Only Murders in the Building Season 4 Episode 4 Recap / Review & Theories | BEV DID WHAT?! 

Guys. The voice in ham radio didn’t say Sazz got killed for asking question ….they said LAST person that asked questions got killed. …..,,

Bev Melon pointing the gun at the end kinda reeked of someone in role play. I feel like episode 5 is gonna open with her saying, “I could totally play a murderer, right?!”

This was such a good episode. And you two breaking it down is the best 🤗

1964 is mentioned... and Charles says the bullet casing was "developed in the 60s" ...AND there's a shot in the trailer of someone wearing a 60s outfit raising a rifle... This makes me think of the cold case mentioned in the s3 finale. "In the big apple we will remain. Maybe we can dig up a cold case or something." -- ALSO Charles mentions a cold case in s4 episode 1. Season 2 mentions The 6th Avenue Slasher, an unsolved case.. All this is to say MAYBE Sazz was involved in OR had legit evidence that could convict this cold case killer. And that's why she was targeted? Shout out to my lovely wife helping me research this one.... teamsqueeki is a sleuth and a half!

I’m still on my original theory. She isn’t dead. I have no idea why or how it all happened but I keep going back to the #1 rule of television….no body, no death Great review again guys!

Yay excited for theories video #1 - I've got a surprise for y'all too

2:32 i wholly believe Sazz is ALIVE!!! idk why but she's alive!

This is a second post for your Theories Video. My theory is that Charles knows something that could identify an unsolved, "cold case" Murderer--but doesn't REALIZE it. Sazz had a cold case of beer in the last episode of S3; and there has been mention of an unsolved murder. The movie about the Trio requires their "life rights"--which will result in digging into ALL of the Trio (including Charles') background. The killer is aware of what's about to happen (b/c the killer is connected to the Bev Melon film?), and wants to eliminate Charles to prevent him was unwittingly revealing the killer, when he's sharing his life story for the film. This theory is a twist on the film "The List of Adrian Messenger" directed by John Huston--with a large cast of Big Stars (Sinatra, Douglas, Curtis, etc.) doing cameos. Just like this season of OMITB.

Dr Maggie seems suspicious. She knows the entire stunt person community… maybe she was an info broker or something for the entertainment industry.. She seems sus tho just a feeling

I haven't seen many comments around the net about how Ana ❤ Rudy. She qualified Rudy's acknowledgement that Helga was his ex-girlfriend by interjecting "your CRAZY ex-girlfriend" and followed that up by turning to him with a doting look and saying "you deserve so much better." So she's disgruntled about not being allowed to get her own apartment (presumably the Dudenoff place) and has an unfulfilled crush. She seems a little standoffish (mom says fix your face from frowning at meeting Ollie and Mabel.) A lot of young adult angst there. Could there be motive to foul play?

At the beginning of this episode, Charles said that he and Sazz shared the same rare blood type. The word Brazzos - is Sazz bro I'm thinking they are brother & sister.

❤Helga isn't that common of a name. I think it was Season 1 where Cinda had "massage with Helga" written on her calendar. I'm always suspicious of Cinda having something to do with all of this. She makes an appearance in all seasons, so far. I dont trust her. It's probably just me, but the 1st time I saw Bev, I got Cinda vibes from her.

The last person on Ham radio was assumed it was Saz. Tim got killed cuz Jan was jealous. Saz was talking about being on Ham radio and she was talking about things said about Charles.

I'm starting to think she did fake her own death

I also think there’s more to Helga, not just Rudy’s “crazy ex GF from Finland” … there’s something deeper there. I think Jules is right & it was Helga w/ her face scratched out in that photo

We've seen Ben, we've seen Glenn, now we only need to see Paul Rudd portray Roy - Roy Moriarty, evil genius and Arconia resident diabolique. He lives in the (yet to be seen) south tower, but his crime empire is everywhere.

15:31 is it something to be said about how much Charles is fainting between last season and this season!?!?

