Тёмный

Pacific Empires: Japan vs. USA - The Path to Pearl Harbor - WWII - Part 1 - Extra History 

Extra History
Подписаться 3,8 млн
Просмотров 775 тыс.
50% 1

Wanna see Extra History episodes 1 week early, watch them without ads AND get exclusive content? Go to go.nebula.tv/e...
December 7th, 1941 is one of the most infamous dates in history but it's not the full story of how and why these two Pacific Empires of Japan and the US came to blows. Instead, the Path to Pearl Harbor was a crooked one, fraught with tense meetings, cultural misunderstandings, and dismissed warnings that led us into WWII.
Miss an episode in our Pearl Harbor Series?
Part 1 - • Pacific Empires: Japan...
Part 2 - • Mystery of the Panay -...
Part 3 - • First Strike - The Pat...
Part 4 - • Countdown to War - Th...
Part 5 - Release Date: • Climb Mount Niitaka - ...
Part 6 - Release Date: • Day of Infamy - The Pa...
Series Wrap-up / Lies Episode - Release Date: 1/7
Music From the Show - "4,000 Miles" - Release Date: 1/6
Thanks for participating in this week's discussion!
Check out our community guidelines so we can have MORE high-quality conversations: www.extracredi...
Want to support the people who make this show?
Become a Patreon Member & Vote on future Extra History episodes! bit.ly/EHPatreon
Or show off your fandom with our merch! extracredits.st...
Want more Extra Credits? Subscribe and follow us on social media!
Twitter: bit.ly/ECTweet
Facebook: bit.ly/ECFBPage
Instagram: bit.ly/ECisonIn...
Twitch: bit.ly/ECtwitch
Tiktok: / extracreditz
Website: extracredits.site/
Interested in sponsoring an episode? Email us: extracredits@standard.tv
♪ Music by Demetori: bit.ly/1EQA5N7
♪ Outro Music: "4,000 Miles" by Tiffany Roman
Download the Music on Patreon!
#ExtraHistory #PearlHarbor #History

Опубликовано:

 

2 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 572   
@extrahistory
@extrahistory Год назад
You can watch The Path to Pearl Harbor part 2 without ads AND get exclusive content right MEOW Just go to curiositystream.com/extracredits​ to get a full year of Curiosity Stream & Nebula for just $11.59
@PablosOutdoorProjects
@PablosOutdoorProjects Год назад
please do Magelon next
@Texanprime
@Texanprime Год назад
Please do Texas revolution
@onehitkill5816
@onehitkill5816 Год назад
why not just wait for the next video for free, and the videos are too short for in between ads besides at the start.
@PablosOutdoorProjects
@PablosOutdoorProjects Год назад
@@onehitkill5816 seems to be working for them
@digitalhistory8526
@digitalhistory8526 Год назад
@@onehitkill5816 because they also have some which are exclusive to Nebula as well I believe
@Oneryeone
@Oneryeone Год назад
I wrote an essay for university on how the lead up to Pearl Harbour began with Theodore Roosevelt's arbitration of the Russo-Japanese war. I got a C because the professor disagreed, said I pulled my ideas out of context, and that I should have just focused on the Japanese invasion of China and the trade embargoes. I mentioned everything in this video, especially the Treaty of Versailles and the unequal naval treaties. After watching this, I've never felt so vindicated in my life.
@timothystamm3200
@timothystamm3200 Год назад
My professor in French history didn't get why I called the Ancien Regime feudal, you know despite the majority of France at the time being ruled by landlord nobles with peasants still being required to adjudicate things in their courts normally. Not to mention, of course, the absolutist monarchy was in the tussle it was in right before the Revolution because it jerryrigged its powers together by agreeing not to tax the nobles so they didn't use the rights of the Estates and the Parlements which were you know feudal in origin.
@fullmoontales1749
@fullmoontales1749 Год назад
History essays should be graded on the quality of the argument, not on whether the lecturer agrees with you. Roosevelt got the Nobel Peace Prize for arbitrating the Russo-Japan peace. I guess the committee didn't ask the Central/Southern Americans what they thought of him If I recall correctly the revolutionaries declared feudalism abolished, then tried to define it. Oops.
@timothystamm3200
@timothystamm3200 Год назад
@@fullmoontales1749 Well I guess OP felt he did argue well and then got dinged for having his "facts" wrong. I was talking about a class discussion where the professor essentially told me I was wrong to my face, and just because the Revolutionaries could not define Feudalism does not mean they were not in revolt against an essentially feudal government.
@theotherohlourdespadua1131
@theotherohlourdespadua1131 Год назад
I did remember somebody wrote a book titled "World War Zero" that did argue that the road to December 7, 1941 really started in Annapolis, MD in 1905. The Japanese really did feel like they got a raw deal from the treaty, enough to start riots. TR desire to make the US a world power left it with two enemies: Japan (who already has developed a sense of paranoia against them) and Russia (for "betraying" them). Tye 1905 treaty, though it saved Russia, ended the 100+ year Special Relationship the US and Russia forged...
@fullmoontales1749
@fullmoontales1749 Год назад
Wanting to be a world power usually does create enemies. Often the existing ones. The Britian to AMerica transition of global hegemony (give or take a degree of control and influence) is rare in that the fading power (Britain) didn't lose a war to the rising one (USA), but simply couldn't compete for internal economic and politicla reasons Obviously the USA exisst because of the War of Independence, to oversimplify, and winning/surviving the War of 1812, but they never actually conquered Britain and forced them to be a vassal or province. They just unlocked enough of North AMerica's resources to build a big enough fleet to rule the waves like Britain had tried
@CaptainKillroy
@CaptainKillroy Год назад
You can always look at one event with all the knowledge and hindsight and say "Why didn't they just do this?" The answer is that they are not us, they don't know what's going to come out of it. And for the most part, these people either were to prideful, to naive, or to scared. Leading to the events we see. Most didn't want war, but were either in it for themself, their nation, or some other gain that put everyone else at risk.
@loricagardener4826
@loricagardener4826 Год назад
Don’t you mean “hindsight” as In looking back?
