspalterei
@thewatcher5271
@thewatcher5271 Месяц назад
Love Douglas Aircraft But Not This Terrible Narration. What A Shame You Can't Find Humans Who Can Read Anymore. Thank You.
@mabamabam
@mabamabam Месяц назад
Hey at least they can write properly.
@raymondo162
@raymondo162 Месяц назад
hit the dislike button - it's the ONLY way.............................. ??
@WALTERBROADDUS
@WALTERBROADDUS Месяц назад
You are more than free to make your own video.
@laurencek.1580
@laurencek.1580 Месяц назад
Yeah I won't even subscribe. Will stick with Dark Skies.
@Einwetok
@Einwetok Месяц назад
@@laurencek.1580 LOL that's setting the bar high!
@andrewallen9993
@andrewallen9993 Месяц назад
The allies did design and build faster bombers. It was called the de Havilland Mosquito.
@longrider42
@longrider42 Месяц назад
Right in One! And the B26 was no slouch, once they fixed all the problems.
@lqr824
@lqr824 Месяц назад
The pre-war-designed P-38 had the same payload, same top speed, but far better performance at high altitude. The Mixmaster carried FAR more than the Mosquito, anyway.
@paulbantick8266
@paulbantick8266 Месяц назад
@@lqr824 Really? I suggest you research just how bad the performance of the P38 dropped to when it carried bombs. How fast, how high and how far a P38 would fly with a bomb-load of 2,000lbs let alone 4,000lbs of the Mosquito? Perhaps you could post evidence that the P38 carried 4,000lbs of bombs? Care to post comparative data for both aircraft?
@warrensmith7397
@warrensmith7397 Месяц назад
Not only that, but the Mosquito first flew in November 1940 and was capable of 408mph, 4 years earlier than the XB-42 first flight.
@ContentGramophone-tp9gw
@ContentGramophone-tp9gw Месяц назад
Mosquito the best bomber period of ww2.... spitfire best fighter of ww2 tempest 11 fastest fighter of ww2 all british, thats why it infuriates because thr british.....
@NEKRWSPHERE
@NEKRWSPHERE Месяц назад
I had a model of P-38 as a kid in the USSR. The manufacturers forgot to include paint in the set, and the only paints I had left were silvery-metallic (left over from Tu-95 I think) and white, from another passenger jet. So it was left unpainted. Of course, I couldn't even dream of XB-42 back then, it was too rare a plane to expect to see it in the hobbyist store, so far from its home. But the P-38 was still the weirdest plane in my collection - a mix of "Shturmovik" , coaxial rotor copter and Formula 1. 😂
@lqr824
@lqr824 Месяц назад
Peacemaker may have been the weirdest.
@dungbetel
@dungbetel Месяц назад
@@lqr824 I had the P38 and the Sturmovik. It's what kids did before they invented the mobile phone...
@tempestmkiv
@tempestmkiv Месяц назад
If my landing gear isn't retracting on a test flight, I sure as hell am not going to raise it using the emergency system but I'd go back and land instead.
@obi-ron
@obi-ron Месяц назад
Hydraulics and electric motors were not as reliable in those days and the systems referred to here were probably referred to as a back up system, not an emergency system. Back up manual systems are still fitted to planes today but, hopefully, don't have to be used as often. Test pilots probably had more concerns about the plane falling out of the sky than if the undercarriage worked flawlessly.
@reubenmorris487
@reubenmorris487 Месяц назад
That's late 20th and 21st century pilot training. Never heard of "alternate/emergency retract" for landing gear.
@beenaplumber8379
@beenaplumber8379 Месяц назад
I suspect wartime test flights of innovative combat technology were conducted under greater urgency than peacetime test flights of non-combat aircraft.
@nilo70
@nilo70 29 дней назад
@@beenaplumber8379 I believe you have it .
@airgunny7416
@airgunny7416 26 дней назад
if youuve hit the retract button and it doesnt retract, you dont automatically assume its still locked down,, if youve hit the button, its now "unlocked" fas far as we're concerned and must be cycled fully up and down before it can be safely used to land
@richjageman3976
@richjageman3976 Месяц назад
The horrid AI pronunciation ruined the video.
