As for the Peruvian attack, they had less possession than Chile (35%) and had 4 shots on target. Chile only had one. Keep in mind our manager for some reason decided not bring our best striker Bryan Reyna and decided to sub in Joao Grimaldo late which we need both of them. (Grimaldo is a dribbler type of guy, Reyna is a Luis Suarez finishing type of guy)
Atleast Lapadula got some good shots off and Peru were more threatening, but the overall game-play from both teams was poor. Peru massively improved in the 2nd half
@@MichaelTalksFootball1yea and I guess Jorge Fossati at least defensively knows what he’s doing. Only 1 goal conceded for Peru in 5 matches under him in charge. And that one goal conceded wasn’t even Peru’s fault it was just a great strike from the Dominicans. But hopefully both Peru and Chile improve entertainment wise after this game
Peru was more interested in fouling than playing football and the referee let it continue all game. Chile at least tried to play some football but looked really rusty but could get better. Peru are just at this competition to bash the other team. Watch out Canada.
For Peru, 'beat Canada' means take dives all over the place in Canada's box and hope the ref gives you one of them. And at the same time foul Canada 30-40 times every time they're near the final 3rd to prevent them from scoring in open play.
I was shocked at how bad Chile were, i may have overestimated them, i'm not taking my stocks out just yet, but im worried Peru looked much better in the second half but you cannot have the retirement home up top
on the other hand Peru vs Chile is a clasico, clasico del pacifico, if anything it shows Peru got better and all the games like this end in awful horrible games to watch with 1-0 or 0-0 draws, the only reason we thought it was going to be anything else is because we thought Chile was better than Peru
You are going to have to add this to your Spanish vocab. When it comes to commenting on Copa. Garbage = Basura Sh!t = mierda. lol. Props on the Spanish!