@commanderstorm8874
@commanderstorm8874 Год назад
They also were raised in a completely different way and time than us
@CaptainKillroy
@CaptainKillroy Год назад
@@commanderstorm8874 That too.
@leggonarm9835
@leggonarm9835 Год назад
Perhaps peace and not fighting would be the best option; but no that would seem as being weak.
@CaptainKillroy
@CaptainKillroy Год назад
@@leggonarm9835 As it always is.
@malachiphoniex8501
@malachiphoniex8501 Год назад
Y'all should do a series dedicated to the annexation of Hawaii. You guys are literally the only channel who does Pacific history and I know you will do a great job of it. If extra history videos are books, the last time we saw the Kingdom of Hawaii was them signing up by the hundreds to fight in the American Civil War and in this series they are annexed.
@crapshot321
@crapshot321 Год назад
I think they already did, you would have to go through the playlists to find it however.
@malachiphoniex8501
@malachiphoniex8501 Год назад
@@crapshot321 They did a series on Kamehameha the Great but the series ends with the beginning of the end for Hawaii but not the actual annexation. There are other series that briefly touch on Hawaii, like the Pacific Exploration and Sun-Yat Sen, but nothing on its fall.
@grsd8069
@grsd8069 Год назад
I have to agree with @malachiphoniex8501. I know that the annexation of Hawaii would have been too big to go into detail for the scope of this series. However, what was stated in this video is the simplified version of the annexation of Hawaii. For instance, indeed, there were a few businessmen (known as the Big Five, who were Christian missionary descendants) who staged a coup to overthrow the Hawaiian Kingdom Monarchy. Moreover, their coup was supported by the US American Navy due to false reports that American interests and lives being endangered. In response to those claims, the US Navy was given an order for all US Naval ships to anchor off of Honolulu Harbor and aim their cannons directly at Iolani Palace; then known as capital of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Some of your videos hint at the overthrow and annexation, but a mini-series or series of the pathway to Hawaii's Annexation would be appreciated. Anyway, keep up the excellent work! Looking forward to videos of this series and other world history subjects.
@malachiphoniex8501
@malachiphoniex8501 Год назад
@@grsd8069 Plus, it's an important topic for how literally one of the fifty states came into the union. I feel like I got one of the better history educations in schools and I literally learned about Hawaiian history in a paragraph. And just on a fun note, Extra Credits seems to have certain national histories they like to follow, namely Ireland and Japan, why not make Hawaii one of these ongoing series.
@sarasamaletdin4574
@sarasamaletdin4574 Год назад
@Malachi Phoniex AlternateHistoryHub did a very informative video on if Hawaii was never annexed. Its not just alternate history, explained what actually happened in detail and explained that by the annexation Hawaii was already controlled so much by US immigrant families it was inevitable that they would control the island, so the annexation itself wasn’t the big event.
@jimsackmanbusinesscoaching1344
One thing that should be mentioned off to the side is that the US Navy ran a series of Fleet Problem exercises from the 1920s until WWII. At least one of those exercises included the surprise carrier bombing of US military installations in the Hawaiian islands on a Sunday morning. There is a channel called Drachinifel that has covered these Fleet Problems in detail along with many things in naval history. It might be a good channel for those looking for more depth on these topics might want to visit. As an example, there is a 2+ hour video on the Zero. They "cut it short" to not "get into the weeds".
@shaider1982
@shaider1982 Год назад
Yup, I watched the Fleet Problems videos from Drach. He noted that it seemed to be a theme of attacking Hawaii by aircraft carrier planes and succeeding.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
IMHO some of the best videos he has done, was on the Voyage of the Damned. Oh man, all those innocent binoculars.
@zackakai5173
@zackakai5173 Год назад
Ah, a fellow fan of Drachinifel I see ;)
@ag7898
@ag7898 Год назад
There were actually quite a few Fleet Problems where an aerial attack on Hawaii was part of both the attacking and defending parts of The Problem.
@ag7898
@ag7898 Год назад
@@kaltaron1284 one of the funniest out of nowhere appearances by Drach was on the Animarchy video about the Russian Imperial Cruiser Aurora. Drach guest stars as Kamchatcha. And does nothing by says "hello" in the video like 3 times. It's hilarious!
@AtlasNovack
@AtlasNovack Год назад
As time goes on, Japan's history gets more and more context through this show lol
@sarasamaletdin4574
@sarasamaletdin4574 Год назад
This channel really seems to love Japan with how many series it has gotten (for example I don’t think Spain, Italy Thailand and Mexico have had any, although some mentions and for first two there is at least Rome episodes).
@beeaggro2593
@beeaggro2593 Год назад
I think it's that one of them is an expert on East Asian history, so their wheelhouse is like China, Korea and Japan. Therefore all the East Asia videos
@ihavetowait90daystochangem67
United States forced Japan to stop being isolationist in the 1850s Japan forced the United States to stop being isolationist in the 1940s “History doesn’t repeat itself but it does rhyme”
@aquila4460
@aquila4460 Год назад
By 1940 the US was far from isolationist. American sailors were dying to U-Boats, American tanks, ships, and materials where crossing the Atlantic in ever increasing number. American float planes where monitoring the war for Britain.
@jonnunn4196
@jonnunn4196 Год назад
@@aquila4460 While isolationism in the US started to decline following events in Europe in the 1930s; in mid-1940 the isolationists were so powerful that the bill to establish a draft only passed by a single vote. That movement basically evaporated on Pearl Harbor; but had a revival in the 1960s in response to Vietnam.
@fullmoontales1749
@fullmoontales1749 Год назад
Trade and lend lease was one thing. But a declaration of war would have been impossible short of a direct attack (and remember Germany declared war on the US, making it unclear whetehr the US would have declared on Germany). ANd an attack on Hawaii and every other American island base they could find stil wasn't enough for a single Congresswoman, who voted against going to war, having also been the sole dissent (in the lower Hosue anyway) against joining WWI.
@matthewblairrains6032
@matthewblairrains6032 Год назад
@@aquila4460 I mean because of cash and carry it was British and Commonwealth sailors dying not Americans
@saddamhshadhin5641
@saddamhshadhin5641 Год назад
Ooooooohhh
@diggoryjaydark97
@diggoryjaydark97 Год назад
Naval warfare is kinda crazy, two massive lumps of metal with loads of guys fire car sized shells at each other while floating around in shark infested water in basically the middle of no where.
