Oxford University Mathematician REACTS to "Animation vs. Physics" 

Just realizing it, it each of the videos are a sequel or prequel to each other. It could be math universe to geometry since the infinite circle created by euler shrunk into nothing but a dot before disappearing, we then see the dot expand into a line ending in a line segment with our main protagonist coming out of the line into the geometry universe which was hinted at in the math universe since phi came into frame with euler and we had aleph and a couple other symbols, but phi was seen in the geometry universe and the interaction in the two could be that the math universe is 1 dimensional while the geometry universe which phi is seen in is the 2 dimensional universe, the object seen, if you didn’t notice was a 24 cell shape known as a icositetrachoron or a hyperdiamond and it was a fourth dimensional entity in a three dimensional form that is easy to visualize in a 2 dimensional picture/video format despite the confusion movement of all the lines and vertices of the three dimensional form of the entity. Skipping to the end, the dodecahedron of Platonic solids which the name Platonic solids instead of Timaeus solids is due to his character being in a dialogue of Plato and his dubious existence, he is seemingly fictional, so it is Plato that the five are named after and the five represent the five elements of fire, earth, wind, water, æther(aether), and æther is the universe in simplified meaning though it is much more complex when you look into it. The antagonist of the animation vs geometry video got trapped in a shape representing the universe, which the inside allowed our main protagonist to see inside and see a bunch of mirror images that are them of different universes but the cowboy hat wearing one that was seen surprised them and they fell which the dodecahedron shrunk and flashed into a dot/circle and that flash could be what we see when our protagonist is seen falling in this video of Animation vs Physicsc though the physics universe could be an alternate entry from the math universe given the looping of that universe and the light at the end of the math universe, alternate/parallel universes of our protagonist could have ended up in both universes and in a complex way, the physics and geometry universe could be occurring at the same time. In their own loops but the end protagonist moves on while the loop continues with a new version of our protagonist for both the physics and geometry universes. Hopefully this is a bit understandable…

​@@VoidedEmptinesswhat.

so, the reason they entered the black hole was because they were angry at being hit in the face by the apple and wanted revenge. but in order to avoid breaking causality they had to hit themselves in the face with the apple. they were laughing at the irony that they were angry at themselves all along.

If the rings are too close, wouldn't that end up with them all sticking?

@@returneefromthemoon Once the magnets get within range of the two fields interacting, they will attract/repel, so, yes, they would stack. What Fabio is getting at is how railguns work by using electromagnets that turn on/off rapidly to accelerate a piece of metal (as long as it is ferrimagnetic). The animation tries to show this with the rocket, but without magnets having the ability to toggle, the same force that pulls you in from the right would equally pull you from the left, leaving with a new acceleration of zero.

@@returneefromthemoon Perfectly! For the magnet slingshot to work without them sticking together it's necessary that the magnets are at the limit distance, so that, their poles do not interact with others and no one magnet attracts the other, and in the same way, the deceleration caused in the rocket in the passage will be low.

@@NelielSugiura in my eyes, he isnt showing how railguns work, but the other version of them, the Gauß Rifle, which is like in the video, a 1:1 version, but as sayed correctly, they would have to be shut down, as soon as the projectile passes through, which you dont have to do with a railgun

Hearing this from someone that's taking the EL Engi. Course, you're making me want to take it. Thanks for the little lesson😁

I get the electromagnetism part. But can you explain the conservation of momentum. Because even though at first, I thought that conservation of momentum of was being violated but then got to thinking that he is creating an angular momentum first, and then converting it to linear momentum. the energy is being provided by his own body so I dont think conservation of energy is being violated?

@@aritrajitraha5944 for one, the icy surface is shown to have a mu of 0.1, so we know there are external losses, but the demo of potential to kinetic back to potential energy shows a zero loss system. Also, he converts angular to linear momentum the first couple times with losses due to friction and then suddenly he's sliding on one leg with zero losses as he approaches the large ball. All that being said, a little creative license to demonstrate different concepts! something something spherical cows haha

Absolutely, and while we're at it, can we please address the scientific inaccuracies of a 2 dimensional orange stick figure that seemingly displays a capacity for consciousness

More fundamental, at 3:20, the ball falls straight down on the top of his head. By Conservation of Momentum, the ball should just bounce straight back up to where it started. The parabola is a combination of gravity and linear momentum.

