I have an LX100 I and when i saw that Panasonic realesed this new camera i was very excited. I was hoping that the problems of the dust, the audio input and the screen were solved, but seem that panasonic want to protect their video cameras line. Like the other people comments, i'm dissappointed, because if they had updated those things, this would be the perfect camera for content creators
I rarely shoot video, but with the exception of more resolution than the first model, not much else has changed. And most importantly, they should have done some engineering to address the dust in the sensor issue that many had in the original model.
Lets see no articulating screen and no Mic input. So not so hot for vlogging but behind the camera shooting could be very fun. An RX100 is in this game too. Plus a few other Sony and Canons maybe. Contrast DFD is not so hot video even before you said it. I love your videos. I have such a great time with your videos. I determined I don't need 4K. Getting more ideal glass for my SL-2 Canon and going with a large Diaphragm Microphone by Shure the SM7B. Along with the Cloudlifter CL-1. Looking at a USB interface too or just use my Tascam DA-40 SD recorder and edit in post. So frustrating to try to beat this camera without blowing too much cash. So I am not! Keep up the great work!
When you watching the video sample part and verifying if youre watching the video at 720p or 144p, and realized that the sample was actually the problem being blurry.
The apeture ring is common in old lens in film days. They tried to recreate this by put apeture ring. And shutter speed. Esposure dials. Anyway. Good video. Sorry im late
You can save $400 by buying the first iteration , LX100, versus LX100 II. The only difference is the sensor resolution (12.8 vs 17 MP) and fps (40 vs 11), everything else appears to be the same (physical controls, lens, evf, and screen).
Some neat features I suppose but no articulating screen? No mike jack? A thousand bucks? DOA lol! Love my $500 G7 with my collection of lenses from my other G's.
Aw man I really wanted to like the lx100 but no mic input was a deal breaker for me. I already own the lx10 and I’m looking to get a primary cam and use lx10 as a B roll cam. But I need that audio input 😓
Lame as, so stupid how most youtubers think 🤔 that people mostly buy these cameras for vlogging. The vast majority of people don't walk around talking into their camera. They buy this to film or photograph things better than their phones. This review is a waste of time for most people.
Aweeee no audio jack!!!! Lame. I guess you could put Zoom on top but, it's almost like going backward rather than forwards, as far as production goes. I will admit that as a photography camera though it is pretty attractive. A sensor that big on a camera that small is pretty sick!
Thanks for the video. Given the price different between the LX100 II and the G7, have you been able to look at the G7 as a close up camera for the b-roll purposes that you liked the LX100 II for?
Hi never knew you were a nosmallcreator too, I saw you in the stream of Cody and Amber, I am thinking of buying a small and cheap vlogging camerawith a screen and hotshoe to clamp an external mic on , it can be an older model, do you have some tips ??
Oh yeah, I don’t really consider myself in any particular group but I try to participate in as many live-streams as I can 😁 If I were to go for a budget vlogging camera I’d probably get a canon sl2. It has the flip screen, an audio in jack, and really great autofocus 👍
The best photographs were taken 50 years ago with mechanical cameras, nowadays everybody is complaining about that f***ing articulating screen, i wish i could slap them every time i hear " wow amazing camera but no articulating screen", i gues they are too lazy to bend and take those crappy flower shots
this off topic question about this video, but i am planning making youtube videos once again and I don't how to stay consistent is there any advice you can give me and i want start making videos on my iphone, but i actually want to use bridge camera that only shoot 720p and holds more memory which one should i use?
If I really want Leica as my first camera, if I get D Lux 7(rebranded LX100 II) instead Leica CL(real Leica made camera), is it feel like I buy a fake Leica instead of real Leica? I’m have quite a bit of skill on photography already just I don’t own a camera yet
I am back and can now see fantastic better wow great report but why oh why do all these cameras have such a small zoom you know an 18 to 120 would be great but an 18 to 200 awesome that way could shoot my aircraft with these teched out cameras ha ha but still another easy to watch report thanks heaps stay safe
No fully articulating screen, no touchscreen, no mic input....this is a photography purist camera. You can make some very nice images however video is secondary and not a major use for this camera. 16 MP M43 is starting to get long in the tooth as well. Lots of good options with current specs available. Before you spend $1000, you have to give this some real thought. Not for me.
YOU must be pretty well of to own so many different gears esp. cameras, even if you sell them off after you have reviewed/evaluated them hence suffering a loss. Does the money from youtube cover the loss I suppose not? Anyway, enjoy your gears.
There are certain mics that will send the audio information through the metal connectors in the hot shoe, but not sure if that camera supports that. For example the Sony ECMXST1M stereo microphone with a multi interface shoe. Also 24fps is King!
image stabilization, autofocus - ouch. Not good. I have heard rumors that the sensor in this gets alot of trash on it fairly quickly (cant confirm) I think there is better ways to spend the bucks. Canon SL2 blows it away...I dont need 4k - at least for what I do...or just grab a G7 or G85
Panasonic LX100 II 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264 Gopro 7 Black 1080p 60fps HEVC ProTune on - 36Mbps (vs 45 in H.264) Video is better on Gopro. No wonder it's a sports camera - lots of movement.
love this camera.. ive always used panasonic,.....but the lx 100 is basically a hoover, the dust it collects on sensor is shocking, ......panasonic basically saying, yep use in dust free enviroments/ or ya photos will have spots/ specks all over them ....haha,.... oh really, so never get it outer the box then,.....cos dust ie pollen etc are in the air, so every time u start up ya camera/ or zoom...it sucks shit onto sensor,........and for over 500 pound to buy, i was expecting better than that....design failure surely
@@TheEverydayDad But clearly not everyone can take criticism. All joking aside, I think that it would be a little more transparent if you didn't claim to "not know what you're doing" to convey a false image for the viewers who really intend on using the cameras you're reviewing to photograph potatoes. Anyways, that's my 2 ¢.
Looks like you didn’t even look at the original LX-100. If you did, you wouldn’t act so surprised at many of the features on this camera, like aspect ratio switch, shutter speed selector, etc. This review is a joke.
