Pet Sematary (2019)- Official Trailer- Paramount Pictures 

He’s always been popular

stephen king has a huge imagination

Bryce Mckenzie you mean fucked up dreams he logged XD

The dude is fucked up, he has some type of fascination with kids and torture...

I just hope it's a sign of an 80's revival overall --- it's obvious to even Millenials that their culture is DEAD --- let's go back to a glorious time when music and movies and attitudes actually were positive and upbeat and not always depressing and suicidal

The best part is this happens in the book too.

Spooky semi trucks sends shivers down yer spines... My comment was a mistake, sorry.

Maximum Overdrive

Joshua Jones That movie was awesome!

@@xfinafire I haven't seen it yet, but I want them to make a modern adaptation someday

Can you explain that? I thought it was pretty good and the horror was eh

I always read at night when I have time😂

@@milanwoods702 Personally, I found the book to be a cautionary tale of what can happen if we allow grief to govern our actions, and the only way to escape it is to accept that death is a natural part of life. As said in the book, "sometimes dead is better". It also cautions against trying to play God, with the god figure in this case being the Wendigo. And I think that's where its value as a horror story comes from; its delve into that particular aspect of humanity. Think about it: if you were in Louis's place, can you honestly say you wouldn't do what he did?

Lisa Plambeck I’m 300 pages in right now and there’s 390. I love seeing how well it was all foreshadowed and built

Even stephen king said it was the most scary book he has written

Yeah it was more tragic and dark than scary tbh

also wrong video

Hmmm , not frightening? I think the human mind is frightening on it's own. I could feel the horror while reading this book last summer. I found it mostly tragic and scary at the same time.

Been listening to the audio book and it gives a good synopsis from Stephen King about why he thinks Pet Semetary is his most terrifying book he's ever written. The fear and terror is all about perspective. Don't want to spoil what he said, but I definitely recommend reading or listening to it, pretty interesting.

the jaunt is most scariest he has ever written imo

It may be my favorite King. I know a lot of people love his ten-pound behemoth novels with tangents and sub-plots sprouting in all directions, but I prefer his more focused, tighter (and shorter) works.

I read that book more than 20 years ago and parts of it still pop back into my head. It's horror at its finest. So stoked for this adaptation. 🌲

I read the book and saw the original masterpiece-movie as a teenager. I was terrified of Zelda and slept with the lighs on as I imagined she was lying under my bed, waiting to grab me at night.

How many chapters you read a day?

CRAB🤭

If I were at that place, I wouldn't dare to get outta my vehicle lol

Wow...

thanks for the spoiler 🤦‍♀️

​@@tee2976don't read through comments when you're about watching the movie yet. it's internet 😂

The original stuck to the book pretty well... Hopefully for the ending they don't use the book. The original film ending didn't employ it either.

Zelda (the sister) was always the most chilling thing to me. Even to this day, just seeing images of her makes my skin crawl.

@@B1GG1N ya'll talking about that creepy sickly looking girl in the bed? Lol yea she really stood out alot when i first saw the original movie years ago......creepy AF

Agreed! And the infamous cut on Jed from the original. Who's paxcow this time??? Louis, I was wrong but don't...Louis??? Nooooooooo nooooooooo

@All Light wow. Having an opinion is great and I hope we can agree that race dosent matter (and that white supremacy and male supremacy is dead) but calling black women irrelevant is kinda rude.

Hisoka Bič it’s intentional

According to the book, the children spelled it that way...

They can spell it however they want! It's their movie!

@@hisokabic6135 cemetery*

xd

True LMAO

Jesus

SuperNoone89 cuz that wouldn’t be “modern”

@SuperNoone89 24/7 mate.

Some nights my dead cat comes back from the dead while I'm sleep, holds me down and rapes me 😖 #deadisbetter

@Tell It Animated Me too! Now we need a Remake to Stephen King's Cujo, Christine, The Langoliers, Tommyknockers and Salem's Lot.

What are you doing here!

Tommyknockers is already greenlit for a remake. Check it out on Wikipedia, and you'll see. Can't wait to see it. And Yes!!! A Salem's Lot remake would be incredible too. Out of the Stephen King remakes, I'm the most pumped for Tommyknockers though. There's not enough, really decent Alien movies out there. But the original Tommyknockers was really well done. Although technically, I guess they're sort of like Demons too, since they can possess people. But I never understood why Hollywood hasn't put out any really terrifying Alien Abduction movies yet. Besides maybe 'Fire In The Sky', I've never seen a really good, high budget, super terrifying Alien Abduction movie yet, where people get abducted by Aliens, and where it shows all the experiments, research & torture that Aliens perform on the humans. The only movie I can think of, is 'Fire In The Sky' that focuses on that kind of stuff. And that was all the way back in 1990. So hopefully the Tommyknockers remake will be a really good Alien movie.

