P1 - More Gods!?! Muhammed Hijab Vs Atheist & Christian | Speakers Corner | Hyde Park 

exactly.

Hijab is not arrogant he is blessed with his gifted knowledge presented Islam... For more clear view of islam to non believer.. ALLAH BLESS Muhammed Hijab

Stinger HitmaN brother not just islam but science too may allah gift him and gift us with knowledge amen 🙏🏾

@@tonynoorafandi8873 you can be blessed with knowledge and be arrogant as well. Also he is arrogant every now and than. If you watch his debates and his speaking corners instead of direct only towards the ones he's talking he quite often is trying to bring the crowd within the discussion.. watch this yeah listen here yeah, I'm going to destroy this arguement yeah, he/she shouldn't have come to me with this etc etc. you can't say it's just knowledge without arrogance. If unknowing people come with questions focus yourself on those people not on your crowd that's mostly muslim. You ain't there for your crowd it shouldn't be entertainment for them. he should only be directed towards the people who come to you with wanting to have answers. Even if you know how to destroy an arguement you still need to do it with respect. ;)

so those 4 people trying to do the same as hijab? trying to let them see his point of view about the islam? Also he ain't alone, he just wanted to do it alone. He also ain't being pulled. Those people just say like: I believe you so far.. but when you say this it ain't lining up with what you said before. can you understand that? instead of thinking about it he quickly is saying yes, yes, yes, just so he could continue making it's point. Those people interrupt than again because they trying to say.. don't continue than with trying to make your point cause it wouldn't make sense to me and uncredible for whatever comes next that you say. it's all part of miss communication and speaking with too much passion and emotion. No, I ain't talking with hate. No, I ain't religious. But my interest in the islam lead me to a lot of videos of Muhammed Hijab to see it happen more often.

Ameen.

John Smith . I can sense your Bla bla nes.

@John Smith. Did you even know what I was talking about?

John Smith. Bla bla.

John Smith. Bla bla bla.

and with none, we'd be as we are right now

@John Smith Bro.. it's very simple to understand.. if suppose there are 2 Gods... One God want to destroy the city and the other God want to save it for another 100 years. Think what will happen.. either one OVER RULE the other or they COMPROMISE each other.. we don't believe that God who's most powerful, absolute, Independent can COMPROMISE or OVER RULED by anyone else.. Hobe you understand.

@John Smith Do your own research. Don't let yourself get brainwashed. And most importantly, whatever may be the outcome of your research, you must accept and believe in it.

@John Smith Whatever floats your boat !

@John Smith So shall I, inshallah ! Enjoy your dinner

Clearly juicing.

@@HassanDibani what's juicing

@@cheeseit2264 when you drink lots of ribena,and then you become a buff daddy.

@@DaniyalAhmed-lb2eo I want become a buff daddy

@@cheeseit2264 you will my dude,then you can get whatever gyal you want

hamza yusuf turned out to be a zionist supporter

amin i hope he goes through and sees inshallah the truth

Boring

Thanks for the greatest example of an oxymoron.

@@wozandnic That is not an oxymoron. It is implied in the statement that there is no false god except the real God (Allah).

@@wozandnic thanks for exhibiting your inferior lingual capacity.

Huh? Allah mean God in Arabic, so you just said there is no God but God.. The Bible never says there is more than one God but instead is revealed as three persons who exist eternally as God.

Cadmar Allah doesn’t mean only god in Arabic. Idiot.

Yes!!

The trinity is ONE GOD.

@@SuperrBoyful no. What follows may create a short circuit in one of your two cerebral hemispheres; all the more so for people who are not enlightened. (1) Ax, y (Gx ^ Gy => (x = y)) Premise (2) Gj ^ Gf => (j = f) Universal instantiation from (1) (3) j! = F Premise (4) Gj ^ Gf Premise (5) j = f Modus ponens from (2) and (4) (6).: J = f ^ j! = F A contradiction. Conjunction of (3) and (5) how are you:>? (1) For all x, y if x is God and y is God, then x is the same as y. (2) If Jesus is God and the Father is God, then Jesus is the same as the Father. (3) Jesus is not identical with the Father. I have already lost most of our faithful BLIND followers of Paul of Tarsus. (4) Jesus is God and the Father is God. (5) Therefore, Jesus is identical with the Father. (6) Therefore, Jesus is identical with the Father and Jesus is not identical with the Father. : d) For any meaningful use of the term "is", the trinity would create a contradiction. If the trinity uses the is of identity, then it follows that since there are real (not virtual) distinctions between beings, there is a contradiction, because beings are DISTINCT in this case but identical. in case the preaching is used this would simply imply that the 3 persons are all different beings, instantiations of Divinity to be specific. In any case, a contradiction is affirmed. the Christian interlocutor should then provide a meaningful account of the term "is" to avoid such contradictions. If you deny that identity through "is" is being used, then what is it? if it's a preaching, it's worse for you... It directly involves polytheism.

No

Lol that doesn't detract from the mistake within Hijabs argument.