@swishfish8858
@swishfish8858 Год назад
And that's just what we have NOW - once upon a time, those chunks of metal were mere chunks of wood that would quickly catch fire in a fight, which means that you're burning alive atop an endless stretch of water.
@davidwright7193
@davidwright7193 Год назад
Almost all the naval battles of WWII either happened within sight of land or around convoys. Even two WWII fleets with a radar watch and CAP would struggle to find each other on the open ocean. Battles do not happen in the middle of nowhere. They happen at strategic junctions where trade or supply routes cross each other. In WWI just putting ships into convoys, so there were perhaps 6 or 7 groups of ships in the North Atlantic heading each way was enough to prevent U-boats from finding them. In WWII Dornetz would set a patrol line of 10 boats covering 150 miles of sea or more and as often as not fail to find a convoy.
@diggoryjaydark97
@diggoryjaydark97 Год назад
@@davidwright7193 I would count the middle of the the atlantic as the middle of no where
@takebacktheholyland9306
@takebacktheholyland9306 Год назад
and the best part about it is that despite the massive lumps of metal being the main focus, those little flies they use above the sky tend to do the heavy lifting
@pflume1
@pflume1 Год назад
What about the airplanes?
@emperorchampionthor
@emperorchampionthor Год назад
My great Grandfather Edward nickname “Eddie” was stationed at Pearl Harbor. He was on the enterprise. Well luckily the enterprise was wide heard from my family, broke down in the middle of the ocean but later found out that they were out doing practice divebombing during the attack and I am thankful that he wasn’t currently at the harbor during the attack. He later died December 10, 2001.
@dorsetball
@dorsetball Год назад
Finally done pearl harbour, I’m so excited for this series.
@ecurewitz
@ecurewitz Год назад
And without a crappy Aerosmith song too
@nathanseper8738
@nathanseper8738 Год назад
Yeah, in most school textbooks, they only really lightly discuss embargoes and the events of December 7th when Pearl Harbor comes up. I'm glad you're giving the events a more nuanced analysis.
@tommyfox854
@tommyfox854 Год назад
Sense when, where I'm at it either never gets discussed or is just brushed off as a "Oh yeah, this happened; anyways" sort of thing; I'm saying this because I honestly don't remember anything from history/Social Studies class. And I live in a more forward thinking state in the USA, New York, so don't ask me what the hell went wrong because I don't know myself.
@nathanseper8738
@nathanseper8738 Год назад
@@tommyfox854 Public school history tends to brush over the nuances of world history. Hence why things like World War II are often oversimplified.
@tommyfox854
@tommyfox854 Год назад
@@nathanseper8738 Oh, really? Thanks for telling me that, now everything makes sense as too why every single class from pre-school to 12th Grade was so forgettable, because that's just how they operate, thank you very much doc, thank you so much. =)
@nathanseper8738
@nathanseper8738 Год назад
@@tommyfox854 You're welcome.
@MK53114
@MK53114 Год назад
I love that extra credits, in around 2-3 hours, can teach me a sizable chunk of Japanese history, from the warring states all the way to WW2
@napoleonibonaparte7198
@napoleonibonaparte7198 Год назад
6:47 Every graphics out there almost always sinks the island of Palawan.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
Have you checked if the island is still there? Maybe the maps are right. ;-)
@vetren23
@vetren23 Год назад
I like that you're using assumed knowledge from previous seasons to cut down o exposition, it means you can get more in depth with the topic at hand. Please keep it up, it's a positive change and opens so many doors to revisit previously explored areas. This is a call for a look at post independence India in some manner.
@shaider1982
@shaider1982 Год назад
Say, I know it’s a small thing but the relatively large island of Palawan seems to be missing from the Philippine map here. If the Philippines is imagined like a cat sleeping on its side, Palawan would be the front legs. The Palawan was part of it during the Spanish and US occupations.
@xXxSkyViperxXx
@xXxSkyViperxXx Год назад
its funny they put many other smaller islands but an island as big as palawan is left out
@watching7721
@watching7721 Год назад
Seeing different designs for maps, seeing what they included and what they didn't is always a fun puzzle
@shaider1982
@shaider1982 Год назад
@@watching7721 the map of the Philippines as made by Spain , US and the present day PH governmrng always had Palawan.
@brycevo
@brycevo Год назад
I hope you guys mention the other attacks in the battle of Oahu. Everyone always forgets that there are multiple US Military bases and stations on the island, and that all of them received fire.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
They also didn't attack "only" Hawaii but the Phillipines at (about) the same time.
@Coiritater
@Coiritater Год назад
As someone who grew up not only in Hawaii but literally next to Pearl Harbor, I'm stoked you're covering this historical event with the level of detail it deserves. And btw, A++ on your Hawaiian pronunciation. I'm very impressed 👍
@ruelarila7201
@ruelarila7201 Год назад
Great video as usual EC! I really hope you'd eventually get to the Philippine American War and how the American government betrayed a budding Philippine republic.
@malachiphoniex8501
@malachiphoniex8501 Год назад
Ooof, that might be one the darkest extra history series yet. Definitely should be made but man, some things we did....
@GeneralLuigiTBC
@GeneralLuigiTBC Год назад
I remember that being a Patreon candidate a while ago, so there's definitely interest among the patrons. I think it lost to the Easter Rising. That doesn't mean it can't be a candidate for a later series, though.
@malachiphoniex8501
@malachiphoniex8501 Год назад
@@GeneralLuigiTBC A worthy loss in my opinion. Ironically, as an American I know less about Irish history than Pacific history. I don't if that's a norm or I'm just weird.
@leguichettravel1599
@leguichettravel1599 Год назад
Perfect!! Because that scenario is mentioned in my social studies class in my homeland.
@AccipiterSmith
@AccipiterSmith Год назад
The things that happened during the First Philippine Republic are being repeated throughout present day. The consiquences of the past still haunts our current society...