King has like 58 novels and 200 some short stories. F remakes. Adapt something new.

I was a wild and horny teen in the late 80's and of course I loved the 1989 version of this film --- but I gotta say this trailer got me kinda excited to see the 2019 version --- I just hope they don't ruin it with over-saturation of CGI undead and speed up the tempo

They should have used tony todd aka the candy man for that role

I was waiting for the New England accent... didn't get it. "The ground is sowah! Dead is bettah!" It's an uphill battle for Lithgow, much as I like him.

@@JoshuaDMaley im pretty sure he will have the accent down pat he is great with them. Still would have rather Tony Todd because john is not creepy to me

When Gwynne said, "sometimes, dead is better" it was much more frightening and authentic than Lithgow, who looks and sounds like a retired college prof.

I know this is only a trailer, but Lithgow really looks and sounds like he's just "phoning it in" for lack of a better term. Gwynne was absolutely sublime so maybe JT's not even trying because he knows he's gonna get plowed.

Yes her performance was purrrfect. 🐈‍⬛

​@@bhgtreegive her an Oscar right Meow 🐈😺

Hi jade 🙋‍♂

To be honest you're right

How bout no? Anyone who actually reads his books, instead of pretending they do has no idea why those things are even mentioned. I'm not even gonna list them, because constant readers already know. Hollywood will just shit out something dumb, like The Dark Tower for example. That is all the more 'cinematic' that there needs to be.

@@zzzhuh Yeah, trying to make a cinematic universe out of the King books would be God damn impossible. It is way too complex for film adaptation. Most of the connections, (albeit the Dark Tower realms) are somewhat minor. It just wouldn't work. I'm happy they are making more King adaptations, but I hope they treat it more of an anthology, and not have them connect. Maybe connecting them from a tonal and thematic standpoint would be okay, but actual tie ins would be too much.

@@zzzhuh Holy fuck, you didn't have to be so savage about it. Just let the dude want something, Christ. I agree it'd be a bad idea, but it's nothing to blow up over.

Still better than MCU and DC

Yeah because cinematic universe has worked ouyt so well in the past. Kids today just dont know what real horror is. They consider The Conjuring and Paranormal Activity good horror.

Nor can you replace Fred Gwynne with Jon Lithgow. Or Dale Midkiff with Jason Clarke. Or Denise Crosby with Amy Seimetz. They didnt even bother to shoot this in Maine, where its suppose to take place. The original was shot very close to where King lives. Litterally on location. If Stephen King goes on record saying he hates this remake, then they have a serious problem. I hope he does.

@@thomasstudstrup7768 i hope he does too.

@@laurenhey6623 Yep.

@@laurenhey6623 By the way King wrote the screenplay for the 1989 originbal movie. Which is probably why its so great. From the looks of it he has nothing to do with the remake.

I absolutely love Fred Gwynne, but I also like Lithgow. Honestly I was going to give this a hard pass before seeing the trailer. I'm not expecting much, but as a fan of much of King's work, I'll give this one a chance to prove me wrong... ...This is the last of my good will for a King movie after the botched abortion of The Dark Tower

Randall Flagg: kids from derry, im here to talk about the Maine initiative

Daisy Ridley Videos this is why I love his work of movies and books and tv shows never failed to scare me

Yes, the King universe keeps repeating itself. What's next, another version of Salem's Lot?

Pretty sure they did, Rod. I think it had Rob Lowe in it.

It never really stopped. Stephen Kings stories have been going on for a long time. There are a lot of adaptations in the 2000's.

I’m reading it now ! I didn’t find it super scary up till the point where gage got hit by that truck :-/ like I knew it was coming I just didn’t know how or when 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫 you can definitely feel what they are feeling up to this point

Stand By Me, The Shawshank Redemption, The Stand

+J G How about an update to Salem's Lot?

+J G A chihuahua 😂

Alexandra Rivera I thought there was a fire starter remake awhile back...? Maybe it was just the Xmen convoluted bullshit

They'd best leave Christine alone

That's literally the point of a trailer lmfao.

But does it have to be this painful?

EpicSC is it literally?