@@MrSkePticaL123 yes and infact he understood his mistake.

@@asrarmohammed4075 they can't grasp what he is saying, because they're to focussed on what they want to say.

The bible funds the idea of the Holy trinity. The book that came before your myth called the “Quran”

Lets make him rich!

Can someone please tell me the name of the autor br. Hijab is talking about? Im from germany and i dont Unterstand it. Sth with senner. Please thanks

Thank you

No problem

How do i fond this bok?

African genes

@@deadgame3298 Please tell me you're not like Sa ra the black supremacist 😂

Muamer Blazevic Nije to. Istina jeste da Crnci imaju mušice koji ostali nemaju (pogotovo u nogama). Kad je Bijeli covjek zadnji put oborio rekord za trčanje na 100m? A kamoli neko is Azije. Nije rasizam. To je faktički dokazano i svaka im čast. Nadji jednog bijelaca koji može skakati ko Zion Williamson? Pogotovo Crnci iz Amerike, Jamajke i Engkeske posto su njihovi preci svi bili robovi iz Nigerije,Senegala (zapadne Afrike) itd. Pogledaj koliki su. Isto kao sto su Maoriz iz Novog Zelanda svi ogromni. Zašto Novi Zeland ima najbolju ekipu u rugby? Posto su najaci fizički a i brzi su za svoju većinu. Rijetko da ih bijelić mogu pobjediti. Svaka rasa ima svoje pozitivne aspekte.

@@alixus10 Ma ne kazem to kazem u sali. Ovaj sa ra sto sam ga naveo je pricao u fazonu da se bijela rasa boji crne rase jer se boji izumiranja jer je crni gen dominantni gen i kao na fazon da je bijela rasa opsjednuta njihovim kitama... Ali u pravu si crnci imaju genetiku ne pokusavam da ih omalovazavam. Pa eto sta da ti kazem... Husein Bolt je najbrzi, onda imas u bodibildingu Phil Heat, Ronnie, u dizanju tegova imas Larry Wheelsa koji je apsolutna zvijer covjek ima i građu bildera i snagu nadljudsku iznad glave je digo preko 200 kila jebo majku. Tako da ne mozes nikako da kazes da nisu dobri u sportu kad jesu. A ako te zanimaju ove gluposti od ovog sare (samo sto on pise odvojeno iz nekog razloga) pogledaj raspravu izmedju njega i hamze myata.

Muamer Blazevic Hijab mi he bolji u vezi filozofije ali Hamza je bolji protiv Hrišćana

False.

Lost his scottishness too

???

Where who?

Muslim Me either you get it or you don’t. It’s from a movie.

@@babysham318 loved the analogy!!! Whaahaha took me back for a minute!

Exactly. That's why as a Christian it has to be said, Islam is the only religion that makes sense

@zyzz 1x1=1,1x1x1x1=1,1x1x1x1x1=1,1x1x1x1x1x1=1,1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1 and the list goes on.what were ur trying to prove?!!!!!!

@zyzz Islam has no connection to nature? I suggest you go and research before you come up with such an immature comment. You're an embarrassment to whatever it is that you represent.

@zyzz This analogy is false to begin with, because you cannot multiple Father, Son and Holy Ghost to get [1] One. Even if we agree with this analogy, this is still not a plausible one. Firstly, the Bible shows Jesus as saying that the Father is the only true God (John 17:3). Therefore, the analogy fails, because it assumes each person is God and therefore is to multiplied. Since not all 3 persons are God, the analogy fails. ● Secondly, each value in the 1x1x1 equation is absolute and fully equal. This is obviously not the case with the trinity, because: 1) The Father is greater than the Son (John 14:28). 2) The Son has 2 natures (human and divine) while the Father only has 1 nature (divine). 3) The Son lacks knowledge that only the Father has (Mark 13:32). Since the Father is greater than the Son, applying this to the math equation: 1x1x1, this would be like saying that one number in the equation is greater than the other two occurrences of the number 1. What happens then? You won't get the answer 1. You would get an answer greater than 1. Similarly, using this analogy to the trinity would not result in getting 1. If Christians say Jesus is equal to the Father, they need to explain how they can be equal, when both do not possess the same number of natures, and both don't posses the same non-contradictory qualities of nature. They can't do it, without violating the law of non-contradiction, and violating this law would result in reductio ad absurdum (absurdity). ● Thirdly, one could say use the same standards against the Christian by saying: God is 100,000,000 persons, and 99,999,999 persons have 2 natures (Divine and man) while the other one has 1 nature (Divine). Even so, there is still one God, because: "1x1x1x1x1x1x1....etc. going all the way to 1 million." If the Christian claims that it can be objectively proven that this is polytheism or irrational using 1 million, why isn't it polytheism or irrational using using 3?

@zyzz which scriptures in islam reflect hatred for dogs?

Agree

Farhan K may Allah give him hidayah

Yes biceps are real as you can *see*, *feel*, and *touch*, unlike God who is just an imaginary sky wizard.