@mustafasfleas7342
@mustafasfleas7342 Месяц назад
Yup! Folkiewolf???
@Yohann67
@Yohann67 Месяц назад
@@mustafasfleas7342 And bomber-deer.
@joncrisler6001
@joncrisler6001 Месяц назад
And Ox On Hell - at least they got "Maryland" correct.
@steveturner2763
@steveturner2763 4 дня назад
The American XB 42 was a direct copy of the Dornier Do 335 which had a top speed of 495 mph with an alcohol boost and only 48 were completed before the end of WW2.
@WAL_DC-6B
@WAL_DC-6B Месяц назад
Interesting at 4:05 to see the Douglas engineers at a table with a Douglas DC-8 jetliner display model in the center. The DC-8 first flew on May 30, 1958, at Long Beach, California. Close to 13 years after WWII came to an end.
@s.marcus3669
@s.marcus3669 Месяц назад
.....and black engineers/draughtsmen in 1944!
@glenatgoogle4393
@glenatgoogle4393 Месяц назад
Ditto at 12:04. (I was guessing the plane might be a 707 and the engineers Boeing guys. DC8 and 707 look enough alike that I can't accurately tell the difference. Someone with more knowledge than I have, would have to point out what to look for.)
@WAL_DC-6B
@WAL_DC-6B Месяц назад
@@glenatgoogle4393 I have that exact Douglas factory model except in United Airlines livery (the model in the video has the Douglas DC-8 prototype markings).
@glenatgoogle4393
@glenatgoogle4393 Месяц назад
@@WAL_DC-6B - Don't misunderstand, I was not questioning your observation or expertise. Any 4 engine, narrow body, civilian type jet liner of that era, would probably look like a 707 to me. 😃
@WAL_DC-6B
@WAL_DC-6B Месяц назад
@@glenatgoogle4393 Oh, I agree, to many the 707, DC-8 and even the Convair 880 looked similar. I'm just saying that I have that model as seen on the table with all the engineers sitting around it.
@EllieMaes-Grandad
@EllieMaes-Grandad Месяц назад
Tricycle undercarriage wasn't there to fit the trend of the time, but to keep those props clear of the ground . . .
@gregorydahl
@gregorydahl Месяц назад
The lower rear rudder was there to keep the props from striking the ground .
@user-xj6rr3yv8q
@user-xj6rr3yv8q Месяц назад
"B-17 can carry 4,800 pounds of bombs, the B-24 8,000" Sorry, wrong
@kevinblackburn3198
@kevinblackburn3198 Месяц назад
On both accounts
@raymondo162
@raymondo162 Месяц назад
hit the dislike button - it's the ONLY way.............................. ??
@PiDsPagePrototypes
@PiDsPagePrototypes Месяц назад
B-17 max take off weight, minus it's gross weight (which should include fuel and ammo, but might not include crew), gives 11,500 pounds (5,216kg) payload mass. Subtracting the average mass of a person, by the number of crew, might give 4,800 kilos, or a little under 10,600 pounds.
@Species5008
@Species5008 Месяц назад
@user-xj6rr3yv8q oh tell us all what the correct information is, Your Royal Painintheassness
@beenaplumber8379
@beenaplumber8379 Месяц назад
@@raymondo162 I'll hit your dislike button every time I see you repeat this cut-and-paste comment. Say something original! Or are you a bot that's programmed to post the same thing?
@briantayler1230
@briantayler1230 Месяц назад
Unfortunately, this is an example of the future. Bits of imagery that are spliced together with an AI voiceover for next to no cost. GI = GO.
@raymondo162
@raymondo162 Месяц назад
hit the dislike button - it's the ONLY way......................... ??
@WALTERBROADDUS
@WALTERBROADDUS Месяц назад
So make your own video.
