Yo, hope this helps! If you are interested in picked anything up, affiliate links are in the description! All goes to support the channel! Appreciate it and good luck.
@@christophermullins7163i am tired of telling people to try used. People will still blabber about mining when it doesn’t change anything about a gpu but they won’t research about it. Bought a mining 3080 that was so dusty and dry as soon as i confirmed that it is working with no fragmentation. Took a couple hours to restore with thermal pads but it works perfect!!
There won't be good value GPUs at the end of the year. NVIDIA is going to bend us over and tell us we're fortunate to be able to pay 2200 for a 5090 or 1500 for a 5080, because Jensen said the more you buy, the more you save.
Being a PC enthusiast used to be fun, you could get either the top-tier GPU for around £350-400, or you could be smart, and get the one down from that for £250-300, and flash the BIOS to unlock the pipes and shaders et cetera,, you could do this every generation pretty much, then there were generations where the middle GPU offered 95% of the flagship GPU, £200 could basically get you the enthusiast GPU, at least CPU’s are current fun and interesting, though Intel nearly put a stop to that, they tried going down the same patch as Nvidia with their GPU's by stagnating CPU tech and putting prices up, thankfully AMD ca to the rescue with Ryzen, if only they remained competitive with GPU's and stopped Nvidia from being greedy tyrants, then again I'm quite happy using the mClassic and a mid-range GPU for now, gives me good enough frame-time latency performance @ 1440p (scaled from 720p) and actually looks better than native 1440p, but GPU tech is really stagnant at the moment, very little features for not so little money, the fact that I can produce much better results with a third party solution (mClassic which cost me £75) and a £300 GPU than an £800 GPU speaks volumes.
Maybe try not being a mindless consumer buying the new and hottest things every year. I always wait 1-3 years before buying anything when prices drop. It's how I got my most recent phone (retailed at $800, got it new for only $300 lol). Plan to do the same with upgrading my GPU. Def not buying anything new.
@@thelonercoder5816 I find 7-10 years is the sweet spot for a new main gaming GPU, as for smartphones, I find them to be completely OTT, I use a basic Nokia that makes phone calls and text msgs, imagine that, when I want a tablet i'll use my iPad, which @ £300 is the only good for value product Apple produces, as it does so much, has Apple Arcade, which is fantastic, a phone is a phone imo.
@@tomthomas3499 There is enough room in the $600 price for installing 16GB. The cost of memory does not matter it's more about pushing you to replace the card due to lack of VRAM (sooner than later) or pushing you to a higher tier of $800 to get 16GB if you want a 4K card. So the strategy is more scummy than just cutting the costs of memory.
The 7900 xtx blows the 4080 out the water on most games I play the main one being warzone and the prices are a lot different here in the U.K. the 7900 xtx is the clear winner here
I ended up winning an auction for a lightly used Liquid Devil 6800 XT for $416 about 8 months ago. Run it UV/OC'd at 2650MHz @ 990mV and it goes toe to toe with the 7900 GRE and 4070 Super at 1440P in the games I play the most. Power consumption isn't even that bad since it's golden silicon on water cooling, it's usually in the 180-190W range and running at 50-52C. If I run RT it can hit 340W and 60C, but I don't really play a lot of games with RT. Nothing even comes close to the value I found with this card, it has impressed me so much and I think RDNA2 might be AMD's GOAT generation.
I had a 6750XT 12GB and it was indeed a supprising card. Its didnt have any issues other than RT, had to upgrade to a 7800XT as i needed 0.8 GB more VRAM to make my simulator smooth in VR
It all depends on geographic location as well. Here in Australia the 7900xtx is a no brainer if that is the price range you are shopping in. the 7900xtx can be found for around the $1350AUD vs $1800AUD for a 4080 Super
It's most likely THE deciding factor. 4080 Super and 7900 XTX go for the same price in France (around 1k€), 4070 Super and 7800 XT were going for around 600-650€ (7800XT recently dropped in price, so 4070 Super matches the 7900 GRE), 4060 and 7600 go for 300-350€. It makes almost no sense to go AMD in France right now because you'd save between nothing and 40€. With current electricity prices, going for the Nvidia card is almost always cheaper past the 1st year mark.