Thank Independence Day for that lol

That’s how it is for each movie.....the 1st trailer is always half a year before the movie comes out.

My thoughts exactly!

They got twins to play the role of Gage this time around. Agree that he looks a lot like the little boy who played in the original. Hopefully they'll follow the book and make him not as adorable as he was in the original film. I live up in Maine and have been waiting for a new adaptation to the book and I'll probably be balling my eyes out😢

My Nephew's name is "GAREN"... Please correct me if I'm wrong but is this remake renaming GAGE to GAREN? I've been a Stephen King Fan since 2004... please tell me I'm wrong @ 1:13

@@awakenaries2230 To me it sounds like Louis screaming "Gaaaaage" I don't hear Garen. As far as what I read online they did not change Gage's name for this adaptation.

Probably the absolute only thing they got right.

yes this is it

Especially when it's people you didn't like the first time.

Winds of March Journey/Perry tribute band you mean especially when it’s people you did like, so the memory is a good one

Did it work tho? I’m a woman and it fucked me up.

Mavis Lupus Yup it worked. I want no kids anymore.

Can you explain what the story is about please?

First day on the internet? Google it. Or watch the 1989 film or better yet, read the book.

@@StinkyGreenBud oh well I'm sorry if I just wanted a short explanation. I'm sorry to offend you by asking a question

"Well sometimes, dead is better. The person you put up there ain't the person that comes back. It might look like that person, but it ain't that person, because whatever lives on the ground beyond the Pet Sematary ain't human at all."

"It's your cat now, Louis. "

I remember how creepy those lines were when actor Fred Gwynne said them. I'm hoping this take on the novel ramps up the scare (not jumpscare) factor by 900.

@@milo14564 Yessss😂

I disagree Jonathan; with all due respect to your opinion, King's script, and the talents of the people involved in the movie's production, having read the book in one sitting the day it hit the book stores, the film was (and remains) so vastly inferior to the source material that, in my opinion, it should never have been released in the first place, let alone remade.

Jonathan B Lerner I agree. The 1989 film is iconic. The acting was top notch and everything from the script to the actors was freaking excellent! This remake business is in poor taste.

Yes the acting in the 1989 was great but so much that made the book terrifying to me was not put in the movie much of it was omitted. The book by far was more terrifying to me. The movie was as you said very well acted but I do hope the remake brings aspects from the book that were not there loke juds wife norma, more focus on the force behind the semetary the wendigo.

Not remade it's an adaptation. The first film was also a POORLY done adaptation if you actually read the book. Still frightening and entertaining but just by the trailer this one is already more accurate.

The moment we meet the returned gage in the book all the pieces are in place. The look of a little kid who was killed by an 18 wheeler, buried, dug up, reburied and emerged from the Micmac ground. Gravelly voice to match along with demonic qualities, profane speech, “knows things”, can speak in another’s voice, all the most terrifying elements of an undead malevolent spirit. What did we get with the movie? A toddler with a latex scar with a toddler giggle, trying to scrunch up his toddler face to look scary (looked like he was pooping imo) and wobbles around with a scalpel and says “now I wanna play with youuuu” in that same old baby toddler gage voice. If that’s how you pull off the most evil moment in the story, it’s high time to set the record straight. Bring on the new one.

I didn’t understand why there were masked children (I didn’t read the book). If you knew, would you tell me please ? 😅

I belive that those kids were dead and have been burried the same way somewhere in the past so they are keep coming back to do the same to others. I didn't read the book so I wouldn't know for sure.

They said they put it in the trailer for advertising

Ikr

@léa léa the masked children were not even in the book, the book has like 394 pages in it & it only starts to get "scary" at like 374... I liked the 1989 movies better than the book, haven't seen this one yet, gonna watch it tonight Edit: The New One Was FUCKING Crazy

Just make it to college --- you will be 18 and your parents will have no legal right to view your report card

Well you failed the class on original comedy.

Don't take it personal, these folks just have nothing better to do, than bother some anonymous person from behind their keyboard.

Tomorrow is my report card day. I have failed in a subject. Wtf do i do now?

@@abhaymishra30 get your bag, two waters, some double A batteries and hit the country.

🤙🎸🎸🎶🤘🤘🤘

Yes

Arcade Fire lyrics? ^_~

Ramones kid... feel your head

I was actually joking that these were song lyrics, but thanks for that...had no idea...

I'll shoot myself if they do

There are literally like 10 remakes already lol

@William Moren yeah bc Hollywood would never beat a dead horse.. .