@stevetheduck1425
@stevetheduck1425 Месяц назад
Three similar planes within a similar time-frame: Dornier Do-335 'Anteater' , the Yokosuka P2Y 'Seieun' , and the Douglas XB-42 'Mixmaster'. One had both engines driving two front props, one had two engines driving a prop at front and back, and one had two engines driving both props at the rear. All three were expected to be replaced by jet-powered versions in due time. Only the Douglas XB-42 was, becoming the Douglas B-43 Jetmaster.
@milesvanrothow2067
@milesvanrothow2067 Месяц назад
A similar concept, but not as weird as Germany's Dornier Do 335, which had a prop at both ends, one to push and one to pull.
@georgemacdonell2341
@georgemacdonell2341 19 дней назад
And it was wicked fast.
@rigel1176
@rigel1176 11 дней назад
@@georgemacdonell2341 775 km/h
@prieten49
@prieten49 День назад
A recurring problem with pusher type planes, at least back in those days, was keeping the engines cool.
@daystatesniper01
@daystatesniper01 Месяц назад
Hmmm a dark skies clone video channel
@daveburch235
@daveburch235 Месяц назад
The B-29's range was over 5500 miles and its top speed over 350 mph, and its $3 billion program cost did not "limit its viability", if that phrase even means anything. I stopped listening at this point, else I'm confident I'd have heard more false numbers or meaningless statements.
@rancidpitts8243
@rancidpitts8243 Месяц назад
My mother worked at Douglas in Long Beach Ca. during WWII. She was given a Top Secret clearance to work on "Projects", her words. She was never specific, and said she was never given permission to talk about it.
@kevinblackburn3198
@kevinblackburn3198 Месяц назад
.there were 4 50 inch 12.5 cal machine guns” 50 inch machine guns? we are in trouble if this is the future of narration.
@raymondo162
@raymondo162 Месяц назад
hit the dislike button - it's the ONLY way....................... ??
@w.reidripley1968
@w.reidripley1968 16 дней назад
Don't drop that decimal point...
@06colkurtz
@06colkurtz Месяц назад
See the guys on the boards? White shirts. Ties. Slipsticks. Those pictures are from the 60;s and 70s.
@ChefDuane
@ChefDuane 15 дней назад
Higher top speed, longer range, and leading edge technology. Wow, that must be why it was so successful.
@66Flux
@66Flux 27 дней назад
So, the pusher propeller makes many people think in this comment section, that this is a "copy" of Do 335. In fact, this is a completely different aircraft.
@wmffmw1854
@wmffmw1854 Месяц назад
Bad data. B17 had an max internal bomb load of 8,000 lbs. Not 4,800. With external racks the B17 could carry 16,000 to 18,000 lbs.
@WALTERBROADDUS
@WALTERBROADDUS Месяц назад
If they almost never ran with external racks. And they could not reach their max range with those loads. It was slow as hell.
@prunga308
@prunga308 21 день назад
A B-29 has a range of 'threethoustwohoundered'?, BF-109 at 'hun'? and what is a "fookieewolf'? I can't "listininen" to this dialogue.
@rogermatheny5512
@rogermatheny5512 Месяц назад
Imagine this plane with swept wings, turbojets and a tailhook. A3D skywarrior
@aristoclesathenaioi4939
@aristoclesathenaioi4939 Месяц назад
A tail hook on that design? I doubt if that design could ever operate from an aircraft carrier.
@rogermatheny5512
@rogermatheny5512 Месяц назад
@@aristoclesathenaioi4939 evolved
@aristoclesathenaioi4939
@aristoclesathenaioi4939 Месяц назад
@@rogermatheny5512 hmm interesting connection. By the way, the fundamental aerodynamic research of swept wings was done by the Germans and the captured data after the defeat of Germany was used by both the US and USSR which is why the Air Sabre and early MiG jet fighters than appeared in Korean War has based on the same design data
@66Flux
@66Flux 27 дней назад
They indeed made a turbojet-powered derivative of this aircraft, the XB-43 Jetmaster.
@theoldmanwithscars4934
@theoldmanwithscars4934 Месяц назад
No mention of the Dornier Do 335 Pfeil (Arrow)?
