Paul McCartney Reflects On His Feud With Michael Jackson Over The Beatles Catalog | the detail. 

The fact this dead child molester owns catalog is insulting

He is fake Paul McCartney allegedly. How is that integrity

@@PhonyPhoniPhone He’s no fake. How ignorant to think he isn’t the real Paul McCartney, and I suppose the other guy writing and singing the song is Not the real Michael Jackson! Lol😂 Like Paul McCartney always had a twin same age, same Left handed playing bass, along with Paul’s Father (and close relatives) still alive after 1966 not recognizing his own son and memories with him..Not to mention a fake Paul being Super talented with much more hits after 1966. That’s Crazy!! to think the fake Paul crap.

@@PhonyPhoniPhone Are there people who still believe that nonsensss like wtf

@@akayumi_gaby it wasn’t nonsense when they were putting subliminal messages in their album artwork. Tell Paul to blame himself and his band mates for stoking the suspicions

He missed the 20s and 30s. And Tin Pan Alley was a MASSIVE influence on his writing.

Somebody took jazz history at community college @@catfishcooler1566

Nope only 20 years, MJ more then 40 years that hurt Miss Paula to. MJ whas way better then the high in his head Paula. MJ stays hiss hole live humble. Miss Paula was never humble. The was one Beatle how was humble and much better then Paula, John Lennon is still great, sad that the shut the wrong men. I miss him nice and humble guy. And write more good and better songs then Paula. Greetings.

@@ecufile4095 who is paula

​@@katojkr7031Exactly!

If only Lennon had a shred of that integrity

The asshole never made 1 offer to get anything. Then talks shit to Michael for stepping up

I think this was Michael’s twisted way of manipulating Paul and saying “I’m better than you Paul”. He wouldn’t budge or even talk with Paul one on one. Michael was made it something personal.

@@Soundofsilver2007 Bullshit . If he wanted it pay Michael a fair price . Paul want Michael to just give it to him . Is he fucking crazy

A real jealous human being. What was Michael supposed to do hold Paul's hand ? The master taught the student ENOUGH TO DO WITHOUT HIM ! read the 48 laws.

He could have bought them and gave half to Yoko or split the residuals with her.

@@bobma6342 Yeah, that's why OP mentioned he is great because he didn't by want to make money off from John Lennon's song.

@@hangten1904 I would have rather seen him buy them and split them with Yoko Ono than to have M.J. get them. The Lennon songs she gets 100% of.

Buy first, figure out how to tidy it up afterwards. Yet another example of how altruism paralyzes the mind because it's not reality-based. It's a Santa Claus morality and it's not possible to be logical with it because it isn't real. What's 2 plus 2? In Santa-world it can be 10 because he's got elves and flying reindeer.

​@@bobma6342I doubt it was that easy, he has lawyers you know, somebody probably explained him all technicalities

I'd be honored if some Beatles fans would take a quick listen to my acoustic piano & vocal performances of BLACKBIRD and PENNY LANE on my YT channel in tribute to 2 of the many genius compositions written by Sir Paul McCartney. Live acoustic with no autotune or digital editing. Peace and stay safe in the '020s.

I think he had done that voice many times out loud as well as inside.

I didn't catch any sarcasm either. Seems to have hurt him though. I'd feel a little used and betrayed but as an adult and a Sir. with class, you put things in their place and move on. I respect that.

I noticed that as well.....in one part its hard to tell who is singing. Paul has a little more cream to his vocals.

@jimi hendrix Paul was so flattered when Jimi played some Sgt. Peppers, literally just a few days after its release at his show. Too bad Clapton didn’t tune his guitar for him-obviously a joke, but some thought it was real.

That's how you know it's the truth

@@lisac4215 That is exactly what I was thinking.

@@lisac4215 indeed! It's always easier to remember the truth.

He's been in the spot light for a while now😁

That’s because he died in the 70s and has been replace by a robot. Robots are nothing but consistent.

^This

What a slap in the face to have to buy your own music! I'm surprised nobody's saying that! Can you imagine writing all this stuff and somebody just buying it out from under you?

