All creators have access to the RU-vid Audio Library. Creator Music is available to all YPP creators in the U.S.! With Creator Music, you'll have access to everything in the RU-vid Audio Library, AND recognizable songs for use in your videos. We’re constantly expanding the catalog, so check back periodically to see what new tracks are available.
Unfortunately, the restrictions on music use are getting unbearable. I'm finding that Twitter, Instagram, and Tiktok are WAY easier for an artist to create short music-themed animations. In a world where I can use nearly any song on Spotify (instagram and tiktok), why would I go to a world where my channel gets a threat and strike (youtube)? PLEASE evolve to become more like IG and Tiktok by providing regular music on RU-vid Shorts. Part of culture involves using music that others make. That's how art evolves, grows, and changes over time (look at folk music for an example).
Why can't you just allow for copyrighted content to earn a percentage of the content creator's monetization so we won't have to deal with all this. We appreciate the free effects and music, (since a lot of third party platforms are charging for those services). But PLEASE arrange for split monetization of copyrighted content, AND active systems that allow for us to petition false claims.
I have a unique question. Can we upload same videos with some editing with multiple language versions as quotes text based videos. Looking forward to your opinion 😢 😞 if no then help me by providing with any feature to create for vast audience like options in channel for multiple channels or playlist options
Eso es buena notica, tener acceso a la biblioteca de audio de RU-vid. Excelente 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Muchas gracias y tengas una noche de alegría y dulces sueños 🙏🏻🍀🍀5:52
HOPING TO GET HELP & CLARITY on this topic. I make workout videos and include workouts to Taylor Swift songs. Now, I am able to upload one song workouts with a copy right claim. I'm not looking to make money off these or claim the music as my own. BUT, when I tried to upload a longer video with multiple songs, I received a strike. I thought it was possible to upload because a quick search shows that other larger creators do this with the music credited on the video. Is it only for those in the partner program? My audience is asking for these types of videos but I don't want to get in trouble or know what to do. Thank you!
RU-vid, you should have shared revenue with the owner of the music, and don’t take it down because is free advertising for any content creators to promote their music.
Because Music Publishers and the big "Music" producers are the most short sited business' around. Right now they have an agreement with YT to take all of your ad money on a video and to pool a percentage of YT shorts money. All which actually discourages the use of their music. So in their greed they are actually minimizing their potential profits. In stead they should come to a fair and equitable system between the content creators, YT and the Publishers so that everyone can maximize their profit. This will actually spare the legitimate use of the music and everyone will be richer.
Why do I lose my copyright rights for the entirety of the video and give it to the music owner? I shouldn’t lose my own video rights because of some incidental music, it is unfair to lose the ENTIRE video monetisation in a 10 minute video and give it to someone else just because there is a few seconds of music in it. Shouldn’t it be divided up so if the music takes up 0.05% of the video, the music owner gets 0.05% of the earnings, that would then be FAIR.
There is a reason you lose monitization. The music companies have threatened to sue RU-vid as well as the creators if RU-vid doesn't do what they've done. Even though they're a safe harbour, the music companies are EXTREMELY litigious. If you don't want the to take away what is demanded you can always fight this in a court of law. This losing of monitization is the compromise that RU-vid came up with The new system with creator music will now cost you money willingly by purchasing licences and this will come out of your revenue as you get monitization. The music companies will make bank off of this as many of these licences will auto renew
Don't forget third-party audio libraries as well. There are a whole bunch of sites that will give you access to thousands of tracks for a simple monthly or annual fee and you can then use those tracks on your videos (usually in perpetuity) without further fees or charges and without risk of a copyright claim/strike.
Are there any you’d recommend? I’ve always wondered what happens if you stop subscribing to those sites, do you then have to remove the previously uploaded videos?
@@BikingChap Most of them grant a perpetual license for videos you've made while subscribing so if you stop subscribing you're still okay. Be careful though because I believe some do only offer temporary licenses and will claim videos if you unsub. I chose Audiio because they have a great deal for the first year and do offer perpetual licenses.
I have had a copyright-problem some month ago. I used a self created song in the background of a tutorial. The notes were taken from Beethoven, it was the 5th symphony. I created the music by taking my software-synthesizers. The music was taken to a very low volume, so my voice in the tutorial is the thing that should be heard. RU-vid named a guy or company named "Latin Author perf" that had the rights for this music, but the notes are public domain cause old german componists are long dead and there are no living people who can have the rights. It took some weeks, and latin Author did not react on the mails he got from youtube. But it should be taken into the listening algorythm to be nice to people using very low volume in backgrounds, and much more nice to people using old masters compositions.