@stevetheduck1425
@stevetheduck1425 Месяц назад
Or the Yokosuka Seieun?
@WALTERBROADDUS
@WALTERBROADDUS Месяц назад
Why should they mention it? It is not relevant to the aircraft story. And had nothing to do with its development.
@WALTERBROADDUS
@WALTERBROADDUS Месяц назад
​@@stevetheduck1425for what purpose? Neither aircraft had anything to do with the design here.
@rigel1176
@rigel1176 11 дней назад
@@WALTERBROADDUS really ???
@rigel1176
@rigel1176 11 дней назад
@@WALTERBROADDUS really ???
@eromadroleromadrol5171
@eromadroleromadrol5171 Месяц назад
Otto Celera 500L and 850 are the proud babies of the XB-42 Mixmaster ! Hope they will have a netter future !
@chrishoff402
@chrishoff402 Месяц назад
Imagine if it had managed to get into a bombing run over Germany in WW2, and a Dornier Do 335 Pfeil (Arrow) got on it's tail!
@EpicureMammon
@EpicureMammon Месяц назад
Fifty inch machine guns. What a time to be alive.
@w.reidripley1968
@w.reidripley1968 16 дней назад
I can hear a "point" before the "-fifty inch."
@arturoeugster7228
@arturoeugster7228 Месяц назад
The principle of a pusher propeller was realized in the B-36, and they added 4 turbo jets . Six turning four burning.
@perkins1439
@perkins1439 Месяц назад
They should have stuck a jet engine on the back of that thing
@RedBud315
@RedBud315 Месяц назад
I worked for the phone company on a contract with McDonnell Douglas aircraft company in Long Beach when they were developing the C-17. I never knew about this aircraft at all until now.
@frankstewart8332
@frankstewart8332 Месяц назад
$3B??? What happened to the other Billion bucks we spent on the B-29?
@raymondo162
@raymondo162 Месяц назад
hit the dislike button - it's the ONLY way.............................. ??
@HotelPapa100
@HotelPapa100 23 дня назад
That must have been one noisy bird. The tail basically has the design of a siren.
@andrewmorton9327
@andrewmorton9327 Месяц назад
Why didn’t they just use the de Havilland Mosquito? It could fly to Berlin almost twice as fast as a B17 and back and carry a 4,000 lb bomb load.
@marsmars9130
@marsmars9130 Месяц назад
Wood
@ianwright963
@ianwright963 Месяц назад
@@marsmars9130 And it worked...very well, the Mosquito was also faster than the XB42 and flew in 1941, three years earlier.
@marsmars9130
@marsmars9130 Месяц назад
@@ianwright963 Yup, but the air frame did not hold up to time!
@andrewallen9993
@andrewallen9993 Месяц назад
Because it was made in Britain, Canada and Australia.
@ianwright963
@ianwright963 Месяц назад
@@marsmars9130 Yugoslavia were still fling them in 1962. The Mosquitoes which were converted to TT Mk.35 target tugs after the war, were still flying in 1963, there are 5 still airworthy. How long do you need them to fly for??
@migueldeniseful
@migueldeniseful Месяц назад
This plane was clearly influenced by the really revolutionary german Dornier do-335...!!
@ericwillison6108
@ericwillison6108 Месяц назад
Modern airlines have been considering going back to propeller driven planes but the slower speed and the noise seems to cancel out the benefits of the lesser fuel consumption. I wonder if this format of aircraft with the counter rotating rear propellers would make for a good compromise given its higher speed, less drag, lower noise, and better fuel efficiency.
@freighttrainwatkins
@freighttrainwatkins 22 дня назад
Tell me you shoplifted ideas and technology from the Dornier 335 without telling me you shoplifted ideas and technology from the Dornier 335.
@w.reidripley1968
@w.reidripley1968 16 дней назад
Given the engine layout, I'd say you're straining.
@PeteSty
@PeteSty Месяц назад
It's a 2 speed supercharger, not "variable speed"'.