@EmporerAaron
@EmporerAaron Год назад
Always enjoy a Extra Credit video.
@fasdaVT
@fasdaVT Год назад
Glosses over how much the Japanese Navy was in favor of the arms limit because 10 to 7 is way better odds then the 20 or 30 to 7 that US and Japanese economies could sustain. The biggest problem was that it was a few percent lower than what Japan estimated they'd need to properly defend themselves.
@michaelbarnes5223
@michaelbarnes5223 Год назад
With the Sengoku Jidai, End of the Samurai, Rise of Japanese Imperialism, and now WW2 in the Pacific, I'm loving the coverage you guys are giving to modern Japanese history! (Hopefully you'll keep it rolling with post-war Japan through to the present day. I've never understood how the "economic miracle" happened, turning Japanese from a devastated country to a modern innovative global superpower in so little time.)
@spaceengineeringempire4086
@spaceengineeringempire4086 Год назад
Boat loads of American money.
@zancloufer
@zancloufer Год назад
It's got to do with a combination of large investments from the USA to rebuild, the fact they could[had] build their entire infrastructure from scratch with modern/nuclear era methods and that they had to compete with American industry. Also the fact that they had no 'military' meant all the R&D and funding that would normally go there went into the civilian sector instead.
@malachiphoniex8501
@malachiphoniex8501 Год назад
The economic miracle stuff would be interesting. I would roll it into the topic of American occupation and cut it at the 1990s. I think retrospective history should have a buffer zone of 30 years. I would also love to see a series on the land war in Asia during WW2.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
I guess we should ask for some Genpei war then. The economic rise of Japan is also indeed a very interesting topic. Maybe finish it with the collapse of the Bubble Economy.
@zackakai5173
@zackakai5173 Год назад
@@kaltaron1284 ^^^ this! Not that more recent Japanese history isn't interesting too (it definitely is), but if you start watching EC's Japanese history episodes in chronological order you're just kind of thrown into the Sengoku period with very little context. A series on the collapse of the central government in Heian-kyo and how the Genpei war lead to the rise of the Kamakura shogunate would really help round off at least the major highlights of Japanese history. A lot of people might not even realize Japan *had* a strong central government prior to the medieval era, and the story of how the country fragmented is probably more relevant to a lot of people today (especially if you're American) than some more recent stuff.
@stardestroyer0019
@stardestroyer0019 Год назад
I’m not sure if this was covered in previous videos, but a significant factor was the political maneuvering of the IJN and IJA, particularly the latter, to gain and exercise more control over the Japanese Diet. Eventually this will have to be brought up, because the political atmosphere led to Admiral Yonai stepping aside for Yamamoto to become CinC of the Combined Fleet and for him to choose the decisive first strike against Pearl Harbor. As with most history, there are a LOT of interrelated people and groups. The history of the lead up to Pearl Harbor fills volumes. John Toland’s book does a thorough job explaining the Japanese government prior to the Pacific War.
@knightofhistory
@knightofhistory Год назад
I love these videos. I've been a massive fan for years! So much so that I actually made my own channel (it focuses on History as well) thank you for the inspiration!
@gonzoengineering4894
@gonzoengineering4894 Год назад
Lions Led By Donkeys covered this subject pretty well in detail on their recent episode "The Dumb Life and Dumber Death of the Battleship Yamato"
@josegodinezvaliente5140
@josegodinezvaliente5140 Год назад
Thanks been wanting for this
@Numba003
@Numba003 Год назад
I want to do some research on the Sino-Japanese Wars sometime. I don't actually know much about them, especially when compared with many of the other events mentioned here around the same period.😅 Thank you guys for another excellent video! Merry Christmas out there everybody! ✝️🎄
@nicholas209
@nicholas209 Год назад
The Washington Naval Treaty was actually pretty beneficial for Japan, although they couldn't have known it at the time. By restricting the UK and especially the US to a 5 to 3 ratio, Japan kept them much closer in fleet size than what they would unleash in WW2. 24 fleet carriers and 175 destroyers of a single class of each (among other things) is quite a bit more than 5 to 3 after all.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
You can't really compare war time production with peace time production. Would an isolationist USA have built that many warships if not at war?
@susakuzero
@susakuzero Год назад
This was still a problem for Japan not so much the size but the tonage. Japan knew of course even if they want unless they realy have a qick victory over China and then enough Resources they could not match the US and GB in production.
@susakuzero
@susakuzero Год назад
@@kaltaron1284 Kinda this. Also Japan was ironic enough only alowed this many Ships since GB/US dont thought Japan would ever atack them. But it was also still a way of kinda dissing them by beoing alowed less ships then US/GB.
@hexblade7575
@hexblade7575 Год назад
@@kaltaron1284 you bet your ass they would have, peacetime America had the third largest fleet prior to WWI and had increased that to the second largest by the time we entered the war.
@peterdisabella2156
@peterdisabella2156 Год назад
@@susakuzero Thats not really the case, the idea was that GB/US were both Pacific and Atlantic fleets and Japan was only Pacific. Its also worth noting that Japan actually was allowed more than France and Italy within the same treaty who were both allowed about half the tonnage of Japan.
@brianstephens7572
@brianstephens7572 Год назад
I first heard about nebula through legal eagle. I'm happy to see that this is becoming a growing trend on a lot of the interests that I subscribe to on RU-vid
@lkzhang820
@lkzhang820 Год назад
A video that is beneficial to watch in the current situation.
@nickcoles9168
@nickcoles9168 Год назад
For those of you interested in the IJN and it's perspective just before and during the war I recommend the book The End of the Imperial Japanese Navy by Masanori Ito. It's a great read, beautifully written, and by the end had me crying with it's ending message. Its a must read for those interested around this topic
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
Seems to be a bit difficult to get.
@nickcoles9168
@nickcoles9168 Год назад
@@kaltaron1284 yeah I got lucky at a used book store, I'll see if I can find a PDF. If so I'll post it below.
@sailor_guy9841
@sailor_guy9841 Год назад
Alarm ⏰ goes of: *Sleeps* Extra Credits has uploaded a video: *wakes up slightly* It’s about Naval History: *eyes Widen* It’s pearl harbour: *Jumps out of the bed*
@frankharr9466
@frankharr9466 Год назад
This is off to a good start. I'm looking forward to it.