The Tommyknockers movie is coming. That book gave me the creeps. The made for TV movie wasn't bad.

Ooh, i would like to see a reboot of Children of the Corn.

yes, but as you know, it won't come back the same. 🤣

@@janellebolotaolo9403 I knew that was coming 🤣

it will grow inside ur head not outside oushing on the skull

Your hair is going to attack people

@@janellebolotaolo9403 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Long live The Ramones!!!!

If they don't include the ramones in this, I have literally no respect for it whatsoever, lol

Ramones

The trailer is not scary

Play ding dong ditch with the bell next to it and join the world dominashhhhhhhhh !!

Evil Duck Pyro i did this comment before I saw the whole trailer lol I realized it wasn’t that scary

Fuuuuuuck this is exactly what I want!!! I need these scenes to be in the movie!!! That's all I ask for!!!

I'm just glad I found someone in the comment section that knows the book. Don't forget Lewis's dream about all the people standing with their dead and the Wendigo standing behind. The book is so much better. I was disappointed with the 2017 IT film. I'm kinda worried about this film. All the scenes with the kids wearing masks. Yes it's kinda creepy but, it never happened in the book.

I agree. I also doubted why they have the masked kids but someone somewhere said that it was probably a burial procession when Jud was a kid. I'd forgive that a lot more. Although, I doubt the neighbourhood kids knew the power or the burial ground. Jud only found out about it because of some French Canadian dude, and the town experienced some reanimated things like a bull and such, but I doubt it was explicitly known by every kid. @@turok8ui

@@gabriellecote1361 There's no doubts in the book. Jud himself says that only a few people could've told him about the power. His father knew but, "he had never been there". My other problem with the masked children is that their being seen in Lewis's home. I hope they don't show kids from Jud's time running around like the house is haunted. The only Ghost that comes in that home is Victor Pascow.

@Daniel HechterIt's just the Loons. The sound carries.

How is this not top comment

Jairus Zapata how?

He said go

@@jairusgerardzapata4862 how is mentioning the word gay homophobic?

😂 yoooooo

+Undead zombie Joshua is correct. 99% of all remakes are crap!

+Undead zombie 😂

What do you mean "Sometimes"?

+Undead zombie Ok. Name one remake that was actually better than the original......waiting.

@@dsmith9964 The Thing (1982), Dawn of the Dead (2004)...

n c lol agree!

@@sherloidbai7064 hipster my ass. Born and raised listening to punk rock and was never the biggest Ramones fan but its a dope song and your name is sherloid so go play in traffic

Gamma Hamma Same here. That’s clever

Roll credits.

Bubble Wrap to be fair they just moved in, and in the novel pet sematarys events occur nearly immediately after, so I wouldn’t imagine they’d be able to make a fence before church died, and after church died I’d be more concerned about the mythical graveyard of resurrection bringing my dead cat back to life than making a fence

ImAPurpleChicken Ok, but the sequence didn’t happen right after they moved in. The whole point of the pet semetary is because all these pets get hit by the cars on the road. A fence or fence(s) definitely could’ve prevent this. Also, fence would defiantly be put up in two days lol Just a flaw he never considered I guess but they gotta have their stories somehow.

Bubble Wrap the whole point of the story is about a burial ground cursed by a wendigo that brings anything buried in it back to life...

ImAPurpleChicken yep but the burial ground wouldn’t be there if there were no pets to burry because mass amounts of them weren’t hit by trucks 🙄

Bubble Wrap the pet sematary isn’t the resurrecting burial ground, it’s a cemetery that the kids made for their pets, the resurrecting cemetery is the mikmaq burial grounds located past a deadfall and through a swamp away from the pet sematary, and throughout the novel it’s suggested the wendigo is what manipulated so many pets to run into the road to die, as some people would be naturally curious and cross to see the actual Native American grounds

Lol

Hell yeah! Lol 😂💯

Usually it is lol

Yeah obviously. Sometimes not being a sour vagina is better.

@@morganthe9218 :Sometimes, I forget your Vagisil so you actually have an excuse to be a bitch.

@Keepa11 Zombieland 2 based on Stephen King???

Zombieland 2 was never part of Stephen King. it was always about zombies.

Cujo or Cat's Eye should be the next movie for readaption of the Stephen King's cinematic universe

@@malikabercrombie9513 Cujo so terryfing... btw thanks give some info.. i know from Stephen King is IT, Pet Sematary, The Shinning, Misery, Black window, The Mist, Carrie and Children of the corn..