Right. He is angry and jealous of Michael.

​@@sugarfalls1that's how the music business works. Say that to Jimmy Iovine and Les moonves and Geffen !

Totally relatable personality type.

That's not what anger is. Anger is ANGER. Disagreeing with someone and keeping it light IS NOT FUCKING ANGER.

That's what happened with Fleetwood Mac's 'Rumours'. There are people who hate it for that exact reason, despite it being one of the best albums ever...

I think it cheapens the music.

He would have done the same thing.

@@pigpink1971I agree. Using a beautiful work of art to sell Coca Cola just feels wrong.

I don't know I have discovered many great songs through Commercials . Also a lot of TV shows used to play some really great songs I'd never heard of at the end of the episode to match the tone of the episode or what a character was experiencing . The song at the end of the final episode of breaking bad is one perfect example or that song at the end of the sopranos

@James Walker even though Paul gave Michael his blessing to buy the catalog.

@@zorafilms No he did not

@@GeeBee909 Paul Was given many chances to buy the keep the catalog so micheal ended up buying it

@@Minceontoast2 Nope, sorry (many chances?). Do your research. I know it "hurts" many of you MJ fans, but MJ was wrong to buy the catalog. He KNEW, "HIS FRIEND" Paul wanted to buy HIS OWN SONGS BACK (after he was cheated out them). Interesting you say "the catalog" like Paul had nothing to do with creating it. However, THERE WOULD BE NO CATALOG IF PAUL HAD NOT CREATED IT. These are NOT "just songs". These are song HE WROTE, HE CREATED. He had every right to want them back, they came from HIS MIND. MJ was selfish in his actions here BECAUSE he knew Paul wanted to buy HIS OWN songs back. BE HONEST, if it were the other way around you would be on Paul's case, saying he should let MJ buy his songs HIMSELF, songs HE CREATED, others would mostly like accuse Paul of racism. IF you seek the truth, Get the FULL STORY first, not some made up nonsense "somebody" posted on the internet

@@GeeBee909 yeah id’ve been pissed too

CIA killed Lennon - 2 gunmen -(Jose Perdomo (CIA) was the security guard.

But he's gone commercial at times.

@@mogadon7 Lay off the drugs. Not true at all.

Easy to say when you are a billionaire!

except when you do it with buddy holly's songs huh paul?

True. ❤️

The funny thing is the song was mocking the idea of 1960s radicals. And Lennon later apologized for it because he became sympathetic to the radicals, who hated the song.

@@robertwilliams9288 Yes it is and I'm sorry to hear about that.

@@robertwilliams9288 i thought you were my dad for a sec... my dads name is same as yours

Revolution was a crap song though.

@@simonamillen3298 it wasn't really and it's quite sad how you liked your own comment.

I'm not above saying, MJ was scum for what he did.

“Don’t waste your time... Because, the doggone songs are MINE”

Imagine him buying every single song except for Revolution 9 and Wild Honey Pie.

I agree. This was the same with Prince . Its why he changed his name for awhile to the symbol. Its why he fought for artist rights and started Paisley Park records and eventuallly got his masters back before he died.

I can hear this😂😂😂

😂😂😂 Fantastic comment! Though I guess his taste in songs > his taste in gold-plated tat.

Man of a thousand voices, it's how Billy got the gig

Some friend Paul was . He just mad he can’t sing for shit . We love you yeah yeah yeah . What the fuck is that

Licensing your music to shows/commercials/movies is one of the few ways you can make a living these days as an artist. Used to be all record sales, but now streaming makes it practically free for people. Would have loved to put out music before the internet when you could afford to not do that 😔

Artists today don't have record sales any more. The industry is not as lucrative as it once was. It's why they sell image more than a thing, now.

@@mindeloman yeah I get it , Justin Bieber just sold all his music for 30 million or something close to that, it’s tempting !!

@@alecshaw4274 Yeah, it's also the only way for independent artist to get their stuff in front of a large number of people, who wouldn't normally think to seek them out, these days, too.

why tho

I'm laughing so hard

Mine, mine. The rights are mine. Dont waste your time. The doggone rights are mine.