@halite_g
@halite_g 6 месяцев назад
Be really cool if EC ended their Japan saga by covering America's occupation of the country following Hiroshima and Nagasaki
@cdagyekybcrpaa
@cdagyekybcrpaa Год назад
One thing I should point out: the Washington Naval Treaty _was not_ intended to deliberately hinder Japanese Naval armament. One of the (many) events that lead up to the First World War was the naval arms race between Britain & Germany, and the WNT was meant to limit that build up to prevent another major war. As for the allotment each navy was given in building ships, it was far more complicated than simply one side wanting an advantage. You see, while it is true that Japan was only allocated 3 ships for every 5 that was allowed for Britain & America, Japan at the time did not have the same level of industrial capacity as the other two countries. In fact, at their then-current production output rate at the treaty’s implementation (or even during the Pacific War) they actually could not build that much more than the WNT limited. If anything, the WNT was _more restrictive to the American and British Navies,_ who both had a much higher industrial output and could produce more ships. Admiral Yamamoto actually insisted on Japan abiding by the treaty since he knew that the US alone would outproduce the Empire at a far greater rate than the treaty allocated. Another reason for the treaty’s allocation rate was simply a case of geography and practical necessity for the signatories. The British still had their vast empire back then spanning several seas & oceans and would need as many ships as possible to defend her interests and distribute them accordingly. The US is right in between two major oceans and needed to have enough ships on both sides of the continent. Japan, on the other hand, only had at the time her Home Islands, Korea, Formosa, the Ryukyus, and a few smaller islands received from Germany after WWI, all of which were within the vicinity of the Northwest Pacific Ocean. These were relatively smaller holdings compared to the British and the Americans and they ultimately would not have needed as much as the other two nations.
@fullmoontales1749
@fullmoontales1749 Год назад
So it was meant to be "As much as you need, but no more".
@cdagyekybcrpaa
@cdagyekybcrpaa Год назад
@@fullmoontales1749 essentially
@Bird_Dog00
@Bird_Dog00 Год назад
Thanks for pointing this out. I hope it gets adressed in the Lies. While the debate of "who "won" the naval treaties of Washington and London" is stil ongoing (some say britian, some say the US and both have valid arguments), japan didn't necessarily "lose".
@thecoolerjon3506
@thecoolerjon3506 Год назад
@@Bird_Dog00 they got the 3rd largest navy in the world, they definently didnt "lose"
@john2g1
@john2g1 Год назад
This would be a perfectly acceptable argument except for 2 things: 1. Racism exists I said just a few seconds before the US very specifically blocked any wording about racial equality. 2. The Future... The US could out-produce Japan because the US is/was gigantic with resources all over the place. The UK could out-produce Japan because its colonial empire was gigantic with resources all over the place. One of the main reasons Japan took Manchuria was for its resources. Not to mention a population of people that could be forced to work. Even in the 21st century the Chinese are major world manufacturers. Imagine if Japan had forced Chinese industrial manufacturing for its empire. On paper everything you said is true but evidence speaks to the contrary.
@andalilbitqueer
@andalilbitqueer Год назад
6:47- y'all excluded Palawan Island; it's bugged me since I watched this and Nebula, and I just felt the need to point it out.
@Googledeservestodie
@Googledeservestodie Год назад
There are so many good possible topics in this episode. The fall of the Hawaiian kingdom, the Mexican-American war, the founding of the Dutch Indies and Australia, the Russo Japanese War. Honestly the next topic poll could just be a list of things in this episode that you might want to know more about.
@malachiphoniex8501
@malachiphoniex8501 Год назад
The fall of Hawaii Kingdom and the Russo-Japanese War have been mentioned so many times that it is kind of ridiculous that they don't have a series yet. The only other event that has been mentioned this many times but doesn't have a dedicated series yet is the Crimean War.
@RamdomView
@RamdomView Год назад
8:30 Not said was that the Japanese economy was severely strained even trying to reach that ratio. In reality, the treaty constrained America much more (since America could afford to build a much larger Navy) than Japan, but that's not something nationalists usually care about.
@susakuzero
@susakuzero Год назад
Yes and no. This still limited Japan how they could build and design their Ships. Also Japan could have build more CVs or BBs if they wanted but they actualy decided to build more smaller Ships instead which was not a completly wrong decision from a Strategic Point of View. Also while it limited the US and GB too it was also kinda an Arongant way of showing we are better then you so we are allowad to have more toys then you.
@stephenjenkins7971
@stephenjenkins7971 Год назад
@@susakuzero They were better than Japan at the time. Both had the industrial might to completely overshadow Japan when it was signed. Though it is quite possible that there was a snobbery there since the US and UK were often allied to each other and would not be concerned with each other's power but with the rising powers of other nations like Japan and Germany.
@andrewhawkins6754
@andrewhawkins6754 Год назад
Calling Pearl Harbor the start of US involvement in what would become WW2 completely forgets that the Philippines were also attacked (shortly before) Pearl Harbor on Dec 8th (remember the international dateline, making it Dec 7th still for all 48 states!)
@greg_mca
@greg_mca Год назад
It also ignores American ships fighting submarines in the Atlantic, or that the US from July 1941 was occupying Iceland in order to allow British forces to be reallocated elsewhere
@watching7721
@watching7721 Год назад
'When the US first entered the war officially' might be better
@seekingcirculation
@seekingcirculation Год назад
5:09 I’m sure that’s the only time in history we’ll hear about a naval incident at Midway.
@glasseagle8368
@glasseagle8368 Год назад
More extra history!
@West_Coast_Mainline
@West_Coast_Mainline Год назад
This looks epic I’m into it
@TheCreepypro
@TheCreepypro Год назад
nice to see the actual history of this be covered
@ninjammer726
@ninjammer726 Год назад
Educational and I need more
@FakeBlocks
@FakeBlocks Год назад
Do the Greek revolutionary war of 1821 against the ottoman empire next please. I've been requesting this since the first sengoku jidai episodes
@Charles37400
@Charles37400 Год назад
WOW this is odd. I was literally just thinking about pearl harbor and WW2, i go to check my youtube reccomendations, and you guys release this. Great job but tell zoey to cool it on the mind reading.