Bev and Sazz might have had a relationship because Sazz told Charles “don’t tell anyone about this” in the flashback. I think Sazz told bev because they were in love and she is looking for answers.

Loretta is suss sadly..poor Oliver..coyld this all have anything to do with Charles father? Could sass be his sister given they have the same blood type etc..back in season 2 hes arrested from rose coopers apartment covered in blood? Just a thought for the long game maybe?

Why would Saz hide out at a toxic site.

Could Helga be one of Jan’s aliases?

If Sazz did fake her own death.. I’m sticking to the idea she was Charles’ driver in disguise in episode 1. Would be wild 😮

12:31 i think the bad relationship was herself/job

Crossed out photo, braids; Loretta wore braids so….

The math for Dudenoff doesn't make sense. Dudenoff is already giving them a great deal at $200 a month. Why would he send them a $1300 Jamon (Ham) from Portugal every month? Is he even real? or alive?

the woman in the pitcure could be loretta 👀👀

3:58 not a himbo 😂😂😂... i think the guy is either Dickie or Tobert!

You guys 🥹 I love ye!

YA FROM NEXT WEEK

I love Paul Rudd!

Dudenoff could be a woman 🤷🏽‍♀️

0:46 😂😂😂😂😂

So, the Westies say Dudenoff rented the apartments “years ago.” Remember back in one of the earlier episodes when Oliver said that there was a brothel illegally being held in the west tower? Maybe Dudenoff was the one who was illegally using the rooms for the brothel back in the day. 😮

Mabel doesn't say she can't afford $ 200. She says: "And at $200 a month, I can't afford not to [believe their story]".

So do you think Sazz faked her own death??

i STILL think this is someone's dream hahhaha - the whole Matrix theme is jumping at me... i don't know what and who is real) there are no bodies there are twins and stunts and dopplegangers all over the place)))))) help sos))))

I believe there was a clue we missed during the Stunt Person bar scene: the imaginary rats that Ben Glenroy's stunt double kept seeing. Is that the show's way of hinting that Sazz was betrayed by another Stunt Person? Also, there are two possibilities regarding Bev Melon at Sazz' property. First, is that really Bev Melon? This season has "doubles" everywhere. And, I anticipate an upcoming episode where there are numerous "Doubles" walking in/out of scenes--and people confusing if they are the "Real" character--or a double. So, if Bev Melon (like many real life film producers) began her career as an actor, she could have had a Stunt Double--who knew Sazz, and is on the property for business reasons. OR, since I'm one of the Sazz-is-NOT-Dead folks, Bev Melon & Sazz could be friends; and Bev is helping Sazz hide out, after she was shot in Charles' apartment--but not killed. Finally, Charles "tapping-in" for Sazz at the Stunt Man funeral may foreshadow a real (Charles?) death later in the season.

The voice on the Hamm sounds like Jan

I was fully on the Twin train when I saw P Rudd. I want to know about this so called ‘cold case’ that Sazz was going to tell Charles about at the Arconia. I wonder if the Westies had something to do with it, a murder or missing person, something to do with the rent control scheme they have going on. Given there is a lot of money at stake..

7:15 soooo do you see that the doubles have a name similar to their "face"!? i just don't think Sazz is her name!!!

Nit pick: Oh Hell game (nothing to do with clues) After looking into the rules of Oh Hell, (our family played cards, esp. dad) I noticed when the trio are playing, Charles had an illegal bid. Each successive hand increases or decreases in a cycle the number of cards dealt (tricks to be taken). The last person to bid is the dealer (Charles). One of the frustrating things for the dealer is that the total number of the bids cannot equal the number of cards dealt. (It means at least one person per deal will not achieve their bid) This often forces the dealer into bidding something he doesn't want to. They were on a 3-card hand. Mabel bid 1 and Oliver bid 2. That means Charles would have to bid at least 1, but he bid none which he's not entitled to do.