@@kevc21 mine, mine The catalogue is mine Don't waste your time The doggone catalogue is mine

After receiving the tips of the older friend about how to conquer the girl. He turns to his friend and says: I'm going to get your girl! LOL😂

those are fightin words

Right 👍

The truth doesn’t change.

Who is he sticking up for?

@@DPPLOWD Is this the only time you have ever heard Paul talk? I am a big John Lennon fan and it is clear to me that he thinks of John as a best friend/brother.

He is a class act. He's not sounding petty or vindictive. Telling it like it was, though.

Snake 🐍

@Janice Ross Drag act

He is rich..lol

Bullshit! I disagree. Commercialize songs r expose them 2 future generations.

too true

Paul:"The girl is mine" Michael:" The copyright are mine"...hahaha

"A working class hero is something to be."--John Lennon

Plenty of musicians back then got screwed over in similar ways. It was really the first time massive money was coming in for pop/rock stars on a world stage. Everyone was naive

John was middle class, but that didn’t help in the shark infested waters of music publishing

Mccartney was middleclass

@@KatieCannotFly McCartney and Harrison were working class. They came from poor families and grew up on council estates. Lennon was middle class - and he used to get annoyed when people assumed he grew up poor. His family were quite affluent, they lived in an expensive neighborhood, they owned their own home, and they went on foreign holidays etc. And his Aunt Mimi actually didn't like him hanging around with the working class McCartney - who was quite rough back in the 1950s

A tad easier when you're already rich as shit.

Or maybe hes done enough acid and prayed enough in times of trouble to know money doesnt matter enough to divide or start a feud

@@TheArmchairPriest he's involved in legal actions to acquire rights and again that zen horseshit is easy to say from a mansion and divide what? he and jackson weren't fishing-buddies. And this is more about keeping control of his creations more than the money and the inherent right for the creator to make money off of the art before some outside profiteer

@@shaunpearson7905 untrue considering paul didnt want to profit off the songs, that was his initial argument with jackson. The songs are art and should never be used for advertisements or for personal gain. Its for rock and roll. Idk about any mansion or zen shit youre talking about but what I said was right regardless of your argument. Hes done enough acid and prayer to know theres more to life especially in art

I thought there was a bit of sour grapes here on Paul’s part! He sounds quite understandably cheesed off but the truth is that he missed several opportunities to secure the rights, the last time being when he and Ono undervalued them significantly. You can’t blame it on MJ, he wasn’t the richest person around by any means.

Maybe thought himself a bit too smart? Martin Bashir did a fantastic piece with MJ in 2002-2003. Exposed.

@@AlexCasonPhotography exposed what?.. the FBI was investigating him years, never find any evidence. He was not guilty, period.

@@AlexCasonPhotography Oh that horrid doc that he tricked MJ with? Fuck Bashir

And a scammer aparantly...I look at Micheal different after seeing this...he scammed the Beatles

Too bad mi sucks at playing instruments. Half the songs were given to him he only had 5 good hits

Preach

The nerve of Mcartney to complain and be butt hurt, when he once owned Tooty Fruity.

MJ gave McCartney jack shit. Where did you get that from? McCartney sued a couple of years ago, around 2016/2017 I think, to recover his half share of the Lennon/McCartney catalog, as US copyright laws allow the artist/writer to reclaim the rights on anything published before 1978 - ie the whole Beatles catalog. So McCartney now owns half of the catalog, but MJ didn't give this to him. McCartney has a net worth of over £1.2 billion (most of which he had before re-acquiring his share of the Beatles rights), making him the most successful musician of all time (and that includes MJ), so thankfully he didn't need any gifts from MJ to enable him to live comfortably for the rest of his life.

@@davidjames3080 he said little Richard not Paul. He said MJ gave Little Richard back his catalog that Paul owned at first.

@@kendallroberts5337 well, he didn't really make that clear. But let's not pretend mj did that out of the goodness of his own heart. Little Richard would have been entitled to get back his artist rights in the same way as McCartney did, due to the age of the catalog, and mj and his advisors would have known that.