@andyharman3022
@andyharman3022 Месяц назад
Allison's auxiliary stage supercharger was driven by a variable speed hydraulic coupling.
@TheChromePoet
@TheChromePoet 24 дня назад
Imagine if they built it out of wood like the Mosquito, just imagine.
@indridcold8433
@indridcold8433 Месяц назад
Back then, a slide ruler and a B-29, P38, even the Me-262, and many more miraculous machines were made. Today, computers, and the Boeing 737 Max series is created. Is this really progress?
@lqr824
@lqr824 Месяц назад
737 Max probably has 1000x fewer accidents per flight-hour, as well as far higher payload and longer range and better top speed. Remember in those days like 10% of the planes a year would just crash while not even in combat.
@danmcdonald9117
@danmcdonald9117 10 дней назад
The narrator sounds like an advertisement lol
@ronaldbrouhard1247
@ronaldbrouhard1247 Месяц назад
Eeeeh, ya might wanna have a REAL dude that ACTUALLY knows what's up doing the narration. The only people who won't catch that is young'uns who aren't sharp, most who won't care about these topics.
@lqr824
@lqr824 Месяц назад
even us young doods get confused by "one two hundred feet" and so on...
@Milosz_Ostrow
@Milosz_Ostrow Месяц назад
I think this video was narrated by a text-to-speech program that stumbled ridiculously over typos and abbreviations.
@paulbantick8266
@paulbantick8266 Месяц назад
@@lqr824 Perhaps you are the compiler of this rubbish? Your post Re: the P38 v Mosquito, would lead one to such a suspicion.
@mikentx57
@mikentx57 19 дней назад
Or. . .They could have just licensed and built de Havilland Mosquitos. Then you have a 400+mph bomber with a great bomb load. It could fly high altitude missions and tree top missions. They also could give "Fokey-Wolfs " a run for their money.
@gregedwards1087
@gregedwards1087 Месяц назад
3:25, "...........if the Allies could develop faster bombers.........", well the British did EXACTLY that, it was called the de Havilland DH 98 "Mosquito", it was fast, could carry the same bomb load as a B17 over the same distance, only had two crew, could hit pinpoint targets with extreme accuracy and bugger off faster than the pursuing fighters, it was the bomber that had the lowest loss rate of WW2, in crew and aircraft, you guys should do better 'research'.
@lqr824
@lqr824 Месяц назад
Nah, the P-38 had the same speed, range, and payload, but could fly far faster at high altitude, and was available years before the Mosquito. The purpose of the eighth Air Force wasn't to drop bombs, it was to establish air superiority over the continent by destroying all Germany's fighters, in preparation for invasion. The Mosquito and P-38 weren't employed for bombing, because bombing wasn't the freaking point.
@paulbantick8266
@paulbantick8266 Месяц назад
@@lqr824 Really? I suggest you research just how bad the performance of the P38 dropped to when it carried bombs. How fast, how high and how far a P38 would fly with a bomb-load of 2,000lbs let alone 4,000lbs of the Mosquito? Perhaps you could post evidence that the P38 carried 4,000lbs of bombs? Care to post comparative data for both aircraft?
@johnp8131
@johnp8131 Месяц назад
@@paulbantick8266 He can't, probable another blinded by American 'alternate facts'?
@daveogarf
@daveogarf Месяц назад
*HIRE A **_HUMAN_** ANNOUNCER, NOT A BOT!!*
@raymondo162
@raymondo162 Месяц назад
hit the dislike button - it's the ONLY way..................... ??
@GNMi79
@GNMi79 10 дней назад
A lot of the human narrators on RU-vid aren't any better at pronouncing foreign names. They don't even try to get them right.
@hutfrd
@hutfrd Месяц назад
Stock footage included scenes around a Boeing 707…. Hahahah!
@chitlika
@chitlika Месяц назад
What the F is a Folkie woolfie
@kumasenlac5504
@kumasenlac5504 Месяц назад
A rottweiler with a tambourine...
