⚠️Just a disclaimer⚠️: this video is not meant to disrespect pilots. Flying can be hard sometimes. R.I.P to those who died. And I tried using mostly pilot error crashes at the beginning. ALSO stop saying JAL 123 crashed, the video is skill based! It doesn’t have to land safely! Jal 123 flew without a tail for 32 minutes which is incredible skill!
@@Goobieton well not if you’re experienced. A short hall flight in sunny weather is not hard. Most of the flight is actually autopilot about 95% of most of the flight is autopilot
@itzvr624 Bro what if and air craft looses half of an wing and looses control and crashes What if hijacker takes over the plane and crashes in the ground in purpose What if the plane lost its head and has no control and crashes What if an FC-## shoots down an an plane What if the plane landed but the breaks fail and crashes blocks away from airport Does this sound like pilot error young man
@@slaviclavender I was just trying out an old trend. Nothing serious. I’ve already commented that I didn’t mean disrespect, there was no need to post your comment in the first place. I’m fully aware of what actually happened during those flights.
@@astrosnoot7943 Its alright, just some trends are not worth continuing or doing. These sort of videos can make avgeeks look silly - like REALLY silly. It is alright though, I see tonnes of these videos when I power up YT Shorts, I guess one video hardly makes a difference =|
@@slaviclavender well at least it wasn’t my short idea in the first place 😅. I guess if I worded it or formatted it differently it might not as seemed disrespectful to some viewers.
The incident was actually caused by pilot error surpsingly enough. The aircraft was caught in another, larger aircrafts wake turbulence, the first officer decided to respond to it but kicking the Rudder full deflect left, and full deflect right multiple times. This constant kicking of the Rudder, combined with the wake turbulence, overstressed the vertical stabilizer and caused it to tear off.
I wouldn’t disrespect any pilots because they went through years of training and it’s never their fault completely (Edit: I didn’t mean it to turn into an argument in the comments😅)
Actually if you do some research. The pilots of that flight a heroes for flying without a tail for 32 minutes, pro pilots where put in simulators to try recreate it and they lasted about 10 minutes. The did there best and that’s what makes them very skilled heroes. Not every hero has to succeed.
Even though JAL 123 [The 2nd one during the beat] crashed, killing everyone except 3, which also later died due to injuries. The pilots did the greatest job on keeping the plane stable even when the horizontal stablizer was fully detached from the aircraft. Near the limit of physics. What makes it more interesting is that the Boeing 747 is a large aircraft, which makes it even harder, and the pilots managed to keep the aircraft in air for a whole 30 minutes before banking over the limit and end the journey. Respect to them. ♥
Then it said sinkrate whoop whoop pull whoop whoop pull up whoop whoop pull up its the end whoop whoop pull up first impact: whoop whoo last impact: end of the cvr
The people who emergency landed would have crashed if the pilots didn’t have enough skill. The reason they crashed was because they didn’t emergency land. And I’ve already made it clear this video isn’t meant to disrespect.
@@astrosnoot7943even people with skill make mistakes. Also for American Flight 587, it wasn’t the pilots fault. They were taught to use heavy rudder (even though Airbus said it wasn’t a good idea). In that context, you are a trash student because you didn’t get 100 on a test. Pilots do a lot for us. Respect that
if you guys don’t know, the second one is Japan airlines flight 123 and the reason why you saying their skills because they kept an uncontrollable plane in the air for 30 minutes
There is a difference between not having a rudder anymore or just an engine failure. Without a rudder you can't control the aircraft anymore, but just without thrust you can