Why is McCartney complaining about it? Why didn't he buy his own songs?... None of this would have happened, had he bought the BEATLES Catalogue. Jackson just saw the opportunity and grabbed it!... and on top of that, he warned him, "I'm gonna get your songs"...

No Kanda, he doesn't like Michael, he thinks Michael was a shit, but he's being polite.

He wouldn't want to speak ill of the dead.

What has MJ done wrong exactly ? making good business desicions, to build his portfolio Reminder MJ was Faux Pauls junior ...

@@raulcitraro Not Pauls Songs, John Lennons. What Genius do Pauls group Wings create hmm ? ..

Thank you! ✨

I’m gonna buy your songs!

🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@masswellwiley6688 Now look Michael, we're not gonna fight about this

@@johnlebonte3176 good one 😂 She’s mine no no no she’s mine

Ie took me out 😂😂😂 Well Everyone who does MJ impressions dissing him makes me chuckle 😆 MJ's voice so cute 🥰

I believe that’s what he said. Thanks for typing it out

@@SmithMrCorona I TOO was so unclear on that... thank God we had stenographer....👍🤣

Have you not heard of the migos my good sir ?

Damn you fine

That's the deal they signed.

If you can sell them they can be bought.

@@G11713 he said, they didn't know that, even I thought, and most people did,and do. I thought you just own your music for life

@@stevejobs7989 He must have owned the rights and then sold them unwittingly. There's a thing called due diligence.

McCartney has actually told three versions of that story. (In all the main story is the same, but a couple of details have changed three times)

@@a.j.f.a.7485 I mean for one, I really doubt he is the reason looked into publishing, especially that he made videos because of him.

@@a.j.f.a.7485 Can you tell more about the differences?

Yes very well done! I agree.

Paul is a great PR man. He knows about the importance of a consistent story.

he said to get into music publishing. he didn't say buy my music behind my back while i am away in india so i cannot stop it...

@@boneless8404 whether in India or not still a back stabbing deal. Irrelevant

At this point in his life, 80 yrs old I believe, Sir Paul will probably live long enough to have his masters rightfully returned back to him after 50 yrs.

@@zarni000 How was it behind his back if he told him he was gonna do it and then told him again a week later as Paul stated?

@@iThinkNot. he obviously interpreted is as a joke. Jackson saw this and did nothing. But of course being the mercantile weasel Jackson us it suited his purposes

Slowly blown up? He was a beatle lmfao.

@@gothxm As an Individual artist .

get ready to sell your soul for fame. Good luck

😂

YEESSSSS 😂👏🏼👏🏼

That would be a hit

♩😂😂😂❤🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻❤✌🌍

👏👏👏❤

@@Mason-sg9zf [edit: apologies for the long response, i don’t know how to be brief lol] yes, but the truth is that having your music in too many ads can “devalue” it, as paul said. an example that comes to mind is the black keys; i remember hearing their songs in so many commercials as a kid, before i even knew who they were. by the time they became mainstream, i’m sure a lot of their back catalog had lost a substantial amount of its value (which they did make up for through multiple albums and relentless touring in the early-mid 2010s). you’re right in that there’s nothing inherently wrong with “selling out”, but artists don’t just care about profits… they also care about their music’s artistic integrity, and in many of those cases it’s understandable when they turn such offers down.

@@Mason-sg9zf Some people aren't scrounging down the back of the sofa for chump change either.

Should have bought them then.

@@Mason-sg9zf how you relate anti greed and monopolisation to being weak is supporting the belief that having more means being more. An error of profound implications.

I am sure that Yoko Ono has an opinion on this, no one knows the truth

Polite but deadly

They may throw very hot tea to your face if angry at 5 o'clock.

You’ve never been to England if you think we’re ‘Polite’ when angry

@@MrRattlebones640 Indeed, go to a Kebab shop in Blackpool at 3am in the morning. They'll see. [Obviously not while Covids on though]

The british are nothing like this lol

Sir Paul👍

Personally feel he's the worlds' greatest all round musician EVER.