@@charlesgantz5865 That's only true if it hits the exact top of the head. Otherwise, it should bounce off at an angle.

His name is The Second Coming.

The TSC hasn't become the second TSC, they are in fact the same, just different timelines / dimensions (hinted by the "world line", that was shown before the 2 interact). As he's now stepped outside of our spacetime, he's able to see every iteration of everything at any given time.

This reply needs to be higher, lol

The reference is dying out of the common knowledge because the film is so old now. These young ones have no idea about Dr. Strangelove unfortunately. Have only see one reaction video where someone has mentioned the reference.

I think hat also added to distinguish the future Second from the present one

@@sunshine1220 It can do other things! Why shouldn't it? - Hubert Farnsworth

Yes but not only that. There is a star on it so it's a Sheriff hat, old symbol for law enforcement ... laws of physics in this case :)

biology

@@kenbow1290 Math, physics and chemistry - every aspect of them are formulas. Biology - not as much. DNA, maybe...

@@kenbow1290Biology is already explored a little in the video

I can't wait for chemistry. Many students like me are still struggling from it.

@@strenter Bio has more math than you think.

Trumpadumpa may be orange coloured but no way is he stick like in width.

Ofc we will troll sometimes it's funny

Torch is the British slang for flashlight, it was originally called an electric torch then shortened when we stopped using combustion torches

@@TheNinthGeneration1 I'm not fond of the idea of using a single word to mean two or more completely different things.

@@AmaroqStarwind welcome to English

@@AmaroqStarwind Well that's just cap.

​​@@AmaroqStarwind and I'm not a fan of people in the internet who diss other nations use of language. This is an international medium, so please show some tolerance to people from other parts of the planet. And if tolerance is not in your nature: at least stop showing yourself up as a boorish fool by instructing English people on how to speak our own language. This channel is created by a guy at a British Uni, in England; and you are telling him how to speak the language of his university; which happens to be the very uni that publishes the definitive dictionary of English words. I'm not going to diss you for being American: or for the way you guys speak our language: but there's some clue on the name of our language about the nation where it comes from, and in that place the correct term is "torch", was confirmed by the said dictionary. And also don't embarrass yourself by saying you don't like words meaning more than one thing: English (including American English) is full of this. Look at how a mathematician, a physicist, and a farmer all use the word "field" for example. Or how a 24/7 workplace manager, a computer keyboard designer, and an American auto designer use the word "shift" to mean there different things.

Or if the portal at the end of the first video led here, maybe the second portal led to a 3rd video...

I once read in a physics book: "According to Newton's nth law, where n is a number between 1and 3 inclusive, F = ma."

I believe the mod switching was just M theory, so yeah, it is about the different interpretations of the string theory.

And some fluid mechanics as well

If you're referring to the sun, he only really does that for his own sake. It doesnt actually do anything. The rocket being angled gives him just enough to prevent him from falling into the sun. That was unclear to me as well.

Well, the star's heliosphere is made up of particles emitted from the star's surface, so the stickman could be using the fact that time is slowing down for him to be able to push the particles around with the hat for enough time to stabilize the orbit, while the thrust of the rocket is helping too.

A sombrero works pretty well too, but it has to be made out of felt fabric, not straw.

@@maupach2022 Greetings, fellow Boomer!

If the cowboy hat is shaped like the normal distribution curve. Bell curve = balance

he's gonna be making more, these 2 are part of a series called 'Animation vs. Education'

I have heard AvChemistry as a common rumor for the next AvEducation. Alan listens to his fans, let's see if this comes to fruition.

@@elijahpatterson2596 it could be biology too, but who knows

@@o1ken_ez It's anyone's guess at this point.

@@elijahpatterson2596 yeah

Firs orange how developed this loop? Or why taking new oranges hat? i think it might be because first orange just boring and take his own hat and new oranges hat so he left with two hat.

Well, everything happens in a loop. TSC will do this indefinetly. That's physics for ya.