@@mitsuhh I would still go for the Vapor X XTX for $1549, extra 50 gets you 8gb more Vram which will last you at least 4 years. I had X trios in the past they aren't very good, the 4080 Supers I would actually go for are variants like the TUF at minimum which is $1858 (4080S) and it doesn't fit my setup, the Gigabyte Aero fits my setup for $1850 but if I was spending I would go for the Asrock Taichi XTX $1600. He was referring to the 4080 Super anyways while you are referring to the regular 4080 to which the cheapest 4080S is $1800 so he is correct.
@pituguli5816 The 24gb vram is honestly useless. Someone buying such a card will move on in 2 gens at least as by then the card will be low end. Cyberpunk completely maxed out at 4k native doesn't even come close to 20gb, it's more around 13.5 avg to 16gb. Alan wake 2 is the same and ue5 which is becoming the norm literally uses less vram than those games even maxed out in games. By the Tim you get to actually use that 24gb vram that card will not be doing anything close to 4k gaming.
Me personally i picked up rx 7900 xt over Ngredia rtx 4070 ti super bla bla bla cuz longevity and 20 gb vram would save me some year ahead especially when it comes to UE5 games. I am so happy not getting fooled by buying Nvidia 4k series with handicapped specs as i did with rtx 3080 . Guys be careful this time around and buy wisely
LOL, FSR 3.1 came out literal hours after you put this video out, so now all the DLSS love is a little bit obsolete. Daniel Owen took a look at it and it's a huge upgrade from FSR 2.2. Competitive with DLSS imho
I find the DLSS and FSR conversations/arguments odd and disconnected. I play/talk to a bunch of pc who have no idea what those words even mean or if they even use it. It’s almost like RT if it’s not automatic set to it I’m sure a lot of ppl don’t use it.
3090 user here, paid $700 new for mine. Biggest plus is never having to worry about vram. Plus, Lossless Scaling has pretty much made my gpu into a 4090 for me. Best $7 on Steam really.
@@ravenstarfire8816 7 dollar program available in steam it is basically dlss for free without input lag and maintaining the same quality as native resolution
@@ravenstarfire8816a program that first puts your game into low resolution and then it upscales it to normal resolution that you use. This say you gain frames. But it introduces input lag.
My 6750xt has been very good to me. These past few years it’s always nice to see it pop up as a good card time after time. I decided to move from 1440p with this card to just a 1080 max everything monster.
I love that you include the used market. I recently dropped a couple racks on my engine rebuild for my truck so I'm not gonna be upgrading for a little while. But its nice to know my 1080 ti can be upgraded pretty reasonably now
Many reviews have the 4070S at the same level or just below the 7900 GRE in terms of rasterized performance. Absolutely wins on RT though. As it stands I just don't care about ray tracing that much so I'm going to go with the 7900 GRE. I was considering the 4070 Ti S but that is a big jump in price
If you’re going budget then go for AMD. I had my eye on the 4060ti for a while as I wanted budget with an extra kick. But I can’t see passed getting the 7700 xt instead and I could get a 7800 xt with the money saved assuming I was going for the 4060TI with 16 gb vram.
Love my 7900 XTX, paired with a 7800X3D it dominates everything I throw at it, ray tracing included, and I find that my frame rate is always higher than what is shown in benchmark videos. Cyberpunk in 4k with raytracing ultra and I’m still pushing over 100 fps consistently and getting an incredible experience. Maybe I’m crazy but I’m super happy to be with team red this time around. I honestly couldn’t ask for more performance. It was the extra VRAM that sold it for me and I’m very happy with it.