@@libertarianmonarchist1039 Well the established science disagrees In order to create something you need to have something .... nothing cant create nothing ! Philosophical argument : there are many but you can read cause and effect Mathematical argument : Quran has more than 700 scientific proven facts. Many of them have been confirmed in past century the probability of getting all those right and nothing wrong is 2^700 you can do the maths.... simply its higher than throwing paint on the floor and getting Mona lisa painting :) e.g iron was sent down from the sky... meaning its not from earth now science says iron forms on dyeing star Embryology, water, moon, sun you get read the miracles of Quran and give a rational answer! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BOoMxN8Qbm0.html

@@FK-xq1ow Let's understand most of the arguments were just speculation and our mere interpretation. Our Prophet Mohammed (may peace be upon him) was guiding us to the ultimate truth , but for a slightest sence of applause the so called modern scholars are unnecessarily interpreting every fact as scientific argument. It's certainly not there, if it were a science book it would have the field equations in it. These kind of approach to gain supremacy will surely damage us, and you see when a new scientific theory or ideology comes up, it is leaving a scar on quran. Why don't you guys understand it's using some words to point out the ultimate truth,and we are trying to find out meanings in the pointer itself.

@Farhan Kauser the video you referred, all the verses mentioned were indicating to something higher. Like the chapter 1 verses where it was pointing out duality of happiness and misery, both sides of life i.e. one point we are gaining and another point we are loosing. Can you see? How deep these things are. And then there are people who crudely make this as " Ohh, see we knew birds live in groups, our quran said that" . And that ant arguments was pointing to something different as well look at chaptee 27 , verse 19 onwards. It's very funny that we think this is good but my friend these things will destroy the true spirit of quran and imams.

It's scary how unintelligent people can be. I'll give you a hint, Google Trinity and come back and tell us how you think people are saying there is more than one God.🤣

@@wozandnic "Google Trinity and come back and tell us how you think people are saying there is more than one God.🤣" *Well, there are different concepts of trinity. Some even believe in modalism. Early Christians were not unanimous on trinity. Some were binitarians,unitarians etc.* *Even today, many christians have different understanding of God and Trinity.* *Moreover, the postulation of more than one necessary/independent existence makes it more than one God.*

@@wozandnic did you even study the trinity yourself? Where did jesus claim i am God worship me? Jesus himself came with the message to worship God not "me" how can Christians be so blind amazes me. 3 are seperate persons but 1, god is not jesus but jesus is god, even a kid can tell there is lack of logic somewhere.

hamza zulfi Well *snap*, you put him in his place 😂🤣😂 @Woz & Nic Maybe you should google trinity yourself before you put yourself out there like that

he is poisoning the conversation by defending the trinity

Don’t assume bro. Just make duah for him.

Goblinkiller Define omnipotent

K 98 we are not going to do that. There is one definition. Or are we going to define anything that is brought up in an argument?

yo do you go unsw?

Very well put

hitler was never awarded a nobel peace price.

I think you were about to explain it at 12:20 before Josh interrupted

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Bxk4IVFSO60.html

I never saw him arguing in the realm of general philosophy. Hijab is quite good at that, today is just not his day.

@@ihtemad agreed, I think Zakir naik is a good peacher but not really a philosopher.

I don't know... people are insecure? People felt inferior? I don't even know what's going on in these comments.

de 👍🏻😂😂😂

@de lolllz

If you come at him arrogantly he disciplines you pretty well.

@@lightuponlight654 plus he does it respectfully always... but don't come with half knowledge and half feelings... most of this discussion was scientific

He leads people into traps and says ahhahhhaa got you

LetsMathsDebate (twitter)

Haha. Mohammed Hijab is a legend

True😅

I agree.

@mma You missed the point. Hijab was making it out like Josh doesn't know about these philosophical thoughts and Josh even mentioned four people in this field. Hijab also said to him "now you're thinking deeper". Very condescending and meaningless in Josh's case. There's a difference in interpretation between Hijab and Josh's view of these philosophical concepts. A person having a PhD means he has the knowledge and is well-educated on the concepts. You're argument that somebody who has a PhD in something doesn't mean he knows more on that topic is so silly. I have a PhD in neuroscience, you want to tell me you know more? Please, just stop. And not only that, but now you're going to tell me what I should or shouldn't watch? What, are you Mr. Perfect? The fact you can't take a different opinion means you're not ready to have open discussions. Lame. Not only that, but you called Josh a "deceptive trinitarian". WOW! Congratulations on labelling somebody who is just very convinced about the Trinity because that's what he has been taught his whole life. Doesn't mean he's deceptive. It's like saying a flat-earther is deceptive lol. Nothing to do with deception. It's like you being fully convinced your whole life that there is only one specific way of living life and are too convinced to think otherwise. Nothing to do with deception. What's funny is that both you and I agree with Hijab's points and not Josh's but you got so hurt because I gave constructive criticism to Hijab? Even Hijab would look at my comment and think about it at least, not throw it out like you.

He wants to justify trinity.. subconsciously or not