@@BrainPilot im sticking to 25% chance that Sazz might be alive, other than that I dont think Sazz would be too tricky enough and make a scheme to Charles and plan a fake out murder. There's still too many loose ends.
Sazz faking her death would be a brutal thing to do to Charles. But, then again I never thought she was particularly kind to him in previous seasons. This season is trying to make her appear nicer than she was in the previous two.
Absolutly agreed with your description of "the show is fully aware of its identity, and thriving because of it", love this series and the pacing of this episode is simply enjoyable. Hope Mabel getting that appartment with $200 a month, she truly deserves it after all providing those murder content podcast.
Yeah something about that story was a little off. I think they are holding something back , especially with how dismissive they were of that mystery ex girlfriend
Considering Jane Lynch (Sazz) has given numerous interviews regarding her character's death; Sazz is dead. We saw her artificial joints in the incinerator.
The woman in the photo is obviously Helga. And of course, she’s not really crazy. She’s telling some truth. I believe Sazz is dead. It’s just more than one person that teamed up to make it happen. I love that we really don’t know what’s going on. I’m just enjoying the ride.
I want to meet this "Helga" if the tenants of the west tower never met Sazz, how did she know who Helga is? How did she know the combination of the lock box? And who is the person scratched out of Vince Fish's photograph?? If they like Doodenhoff; whos that in the photo?????
I don't think Helga is crazy. She knows something. I don't think the westies are telling the truth about everything. Bev definitely had some kind of connection to sazz in order to know about her paradise.
I agree with your two main points: Sazz may not be dead; and the filming of the movie may be mixing reality with fiction, at a much greater level than we assumed. There is a style of film-making called "cinéma vérité" where the movie looks like a documentary and doesn't have a detailed, written script; but puts the actors in scenes, that they improvise. Creating the story as it's being filmed. This may be the concept behind the production that Bev Melon and the Brothers Sisters are creating--and purposefully are not telling the Trio. This could also explain why the "life rights" of the Trio are so important for Bev Melon to secure--she doesn't want the Trio to prevent the filmmakers from using whatever reaction the Trio may have to the situations the film puts them in. This would be very twisty. Because Charles, Oliver, and Mabel are the REAL actors in the Bev Melon film, and Eva, Eugene, and Zack are not really portraying the Trio in the film. This stands the "doubles theme" on its head; and plays with the question: What is Reality?
Nice roundup, yet the witty findings of Becca Koblin are so much more interesting. Tackling down the meaning of things I never noticed, explaining the red herrings. She's just great!
Ham is either a big clue or a major red herring. So much ham going on in these episodes. The pig, the leg of ham from Portugal, and the ham radios. What is the ham pointing us towards?
I believe she is dead but this was a good filler/misdirection cause it goes back to the original story that we know is that basically someone was tryin to kill Charles. I agree there is going to be a good twist in the second half of the show.
Okay listen look at the shoes that the Brothers sisters wore to Howard’s audition and then look at the trailer again, where they showed a person getting ready to shoot😗
The question that Sazz may not be dead/faked her death is a red herring IMO. It keeps you guessing and thats the point. If she was definitively dead there wouldn't be as much to consider.
I don’t think the first episode was the BEST episode, sure it was visually STUNNING but the silly and mysterious aspect of only murders was stunning for the second, third, and fourth, episodes!
Loving this season with each episode getting better and better and how Scott Lang/Ant man mastered the Irish accent looks impeccable. Only wish they would bring Dr Grover Stanley, he's pretty funny.
Faking your own death because you want a career change is kind of dumb and nonsensical. I just don’t buy it. Again why would sazz be looking into charles and have those clues lying around? Sazz is dead. I don’t think faking it out in this way would lead to a satisfying pay off..if anything it will be vapid and corny.
Considering the handwriting from Sazz's table and exact match with Rudy's, I tend to think that sazz IS helga (somehow.... may be she trained her voice to be different or sth) - and she hasn't been living in that place for a long time - and Rudy came there tracking her and it was him - who left all that notes (the pile of unread mail at her door was bigger than just a few days' pile) ... idk...
I think Paul Rudd's new character is the killer. First off, he's nuts. He sees rats everywhere. Second, his "Face" was killed in the last season when Ben got killed. He blamed Charles and Oliver because they put him in the play. He even says something to the effect of, "If you hadn't put him in the play he'd still have a "Face". He killed Sazz so that Charles would need a new stunt double. At the bar he asks Charles if he can be his new stunt double. Paul Rudd will become the first actor to be both a victim and a killer on the show.
The show of the shooter in the trailer for the series is the exact same show worn by the Brothers sisters. Go back and look at the episode 4 where the sisters are sitting watching Howard perform. SO, one of them is the killer. THoughts?
After episode 2 i knew for sure that Sazz IS dead. This season holds a lot of emotional gravity,it shows Charles hallucinating Sazz, their relationship so after all this if it turns out that Sazz faked her death it would be really f*cked up and tbh disappointing. The westies are definitely hiding something bigger, what do you mean they only pay 200 for rent? They basically live there for free. They probably killed Dudenoff. Also if the writers follow the same pattern as they did the previous seasons then we have already seen the murderer(s). About Helga... I don't buy what the westies said, that she is crazy. Helga was close with Sazz,she knows things, probably knows who killed Sazz. Something that worries me is when Oliver mentions Loretta and Charles says "At least she is alive". I don't think that she will be alive for much longer. Oliver also mentions that he would propose to her... I think that Loretta might be the next victim. In the first season Tim who was close to Mabel died, now Sazz who was also close to Charles died, so it would make sense if the writers also killed someone close to Oliver. This show gets sadder and darker every season. I really believe that Loretta is next
I think Saz isn't dead. I think she's apart of this fake death scene. Saz is nearing the end of her career. A stunt persons life isn't a long one due to chronic pain and older age. As we see in the bar. Saz is trying to make money off one last gig before she retires. This gig involves the trio in solving this crime. Saz is possibly taking the cut of the proceeds of this movie the trio is getting involved in.
If you could not put your brain farts of a theory in your thumbnails, I would have watched your video. But these theories should be KEPT in the video and not potentially spoiling things for the audience. So, I'll be blocking your videos from now on. This isn't me announcing my departure, It's me telling you some people like myself will block you for the reasons stated.
I'm watching a mystery show and I haven't watched the newest episode yet. You put a theory in your thumbnail that suggests a major twist, one that I hadn't considered. I now assume that the episode contains new plot that I hadn't considered. It's spoiling the experience of watching a mystery show in its pure, uninfluenced state. I like your content, but most people don't include direct references that could spoil the experience for other people. And I kinda think you get that without me explaining this.