The X3D CPUs are so damn good, the improvement in input latency they bring is night & day, especially when combined with Intel 3DX SSD's. (how about that, AMD X3D & Intel 3DX, who is naming these things lol o_o)
Yeah i commented same thing. Seems like US market prices are totally different and in US for some reason they can sell nvidia cards cheaper or close to msrp
and it's not just the prices. US average monthly salary is like $6,000. EU don't have €6,000 monthly salary, so the €1,400 and €999 are even more expensive than US prices.
If my budget is around 400 dollars and i already have a pc with ryzen 5 7600X which gpu should i take if i want to learn video editing and graphic designing
I think my GTX 1080 is a good value. Still works very well with everything I do with it. The 4790K/DDR3 1866/SATA3 SSD to 12400F/DDR5 6000/NVme M.2 SSD migration brought it to life while being able to feed the GPU more.
its funny how those company train people . Replace a 500usd card annually became the normality even if there is not price/performance increase. People are awsome. AI become more and more intelligent and the human become progressively more stupid.... not a good prediction PS.... but we have the features , lets you think the gpu its faster than what you think
In terms of ray tracing, the RX 7900xtx is practically on par with the 4080 Super in many titles. Where the 7900xtx falters is in titles with path tracing, but to be honest, today there are only about 3 titles with path tracing and it has a cost. very great performance to be honest so if we talk about gaming we should think that both GPUs have a similar performance currently the 24gb of vram of the rx 7900xtx will give it a significant advantage in scenarios where a lot of vram is used in addition to having a better bus, for example warzone is a game that consumes an absurd amount of vram today, just look at the consumption with all the presets in ultra only at 1080p which is already around 14gb/16gb of vram, it is a poorly optimized game but Unfortunately that is something very common to see nowadays so buying a gpu just to have things like dlss is not worth it since you have decent alternatives that are not far behind it like fsr 3.0 and xess also when you are paying $1000 for a gpu the least you expect is to use rescalers and many people will tell you that dlss looks better than the native but nothing could be further from the truth, it is worse than the native when it is well implemented it does not look much worse than the native but it looks worse besides in certain scenarios you lose fine details with the movements etc. also another thing that they always discard and I don't know why it is the people who precisely want to maintain the maximum graphical fidelity possible for that you have dlaa, fsr native aa and xess native aa that provide the maximum graphical fidelity possible when they implement them well, something that seems really a good plus in many scenarios, even with GPUs in these price ranges, is the frame gen and we return to the same thing, there are alternatives to dlss frame gen that are even closer to rescalers like fsr frame gen and even programs like lossless scaling that you can use anywhere, the only valid excuse in my humble opinion to opt for nvidia is that you depend on programs that use cuda since there is no alternative to As for the rest, there is no real reason to go with Nvidia, plus with the AMD alternative you can also work with 3D renders, video editing, etc. It is even offering you advantages due to the greater amount of vram and bus
People saying DLSS looks better than native are either blind and or paid to shill or just unable to see the blur and artifacts introduced or don't want to, so they can use it like a crutch and feel like it isn't a worse experience. it is worse. so is FSR. Neither framgens are not the same as native and never will be, it'll get close but it can never 'ai' everything.
@@N4CRhow can upscaling ever look better than native? It kinda bothers me that he keeps praising dlss like it should be the norm to upscale on every game. It has definitely become a crutch
i do own AMD cards and they suck power like crazy just limit the max fps then the gpu wont suck as much power i play mmorpg a lot and left it on for hours but my gpu is only drawing 60w down from 230w if i were to let the fps fly which is pointless
the sound quality is much better, i always preferred high-end condenser mic quality over dynamic ones even tho shure do make good sounding dynamic mics but daym, the quality of the high-end condenser mics is just insane, your voice now sounds a lot less muffled and much thicker and better overall
i managed to snag a rx 7900 xtx open box for £700 (885usd), normally they go for £850+ or £950+ for 4080 super so i believe my deal was worth it vs new
ive owned a 6750xt for about 2 years and its been an absolute unit ive never had a problem that a normal user would have the only peculiar thing about it is that the coolers are overbuilt even with 2 fans meaning very heavy overclocking is possible and i would even recomend it
my 3080 recently died and was considering the 4080s but honestly didn't need that extra performance but did want the extra vram so I just got the 4070ti super and it's great, the fact that it's using over a 100 watts less than the 3080 while still having 25% ish performance increase is pretty impressive
The 4070 TI Super is one of those cards that hits all the bells and will work at 4k until the next gen consoles release. I feel that card is going to age well
No matter your GPU brand preference….. make sure you’re getting your desired GPU at a vg price 💪🥰😇👍. In addition, I find getting a GPU close to launch (and I look at open box deals🥳🥳, damaged packaging models etc first) as you get to enjoy the improved fps, features etc longer than getting it later to save 5-10-15% 😅😂🤣.
