Pipe Dream. As a Muslim Punjabi from India (Village of Bassi Pathana Of Mahadian Village Gram Panchayat of Sirhind now Fathegarh Sahib we coexisted and lived peacefully with Sikhs and Hindus. Our forefathers knew that creation of Pakistan was Wrong and Uncalled for and thus did not migrate. They were absolutely right. Today we are very happy in India leading a very comfortable Life visiting our ancestral village from time to time.
@@gayatrikarandikar1580 RSS as the only responsible .... especially bhramins .......and today too will be ... . RSS only repeate .......write my words....
95 perfent Muslims especially of UP Bihar and Bengal supported partition of India but 80 percent stayed in India after partition. They are themselves to blame for their sorry state. World has changed with new reforms but they are not ready to reform and do not bother to respect laws of land but only Sharia.
Thanks ! Prof. Ishtiaq Ahmed & Vardhan Ji for a unbiased, nice discussion & Interview based on facts & reality. It a curtain raiser for Indians who are told false things by the ruling communal forces RSS/BJP/NDA who themselves were never participated in freedom struggle. These communal forces spreading false myths about Respected Leaders & freedom fighters.
Do hear Mr Ishtiaq talk about how Mr Jinnah fooled the Congress into buying the secular narrative so that Pakistan is not burdened by more Muslims from india. Some things ofcourse are exaggerated by politicians from both sides of the spectrum but it cannot be forgotten how some leaders from congress practiced politics of submission.
Two nations theory was first voiced by Sarvarkar. He was not for partition but wanted it to be Hindu Rashtra thereby relegating Muslims to secondary position. Jinnah was prescient enough to look beyond the then leaders of the country. Today, thanks to open communalism being practiced, Jinnah has been proved right.
two nation theory was given sir sayyad ahamd founder of Aligadh muslimuniversity, later on MUSLIM LEAGUE was made in 1906 , and Bangal partition was done. khilapat movement for turkish khalipha by muslims in india turned to Mopala riots, kerala in 1920..., (sawarkar was in jail from 1909-1923) and overall reaction came by sawarkar in 1923-24. Muslim league accepted leadership of Jinnah because he was ready to fight seperate muslim nation as per majority leaders maulvis and Allama Iqbal. idea of seperate pakistan was 50% reservation from parliment, militray, judiciary, education and govt jobs to muslims..a poupulation of 20% even war with muslim country will be decided by miltary & political muslim leadership! personal laws as per shariya & judiciary will be decided only by muslim leader.. so a comlpetemuslim nation within secular india....... tried even after partition in secular constitution of india, shahbano case is example...how rigid is religious & political leadership. dont blame to sawarkar. common govt of cong & muslim league prior to partition...was very difficult to run, hence Nehru and vallabhbhai patel decided to accept partition as last option. sawarkars idea was totally athestic secular modern india with scientific base keeping away all religious scripts.... all muslims voted to support seperate pakistan to muslim league.... and you are blaming sawarkar. let me know who was responsible for riots in kerala in1920? in pakistan in1946? in naukhali ,bangal..in 1947. ok partition why riots against hindus and sikhs in 1947...... was it started by instruction of sawarkar??? even Maulana Azad was one of leader of khilapat movement, he blamed toNehru &patel for partition but he never spoke about mopala riots against hindus in kerala ....... what happened in 1920 in kerala turned political course of india.... root of todays communal politics is result 1920 kerala mophla riots..by khilapat movement...
" Afsos Ki Hum Doodh Se Bhi Jal Jaatey Hain " We were hoping for a very open relationship between Pakistan and India. It was a divine experience to see Pakistani cricketers play in joint teams in IPL 20 :20 matches. Pakistan and India have so much in common. With due respect to their proud national identities, both countries have the closest historical, cultural, geographic,social, religious and linguistic bonds . Still, we treat each other with so much suspicion . We may place our trusts in very distinct people but we do not have confidence in each other. THIS IS SAD. We are reminded of a famous dialogue from the blockbuster Indian film " Pakeezah" when the bold and fearless Raj Kumar faces the ire of a cautious Hakim Sahib ( Sapru ) for giving shelter to Meena Kumari. Hakim Sahib : Doodh Ka Jala Chhachh Bhi Phook Phook Kar Pita Hai Raj Kumar : AFSOS KI LOG DOODH SE BHI JAL JATEY HAIN
Sir, British government has published in twelve volumes, each and every minute details of meetings, correspondings,press conferences which took place between Gandhi,Nehru,Patel Jinnah, maulana Azad and various viceroys of India. It clearly shows that, the sole liability of Partition rested with all those leaders minus Jinnah. These volumes are officially certified documents of British Government.☝️☝️
@@ThePublicIndia , sir, I once have a detailed discussion with moulana Sajjad nomani of Lucknow, he has studied all of said volumes. He told me the publisher's name but it slipped from my mind. But he has those volumes at his library. I will ask him and let you know.