@Artur_M.
@Artur_M. Год назад
1:44 "But now onto the infamy." Seemed to me like such a cool little line (obviously referencing the famous speech).
@typhonplume9374
@typhonplume9374 Год назад
I'll admit I still try to honor on Dec 7th, as I am a US Navy veteran, but I also try to celbrate it as while not on the same year I was born on Dec 7th. My Grandfather as also there when it happened.
@AndrewJohnson-oy8oj
@AndrewJohnson-oy8oj Год назад
"Underdeveloped" the classic euphemism for "sensitive and ecologically important biome".
@bickyboo7789
@bickyboo7789 5 месяцев назад
Economically important lol
@Kigge719
@Kigge719 Год назад
Hey. You guys seems to be missing the links in the descripton thats mentioned at 1:40 that has some background info that you say are important to this one.
@ChiChiLand299
@ChiChiLand299 Год назад
I love how you left out the fact that there were also a lot of native Hawaiians that were also part of the 1893 coup, lol 😁
@susakuzero
@susakuzero Год назад
Maybe cause this should be obvious. Making a Coup without at least some People suporting you is never a good Idea.
@Epsteinvictim
@Epsteinvictim Год назад
Finally you made a video on Pearl harbor
@Snp2024
@Snp2024 Год назад
Who is that hansome fellow on your I'd ? Must be a priest in training.
@greg_mca
@greg_mca Год назад
To quote Indy Neidell, talking about Pearl Harbour, "History does not happen in a vacuum" Go watch his pearl harbour in real time series if you have not already I feel the Washington naval treaty could have been expanded more, for example the negotiations being tapped by the hosting US which led them to force Japan into the weakest position they'd accept, along with Japan losing its greatest naval ally (the UK), yet forcing the concession that nobody in the western Pacific could fortify any naval bases
@zackakai5173
@zackakai5173 Год назад
I'd still love to see a series on the end of the Heian period, the Genpei War, and the transition to the Kamakura shogunate. EC has a nice little run of Japanese history series now, and that particular chapter of Japanese history HEAVILY informs a lot of what they've already covered (especially the Sengoku episodes!)
@margaretkairu7418
@margaretkairu7418 Год назад
DO A NAPOLEON SERIES
@Spooky_man
@Spooky_man Год назад
This episode touches on SOOOO many historical topics you already covered! The end of the XIng Empire, the aftermath of the end of the samurai and the American civil war!!
@jimnicholas7334
@jimnicholas7334 Год назад
As a kid, my parents took me to the USS Arizona Memorial (spoiler alert! : o) and Museum at Pearl Harbor when my dad was stationed in Hawaii. I loved it. I couldn't get enough. I boggled my mind that things could be so different from how they were today. It started my passion for history and wondering about the world.
@owenthemousey2268
@owenthemousey2268 Год назад
woo new extra history series!
@LittleinnocentJimmy2
@LittleinnocentJimmy2 Год назад
I'm waiting that you're going to talk about the history of the Pacific war by the Philippines perspective
@ag7898
@ag7898 Год назад
Pearl isn't the only naval sneak attack in Japanese Imperial history. They also did it to the Russians in 1904 when they attacked Port Arthur.
@jiyuhong5853
@jiyuhong5853 Год назад
pearl : by planes port aruther : destroyers
@Texanprime
@Texanprime Год назад
Please do Texas revolution
@sanguiniusonvacation1803
@sanguiniusonvacation1803 Год назад
My grandfather was stationed in PH during the attack.
@Tomartyr
@Tomartyr Год назад
America: December 7th is super well known around the world The World: December 7th?
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
It's the day after Saint Nicholas, right?
@TheManFromWaco
@TheManFromWaco Год назад
8:25 A major reason the Japanese received ratio at the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty that looks unfavorable on the surface was the fact that the USN and RN had to keep their fleet dispersed to meet their strategic commitments (Two Ocean defense in the case of the former, an international empire spread from London to Hong Kong in the latter case). Japan would be much more able to concentrate all its forces in a single spot. The ratios for all practical purposes gave Japan a seat at the head of the table in the Pacific.
@kwokziyi4937
@kwokziyi4937 Год назад
What you just said just confirms that the treaty was unfavourable. It does not change the underlying result of crippling Japanese naval power in the pacific. Whilst not endorsing colonialism myself, this must at the time have been hypocritical to the Japanese who would have wanted colonies of their own and saw no reason why their efforts should be hampered by countries who needed to spread out their forces because they already had carved out and enjoyed the economic benefits of their colonies.
@cult_of_odin
@cult_of_odin Год назад
Unknowingly? Yeah no. They knew damn well what was going to happen. That's why they were there.
@Rbjorgen
@Rbjorgen Год назад
I have been using yall as a supliment since primary school. Now in highschool, I actually have use for your videos. Thanks alot!
@tykep1009
@tykep1009 Год назад
I envy you to have such excellent content to grow up with. Enjoy your study!
@darthbee18
@darthbee18 Год назад
"FDR planned to put the Pacific Naval Fleet in Pearl Harbor to deter Imperial Japan from taking over Dutch East Indies..." Yeah nah look how well that worked out 🙃🤪💀
@palestinianmapping5724
@palestinianmapping5724 Год назад
Damn this channel has only gotten better in the past 7 years, not just consistency but improvement at an insane speed, Very Very Well made
@bricksblocksandbeyond
@bricksblocksandbeyond Год назад
This made my day.
@tavernburner3066
@tavernburner3066 Год назад
To be fair the Washington naval treaty was signed by the japenese government specifically because it would help restrain the japenese navy which was uncontrollable at the time.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
Win for the government but loss of face for the navy. I think one side was unhappy with this. And as the diplomatic efforts didn't work as well as the military ones...