@poopytowncat
@poopytowncat Месяц назад
@@kumasenlac5504 -- That's a howl!
@kevinblackburn3198
@kevinblackburn3198 Месяц назад
@@kumasenlac5504😂😂😂
@raymondo162
@raymondo162 Месяц назад
hit the dislike button - it's the ONLY way......................... ??
@markgarin6355
@markgarin6355 Месяц назад
When you are flying towards someone... speed isn't so much of an issue as it is when your flying away from them. Ah. Air Cobra
@captaccordion
@captaccordion 27 дней назад
It's a funny thing how common it is in WWII aircraft videos to discuss inline engines while showing footage of the assembly of radial engines!
@merlin51h84
@merlin51h84 Месяц назад
Really annoying when there is irrelevant or incorrect film footage used or repeated views. Shows slack editing. Otherwise some interesting footage of the actual aircraft.
@raymondo162
@raymondo162 Месяц назад
hit the dislike button - it's the ONLY way....................... ??
@Milosz_Ostrow
@Milosz_Ostrow Месяц назад
Was this video was narrated by a text-to-speech program that stumbled ridiculously over typos and abbreviations? For example, listen at 2:22.
@hertzair1186
@hertzair1186 Месяц назад
Allegedly A&A models will be producing a 1/72 injection molded kit of this aircraft soon…. Can’t wait.
@christopherbedford9897
@christopherbedford9897 Месяц назад
2:24 if you had any doubts about whether this was a robovoice... "three thoustwohoonderfifty miles"
@lqr824
@lqr824 Месяц назад
the shock is that the numbers are all screwed up. I'd have thought as a software guy, that numbers might be the easiest thing to read right.
@woutmoerman711
@woutmoerman711 Месяц назад
Beautiful plane, I build a rubber powered free flight model of it which flies quite well.
@cynthiakoehne7004
@cynthiakoehne7004 Месяц назад
MAN if Lockheed had built this, what a world we would be living in today!
@zippyt.libertine3787
@zippyt.libertine3787 21 день назад
I wonder how a turbo prop would have worked.
@yngvesamuelsson
@yngvesamuelsson Месяц назад
Whether this movie is true or not. What is true is that World War II led to many new inventions in many fields. It also accelerated the development of jet-powered aircraft.
@Jack-bs6zb
@Jack-bs6zb Месяц назад
Looks commonplace compared to British experimental aircraft of the period.
@prilep5
@prilep5 Месяц назад
Imagine this bird with turboprops
@callenclarke371
@callenclarke371 Месяц назад
Numerous narration and audio errors. Production quality is very poor. Dislike.
@indridcold8433
@indridcold8433 Месяц назад
It seems that a rear mounted propeller would be always better than a front mounted propeller. The fuselage and wings would be in smooth air if the propeller is in the back. This is just my completely worthless opionion that requires no regard nor consideration.
@kenthatfield4287
@kenthatfield4287 Месяц назад
I said US Air Force in 1949 that was a mistake the others are right it's 1947
@AchimEngels
@AchimEngels Месяц назад
Dornier Do 335. Although a fighter and not a bomber, obviously lend something to it.
@gordonlawrence1448
@gordonlawrence1448 Месяц назад
More american claptrap. The Mosquito had a top speed of 415MPH for the standard model in 1941 before the USA got involved in the war, and there were some fettled "hot" specials that were faster due to an extra 20% power. There were also some that were made with a better drag co-efficient. Why they didn't (as far as I know) try the fettled engines in the slippy airframes is a mystery to me. I did some calculations and I think they could have hit 435MPH.
@michaelweston1042
@michaelweston1042 Месяц назад
The museum at Wright Patt ia amazing. Well worth a trip. I have been there several times. One time they even had a biplane simulated dogfight over a field right by the museum. They also have a virtual tour on their site. Though nothing matches going yourself. It's still nice.
@longrider42
@longrider42 Месяц назад
It would have been a great plane to have during the Korean War.
