In this session I have tried to cover the concept of Ostensible Owner or Doctrine of Holding Out or Benami Ownership which is discussed under section 41 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Video of sec.41 yet to complete but now i feel am comfortable with your expression and the way you explaining things with background picture. Very kind of you sir. God bless you. Can i get your number sir? ....happy dreams sir. Vanakkam🙏🍎
Sir, may I mention a little bit of error ? that's Bunnoo Bibee was wife of Alexander and Macqueen was daughter of Alexander, during the lecture, you mentioned Macqueen as wife of Alexander. Ranjit Basfor, Guwahati, Assam.
Sir i have a qestion if husband purchase a property on the name of wife she became ostensible owener but the possession is under the husband then can wife sell that property and can it become a valid trasfer?
There was lot of confusion before coming to this lecture nd infact upto 2 slides I was not able to understand it........ Now after complete lecture everything is clr..... tq sir👏
Sir this is mains question please tell me which provision will be explained in this question from transfer of property act. The question is Where there is no gift but a direction to transfer from and after a given event, the vesting will be postponed till after that event has happened, " Are there exceptions of this rule? Explain
Sir....plz can you put a video doctrine of lis pendens in transfer of property act....mu semester exams is coming soon .....I always follows your video to clarify my doubts ....I can't find out the exact explanation in others video
Sir under ram kumar vs MC queen case the sale was valid without the consent of mc Donald But under requirements u said that consent must be there Can u pls clarify on this?
What is so difficult about the word " ostensible " ? Is it not another word for " apparent " ? " Ostensible" appears to be more attractive ! That's all.