@Luffingtoncloak
@Luffingtoncloak Год назад
Aaaah yeah yeah yeah more ww2 videos woo love your history videos
@SuperTwoU
@SuperTwoU Год назад
I was literally researching about what led to the Pearl Harbor attack and then this comes out lol
@iulaihe51299
@iulaihe51299 Год назад
please tell me you didn't forgot Nancy G Fox she was the 1st woman to get a purple heart for saving injured civilians and troops after the bombardment
@scifantasy
@scifantasy Год назад
I thought Matthew Perry was a commodore, not an admiral. Is this a definitional issue (what were once commodores are now read admirals or something like that)?
@susakuzero
@susakuzero Год назад
Yes was a mistake they made.
@bigj1905
@bigj1905 Год назад
I’m a man of simple tastes. When I see a video on WW2, I click.
@kennethkellogg6556
@kennethkellogg6556 Год назад
Something for the "Lies" episode: it was the Japanese who broke the Washington Naval Treaty at the end of 1934. (Though they had been merrily violating the 10,000 ton limit on heavy cruisers for years already.)
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
To be fair all the contractors had their own ways of being "creative" with the treaty. Like measuring the tonnage of a ship without its full load or using the design values. I think Drachinifel has done one or more videos on it.
@SusCalvin
@SusCalvin Год назад
The japanese diplomatic corps is also part of the same wonky division of power that lets the army and navy (and the Manchuria army, and even little groups of colonels) have their own foreign policy.
@renegadeleader1
@renegadeleader1 Год назад
Honestly, it was either let the IJA, IJN, or Kwantung Army do what they want or face assassination or coup attempts. You would be shocked by how many civilian diplomats and politicians were murdered for daring to not do what the military wanted in the 1930s.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
@@renegadeleader1 I know. It's a bit like the saying about Prussia: "Where other countries have a military, the Prussian military has a country." And the Japanese were possibly worse. Also the infighting between different arms was legendary.
@susakuzero
@susakuzero Год назад
@@kaltaron1284 I would not say they where worse then Prusia but more on the same Level.
@renegadeleader1
@renegadeleader1 Год назад
Claiming that the declaration of the Stimson doctrine in 1932 was used an excuse for for the United States to not recognize the Washington and London naval treaties is pretty misleading bordering on an outright lie. The Stimson Doctrine was a declaration that the United States did not recognize the territory Japan had illegally annexed when it invaded China. It had nothing at all to do with the naval treaties. In fact the United States continued to adhere to the Washington and London naval treaties longer than any of the other signatories like Great Britain, France, and Italy who often seemed to violate on a whim This stands in stark contrast to Japan who had denounced the Washington Naval Treaty in 1934 and let it expire in 1936 when they outright withdrew from the Second London Naval Conference.
@generaldorimes2651
@generaldorimes2651 Год назад
The series is gonna be sick
@snapchatsnacks3154
@snapchatsnacks3154 Год назад
I hope you touch on the Nanjing massacre. To this day people don't acknowledge it.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
I think most people acknowledge it but argue over the numbers. Like with the Dresden fire bombings I don't really care about the precise number. BTW do you know John Rabe?
@rikuvakevainen6157
@rikuvakevainen6157 Год назад
Finally, after seen the events of both superpowers in Extra Credits it is time for the diplomatic dance between these giants. It's a facinating concept. You have talked about Japan's expansionism, its militarism and also US racial depates and their expansionism. All of those things are playing a role for the coming events. It's like you are tying the nods together for the big event.
@PlebNC
@PlebNC Год назад
Mentions Wake Island. *Battlefield 1942/3 theme intensifies*
@mattwoodard2535
@mattwoodard2535 Год назад
Japan had been violating the Washington Treaty in major ways long before the treaty was officially ended. While the US and British had launched some ships that broke the treaty, they did so in rather small ways and the US and British both kinda looked the other way so long as the violations were small (500 or a 1000 extra tons on a cruiser or something). Japan on the other hand did it in a big way and had done it for a long time. sm
@chaturanarasimhan473
@chaturanarasimhan473 Год назад
I love your videos 🎉👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@razorka1293
@razorka1293 Год назад
Cool
@leguichettravel1599
@leguichettravel1599 Год назад
And you finally gave credit to the Americans who pissed off my homeland. PS: I'm a Filipino after all.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
Yeah, "Europe first" sucked for many countries in East Asia but in the end it worked. Losing too many resources fighting an unwinable defense may have been worse. It may also have been possible. Who knows.
@Terinije
@Terinije Год назад
Small correction, Perry was only a commodore.
@Kyrephare
@Kyrephare Год назад
You missed the fact that a major part of US Pacific expansion was the an act in 1856 called the Guano Islands Act that allowed US citizens to claim any island they found in the pacific that was not under the government of another country. This was because the US really really loved bird poop as it was still very agriculturally based. It was extremely high in nitrogen and thus made fantastic fertilizer in an age before synthetic fertilizers. Pacific Islands were caked in the stuff as birds migrating through would just densely pack these islands/atolls for thousands of years. The US would claim several places that werent even above water until the tides receded. At least when I took a class on the US expansion in the Pacific when I was in college (a long time ago), the whaling industry was never really brought up as a reason for expansion. I could be misremembering that aspect though, it's a lot easier to remember that the US claimed large swaths of the pacific hunting for bird poo.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
Claiming Pacific islands didn't make Japan interesting for them though. Needing open ports for whaling ships did. It's also interesting how they exploited the Japanese currency. Gold was undervalued there so they would buy stuff with silver and recieve gold as payment. Which was quite a bit of a drain on the Japanese economy.