I bought in my country (my country in the middle of the Europe) rx6800 about 410$, because in my country don't have any amd gpu with xt and my budget very limited. I'm very happy own this masterpiece very good price
Why would spending over $500 mean you should care about DLSS? The truth is the opposite: People spend that much to NOT run fake frame technologies like upscaling and frame Gen 😂. Why would I buy a good graphics card just to ruin it with image quality enshittening and FPS destroying tech ?
I got my RX 6700 for 180€ and my Ryzen 7 5600X3D for 200€ (all prices tax included). I live in Central EU. Love my setup, thanks to you I got an RX 6700. ☺
I picked up the Hellhound 7900 XT for about $680 (including taxes) last Oct and its been a great card. At that time the 4070 Ti (Super wasnt available) was more close to $900 dollars here. Honestly the drivers haven't been an issue with any games I've played and ran everything great.
In my country the 7900xtx is way cheaper than the 4080 super, and I never play with RT on. I dont see any use for it tbh. The 7900xtx is a beast card and I do like having 24gb over 16gb.
idk man it feels weird .. im playing 1080p and my 1080ti its akwardly holding up like a powerhouse. I was thiking about upgrading to something with RT (because of blender) but man ..i dont feel it atm
Id say more importantly upgrade the monitor. You can use upscaling and continue to use the 1080 ti but you will see the goodness of higher res and will be way more excited for a future upgrade.
@@HS_Rides very nice! I actually bought two msi RX 5700 oc editions for 55usd each today. With no fans due to mining. It fits in my Lenovo small form factor pre built like barely. Just about to try and plug it in with an untested external PSU. Wish me luck lol. Might light up like the 4th of July up in here 😜
If the consoles can play at 4k and still look decent. Its hard to justify spending huge amounts of money on just a graphicss card. I love pcs and building them but its so expensive for just a graphics card. Ray tracing is cool but when im playing a game i dont stop to look at reflections every 2 seconds. I like amd more because it has great non rt fps
The main advantage of the Radeon RX 7900 XTX (which I have) is the 24 GB of VRAM. With that amount, you can always set textures and settings to maximum and not worry that you'll have performance issues or crashes. When I check how much VRAM is being used while I'm gaming at max settings, it often shows up as 14 to 16 GB of VRAM! Therefore, at around $1000 for the Geforce RTX 4080 Super, it's tough to recommend it with its 16 GB of VRAM... Kind of unacceptable considering that even an Intel ARC A770 for $350 or whatever also has 16 GB of (LOL!) I'm predicting that in the next few years this will become a very tight amount of VRAM for a lot of games, or cause performance issues. It's mostly ok to have 16GB of VRAM today, but you don't buy a $1000 graphics card to change it in just 1 year... I'm surprised that almost no one talks about this. The same happened when reviewers and tech channels were talking about 8GB VRAM being an INSANE amount back in 2020 or 2019 or so. But they made it seem like you won't have to worry about that for a long long time. Already 1 year ago, 8 GB was a joke and frequently I had crashes when I had a card with just that amount in games.
VRAM is primary limiting factor of lifespan of a card. Even if features go out of date, you can still play that big texture/mod pack... the 16gb 4080 turdLSS can't.
