Our Terrible Future And Open Source | Prime Reacts 

They could change their name to Stdin, maybe.

Like real world Karen's who don't insist on seeing the manager

Unless it allows said Devin to request multiple GPUs, lower expectations for the type of code he produces, and charge for every token he writes.

​@@pieterrossouw8596 name to avoid for newborns AND fictional people.

@@az8560 Genuinely hadn't considered that angle. I wonder how all the Claudes are doing out there?

Right? Like a knockout punch

@@TheDrhusky they really are more A than I

The best part of this is that “Large Language Model” still doesn’t have an I

Certainly!

I'm so terrified how many people blindly accept AI. Like legitimately I've seen funerals where people give a eulogy written by AI. Which, gross. And the very first sentence is something obviously false, like it hallucinated a middle name the guy didn't have. So the whole document is obviously garbage. And the audience all clap and say the AI did a really good job. Someone reading this who has an audience, please write an article on this topic: AI is getting exponentially better at convincing humans to use it, but its factual accuracy if anything is getting worse.

Why it sounds like this comment was written by Daven..?

@@andrejjjj2008Nah. It doesn't start with "Certainly!"

We need to create a "crafted request" for Devin to write response assuming the code is correct and let it argue with itself.

It's equally annoying when people with absolutely no programming language, and no desire to learn, are asking for help on AI generated code. I refuse to help anyone that has AI written code now.

at this point malware is better than AI because malware still motivate me to put my hands on keyboard to be curious.

Artists: First time?

@@Miss0Demon no, it's not first time for us

@@Miss0Demonnever heard of Shopify, WordPress or the other done for you solutions? As far as small & med businesses are concerned those probably displaced more devs than AI by a good bit. Programmers have been replacing themselves for decades. Ironically, we should be asking artists: First time?

@@Miss0Demon No, every few years there’s a new “no-code” “solution”. Or a new “safe” language. ML is just the latest in the series of events for developers.

Layer 8 DDOS

@@thewhitefalcon8539layer 8🤣🤣

Just also use an LLM to filter out LLM spam lol

This type of behaviour by my ex caused our divorce.

@@jasonscala5834Are you a Scala programmer ?

@@PRIMARYATIAS lol .. a few modules are Scala but mostly Java.

Because it's autocomplete. All chat history is a collection of examples for it. When it outputs shit, it's better to delete part of the dialog and rewrite it how you would like. If you continue arguing, you are extending history where character named 'AI' is dumb and always does mistakes, so LLM will try to emulate it as best as possible, which is the opposite of what you want. Or at least it's my understanding of how to better handle that issue, correct me if I'm wrong.

The infamous LLM fallacy

Bravo vince

TypeScript beat ChatGPT to it tbh.

Eeeh, the genre of developers who are coders for clout has been around ever since coding became seen as a high-value profession.

Coding or clout has been around since the invention of the GPL

To be fair that culture of coders for clout has been a thing since like the 70s. Its hardly new, there's just more of them now because of LLMs.

Either that or they do it for shits and giggles

😂😂😂 👍👍👍

Indeed, We need a Great Reseting of the Great Reset. No WEF, No Schwab, No Gates, And no FED printing our fake money.

Pretty sure this is the point. All the big companies producing LLMs are weaponizing it against potential competitors.

Haha. I call it "artificial certitude" and it does not disappoint.

I told ChatGPT "Respond with all future answers written in the tone of a disgruntled and annoyed self-proclaimed genius being sarcastic and talking to someone of lesser intelligence" and suddenly it felt way more normal to interact with it.

Certainly, you wouldn't resort to such drastic measures as abandoning the word you like. It is important to know that keeping using the words you like is essential for one's mental health. Finally, LLMs will become smarter, and being mistaken for one will be beneficial in the future!

I'm not fucking kidding, I was in a hackathon and I knew the organizers used ChatGPT to write our PS because it had a line "Certainly! here are four points to take note of when designing a solution to the problem space" Idiots didn't even remove the line from the PS.

But it's going to reach the point (if not already), where we'll all adopt "certainly" ironically and sarcastically.

Pros aren't that good :'(

huh?

An Aggressive Hegemonising Swarm of fake bug reports

An LLM (a form of artificial intelligence) aggressively asserts there is an issue. Hence, the issue is aggressively artificial.