"We were all about resisting the system" Sir Paul McCartney OBE

@@Kelly14UK he is the best

@@AndreSetyon ZERO disagreements.

@@kathleenmaclachlan1541 RIGHT! He's a King, The King of Music. Legend is far too demure for him.

The Beatles were certainly not over rated. They wrote their lyrics and played their own instruments. Not like artist today, sampling all the hits they never wrote.

And people dont understand this fact that music is a huge business. He owned many catalogs aka music songs and albums aka the music rights. It warms my heart he gave back those masters for free. He owned so many catalogs that Sony became Sony ATV. And they wanted him to sell it. And Michael wouldn't. That is a very good reason to lie on someone throughout their career and attack them in the media wouldn't you say? And guess what Sony/ATV got their catalogs after he passed. But Michael Jackson and his family to this day still own Michael's catelog aka music right aka rights to his songs and Heal LA is still a huge thing through his son today If my memory serves me he bought the rights around 1985. In 1982 he song beat it. Which only the light of this information I think the song can point to him thinking about buying those rights and what it would mean.

Wonder if Mike felt some kinda way cuz he knew the Beatles were heavily ripping from Muddy and Chuck Berry and others from that late 40s, early 50s era. I feel like he knew it and felt no reservations about grabbing that catalogue when the opportunity arose. He told him ‘it’s just business’ as a way to keep the heat on himself instead of letting Paul know they had no love and respect from a lot of legends in the community. Saved Paul from that conversation too cause the Beatles had no concrete answers for explaining their own profit off others ‘originality’.

@@joemjr6394 God, this jealousy you guys have of white people is so pathetic.

True

Great point and bang on.

Truth!

"It's just business" is a lousy excuse for being a shitty human being.

@@jayeff2 Why is McCartney complaining about it? Why didn't he buy his own songs?... None of this would have happened, had he bought the BEATLES Catalogue. Jackson just saw the opportunity and grabbed it!... and on top of that, he told him, "I'm gonna get your songs"...

@@raulcitraro RANDY JUDAH TALK 🎼❤️

Well Put

Michael Loved Spider-Man.

yep ... including Elton ....

Dave Chappelle just put out a video about this same topic...

So many music acts of the 50s and 60s, especially girl groups and female singers, got completely screwed by their management/record companies

The same Dick James who sung "Robin Hood" in the 1950's series on TV.

@@tectorama And *The Buccaneers* both of which are *ITV* shows, which like most older *ITV* dramas and comedies, have been forgotten by the people in charge of the network, and will no doubt never be shown again on any of *ITV's* channels, even though they'd be perfect for *ITV4.*

..... and he is so outgoing and un-jaded that he's happy to share them. A natural born communicator.

I wish. I just wish I could see him one time and talk about life.

Sorry what did you say I’m too busy listening to Paul

interesting my ass....

Assuming his stories were closed captioned, you must mean.

Thank you!

@@thedetail. you’re welcome brother. Pleasure to watch, really well made video

Jackson was a Virgo too, which is really strange -- I know all you Virgos out there know what I'm talking about.

@@Pimp-Master maybe because it doesn't mean shit huh

@@Pimp-Master word!!! Double Virgo here!

@@Pimp-Master I kinda don't get it CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN

😂😂Right

Lennon used to say 'Let's write a swimming pool.' or a song that paid enough royalties to build a pool. Money is the main driver with most bands, forget all the 'we're in it for the art, we don't make any money' spiel they come out with.

WAY TO GO, Sir Paul!! What integrity! What grace!

@TheManMan Grace in how he handled MJ’s disloyal “snake move.” In other words, McCartney just wreaks of class. He doesn’t seem consumed with vindictive rage. Man, I would’ve been ‘off the chain’ in calling out MJ as a Judas. McCartney took the high road, and in so doing he demonstrated total class and grace.

