Тёмный

Overshooting 1.5°C: the latest science on the risks and action needed 

Climate Analytics
Подписаться 527
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.
50% 1

This webinar, hosted by the Horizon Europe project looking at climate overshoot (PROVIDE), features presentations and expert discussion on what the latest science suggests overshoot of 1.5°C could look like, what the implications are for our planet and societies, and how this should inform climate action today.
Implications for the speed of emissions reductions, impacts and adaptation efforts, loss and damage are touched on, as well as expert views on untested technologies such as solar geoengineering.
Speakers:
Prof. Dr. Sabine Fuss, Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change
Prof. Dr. Joeri Rogelj, the Grantham Institute, Imperial College London
Dr. Benjamin Sanderson, Center for International Climate Research
Kaisa Kosonen, Greenpeace International
Dr. Philippe Tulkens, Head of Unit “Climate and Planetary Boundaries” in the Research and Innovation Directorate General of the European Commission
Moderation:
Prof. Dr. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Climate Analytics

Опубликовано:

 

3 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 38   
@vthilton
@vthilton 10 месяцев назад
Save Our Planet Now!!
@parrsnipps4495
@parrsnipps4495 10 месяцев назад
Jan-Oct 2023 average temperature above 1850-1900 pre-industrial was 1.54C so we've already surpassed 1.5C. Move on to what happens when we pass 2C, which happened on two different days in Nov 2023. My prediction for 2024 is the average temp. above pre-industrial will be 1.92C just a tad below 2C.
@amberazurescale5617
@amberazurescale5617 Год назад
Very good, very important things have been said.. but still, it's only just talk while the world keeps heading into a different direction.
@keithw8286
@keithw8286 Год назад
Hold on, what is causing these plots ( at 3:50 ) to suddenly dive at 2030? Had to stop watching when the enthusiasm for carbon removal got ahead of reality. Removing 80 Gtonnes per year from 2050. Aside from cynically kicking the “solution “ to 2050. I would like to point out a couple of things. Mankind does not have the capability to move 80 Gtonnes of anything in a year. Not if you add up all mining, oil and gas and manufacturing for the whole planet would you approach that quantity. Where do you put that quantity. Each year. Considering CO2 keeps going up regardless of the annual COP circus. Trials of carbon capture are so flawed as to be virtually useless. Land use change ? The EU have been fighting over agricultural policy for fifty years, but the world will fall in line with changes decided on by consensus and implemented by all governments. Hasn’t worked for CO2 for the last thirty years.
@BufordTGleason
@BufordTGleason 11 месяцев назад
In all fairness, they probably weren’t allowed to say, forget this, none of it matters and this report was just an academic exercise. I’d imagine when it went upstairs for redacting it was returned with instructions to the effect of. Find a happy ending in this somehow.
@davidwilkie9551
@davidwilkie9551 11 месяцев назад
If CCS CO2 is pumped back into a reservoir that is getting low on Methane but has good extraction and recharge characteristics, that is where the synthetic fuel system should begin to recycle CO2 for Jet Fuel etc.
@europaeuropa3673
@europaeuropa3673 Год назад
Overshooting 1.5 C is easy to fix. Just take out the NASA AI algorithm that inputs satellite data. The algorithm cools the past and warms the present. Without the data manipulation algorithm the 1.5 C goes away.
@JohanThiart
@JohanThiart 11 месяцев назад
This 1.5% overshoot thing is an absurd argument for planetary temperature change…. Imagine if we had chosen 0.5% or another imaginary number of say 4%.
@-LightningRod-
@-LightningRod- 11 месяцев назад
because
@thefuture986
@thefuture986 11 месяцев назад
​@@JohanThiart: Thats Degree Celcius (or Kelvin) i.e. 1.5°C. The average surface temperature on Earth is approximately 14°C. A difference in global average temperature of 1.5°C means an approximately 3°C difference on land and an approximately 10-12°C difference at the poles. The latter are accelerating their melt. With North Pole Ice at present-day decline our weather is already going nuts. Imagine what it would mean if ocean currents stop?
@JohanThiart
@JohanThiart 11 месяцев назад
@@thefuture986 meant to comment degrees C. Sorry to confuse, but I suspect you understood that….
@christinearmington
@christinearmington 11 месяцев назад
Someone please explain this to the floods, fires, droughts, hurricanes, and melting glaciers. 😳🔥🌊💀
@jameschambers4387
@jameschambers4387 11 месяцев назад
This "suggests" that the Climate Alarmists are alive and well. Is it chicken little we should listen to now or maybe the boy who cried wolf/ This is garbage.
@-LightningRod-
@-LightningRod- 11 месяцев назад
mayber yer just Dum,...
@CentaurUK90
@CentaurUK90 11 месяцев назад
Given the sheer number of people who have been led to believe that CO2 is the enemy here, what will they do when they finally discover it is not, and even worse, that it is a BENEFICIAL gas which promotes plant growth on which most life on the planet relies ? Far from doing anything (apart from stopping the REAL pollution man makes) what was their proposed 'solution' to this nonexistent problem, and whatever it is, won't it simply just make things potentially worse ?
@scribblescrabble3185
@scribblescrabble3185 Месяц назад
🤦
@A3Kr0n
@A3Kr0n 11 месяцев назад
There's way too many of these webinars.
Далее
Провал со стеклянным хлебом…
00:41
BiodivTransform information webinar
1:35:15
Просмотров 567
Neanderthal Genome Project: Insights into Human Evolution
1:22:46
Dr. Patrick Moore - Carbon and Climate Catastrophe
1:18:09
Should we reflect sunlight to cool the planet?
9:57
Просмотров 556 тыс.
Провал со стеклянным хлебом…
00:41