So the reason I dont see this ever working is the balls are going to be trying to pull and float in opposite directions there is nothing forcing the upwards force of the water to push the balls in a certain direction
What you’re saying is completely true for a circle. If you can submerge a triangle, you can have 2-3x more balls on one side submerged pushing up than on the other. Engineering theory: Statics + trigonometry + buoyancy If i replace the weightless string with chain, you’d also have the gravity of the top chain acting favorably with the direction of the dominant buoyant force. I tried to describe this in greater detail on paper as well in an earlier video, maybe can help if this didn’t.
@@floki-man so if it were a triangle, 1 there would be way more friction on the side you are trying to generate more upward force on, 2 there would be a great deal of drag being generated, as you are trying to displace the water by pulling the same sized object into the water as you are pulling out. Gravity in theory could work for you on one side of the equation, with a heavier weight pulling down but, that also means it will be working against you as you are trying to pull the same amount up.
@@floki-man In order for that to work, the side with more balls has to be at an angle. They're pushed straight up, but only the component in the direction they can move matters, and it will still all cancel out. Buoyancy is just the water being pulled down by gravity and pushing out whatever is in its way. If the water level isn't going down, then the buoyancy can't be doing any work. And the water can't be going down if the whole thing moves in a circle.
This is a very basic entropy engine specifically a wave generator. But soon as you add resistance aka attempt to generate electricity the water source will stabilize and it will stop rocking over time until a new source of entropy is introduced to the water, hence why these do not operate outside the ocean. I've already engineered a static entropy engine, and it is not something you can put together in a bathtub. The cost of producing a small model is in the 10s of millions... and enjoy the free trip big oil provides if you attempt to secure funding.
I don’t think you understand the design concept here. Appreciate the comment. Entropy engines sound dumb. I was a field drilling engineer on rigs for big oil. I wouldn’t work with/for them for anything again. My starting salary straight out of college was $105,000/yr.
@@floki-man Once manually started the rubberbands function as a makeshift spring allows the rotary system to dip back into the water any time the buoyancy begins to equalize, thus allowing the rotary system to continue to cycle by harnessing that entropic force. However you are simply recycling the initial entropic destabilization you have introduced at the start with no new source. So once that is depleted the rotary system will fail.
The rubber bands are 100% unnecessary. I could hang a static weight on the end, or simply tie it down. They are there to keep the pvc from slipping out, only.
Here’s the original explanation of theory behind design: Buoyancy Engineering Math: Floki-man’s Theoretical Perpetual Power Loop (Buoyancy=Free Energy?) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8cBvR1oCfxE.html
@@floki-man Well you have intentionally created a entropy engine, once you stabilize that makeshift hinge the device will at best only slowly loose energy to entropy. The friction on the wheel will match the rate of the balls submerging resulting a at absolute best a net 0 energy cycle aka perpetual motion. But in reality the unaddressed entropy in the form of ripples created, will eventually siphon all the energy out of the belt halting it. With the hinge you are able to benefit from what is basically a kinetic ram cycle, as the device itself if allowed to float then submerge based on end point resistance which will mitigate the friction on the wheel. This harnessed the energy entropy creates/amplifies to stabilize(stop the motion) and instead siphons that energy into the device.
It’s a lot more fun when it’s in water. May still film a follow up bath test today🤞 I do minimal editing on these videos, and film them in a single take. Easier to share quickly, and the mistakes are the best parts, I hope. Appreciate the support!
There’s no such thing as free energy. It’s like trying to find the secret loop hole that shows 1+1 is actually 4. No matter how complicated you make things you’re not going to have any luck. I hope you at least have fun failing to overturn the laws of physics.
PS: if you don’t see the laws of physics as standards that should always be challenged, you’ll never change them. And you probably should avoid degrees requiring creativity.
@@floki-man Sure, but this is basic Newtonian physics. It's been shown to be very accurate. And if you have some theoretical basis for why you think it should work, but it's founded in laws that have been proven to conserve energy, you clearly messed up on the theory.
Flokiman Perpetual Buoyancy Powerloop Indoor Tub Test 1.2; Does Revolution Begin? Or not yet? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Ete4J7oi1aE.html
