even if zelena did go back in time, we wouldn't have to worry about hook being born or not. he was already born back when rumple was probably a teenager. by the time cora is living (when rumple is the dark one), hook is either stuck on neverland or running around doing pirate things lol. he would already just be existing.
Victorious fan love 22 with all due respect Regina always but always treated Henry in a way every child should be treated, even when she was bad in seoson one and two (tho she was a bit nicer in seoson two) she loved Henry with all her heart and maybe Henry didn't see that but she treated him the best way she can. I do agree that Emma is his mom too but with all the bad stuff Regina did she always treated Henry in the best way.
@@_agamh Except she was known to have lied to him several times and threatened or framed others he loved like framing his grandmother for a crime she never committed (though Abigail still lives).
Am I the only one who doesn't immediately see Eva as being in the wrong here? Am I the only one who doesn't see Cora as the victim in that situation? Like, yes, she was lied to by some gardener who pretended to be a prince and she got pregnant. Yes, that sucks. But it doesn't justify her turning around and trying to get Leopold to raise a child that isn't his, the entire time lying to him and saying it is. That's just the parental angle of thinking a child is yours when he/she isn't. That doesn't begin to touch the dynastic level. Leopold's kid would be a prince/princess, heir to the throne. Were someone to find out the fact about baby Zelena not being Leopold's child, it would delegitimize any authority she had and cause insane dynastic conflict, opening it up for any challenger. Really, I don't think Eva was in the wrong here. I think telling the truth about Cora being pregnant by the gardener while trying to marry Leopold was the right thing. Not necessarily victimless, but right. The real victim in the situation was Zelena, who got shipped off to another world so that Cora would have her best chance. But the one who hurt Zelena in that situation is Cora's decision, not Eva's. While I may be in the minority with that opinion, I think the show at least mentioning the possibility would have been interesting
No, you're completely right. Eva might have had mixed motives, but it's still good that the truth came out, and Eva was just one more bit of fuel on Cora's fire of hatred for the royal family. Yes, a liar pretended to be a prince to seduce Cora...but on the other hand, she wouldn't have been interested in him anyway if she had known he _wasn't_ a prince. So it's not as if she was a naive innocent. And royal offspring legitimacy is a deadly serious thing. If the paternity of a royal heir comes into question, the result can easily be _civil war_ . No, Cora is not Eva's fault.
A lot of toxic fans were justifying Cora but I like how you think. Nobody, including myself have ever though of that. Leopold will raise a child that's not even his.
Tony Ruse with how much I love Regina, she is my favorite character and she is Henry true mother but emma is too, maybe not from the start but she learned too.
But Emma gave up Henry because she wanted a better life for him, and she said she couldn't give him a real and happy family. So she was a good mother for him, and at least she could have the chance to live with him for one year in season 3, and with fake memories, but it was one of my favorite chapters.
Hun, have you ever watched the show? Because if you have not, then do not even comment. And if you *have* watched the show, then you are extremely foolish. Unless, you wrote that deliberately, because you seek attention. Please. I vehemently request you, don't do this. You just come off as a foolish ignorant uneducated potato.