@TheManMan You’re 100% correct. He said that exactly. I think Sir Paul didn’t take him seriously enough, or thought he was just kidding ... The one aspect where I think McCartney bears some blame is in not just buying the music himself. I know he briefly addresses that in this segment. And so he (McCartney) had to know that if he didn’t buy the publishing rights to the Lennon-McCartney Catalogue, SOMEONE eventually would, whether it be MJ or someone else. So that aspect of things is the only head-scratcher for me, where Paul seems perhaps a tad disingenuous. Maybe I’m missing something. Lol

@TheManMan And I’ve heard often times (who knows if it’s true) that McCartney has a reputation for being a tightwad, which is crazy because the guy is worth like a gazillion dollars. He’s so rich, that he was the richest person in the UK. Heather Mills divorced him and took almost half of all he had. And he was STILL the richest person in England 😂 But anyway, my point being that his being a tightwad is probably why he didn’t buy back his music, and it came back to bite him .

he be dead

Yoko's only real achievement in life was her ability to land a wealthy and famous husband.

@@pandapeep1148 Ridiculous statement. Not only she was an accomplished artist prior to meeting Lennon, but she also was responsible for some of the most forward-thinking music Lennon recorded. Her Plastic Ono Band record is a work of genius.

@@MrFreedomGotAnAK She also got John Lennon hooked on heroin.

Yogi knew what she was doing and John needed her.

@@MrFreedomGotAnAK Accomplished artist... yea, and this is the kind of art she did: watch?v=HdZ9weP5i68

@James Paul McCartney Bruh what

@@SmexyRexy hmm could it be Sir James Paul McCartney? Musician and generally good guy?

@James Paul McCartney I'm listening to your music since my high school years. I'm 33 now. And still the same feelings I felt every single time I'm listening to it. Thank you kindly for all your songs, for all this beautiful feelings that it giving. Wish your heart be full of love and peace forever. Evgenij.

Hi Janice 👋 I hope my comment didn't sound as a form of privacy invasion your comment tells of a wonderful woman with a beautiful heart which led me to comment I don't normally write in the comment section but I think you deserve this complement. If you don’t mind can we be friends? Thanks God bless you….

Just the opposite of M.Jackson. He betrayed Paul's friendship

No...Micheal scammed him

Michael didn't scam him. Paul had an opportunity to buy the catalog and didn't. Paul screwed up twice. The first time when they lost the catalog rights and the second time when he didn't buy it back. That's on him and no one else.

@@boardwalkbw7130 how? Paul was showing off to this young black man and didn’t think Michael was actually listening. You think Michael didn’t know how many artists the Beatles basically stole from and never gave them credit? Mike gave back to Sly and the Stone Family, Lil Richard and several other artists that were truly gipped by these record labels for decades. Someone on another video said it best, as soon a black man makes a move it’s about friendship, honor, betrayal, but when a white man makes moves it’s just business. Mike said he was going to do it and he did. He needs to get over it. The man is dead now and all you older people spent years tormenting him.

@@48mavemiss2 no need to make it about race and who did the Beatles steal from? A cover isn't stealing, just because little Richard inspired them doesn't mean they are stealing, they wrote all their songs after Help!. Its dumb to say that they are stealing in the same sense of Elvis who would get writing credits on covers .

@@48mavemiss2 baseless accusations lol

💯

Been telling a story since he "became" Paul

When it’s true it doesn’t need memorization.

@@amywood7082 So, ......Birth then?

@@stephenross8463 stay asleep. IDGAF

Your girl? LOL!

Or your 10 year old son.

@@v-town1980 can you be more ignorant than that ?

m@@SWog617 well. Lisa Marie Presley was married, when MJ met her. In 3 months she filed for divorce and moved into MJ's. Gotta love bitter Beatles fans...

😁facts👌

Thank you!

Thank you!

@@nforne pahhahahaha thats a quality reply

@@nforne Exactly, which is not the case for Michael because there is documented envidence that he paid for the Beatles catalog.

If Paul advised MJ to get into publishing, that means he already owned the publishing of other artists.

@@meatymatmart McCartney got mad at MJ cause he had the money to purchase something he either didn't have the money to purchase, or he procrastinated thinking about it. Or MJ just started thinking like a publisher, instead of an artist owning his own work.