I normally do not take part in such discussions but Hasan Siddiqui Sahib you need to read the 12 volumes and I have all in my own library. I have used those chapters heavily to demonstrate that it is utter nonsense what your Maulana Sahib told you. I suggest you do your own reading and form your opinion. And please read my book on Jinnah.
@@Billumian47 ok sir. I will read your book. But i will ask maulana over his wrong statement on partition issue. It's my fault, i took him as a learned person. Sorry, to disturb you. Thanks.
@@hasansiddiqui5793 Sahib I am glad you responded in this positive manner. Please do read the book and I am sure the 12 volumes are also available somewhere in India. I heard him too. I think he is based on Maharashtra if I am not mistaken. When I saw him say this in a video I was simply astounded. You need to read the ToP volumes, especially from Vol 7 which deals with the Cabinet Mission Plan onwards. My book is now available anywhere in India. It is a Penguin, India publication.
First, I must congratulate and thank you for bringing up this video blog. Russia may be the reason behind the unfortunate partition, but post World War 2, there was a huge demand to form Israel on the basis of religion and Pakistan was an experiment. I just hypothesise this, I don't have evidence to prove this.
Two nation theory first given by Savarkar in early thirties, that time Jinna was in England,he came back India after several years and made the government with hindu mahasbha in Punjab,
two nation theory was given sir sayyad ahamd founder of Aligadh muslimuniversity, later on MUSLIM LEAGUE was made in 1906 , and Bangal partition was done. khilapat movement for turkish khalipha by muslims in india turned to Mopala riots, kerala in 1920..., (sawarkar was in jail from 1909-1923) and overall reaction came by sawarkar in 1923-24. Muslim league accepted leadership of Jinnah because he was ready to fight seperate muslim nation as per majority leaders maulvis and Allama Iqbal. idea of seperate pakistan was 50% reservation from parliment, militray, judiciary, education and govt jobs to muslims..a poupulation of 20% even war with muslim country will be decided by miltary & political muslim leadership! personal laws as per shariya & judiciary will be decided only by muslim leader.. so a comlpetemuslim nation within secular india....... tried even after partition in secular constitution of india, shahbano case is example...how rigid is religious & political leadership. dont blame to sawarkar. common govt of cong & muslim league prior to partition...was very difficult to run, hence Nehru and vallabhbhai patel decided to accept partition as last option. sawarkars idea was totally athestic secular modern india with scientific base keeping away all religious scripts.... all muslims voted to support seperate pakistan to muslim league.... and you are blaming sawarkar. let me know who was responsible for riots in kerala in1920? in pakistan in1946? in naukhali ,bangal..in 1947. ok partition why riots against hindus and sikhs in 1947...... was it started by instruction of sawarkar??? even Maulana Azad was one of leader of khilapat movement, he blamed toNehru &patel for partition but he never spoke about mopala riots against hindus in kerala ....... what happened in 1920 in kerala turned political course of india.... root of todays politics is 1920 kerala mophla riots..by khilapat movement
Spreading lies about a great educationist and reformist of 18th centuries is showing your hatred ideological mind and your ignorance towards Indian history, go and increases your knowledge,be a good citizen, not just like andh Bhakts, illiterate idiots foolish haters,
@@Jas-jf8kj no dear i have no hate towards sir sayyad ahmad but it is fact . sawarkars thought was just reaction to keral mophala riots and khilapat movement. if you read sawarkars idea of nation he was true secular atheist leader he equally critisized orthodoxy in hinduism and also muslims. even sawarkar proposed 24% reservation for muslims in govt jobs and parliment so that UNITED INDIA must not be divided. he had devoted his life what muslim league , supporters of muslim league and jinnah had done to this country is historical fact. better you read sawarkar and make opinion..even he was critique & against Rss
@@Jas-jf8kj wikipedia- Two-Nation TheoryEdit Sir Syed is considered as the first person to theorize the idea of separate nationhood for Muslims in subcontinent.[54][9] In a speech at Meerut in 1866 he presented on overall scenario of post colonial phase in which he described Muslims and Hindus as two nations.[55] He's regarded as the father of Two-Nation Theory and the pioneer of Muslim nationalism which led to the partition of India.[7][8] Urdu-Hindi controversy is seen as the transformation of Sir Syed's views towards Muslim nationhood which he expressed in his speeches during later days.[54
We ( myself Victoria Miroshnik and Dipak Basu) have analyzed this issue in our book, India as an organization, published by Palgrave-Macmillan. The thesis of Ayesha Jalal was wrong. Jinnah was recruited by the British in 1934 to create a new state where the British Army could stay to protect the Middle East from the Soviet Union and the sea route between the Suez Canal and Australia. NS Sarila, who was the ADC for the last three Vice-Roys of India, wrote that in his book. There are two others who were recruited by the British: Gandhi in 1915 and Ambedkar in 1930. British supported the Muslim League wholeheartedly from the beginning in 1906. In every riot, British police took the position to support the Muslims. That was obvious in August 1946 in Calcutta, then in Noakhali, and Chittagong in East Bengal. Pakistan was created by the British and Jinnah, Gandhi, Ambedkar were the British agents. Gandhi planned Pakistan in 1943. He sent his plan to Jinnah through Rajagopalachari, but Jinnah wanted a corridor through India which Gandhi could not agree with.