@@N4CR I 100% agree. Having really high textures is indeed the "hack" to having really nice visuals in games far into the future... And that 16gb 4080 will be handicapped.
Picked up my first AMD card. A used Sapphire RX 6800 XT Nitro+ SE for $299 cash. Absolutely friggin' love it, after coming from team green (970,1060,1080,2060,2080S,3070). I cannot stress enough, to those whom are comfortable buying used, to check their local facebook marketplace/craigslist/etc. Many often forget about taxes and shipping can get expensive while buying used GPUs online.
@@christophermullins7163 What are your thoughts on your 6950 XT? I was thinking of picking one up prior to the 6800 XT, as they are going my for $400-$450 local to my area. Only didn’t pick it up due to not wanting to change my PSU lol
@@4eremy832 it's powerful and plenty for 4k 45-60 in AAA and 4k 144 in competitive games. Often have to enable some upscaling but only a 4090 can push out that many frames in the latest games. I'd say it is plenty for 4k and would crush 1440. It's 330watt but you can easily get that to 250 watt with 95% of the performance. A lot of my games run 4k at under 300watt total usage from the wall. It will OC to over 400watt though so gotta be careful for anything less than 1000watt PSU.
@@christophermullins7163 How long do you think you’d stick to your 6950 XT for before upgrading? Also is there any GPU specifically in mind to consider upgrading towards within the next few years for 1440P High/Ultra?
I paid $335 for my ASrock Phantom 6800XT, it's been an outstanding 1440p card. I've never had major issues buying used stuff, and good advice, always check local ads to possibly save on shipping charges.
aaahhhh.... " the features" this magic word Nvidia profit from. Who cares if majority of people dosnt use it.... "its nice to have it" ....who care if the games in 2-3 years will sthutter for the ridicolus bandwith and vram capacity.... " we got the features ". In any case the fools will purchase a 500usd gpu everyyear. Nvidia trains his dog well . 🐔
Do not buy any gpu right now... unless you need one. Wait for next gen, as it's just around the corner. Current gen prices will drop as next gen arrives and maybe next gen might some how be a big jump in performance and may be worth even buying when that time comes around
There will be no new AMD cards next year so I wouldn't say it will be next gen. At best I will say next gen will be in 3 or 4 years. As a matter of fact GPUs and CPUs are releasing way to fast hence why marginal returns. Hell the Ryzen 7 7000 3d chip still best the newer chipsets. even older GPUs are beating newer ones unless it is the 4090, however that is a trainwreck with the power its needs. I will make a computer this year, but I won't upgrade so soon unless they really impress me.
I've been waiting to build a gaming PC for 6 years, and now that I have the cash you tell me to wait another year 😂😂😂 Nah, I'm doing it now, fk it, can't wait all my life, seems like its never the right time to buy anything.
I bought 1 PNY product in my life, and it turned out to be a scam. Listed as a 1TB SSD with 550 read/write speeds. However, that read write instantly drops down to 50~70 on any files bigger than a few gb. That is not listed anywhere when purchasing that SSD. NEVER buying PNY ever again. Cheap scam brand.
@@mercurio822 Yeah, it's the sweet spot right now when all things are considered. I found a used 6700XT for 200 euro recently so I'm good, but I'm looking at 6800s for when a deal pops up.
I had a 6700xt nitro, sold it when i got a great deal on a 6950xt nitro. Then i sold the 6950xt for a 100 euro profit and bought a 7900xt which i eventually sold for the same price that bought my current 7900xtx for.
I got a used 3080 ti (suprim x) for 550 euros. Hope I at least did okay. Building a new pc with a 7800x3d and so the 3080ti which I made upgrade later on. Upgrading from an i7 4790, GTX 970, and only 8 GB of ddr3 ram.
I’m still running on my 2070Super. I did some unnoticeable adjustments to Helldivers 2 and now get 90 FPS, pretty stable, at 1080p. Remember that not all the sliders have to be turned up in the graphics menu. There are many you genuinely won’t notice, or may even look better at a lower setting.