@anvilsvs
@anvilsvs 29 дней назад
After reading the comments I'm not doing the video. There was another plane the AAF never asked for and didn't want. The Merlin engined P-51. They fought that off for a couple of years.
@bobd9193
@bobd9193 10 дней назад
@2:23, What was the range of the B-29 again? lMAO.
@jimmeryellis
@jimmeryellis Месяц назад
Why not employ a person who can read a script. This is almost unlistenable.
@commentatron
@commentatron Месяц назад
2:23 Artificial _Intelligence_ gets tongue tied.
@georgemacdonell2341
@georgemacdonell2341 19 дней назад
I thought Martin's B-26 had a top end of 409 mph ?
@SaratheSR500Yamaha
@SaratheSR500Yamaha Месяц назад
And yet, a bomber with similar performnce was already in service in Europe, the DH Mosquito, that had no guns and could outrun the enemy fighters.
@limyrob1383
@limyrob1383 Месяц назад
I was thinking the same.
@lqr824
@lqr824 Месяц назад
Heck when the Mosquito was developed, a bomber with similar performance was already in service in Europe, the P-38, with similar range, speed, and payload, but far faster at high altitude. Also you sound really silly ignoring the massively improved payload and range.
@GNMi79
@GNMi79 10 дней назад
The Mosquito couldn't carry 8000 pounds of bombs. That was the goal here. They wanted a fast medium bomber, not a fighter-bomber.
@SaratheSR500Yamaha
@SaratheSR500Yamaha 10 дней назад
@@GNMi79 Fair comment. I have actually always liked the Mixmaster!
@elvisischrist
@elvisischrist Месяц назад
I’ve seen it. It’s in one of the annex hangars at Wright Patterson AFB.
@sirfrancis9619
@sirfrancis9619 Месяц назад
Wow the rear of this thing looks very much like the Do335.
@philprice5712
@philprice5712 Месяц назад
"the engine's cool" is that a real term? sounds like a hip jazz airplane
@FallNorth
@FallNorth Месяц назад
"Douglas XB-42 Mixmaster" Didn't he do some stuff with the Beastie Boys in the 80s?
@kbjerke
@kbjerke Месяц назад
Another artificial announcer.
@CthulhuInc
@CthulhuInc Месяц назад
Do335 imitation ? 😊
@mule5267
@mule5267 Месяц назад
Exactly what I thought, the americans took the surviving ones after the war as well, that is probably where this came from. The Germans were way ahead in technology
@GNMi79
@GNMi79 10 дней назад
🤔The Do 335 had one engine and prop at the front and one at the rear. This plane had both engines behind the cockpit, and both props at the rear. As far as I can see, the only real similarity between the two is the inclusion of a vertical fin under the fuselage.
@windyworm
@windyworm 28 дней назад
The words "precision bombing" and "USAF WW2" don't really hang well together. Only 16% of USAF bombs fell within 1000ft of the target in WW2.
@cynthiakoehne7004
@cynthiakoehne7004 Месяц назад
Just think of this aircraft with RR merlin engines, and De Haviland type Aerodynamic upgrades, NOW that would be a fast medium bomber!
@oweneather1435
@oweneather1435 Месяц назад
The British zde Havilland Mosquito carried 4000 pounds payload over 1300 miles at over 400 mph in 1942. Development would improve. This design seems over complex, not grou d breaking and a solution searching for a problem.
@frankmitchell3594
@frankmitchell3594 Месяц назад
Like many new warplanes in the mid 1940's they were soon outdated by jets.
@ronaldbroehm1411
@ronaldbroehm1411 Месяц назад
it really looks like the HS-P87 made in Germany around 1939
@randysmitchell4810
@randysmitchell4810 Месяц назад
@3:55 - stating this is 1943 at Douglas Aircraft Co - there is a line of swept-wing bombers which must be B-47s? In 1943? Either those aren't B-47s or it isn't 1943?
@coriscotupi
@coriscotupi Месяц назад
04:06 - What's a DC-8 doing in this discussion?