@@c1979h mccartney did have more than enough to buy it at 20 million and not think twice, which he should have done, but hes a bad businessman and always has been, its part of being a succesful artist aswell, michael k found out from people like quincy jones and berry gordy, firstly take the business route or someone else will and secondly know your worth, even at 11 he didnt acceot stupid deals worth far less than he was worth because he was intelligent unlike paul who accepted them and was tempted by sudden cash without thinking about its future when he was in his late teens to twenties and on

They were mad a black man own those songs.

@@johnsonnathaniel54 don't be ridiculous, youngster

@@tangogrrl they aren't being ridiculous. Jackson has been the piniata for the institutionally racist media ever since.

​@johnsonnathaniel54 lmfao, how does it smell having your bigforehead so far up your own ass. Paul was mad because it was THEIR songs, they wrote them, worked hard on them. It didn't belong to Micheal, black and white ;)

Aww thnx back to ya😊

You too.

Ditto

Daniel 12:2 And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to EVERLASTING LIFE, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. Matthew 19:29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit EVERLASTING LIFE. Matthew 25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into LIFE ETERNAL. Luke 18:30 Who shall not receive manifold more in this present time, and in the world to come LIFE EVERLASTING. John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have EVERLASTING LIFE. John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath EVERLASTING LIFE: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. John 4:14 But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into EVERLASTING LIFE. John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath EVERLASTING LIFE, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. John 6:27 Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto EVERLASTING LIFE, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed. John 6:40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have EVERLASTING LIFE: and I will raise him up at the last day. John 6:47 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath EVERLASTING LIFE. John 12:50 And I know that his commandment is LIFE EVERLASTING: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak. Acts 13:46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of EVERLASTING LIFE, lo, we turn to the Gentiles. Romans 6:22 But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end EVERLASTING LIFE. Galatians 6:8 For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap LIFE EVERLASTING. 1 Timothy 1:16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to LIFE EVERLASTING.

Lies

Don’t forget Yoko’s part. As Paul has stated, he wrote the songs for nothing.

@@ladybuggs11 yep

bad business move by Sir Paul

His fault is that he degraded the songs in spite of the songwriter's wish and that he took away the opportunity from Paul to buy them by offering a huge amount to the seller. At least according to what Paul is saying in this video.

@@alexsandra7173 do you think MJ was dumb enough to overvalue something he was about to buy ?? The seller is the one who decides the price, Paul was too cheap to buy it even when Michael offered him to buy it 50/50 with him, he is just bitter than with time the catalogue worth get to ten times what it costed to MJ and turned out to be a very good investment.

Exactly he thought you make music for the ears not for the wallets

@@lizi.2503 so why did he buy up other peoples and use them in commercials

Mike did the Business move, Paul must blame himself!! 😂

Michael bought them but could have sold them to Paul and Yoko at a reasonable price but instead turned a profit with them by using them for a Nike commercial for shoes and other bs commercial deals. He’s not a friend and I admire Paul’s way of addressing the issue.

Yeah. And after Yoko Ono rejected his offer to team up to buy back those songs, why didn't Paul just try to team up with Michael to buy those songs?? He got no one but himself to blame. It wasn't like Michael was secretly working behind his back.

@@highway264able Why should he?? If McCartney and Ono don't see a need to buy them in the first place, why should Jackson buy them to sell them to them?? That makes absolutely no sense.

@@scanpics491 Truth! Black Ownership drives them KraZy!! 😂🍾

Thank you!

@@thedetail. Have you ever seen Apostle Gino Jennings?..u'll be amazed

Totally agree 👍

My God yes. I still remember how angry I was when I first saw that nike commercial.

That's one way to look at it. ON the other hand, the music was able to live on and gain a larger fan base because of insertion into the commercial realm. The Beatles stole music from other artists. It's bigger than them.

@@mrsaye499 Oh, please. The Movies do so to songs, but not commercials. "The Beatles stole music from other artists" - that was the funniest part of your comment.

Some vehicle commercial used rock n roll by led zeppelin. I Didnt buy the vehicle but I've purchased that song at least three times since hearing it in that commercial. We are young is another song in the same situation and I'm glad the songwriters actually get payed on those deals.