4060 8gb vram is absolutely fine just turn down some useless settings and game at 90fps target people claiming 8gb is not enough for 4060 is stupid, they literally turn on every useless settings to the point the gpu is running 30fps like wtf do you enjoy 30fps gaming now?
I just went from a Ryzen 3 3600 with a GTX 1080 that held up for 7 years, to a Ryzen 5 7600x and a Radeon 7800XT. I believe this new set up will be another longevity build.
Thats the exact same build I just purchased myself. I'm coming from a GTX 760/Intel i5 3300 that lasted me 10 years. Now lets rock n roll for another 10
I did the same, but with a 4070 super. I just couldn't live with the 100+ extra watts of power usage. I hope I'm happy with it as it hasn't arrived yet....
@@klovez49 If you are used to NVIDIA, stick with it. I moved from NVIDIA to AMD and the software interface for the AMD card was a bit complicated and took a few days to really get used to.
Needed a card for light gaming @1440p. I know many think the RTX 3050 8 GB is a bad choice, but I bought a new one today from Best Buy for $170.00. It's an MSI Ventus 2 and with my Best Buy Plus membership and a $10 online discount brought it down to that price. It's going to be paired with an i3-12100F and I think that'll be a good match for WoW and other moderately demanding games. I didn't want used, been burned too often. Also preferred Nvidia.
a 7800xt is $600 and the 4070 is $700 in my country, meanwhile only having $400 average income a month, yeah i dont think gpus are worth anything anymore
How old are you? 12? Normal people actually have to PAY for the extra Wattage of a videocard. If a card costs $40 more, but also uses 80 Watts more, this is a BAD DEAL.
I just upgraded from a gtx1080 to a gtx1080ti so I'm still way behind the times but it seems pretty good so far. I still desperately need a monitor upgrade as I'm using a hp 27" but only 60hz.
I have the 6700XT Red Devil, and it's a 1440p card for Games 2022 and below! My card is little overclocked and undervolted does max 170w on any games and max Temp 68c hotspot 75c I get 144 FPS in all Games sometimes with FSR 2.0 on others with it off and settings High/Ultra. It's A real BEAST of a card 👹
12 gb will be enough for most people for like ~10 years. Only the most demanding games like Alan Wake 2 are gonna push the limits of the vram, but 99% of other games won't get to 12 gb consumption for a long time. And it's also just enough for ai stuff, cus i'm using rtx 4070 super and it never really needed more than like 8 gb for general usage of different ai models. And u can even train some light-weight models like RVC models, sd loras or music separating shit with it. So generally speaking, if you want a 1080p ultra card buy some amd gpu, but if you want 2k gaming, ai support and wide support of different software - buy nvidia even if it's a lil worse in games.
Many people say that 8gb vram isn’t the bare minimum to buy now and that you should buy atleast 12gb vram in 2024. Is that true? My brother mainly play 1080 but don’t want to upgrade I a few years. He thinks about the 6650, 3060 or 6750 but the 6750 might be too expensive.
4070 Ti / Super - 7700x / 7800xt is best gpu for me. But it's boring and annoying to pour money into a PC when the games don't work as they should and they're not well optimized at all and all performance is controlled by DLSS and FSR.
I really wish I knew this channel existed when i built my pc in late 2022. Everyone who owns a pc should subscribe to you as long as you keep making these kinds of vids
33:23 what a shit excuse, the entire point of buying a card priced that high IS THAT YOU DON'T NEED UPSCALING. If you want to use DLSS buy a 4060.................