@Kyrephare
@Kyrephare Год назад
@@kaltaron1284 So heres the thing, whaling was a mostly coastal, not a deep sea type of trade. The main reason for whaling back then was not the bones, but the oil produced was used for lighting and the meat. Obviously meat and fat spoil (esp pre refrigeration) , so they cant go too far from coastal areas. However, especially after the civil war, you had railroads delivering kerosene everywhere, gutting the industry. Whaling was only done in areas that werent connected via rail (like Alaska) or native tribes. Basically, the statement about whaling doesnt fit my knowledge, nor basic logical analysis. Im not all knowing, there maybe some factor Im missing, but as you can see, I'm kinda sus that whaling was a thing on anyones from the US's mind in the Pacific. Bird poo or missionaries? Sure! Workers to gather the bird poop? Definitely a +! (as no one wanted do that job for obvious reasons). Outside of that, you had to go close to Asia for anything worthwhile to trade back then. Also the gold to silver isnt too bad (not great, but not disastrous). Back then there was still the opium issues in China (in fact they were ramping up). I believe that silver was the main currency being used to pay for the opium imports, so they needed lots of it. It did hurt Japan when they wanted Western goods, but its not like they were trading for sea shells that were worthless everywhere else. The US actually protested the system at first because they thought it was unfair to them because they would lose on the silver to silver trade in terms of the coinage exchange rate, but then realized they could exploit the gold value after Japan rejected changing exchange rates.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
@@Kyrephare Good points. I don't remember where I learned that whaling was part of their interests. Why else would they want to open Hakodate in addition to Shimoda in the Treaty of Kanagawa? Well, they got more rights four years later with the Treaty of Amity and Commerce anyway.
@Kyrephare
@Kyrephare Год назад
@@kaltaron1284 I went into a bit of a rabbit hole. So there was some whaling in the pacific, the name Starbuck was actually a family name that appeared in Moby Dick, but is also a clan of sailors from the Massachusetts who went whaling in the pacific. They didnt discover the island, but did name Starbuck Island in the middle of the pacific (when they were captaining a British whaling ship, as he was the first Westerner to step on the island). This was of course later claimed by the US under the Guano Act, and mined for Guano. Apparently the British were active in whaling in the Pacific, but not the US (atleast outside of the Baja area). However the US had a giant whaling industry in the North East, so many of their whalers went on British ships into the pacific. The British funding the whaling in the pacific? Why the Dutch East India company! But yeah it makes sense that the British Empire would have more "domestic" use of whale oil for lighting as the were more fragmented territoriality, and I dont know if they had access to oil/kerosene from a domestic source in their empire at the the time.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
@@Kyrephare Interesting information. It's probably worth mentioning that the first treaty with Perry didn't include any trade but only refueling and stuff.
@ahmadniam3568
@ahmadniam3568 Год назад
Isn't London Naval Treaty even more controversial for Japan, I mean WNT limit the capital ship tonnage like battleship and battlecruiser but didn't limit the tonnage for Heavy Cruiser that Japan now called "super mini battleship" Or something
@jannegrey593
@jannegrey593 Год назад
I hope you remember that ships were supposed to be safe in Pearl Harbor. After all it was shallow port. No torpedo could work in such conditions. Also engineers do like a challenge.
@maxleroux
@maxleroux Год назад
I hope you don't forget to include the Internment of Japanese Americans/Canadians in this series. Those camps were one of the worst hate crimes in history!
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
That really depends on your definition of "worst". By mine it won't even make top 10. One of the most pointless ones I'll give you for sure.
@GeorgeEstregan828
@GeorgeEstregan828 Год назад
IJN: Well Hawaii is nearer than California so thanks
@Kuudere-Kun
@Kuudere-Kun Год назад
The Immigration Acts of 1917 and 1924 also played a role in worsening US-Japanese retaliations.
@elmarmamaril3958
@elmarmamaril3958 Год назад
Sir just for info sir you forgot to add the island of Palawan on the photo of the map of the Philippines
@admiralgoody
@admiralgoody Год назад
6:49 So I guess Palawan just doesn't exist in the Philippine map of Extra History? Palawan bros got Atlantis'd
@str2010
@str2010 Год назад
It should be noted that at Versailles, while Japan's racial equality proposal was struck down by the US, the japanese in reality held a "equality for me, not for thee," attitude towards the Koreans and Chinese.
@8-bitsmarck554
@8-bitsmarck554 Год назад
I loved your Extra History Series but I can't stand it anymore that the last 3 minutes are just an ad-read. Be it Nebula or some other company. I was happy to see you making 10+ minutes videos but a whole third or forth of it being ads or sponsors or whatever ruined it for me.
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
They at least try to make the ads entertaining and for something they think is worthwhile. Living on RU-vid ad money seems to be a bit difficult by now. I have to admit that I skip those most of the time though.
@8-bitsmarck554
@8-bitsmarck554 Год назад
@@kaltaron1284 I get that but do they have to take up so much time? Like literally a third or forth?
@kaltaron1284
@kaltaron1284 Год назад
@@8-bitsmarck554 They obviously don't have to but you're also free to skip or not watch the videos.
@colbyjackson6500
@colbyjackson6500 Год назад
Can’t wait to hear the rest of Pearl Harbor’s story
@ピップ-p6r
@ピップ-p6r Год назад
Before the attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States sent weapons to China and sent fighter planes and soldiers to fight the Japanese army. Under international law at the time, this was synonymous with the United States declaring war on Japan. I think that this is also present in the documents in the United States.
@jiyuhong5853
@jiyuhong5853 Год назад
a message was sent to america a day before the attack. the messenger got to pearl 1 day late, the day the attack came
@susakuzero
@susakuzero Год назад
Funny thing is this maybe saved many lives and Ships. If the Declaration arived on time or even worse for the US the IJN Strike Group was delayed for a day the Events could have ended much much worse for the US. Enterprise and Saratoga for example where already on route to Pearl and if they formed with the other Ships a Strike Group and where then amushed it could had ended in a realy disaster for the US.
@jiyuhong5853
@jiyuhong5853 Год назад
@@susakuzero also the us wouldn't be able to call it an pre-emptive strike because the declaration of war had ca,e
@edwardcamp3376
@edwardcamp3376 Год назад
3:48 That map isn't really accurate. Texas historically comprised the lands north and east of the Nueces River and didn't extend into New Mexico (which included much of western Texas including El Paso) or other modern states as Texans or Texas-published textbooks will claim. The Mexican-American War gave the U.S. that land as well, since it was never Texas' to give.
Далее
There Is Something Hiding Inside Earth
11:35
Просмотров 1 млн
Why a German Kamikaze Cried Tears of Joy
14:41
Просмотров 465 тыс.
The Pig War - OverSimplified
38:43
Просмотров 31 млн
What happened to the USS Arizona? (Pearl Harbor)
14:41