Prof Miroshnik, greetings from Anand Vardhan Singh. I am the editor in charge of the channel Thepublic.india. Keen to talk on the subject, will appreciate if you can send your email id on my mail anandvsingh@gmail.com thanks
It was never in doubt and has been made further clear by Prof. Ishtiaq that Pakistan came into existence only on account of demand for it by Mohd. Ali Jinnah and the Muslim League. Had there been no demand for it, how could it have come into existence. It was Jinnah's and Muslim League's Two Nation theory not Congress's. The fact that the then Indian leadership offered him the Prime ministership which Jinnah rejected or never even considered, further proves that he wanted a Pakistan for himself, without Gandhi, Nehru or Patel or the Hindus. Remember his call to the Muslims in July 1946 for a direct action day that is the day of massacre of Hindus, only to prove his two nation theory. Stop beating about the Bush. It is only and only Jinnah and his Muslim League that is responsible for partition of India and for creation of Pakistan and sadly also for the merciless killing of nearly 20 lakh people of Undivided India.
देश को बांटने के लिए केवल और केवल, सावरकर की टीम ज़िम्मेदार है जब इन्होंने हिन्दू महा सभा बनाई इससे मुसलमान चिंतित हो गए तथा उनमें ये अवधारणा घर कर गई कि उनके पूर्वजों ने काफी अत्याचार हिन्दुओं पर किया है अतः अगर ये हिन्दू राष्ट्र बन जाएगा तो मुसलमानों को दोयम दर्जे का नागरिक बन कर रहना पड़ेगा तथा अत्याचार सहना पड़ेगा। इसलिए मुस्लिम नेता लोग इस बात पर सोचने को मजबूर हुए कि अब उन्हें भी अलग देश की बात पर गौर करना चाहिए। जिन्ना के दादा पूंजा भाई हिन्दू थे लेकिन सिन्धियों ने इतना बिजनेस में तंग किया कि वों मुसलमान हो गए। उसके बाद अपने बच्चे नाती पोतों की पर वारिस अंग्रेजी वातावरण में किए। जिन्ना भी अंग्रेजी वातावरण में पले बढ़े थे वे कट्टर मुस्लिम नहीं थे लेकिन एक बुद्धिमान बैरिस्टर होने के कारण उन्हें नेता बना दिया गया। सावरकर के ग्रुप द्वारा बार बार हिन्दू राष्ट्र का संकेत देने के कारण डा.किचलू ने 1925 में लाहौर में कांग्रेस के खुले राष्ट्रीय अधिवेशन में कह दिया था कि अगर हिन्दू भाई हमारे तंजीम आंदोलन में रुकावट डाली तो हम किसी मुस्लिम मुल्क से मिलकर अलग राष्ट्र बना लेंगे।इसके बाद भी हिन्दू राष्ट्र बनाने वाले चुप नहीं हुए। इसका दुष्परिणाम ये हुआ कि धीरे 2 दोनों ग्रुप अलग महशुश करने लगे जबकि एक तबका दोनों में ऐसा था जो एक राष्ट्र की बात करता था लेकिन 1940आते आते अब खुल के दो देश की बात होने लगी हालांकि गांधी आदि बंटवारे के पक्ष में नहीं दिखाई दे रहे थे। इन सब बातों को देखते हुए ये बात बिल्कुल साफ है कि हिन्दू राष्ट्र बनाने के चक्कर में कट्टर पंथी हिन्दुओं ने आरएसएस की सह पर देश का बंटवारा करवा दिया। लेकिन खलनायक जिन्ना को बना दिया।
two nation theory was given sir sayyad ahamd founder of Aligadh muslimuniversity, later on MUSLIM LEAGUE was made in 1906 , and Bangal partition was done. khilapat movement for turkish khalipha by muslims in india turned to Mopala riots, kerala in 1920..., (sawarkar was in jail from 1909-1923) and overall reaction came by sawarkar in 1923-24. Muslim league accepted leadership of Jinnah because he was ready to fight seperate muslim nation as per majority leaders maulvis and Allama Iqbal. idea of seperate pakistan was 50% reservation from parliment, militray, judiciary, education and govt jobs to muslims..a poupulation of 20% even war with muslim country will be decided by miltary & political muslim leadership! personal