@@Serhat-898 Nah I think that he only has taken one hat. Because his hat had been taken away by the one who came before him! If that make sense😅🤣

@@kashishyadav6932 its an option

@@kashishyadav6932 its complicate and it has infinite potantiel so yeah maybe.

I also wonder if the apple represents hawking radiation. I guess the apple would have to represent a radiated particle though instead of an entire apple

Yep❤

Ive been looking for this comment

There is this weird stigma around intelligent people (in terms of IQ anyway) liking regular shows and books, as if you are required to only talk about intellectual topics. It's very weird

​@@shadowyzephyrMostly if you are good with maths, people already think your whole personality and life in general turn around that xd something i find sad is that only mathematicians are considered intelligent, because you can be good with other subjects but you aren't intelligent because you're not good with maths😢

@@sgjoyder2890 "only mathematicians are considered intelligent" I'd be interested in where you get that massive generalisation from. Especially as even you yourself don't seem to agree with it. I think a key thing is that it is a generally held belief (outside of the arts and religion) that _everything_ is described by mathematics and the other, derivative sciences. I mean how can you possibly deny it in a world so driven by technology? A technology that constantly pushes this world-view. Because without it, you simply wouldn't be typing words into a medium which is only there because of all the work done by mathematicians and the rest of science. And I'd not be replying to you via mechanisms I don't even understand. But this all leads to the idea that if you understand mathematics, you hold the 'key' to everything. As a mathematician, I certainly appreciate the very compelling validity of this, from a philosophical point of view. In the real world, it's possibly mostly garbage (also from a philosophical point of view). The universe and life and language and culture existed in some form long before we articulated it all in maths. And although, fundamentally, I believe that mathematics is the language of the universe (because it all matches up so very nicely), I don't really think that a small understanding of it defines intelligence. Of course, I might be completely wrong about all of that. But would only prove my point, as well. 🤔

5*

Which is labelled well in the video :)

But what would happen if you tried to do a gravitational slingshot using a planet (or whatever works as a gravitational slingshot), and it's moving diagonal of the direction your moving? (meaning left, or right of the direction your moving) what would happen? Would you get pulled in the diagonal direction that the object is moving? Or something else? 🤔🤔🤔🧐🧐🧐

@@DavidMuri-lm5vy It is mostly the angle of your exit from the gravity well that determines whether you gain or lose speed. The extent to which you exit in the same direction as the planet's orbit will determine how much speed you gain. And the extent to which you exit in the opposite direction of the planet's orbit will determine how much speed you lose.

@@samski2185 I had to stop the video to see this because it flashes by so quickly. But you're absolutely right.

I’ve been waiting for your reaction to this

You should probably pin this comment to the top of the comments section Love your videos.

The setting they change it to has a label on the setting that looks like the words "the end".

I was assuming the same thing.

btw im aware physics "is" math but like concepts and what not

Math is in every part of life. You do not think about it. But, we live in a mathematical world. Physics is the practical use of math. Then, we get into Quantum Physics. Which is the theoretical next step. To reach the Quantum level. We reached the level of being gods.

@@austinL. Math and physics are almost universally interchangeable. The only major difference between the two is that physics rely on units of measure, math doesn't.

@@Qardo Not quite. One would have to extend beyond the entire physical realm. Beyond time, space, and matter. We would have to venture into pure energy of thought or consciousness without bounds into all eternity. We'd be dealing with multiple fractals in conjunction with information theory, intelligent design, and more.

Yeah. I caught that, too.

As a programmer there is no such thing as an "insignificant" off-by-one error. That's either an easy fix or a five hour bug-hunting nightmare.

TL;DR: there is no "off by one" error! Here they are: 1: "An object can't change between stationary and moving on its own: an outside force has to act on it." 2: The magnitude of the force in question is exactly the ratio between the change in momentum and the time over which it occurred. (More commonly, momentum=mv is pulled apart- but that works because of conservation of mass) 3. This force isn't the only one! There's an equally strong force in the opposite direction.

@@wyattstevens8574 out of these three, which do you figure is F=ma?

@@bass2564 2, because the expression in form 1 is p/t= (p=mv) mv/t= (separating out m for F=ma) m*v/t, and v/t is exactly a!