I’ve played every main AAA game to release in the past few years on high-ultra settings at 1440p with the 4060ti 8GB + Ryzen 5 4600G and every single game runs smooth as butter at 60+ fps so the people saying 8GB cards are already having problems at 1080p have no idea what they’re talking about lol. Yeah, you probably can’t max your graphics settings to ultra with ray tracing at 4K in Alan Wake 2 on an 8GB card but i’ve had no problems at all playing the game on high-ultra with no RT at 1440p getting constant 60+fps.. if it’s able to run that game on those graphics settings then it will be fine for a few more years to come. The only thing i’ve seen that I wouldn’t technically be able to do is use more vram to increase texture filtering which hasn’t been a big deal to me considering 1-2GB already looks great with ultra settings in most cases.. if you’re wanting to set it to something like 16GB and see every pixel in the game then yeah it’s probably not the card for you. With that being said, I still wouldn’t recommend anyone to go buy a brand new 8GB card or even a used one unless they’re getting a great price, my point however is they still work good enough for most users.
I use the rx 5700xt, on a 2K monitor, every game on ultra, above 60 FPS. Including RDR2, Cyberpunk, GoT, The last of us part 1, etc... What processor are you using, ssd or nvme, how much ram and so on. Also you didn't show us on which settings were you running the games. I mean when I saw 48 FPS RDR2 on a 1080p monitor is preeeetty not accurate. How come I can run it on a 2K monitor with steady 60 FPS?
Just picked up a 12Gb 3080 for the equivalent of $480, which in Europe is a great deal considering the 3080Ti is only 5% faster but they cost the equivalent of $630 used here
@@HanSolo__ every review I've seen shows it sitting between the 10Gb 3080 and the 3080Ti, but closer to the 3080Ti. It's faster than the normal 3080 remember. More like a cut down 3080Ti rather than a 3080 with extra VRAM
Currently on a 3060ti with a 5600x, upgrading to a 1440p monitor and would like to upgrade my GPU - would you recommend holding off until the new 5000 series release - or should I get a 4080 super for 950 USD
Love your new mic and have been looking for an arm just like that one. However, my favourite thing is your sweatshirt (that colour rocks). Unfortunately, for your tastes, I am printing a few thousand with "Cats taste better than Rabbits do" (I'll allow your imagination to draw the picture)… Oh, you sound great. Another savage subscriber, fabulous video, and I love how you calmly talk us through the GPUs without the need to scream as most do, I hate screamers unless they are female, that is, Cheers.
where I live the prices are kinda high u know... like... the 4060 ti is 500$+ 💀💀💀💀 if u don't believe try to search for the prices on Brazil (where I live) and convert to yall coin. Bro it's 2700 R$ (my coin)!
Bought the Sapphire RX 7900 GRE Gaming PURE OC 16GB just a couple of days after it was released in Europe and I don't regret switching from Nvidia to Amd at all. What a beast of a card for it's price.
What card do you recommend for a ryzen 5 5600g and a 550w psu? I bought a gtx 1650 last christmas and I wanted to upgrade it for a rtx or a rx series but the psu is quite small so I am worried it might cause an issue on my system
great vid man, super thorough info. much appreciated. I'm thinking about building a system soon, considering going 7950x & a nvidia 4070 ti super, or possibly 4080 super for a makeshift productivity build, I was leaning intel since it's probably the faster kit for what I intend to do, but they seem like there's some instability atm they need to resolve, we'll see if arrow-lake can turn it around... this release generation has been a rough one eh? haha. so many wacky ups and downs and unusual annoying compromises... but i digress. As for your Mics, I haven't played around with an MV7 before, it seems like a decent mic over all, how's the noise floor on it for you? also, the NT1 sounds good, that's a solid mic, can def hear the the gain bringing out some detail since it's got that extra condenser sensitivity, sounds legit. What kind of audio interface are you rockin' if you don't mind my askin? Cheers.
great vid,tho i disagree with 1 point,getting the 4070 over the 7800 bc amd dont have dlss,now u see,even with dlss the 4070 doesnt even match the 7800 on native res,so why go for the 4070 and upscale to get the performance of the 7800?and why use fsr on a 7800 at that point anyways? like i know upscaling is really helpful but having way better performance right off the bat seems like a much better deal,like why pay 70bucks more and get less performance?