laws as per shariya & judiciary will be decided only by muslim leader.. so a comlpetemuslim nation within secular india....... tried even after partition in secular constitution of india, shahbano case is example...how rigid is religious & political leadership. dont blame to sawarkar. common govt of cong & muslim league prior to partition...was very difficult to run, hence Nehru and vallabhbhai patel decided to accept partition as last option. sawarkars idea was totally athestic secular modern india with scientific base keeping away all religious scripts.... all muslims voted to support seperate pakistan to muslim league.... and you are blaming sawarkar. let me know who was responsible for riots in kerala in1920? in pakistan in1946? in naukhali ,bangal..in 1947. ok partition why riots against hindus and sikhs in 1947...... was it started by instruction of sawarkar??? even Maulana Azad was one of leader of khilapat movement, he blamed toNehru &patel for partition but he never spoke about mopala riots against hindus in kerala ....... what happened in 1920 in kerala turned political course of india.... root of todays politics is 1920 kerala mophla riots..by khilapat movement
India partition ke zimmedar sirf british ruler hi they .unko kon majboor kar sakta thaa partition ke liye.agar british rular undivided india ko aazad karkey chaley jaatey to nehru gandhi ya jinnah kya bigaar letey.
You forgot direct action day? 5000 Hindus were slaughtered in a factory to kick start violence, on call by Jinnah which Suhrawardy implemented. Once violence spiraled, partition happenned.
یہ تبصرہ انٹرویو دینے والے یا لینے والے کے خلاف نہیں ہے۔ یہ محض ایک مشورہ ہے۔ براہ کرم نئے چہرے لائیں تاکہ لوگ نئی معلومات سیکھ سکیں۔ مختلف چینلز پر ایک ہی لوگوں کے نمودار ہونے سے کوئی نئی چیز سامنے نہیں آتی۔ پاکستان اور ہندوستان کی تاریخ کے حوالے سے ، بہت سارے آزادی پسند جنگجو موجود ہیں جنھوں نے آزادی میں اپنا کردار ادا کیا اس پر بات کی جانی چاہئے۔ ایسے رہنماؤں پر گفتگو آپ کے سامعین میں مزید دلچسپی پیدا کرے گی۔ ورنہ انٹرویو کافی بورنگ ہوجاتا ہے۔
HERE IS A DREAM. India, China and Pakistan open trade/combine nuclear capabilities and resources and become the next super power. universal health care, open borders. First objective is to bring the poverty sectors close to middle class in all 3 countries.
Why was India 's Independence Preponed from 1948 to1947Let us pay Homage to Lakhs of innocent Victims of Partition ( on both sides ) - People who were devastated for no fault of theirs ------------------. INDEPENDENCE WAS PREPONED FROM 1948 to 1947. WHY ?An enquiry should be instituted as to why the process of India's Independence and Partition ( Creation of Pakistan ) done in a TEARING HURRY .Who were the Politicians crazy for grabbing Power at all costs ?Why no Security ( like UNO Troops ) provided to millions of helpless Refugees / Migrants who were slaughtered on an unprecedented scale.15 th August be observed as a Holocaust Day .Memorials be put up remembering all those who perished .---------------- .WHY INDIA 's INDEPENDENCE PREPONED FROM JUNE 1948 to AUGUST 1947 WITH DISASTROUS CONSEQUENCES" Why, then, on his ( Mountbatten 's ) return from London a fortnight later, did he then suddenly declare that the Partition of India would take place with inexplicable haste on August 15, 1947, almost a year ahead of schedule?