No. Commercials add value to songs because it opens up their music to a new generation of listeners.

Sadly, maybe it's karma because at the end, Michael was paranoid about being killed for the catalog. I was surprised to hear the ruthlessness of it too. It sounds to me like the survival mode took over Michael.

Yes he definitely should’ve done that it’s definitely a weird situation they became great friends that unfortunately is what probably made Mj become less open minded and understanding of their friendships

​@@treasurechest2951I was thinking of the irony of that parallel as well but that hardly seems like karma to me. He didn't kill anyone over it.

@@treasurechest2951 Jackson bought it fair and square how is that karma? Maybe Paul should've outbid Michael for the catalogue.

@@freebandz4332 Karma is just cause and effect, not a moral game. MJ buying in that way created contention btwn he and Paul.. What followed was contention in himself. That's all I meant.

True 8

Si, y Paul, reconoce que se las ofrecieron a él primero y decidió no comprarlas. Me irrita un poco que imite a Mj, siento que lo mira peyorativamente...por qué no podía creer que Mj las compraría, también se burla refiriéndose a MJ como un bebé rico...eso fue gracias a su trabajo desde los 5 años, a su talento y visión. Debió estar igual de molesto con todos los que compraron las canciones antes que MJ.

@@vivianavaldenegro593 Gracias, agradezco tu observación. Amo a Paul y MJ, pero que Paul lo menosprecie solo por hacer negocios es doloroso. (Es posible que esta traducción no sea lo más precisa posible porque la hice a través de Google. ¡Gracias de nuevo!😀

@@raymondjackson6069 Muchas gracias por traducir tu respuesta, considero que el vídeo tiene un sesgo y lleva a juzgar a MJ, como siempre lo hacen. Bendiciones

It wasn't accepted but he also offered him a lifetime job as a writer in his production company, LR, Stevie, Mavis, Smokey, always paid respects to predecessors

REAL NIGGA VIBES

@@SweaterSwagg So true

..and not the Beatles?..shows he was a shithead

@@proinseasokiellig4388 speak for yourself.

Haha. Knighthood.

Michael Jackson wouldn't know class if it jumped up and bit what was left of his nose after he decided he wanted to look like Diana Ross

@@williamrichards3707 I thought he was trying to look like a young Elizabeth Taylor?

@Parker and that reply from Parker is the opposite of class, people. That guy will never be thought of for anything resembling knighthood, lol.

@@williamrichards3707 lmfao

One of the best nights of my life 🥹💜

History repeats right? I have hope in a new revolutionary band in this technology age of information

@@lizi.2503 Sounds like a (Revolution.)🤘

🤣🤣🤣

You mean just about every artist lol

This is nothing new, this has happened to almost every black artist from that time period. Most have died broke and pennyless while the white person that owned their lifes work became millionares. The only difference here is that the roles are reversed, and that makes a lot of people angry. I wonder why?

@@tapmaan6150 My comment was in no way racial, so leave race out of it. The Beatles were being ripped of long before Michael Jackson bought their catalogue !!!

Yeah Paul did the same thing to so many other artist

Don't feel sorry for Paul he owned the publishing to so many other artists and never gave a damn about those signers and song writers

The effect of one sided journalism.

I know, the Beatles are great for GB, but Brexit will be much better, since it has freed the shackles that has constrained this great nation since its foudning. I can't wait to see how it plays out, and the great things we'll achieve now!

No, The Spice girls were, They were spicing up peoples lives and slammin bodies down.

He was very jelous that MJ had the money to buy and he didn't.

@@andreawilliams2386 of course he was jealous, it’s his own songs??

@@AliRaza-yf7bp what the other artist that he owns, that don’t have enough money to buy the own music back. It literally business

I'm glad Mike did it to him

@@AliRaza-yf7bp he could’ve bought them himself but he didn’t.

Hi AzlfCaron 👋 I hope my comment didn't sound as a form of privacy invasion your comment tells of a wonderful woman with a beautiful heart which led me to comment I don't normally write in the comment section but I think you deserve this complement. If you don’t mind can we be friends? Thanks God bless you….