I had the same notice while uploading a video with classical music in the background. I wondered how Mozart was still getting royalties on his music after so long. I thought that the person who recorded it was the one to claim rights on their rendition. However, if you made your own redition, then the problem is deeper. Maybe their algorithm had a hard time making a difference between yours and some copyrighted rendition.
I've used short shelf music on previous videos within the RU-vid app, no third party, and still received copyright claims, also the audio library isn't updated very often as far as I've been noticing the same audio for months hence it's a bit difficult to find fresh tracks in the audio library, I appreciate the clarification and the current options available but sometimes it can still be difficult to find fresh music and or shorts music that won't get a content ID claim regardless of following instructions, I hope adjustments are made so that the system doesn't falsely flag or claim audio via upload as it's quite nerve rattling not knowing what will happen upon upload and or having even you're speaking voice flagged zero profanity spoken yet this still occurred due to sensitive ID scanning systems etc.
Thanks for the information. Could you do a video on getting un shadow banned? My channel was clearly hidden. You can see it in the analytics. I have 2 other channels that have not been shadow banned so I have proof. How do I get un shadow banned?
RU-vid claims they don't shadow ban at all. I think this requires doing a little searching as it obviously does happen somehow whether it be by bot or AI or manual review, it obviously does happen.
I have had two short videos in which I used music from the RU-vid library which were flagged as copyright. One song was “watermelon sugar”, and the other was a techno song. Can you explain why this happened?
Same the video was 14 seconds and got flagged this happened multiple times even a video with non copyrighted basic audio from a known non copyright free source was flagged, my voice was flagged during a video in which I narrated and comments removed, when previously it had not been, it's scary not knowing what to do and trying so hard to follow the rules and still have this happen, honestly it's discouraging is specially when you're at a stage of building conference.
I just searched for the watermelon sugar song and it doesn't show in the Audio Library at all. As it is I am wondering if it was a song you had to attribute. In the Audio Library there are songs that have the RU-vid symbol and require no attribution and others that say "CC" - the non attribution songs seem to have a higher level of restriction and the one's that need attribution don't. I'm also wondering if I create shorts on my alt, that if I should use more recent music as opposed to stuff from 10 years ago
Thanks 🌷 RU-vid great option now viewers can add or remove copyrighted area in thier video, & can add new music on copyrighted area easily to remove copyright, thanks❤❤🌷
Thanks but I still don't feel safe knowing the automated content ID could claim a legitimate video of mine. I've got a cover with another artist of "Dust in the Wind" by Kansas on my collaborators' channel. The content ID is claimed to another person's cover, I have had no luck removing it as the claimant has ignored us.
ماذا عن استخدام موسيقى قنوات أخرى عن طريق البحث اثناء رفع فيديو قصير؟ هل يخالف ام ان الارباح تتقاسم معه؟ طبعا اقصد البحث بالموسيقى الرائجة اثناء رفع فيديو الشورتس وليس تحميل هذه الموسيقى مسبقا ووضعها بالفيديو عبر برنامج مونتاج ثم رفعها لليوتيوب...
What if I want to use songs that aren’t in the library for creating music videos where the song is an essential part? I would let the music owners take all the profit if that’s what it took to have artistic freedom, although 50/50 for sonic/visual would seem fair to me. So far NONE of the songs I want are available. I really want to share these amazing songs and my visions with people. :/ What can I do to get permission from artists/labels and permission recognition from RU-vid? Is there any streamlined process or do I have to research and cold call/email artists and labels for every single track? P.s. I wish I could just share a link to a massive Spotify playlist and RU-vid creator music app could just scan it and pull up all available songs. I don’t have time for one by one search. P.s. Would it be legal to upload a silent video and just tell people to play the song on a separate device at the same time? 👀
This idea is so amazing! I would love this. I would be happy to give up my profits too for creative freedom. Because I don't care about $20, I care about making a funny cartoon that fits what I imagine. I don't think permissions and stuff matters, in my experience (have been on YT since 2006). I have even received strikes on my own music and I obviously have permission on myself. It's the record labels that are the issue and they're notoriously difficult to manage. Sad as it may sound, I have found my solution in posting on Twitter and Instagram and TikTok...which allow that creative freedom much more.