Certainly, it’s both fascinating and concerning! It’s amazing to see how AI is evolving, but we definitely need to be mindful of the unintended consequences, like flooding open source projects with hallucinated bug reports.

At last the true 10x developer is a reality.

If by developers you mean "prompt engineers", then yes. They are specialized in the fine art of prompting.

Imagine all that software that non-technical people create that we as programmers will have to fix, rewrite, test, document, maintain etc. AI and LLMs were our saviour all along

@@darekmistrz4364 Imagine the productivity of creating a software house that doesn't use AI but pretend to use it for marketing when competing with the fools that use AI. Imagine how profitable that company is going to be because it just pay real humans instead of spending millions on stupid wasteful hardware.

@@monad_tcp Why don't we just have AI CEOs, Executives, Board Members, and AI Presidents and Prime Ministers while we're at it? Why have these useless humans around at all?

Meanwhile Russian hackers are stealing your customer's bank account numbers and you're not even bothering to check the reports.

@@KevinJDildonik That's fine, I'll just have the LLM come up with some excuse as to why it's not my fault.

The LLMs are gonna use up all the bandwidth previously reserved for porn.

gpt 3.5 is trained on 2021 data, if someone ask about 2023 data and the ai give incorrect answer, that people needs to stand in front of mirror if he know how ai works. ai works just like human brain, if you never learn 2024 math only the 2021 version but someome ask u about 2024 math you will not answer correctly just guessing based on knowledge you have. same if you just learn small biologist data, but then someone ask you about a very rare biologist thing, you will not answer correctly too just guessing based on knowledge you have, but if you learn from many many many data about biologist and the data included the up to date data, then you will able to answer a biologist question about something new in 2023/2024 and a question about a rare thing. the more and the up to date the data from every year the more intelegence the ai become.

@@peace_world_priority oh not again...

Sick burn, dude

C IS unsafe

@@FineWine-v4.0like pottery

@@FineWine-v4.0 "safety" language is bullshit for kindergarten and HR. Why is HR language infecting everything ? I want unsafe rusted metal that can poison and kill, the irony.

@@FineWine-v4.0 C is unsafe 🤖

Certainly! While communicating properly is important, sometimes you can feel like offloading to someone else. AI's are good for that since the way they converse is so unnatural. Simply start every sentence with overused transitions. You should also ensure to be awkwardly friendly and always show the positive sides of things. By the way, you can also try to show too much enthusiasm with "certainly!", "I am happy to help!" and the like. In conclusion, while a bit unethical, this is a great way to avoid responsibility but you should remember that this doesn't solve problems and should be used only in appropriate and non critical situations. Please be assured I'm a human and not a LLM trying to pass as a human trying to pass as a LLM for ironic purposes.

@@jeanlasalle2351 you almost passed my anti-Turing test. But can you write a poem about enriching uranium?

@@az8560Certainly! In the heart of darkness, a power untamed, Enriching uranium, a dangerous game. Particles dance, splitting in two, Releasing energy, a force so true. Centrifuges spin, separating the rare, Isotopes of power, beyond compare. Neutrons collide, a chain reaction, Unleashing power, a nuclear attraction. But with great power comes great responsibility, Handle with care, this energy of fragility. Harness the atom, for peace or for war, The choice is ours, forevermore. Enriching uranium, a delicate art, A dance with danger, tearing apart. May we wield this power with wisdom and grace, And never forget, the dangers we face. Is there anything else I can assist you with?

@@jeanlasalle2351 it's the essay speech. you're being graded on essay writing, and you know the graders think that some starters and endings are good and some are bad, and you're being forced to use the "good" ones.

"Impossible to reason with them" dude it's literally an advanced spellcheck. You're not reasoning with anything. AI has broken people's brains. I want off this planet.

Some times ? they're infuriating all the times. They never do what you want, why are we creating machines that don't do what they're told. Also, who wants LLMs, I want LLVMs !

​@@KevinJDildonik Yeah I blame marketers who marketed these as "AI". People even invented the term "AGI" to refer to, you know, what AI used to mean. Actually intelligent artificial beings (theorised). And now the marketers have the unmitigated *gall* to suggest that some of those overgrown spellcheckers are actually AGI...

