There's an infinite number of "senses" in which something can be off. I think anyone's philosophical view would be off in some way to anyone else's because no one can have the same point of view though many pretend. I think Mr. Anderson puts forth the view that God is masculine as the Father and the subconscious mind of the Universe which I think many view the subconscious mind to be the feminine as represented by Eve with Adam being the conscious mind of each individual. He also seems to support the belief I believe is the Biblical view which is we are here to overcome the world, to save it rather than condemn it. Which is contrary to many who might be said to follow Eastern philosophy as believing we can't overcome the world but can only be liberated by renouncing our desires because they will always lead us into temptation as abandoning the golden rule viewing our individual apparent self as being more important than others and this inevitably leads to a cycle of suffering because as we do unto others we do unto our self because there are no others in actuality. I think we can agree that philosophy is inevitably confusing even without the barrier of needed to have an extremely precise agreement on the meaning of words just to put forth our own opinion of philosophy and so all opinions will unavoidably be off in some way compared to our individual philosophy which I believe everyone's appear to be ever changing. My current philosophy is that there are many philosophies which might be true but no one can prove entirely even to themselves when trying to explain exactly how the Universe works like is it many worlds, what's liberation mean, what would a new Earth and heaven be like. 🙏
Is the person talking actually the writer of this information? Or is he translating something from someone else's. Either way it's profound and the speaker has a vibration in his voice which connects directly so even if not his words he is still a worthy translator. I am curious only