Singh sahib aap na main sawal pusha he nahi jinah chahta to tha ki wah Pakistan ka sab sa bara leader bana kaya jinah ko pata tha ki usa itne buree tv hui ha ki wah 6 mahina ka mahman ha
@Ali Mubarak Gentleman I have no idea about your credentials but keep in mind in politics that very common to instill or induct one's near dear. ZA Bhutto introduced his daughter Benazir Bhutto. And what Hussain Wajid is doing in Bangladesh and the same is the History of Sri Lank and Mynamar. Canadian PM is the son of a late Canadian PM. In America after Bush senior, Bush Junior came in power. What Nawaz Sharif is doing? projecting her own daughter. That's very common in the Sub-continent politics. After Quaid-e-Azam, his sister Fatima Jinnah appeared on Pakistan's political scene. What Clinton's wife was doing in American politics. After President Kennedy's assassination, his brother Robert F. Kennedy was a candidate for American Presidentship but he too was assassinated by the CIA.
@Ali Mubarak Simple: democracy started in Canada and the US long before India. The countries that I referred are swiftly marching towards true democracy. In true democracy, parties are stronger than personalities or families.
@Ali Mubarak In established democracies, parties are important than personalities. Abe resigned in Japan, the new PM assumed the office. Boris Johnson replaced Thersa May, same party again with the change of PM continued its functions with slight changes.
Good Informative Video. The Creation of Pakistan and Partition of India was a Unmitigated Disaster Masterminded by the West in Connivance with Whisky loving and Pork Eating Jinnah-A Khoja. The Creation of Pakistan devastated Punjabis of ALL Hues, Muslims Sikhs and Hindus who were all uprooted from their respective Homes, where they were coexisting and living peacefully for Centuries, and subjected to untold cruelties, abductions, depredations massacres and terrible crimes. The Punjab lead by the Secular Unionist Party of Sir Sikandar Khan (Khattar Jat Punjabi) comprised Muslims, Hindus and Muslims (Sir Chotu Ram was also a Cabinet Minister) Was Totally Opposed to the Diastrous and Lunatic Concept of Pakistan but ultimately, due to the communal tactics, strategies and Modus Operandi of Jinnah and the Muslim League was defeated leading to tragic and cataclysmic consequences culminating in the vivisection of India which also impacted the Muslims in India who were compelled to suffer collateral damages and consequences thereof.🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Hindu core log tab bhi they jinhaha bhi they.. mere maa baap ne khud aankho se dekha hai pakistan mein Hindu roj jaloos nikalte they . Gandhi bahut dukhi they
The problem on both sides is brainwashed masses with National Curriculum and Media. It's ok to follow your religion but if you are true follower of God then you need to accept the facts as well. We are humans not angels. Respect each other.
Jab batwara hua tha to pure Muslim Pakistan kyo Nahi gaye aur Pakistan se India kyo nahi aaye us samy jawaher LAL nehru ne sabse badi galti yahi kiya jabki patel yahi chahte the
Jinah jo muslim kom ka naam per Pakistan mang raha tha khud paka muslim nahi tha kabhi nabaz parna masjid nahi gaya tha Pakistan ko jo number 2 leayakat alli jo pahla Pakistan ka prime minister bana wah be paka muslim nahi tha jah baat janta ko jani aam admi ko samjni hogee ki wah chaha hindu leaders ho muslim ho ja koi or darm ka ho un ka darm sa kush lena dena nahi hota wah to bus power ka bhukha hota ha darm ko to bus use karta ha power hasil karna ka liya per is ka harjana aam janta ko dena parta ha jo bara bara log tha jin ka uthna bathna tha bara logo sa unho na to pahla he apni jaydada transfer kar Lee the ak dusra ka sath 8 ak be koi muslim ja hindu leader nahi mara gaya india Pakistan banna ka time aam janta 1 crore sa jada Marie gayee jah be abgrajo ki chaal the ku ki agar batwara bina danga kiya payar sa ho jata to india Pakistan ki dushmine na partee to angrajo ko Pakistan banna ka koi fayda na hota ab socho aam janta 1947 sa la kar 2020 taq 73 years ma na tab koi leaders mara gaya dango ma or na koi ab mara jata ha hajaro danga is baat ka gawah ha per janta fir be nahi samjtee
India Pakistan parttition Hindu Mahasabha ( aaj ki RSS) aur muslim league ( Pakistan ki jinha party) dono ki milibhagat se hua , jia ka faeyda british government ne oothaeya .