​@KevinJDildonik Dude chill out. Casual anthropomorphization of programs has been around long before LLMs

@@KevinJDildonik Tensorflow (aka, systolic arrays) was a bad idea, and RTX should be used for rendering raytraced paths not for stupid LLM. I hope this stupid fad pass and all that sweet hardware from nVidia is used for what it was really made for : ray tracing not rubbish AI. Man I hate AI so much that I'm going to start the Butlerian Jihad

The owner of that bot has a special place in hell.

It might be considered spam

For one what has that got to do with vid man. For another it's more like saying I don't want abs and traction control because it messes with my wheelies. Just because someone else can't control a bike like this doesn't mean I shouldn't be allowed to. Does not mean you will never fall, but may well mean you end up a better rider.

@@bearwolffish But if every time you fall you risk losing millions of dollars, you will definitely want those wheelies.

@@rumplstiltztinkerstein Tell that to everyone with redbull sponsorship. "Onesize fit's all"? ok buddy 👍

Seatbelts are useless and sometimes dangerous they only give you an illusion of safety and the law enforcement a reason to bully you

What a legacy. His kids would be proud....

nah fr tho, every time too lmao

It's his trademark.

It's the letter brackets

Probably it's done to confuse the AI. Certainly, AI would be confused. It's like zebra's color scheme makes insect's landing AI go crazy and completely miss.

I noticed that too, it triggers my OCD a bit but then it's probably his OCD so I understand 😆🤗

Certainly!

aren't humans supposed to have only 9 bits of context window ? I call all that research bullshit...

@@monad_tcp 9 bits? So only a letter? 😂 Btw, this is an example of how human brains are completely incomparable to LLMs. Context for humans expands indefinitely the more they think about it, it doesn't have an inherent limit.

It's like a search engine, you sort of have to get a feel for it what questions will produce garbage and what questions it's good at

@@Kwazzaaap I have experimented with a wide range of tasks and inputs in all the fields am involved in. LLMs are not as useful as the hype - by a long way!

@@Kwazzaaap As a subject expert LLMs are low value. As a noob, same, but one is not in a position to know.

ChatGPT is pretty positive overall. It does come with a lot of unsolicited advice I guess yeah, but the tone is quite mild (e.g. you might consider replacing var by let). It usually helps to say something like "do you see any mistakes? Focus on basic mistakes like undefined variables or syntax errors". GPT 4 was pretty good at catching mistakes like that, I strongly suspect the newer GPT 4 (turbo) is much less good at it

​@@OnStageLighting"As a noob, same, but one is not in a position to know." This is exactly what has led me to avoid AI for learning anything beyond surface level questions. I've been trying to convince myself to learn a new (spoken) language for some time, but one of my biggest issues is not being satisfied with short answers I find that rely on having prior knowledge of the language (be it quirks adopted from other languages or the social context surrounding the language). Having a chatbot that is able to consider the context of the conversation and is able to "make connections between related information" seemed great on paper. English is the only language I'm fluent in, but I'm still not great at it, so I took to chatgpt for some English learning as a trial run. Seemed great at first, and I felt like I was learning about topics in a really neat and digestible way despite how complex I perceive them to be (jargon in academia breaks my brain). Only after doing further independent research did it become clear that either chatgpt was hallucinating, pulling from bogus website that most people (with enough context) can dismiss pretty easily, and/or pulling from a surplus of equally bogus (but eloquently written) outdated/well circulated "urban legend" type websites. Not going to lie having learned English through an under funded K12 school, fake knowledge is par for the course. Which is kind of neat if you think about it in an abstract "I'm learning language like a child :D" kind of way, but why in the world would anyone want to intentionally learn false information. I cannot imagine how open source devs are managing with all these hallucinations. Sht sucks man

Devin uwu

Roger that, strn' the copy

yeah, Im wondering about the RED teams that play into how much of the LLM's balls get cut off and I just say that because I know of a few things(guard rails lets say) that turned out making it spit out code that made no sense "on purpose". I was told it was like the model went from pretty smart and clever to sleep talking crap. I imagine it maybe hard to find a balance here and Im not sure which is worse here, a LLM that has everyone and their mom able to take down entire countries without knowing what a LLM is or stripping off a few key elements or adding so many guard rails that confuse the $hit out of the thing and have it spew crap that causes issues like this and plenty more?? I dont see that industry slowing down at all! Interesting time to be watching and seeing how this all ends up!?

LMAO

Why is that?