@creaslin
@creaslin Месяц назад
sounded to me like it said the funky wolf 190
@TUBESPECIFIC1
@TUBESPECIFIC1 Месяц назад
It was a flying gun with 8000 pound bomb with clear plexiglass front to see and shoot the target. Was it built in Hazelwood, Missouri? Looks like one my grandpa would have known. Never seen one at a AFB airshow. Finally Hill AFB is going to do a big airshow which hasn't really been a thing since 2019 and is only every two years in 2020's instead of annual. A hot fiery June day is coming just before the 4th of July.
@jonnsmusich
@jonnsmusich Месяц назад
In the days when the firm was run by engineers rather than accountants and then shareholder value enhancement philosophy...executives. Look how that worked out for them and then Boeing..
@georgeburns7251
@georgeburns7251 Месяц назад
Boeing was rarely run by engineers. Boeing was a lumber baron and a capitalist, not an engineer. Most of Boeings CEOs were not engineers.
@zbaktube
@zbaktube Месяц назад
I do not know how are you with it, but to me, this airplane resembles the A 10...
@patrikez1
@patrikez1 Месяц назад
-Fastest airplane ???.
@IAPPEARINVISIBLE
@IAPPEARINVISIBLE Месяц назад
Oh yeah, the Folky Wolf...He still hunts sheep and stuff, but he likes to listen to Bob Dylan and The Kingston Trio while he's doing it
@Dudeman9339
@Dudeman9339 Месяц назад
Pusher props have MUCH worse low speed authority compared to pullers.
@welshpete12
@welshpete12 Месяц назад
I have read they didn't pursue developing this aircraft due to problems with engine over heating.
@Ihaveguitars
@Ihaveguitars Месяц назад
I take it you know sweet nothing regarding the rather successful De Havilland Mosquito.
@Gyrocage
@Gyrocage Месяц назад
The XB-42 was in a different class. It was to have had twice the bomb load of the Mosquito and a longer range.
@cedhome7945
@cedhome7945 Месяц назад
But the mozzi was a success and this wasn't
@bobcannell7603
@bobcannell7603 Месяц назад
Mosquito top speed 408mph, bomb load 4000 lbs, range 1500 miles - B17 top speed 287mph bomb load 4800 lbs range 2000 miles Mosquito could outrun all fighters for most of the war, pinpoint bombing and lowest loss rate. Why did the RAF and USA not use thousands of cheap and easy to build Mosquitoes? because Bomber Harris and his US counterparts wanted to punish the Germans who were correct in calling them terrorists. With more accurate bombing the war in Europe could have been shorter, fewer civilans killed, fewer bomber crews lost but the top brass wanted vengeance. Harris said as much.
@carlwilson1772
@carlwilson1772 Месяц назад
​@@GyrocageWas to have had.
@Gyrocage
@Gyrocage Месяц назад
I don’t think it was a bad concept at all. If people don’t explore ideas technology stagnates. Douglas proposed an airliner with liquid cooled engines buried in the fuselage and counterrotating pusher props too. The XB-42 was largely a dead end because it was eclipsed by the rise of jet technology, certainly not because it was a foolish idea. It is a bit disappointing to see so many people mocking it.
@baeruuttehei1393
@baeruuttehei1393 Месяц назад
Quite similar to the German Dornier DO 335.
Далее
The WW2 Plane with the Most Bizarre Killing Technique
12:32
The Gunship Bomber that Tore Open the Sky
13:13
Просмотров 341 тыс.
The Most Underrated Aircraft of WW2
10:58
Просмотров 371 тыс.
The Other Flying Fortress You Haven't Heard About
13:09
This Tiny Plane Rocked the Aviation World
10:28
Просмотров 345 тыс.
Super Bomber - The Only One Ever Built
13:33
Просмотров 280 тыс.
The Westland Wyvern; Outdated Monster
11:55
Просмотров 104 тыс.
What’s your charging level??
0:14
Просмотров 6 млн
Power up all cell phones.
0:17
Просмотров 48 млн
Плохие и хорошие видеокарты
1:00
Эволюция телефонов!
0:30
Просмотров 6 млн