Many artists/labels allow channels to use their music with ads, If they do you just get a message from RU-vid saying ”this is not a warning, this does not affect your channels status”. Etc. But, it does…? It can stil be a issue for channels if they want to monetize the channel later and have these copyright claims. Even if the owner allows it. Why not mention this? At least this happened to one of my channels (another channel), but you didn’t say in any mail that this could happen. You just said that everything was fine and that I could keep it up on RU-vid. And it was fine… Until I got 1000 subs and wanted to monetize the channel myself 😏 The whole channel got demonitized, and not just the uploads with copyright music (that was stil ”fine” to keep, with ads). You could at least mention this in these messages? I cant remember any of that. So now I have a channel that had one million views and RU-vid/labels takes 100 % of all ad revenue. I have no issue that the owners earns more money then me, they should! But I dont think its fair to demonitize whole channels while saying everything is fine, and then take 100 % ad revenues from these channels. I didnt uploaded whole albums or anything, most of it was live stuff with bands that I know have nothing against sharing live bootlegs. But I moved on and started a new channel. Stil have the old one though, so RU-vid can earn ”their” money 👍Today I allow people using my own tracks as long as they don’t sell it. I dont want their whole channels getting demonitized just because of this though! But I cant really guarantee that RU-vid decide something else (because of the copyright claims they stil can get if I release the music). I guess this is out of my control, even if I am the owner of these tracks and not RU-vid! Or is it a way to guarantee that the copyright claims wont be a issue if people share my tracks the way I allow it? (And stil having ad revenue from content ID)
❤Thank you for this BUT when ever i UPLOAD Shorts with Free Royalty Library Music , Shorts Don't go viral even if The Video is not BOring 😢 , Dont know how but im not the only one experimented this issue😂 ,But Hey thanks we need more educational vids like this one for heads up
RU-vid deals a deathblow to companies that monopolize music, a deathblow to game companies, anime, etc... And a decisive deathblow to the content creator who reuses such. We're done and RU-vid is done.
unfortunately, (I have been posting cartoons on youtube since 2006 and was very loyal) I agree with you. I have since transferred to Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter because these platforms, imperfect as they are, usually provide way more creative freedom than YT does. They're losing us in favor of pleasing enormous companies, and I find that sad but inevitable. UNLESS they change their ways and allow culture to flow freely without punishing creators.
It's laughable the number of times you hear about channels that get RU-vid strikes on their own music 🙄 RU-vid is a time and energy waster on that sort of thing, not to mention the distress it causes.
Really good tutorial BUT RU-vid has many flaws that still to this day did non resolve. Like the retroactive copyright claims on older videos. Something like this: I have a small gameplay channel and years ago I made a playthrough of Quake. At the time that I was recording and editing the run, the soundtrack that came with the game was free for everyone and so everything was monetized. Then the pandemic struck, Trent Reznor realized that "Hey, I can make a Vinyl of Quake with the whole OST". Cool, no problem with that. But when your record label starts to screw over the content creators by demonetizing everything or worse, asks the platform to take down some of the videos, that's when you realize that the amount of care, passion or hard work doesn't pay off one bit.
We see on Instagram and Tik Tok people constantly using famous songs of famous artists all the time. We assume that Instagram and Tik Tok has an arrangement with the Creators and with the famous artists where they each receive a split in revenue created? Is this correct? If so why doesn't RU-vid do the same? Seems like RU-vid is a bit of a slow Dinosaur in this regard
So there is an app called sing where you can make a new video of you singing versions of songs and uploading it to RU-vid. How does this work with a copyright?
What exactly do they do except give people false hope? And they never reply to comments or "like" them and RU-vid is too big a juggernaut for them to sort things out on channels' behalf. And they're not part of google/RU-vid.
@@riteasrain false hope? You know what that word means right? I know creator music isn't available for all creators, but majority of things RU-vid says in youtube updates has been added, I know youtube is here to make money, but you can't just say things that make no sense
It doesn't make any sense for your ENTIRE video to get demonetized because of a few seconds of copyrighted music. The copyright holder should get a cut of the revenue relative to how much that part of the video is watched compared to the rest of the video.
the biggest problem i have with copyright is when someone claims on behalf of someone else that's not affiliated and it can become a threat to the channel if you try to dispute it. is there anything planned to help with that?
What about when your walking in Public and some bar is playing music so loud. That you pick it up while your recording say a travel video? And/or/also what if your doing a food video in a restaurant. Recording what you eat and music is played thru the restaurant? I can not tell the restaurant or bar to turn off the music. Or someone rides by on a bike or car. Playing loud music? That you do not want to hear in the first place?
Ini sangat penting khususnya bagi pemula seperti saya, terimakasih informasinya. Dan ojoy84 mengucapkan selamat hari raya idul Fitri mohon maaf lahir dan batin buat semua yang merayakannya🙏🙏
What if creators of the music in youtube audio library suddenly change their copyright policy? Will this get people who use their music in trouble? Is changing the policy like that even possible? Because I've heard of people getting claimed for using music in youtube audio library. What's up with that?