I hope IT part 2 trailer in Pet Sematary

"Sometimes dead is beddah"

ayuh...

@@Capain_D00dle Really? Because all I hear is Trinity.

Maybay there’s a betta way.

Paris Wintour Zelda in the first movie scared the hell out of me and my brother when we were kids.

Paris Wintour also elderly age would make you not want to get out of bed again. Beds are very relaxing

K ris lmao I think Zelda literally gave everyone nightmares. She was mad creepy.

Yo that ish used to creep me out when I was younger lol.

The worst part for real though was when kid Rachel had to feed Zelda that goop shit and it looked nasty as all fuck.

yay, 2 shitty adaptations in the same year

IT chapter 2??? Omg for reals?

Yeah, all the roles are cast for adult versions of the loosers club. What's awesome is that my favorite of the bunch, Richie, is being played by Bill Hader

Yeah bois

johnjohnson you don’t know that yet. Watch them first.

Salem's Lot would be cool, but they shouldn't mess with The Shining.

Perry McCorkle The Shining is getting a sequel (Doctor Sleep film adaptation)

Taken on its own, Kubrick's Shining was an incredible movie - but it sucked hard as an adaptation of the novel (it flattened the characters, among other problems). The Shining TV miniseries, while no award-winner, at least told the story correctly. Someday it might be nice to see a real movie (as opposed to TV) telling the novel's story.

Rob Arsenault yeppp

Just surprised they didn't update it for 2018 lifestyle. You know, have it a gay couple with two kids, or the dad is actually trans, or a black couple, or a mixed couple with adopted kids, and one kid has asthma, or a fixation on a doll or blanket. They could have gone with an all female cast. Where is all the diversity?

Yes

and mow down his parents

@@daudahmedmalik803 samee😭

LMAO i dont even know whats gonna happen next there

On god I bet he either open the door and died or he stayed in there forever and somebody killed them and got him or they got him by breaking the glass or sum or he just stayed in there and died slowy

Not a remake

It is remake of 1989 version, isn't it???

Nice

@Jesse Cab No its not, dipshit, its an adaption of the book.

Jesse Cab Chill

Majority of the time

Angel Quintanilla Have you even seen the original? It's extremely outdated and due for a remake.

The original hardly followed the book at all and wasn’t that good. This looks good.

You mean all the time

Most of the time the original is outdated and needs a remake. Get over it.

I thought that too...

...ayyy thx m8...jk but my name is Gage and i was named after thjs movie charecter...watch out

Jared Jackson yes I noticed that too!

Gage i bought you something

Undead zombie Yes

Es not?

Candi Soda no

People that didn't read the book

Candi Soda You’re on the Internet buddy

The AsianTaco I'm also from the US.. Doesn't mean I can't call us fatasses even though I'm not

*Adaptation. Not remake.

I learned a long time ago to not even watch the movie adaptations of books that I really enjoy. I'm not an expert on Stephen King or anything (I've read maybe 8 or 9 of his books) but I think the biggest problem with the screen adaptations of his books is that King is such a descriptive writer and he uses this uncanny ability to create such in depth and rich characters that it is impossible to duplicate with simple imagery and dialogue. The way he can create such heartpounding thrilling scenes through descriptive writing is hard to translate into a 20 second movie scene.

DEthe5150 this movie is a remake of the 1989 movie. It is also an adaptation of the book. Yes, both.

I read the book first then see the movie. The books are always better hands down, everyone would agree with that regardless of the author. That being said I really enjoy most Steven King movies. Clearly you cannot capture his style in a 90 minute movie but some have been really amazing. Christine, Shawshank, Stand by Me, to name a few...... Salems Lot!!! Misery!!! wow, I guess I could go on and on....

It was very faithful to the book though. Stephen King even wrote the screenplay

If you mean a reboot of the old movie, then I agree.

It was remade with Rob Lowe as a mini series, actually it's pretty good

Hollywood: OKAY SO WE'LL JUST FUCK IT UP AND MAKE IT A CHEAP CORNY MOVIE!!!

Can Guillermo del toro be directing/writing it? He LOVES making vampire stuff.

@@Gojiragon that's an amazing idea although I'd like James wan to give it a go

In pet sematary

@@pandaprotect1 I don't want to live my life again.

@@sicklillette this speaks to me on a spiritual level. It hits too close to home lol

Terry I im okey with that, i don't shot by shot copy paste from the original, i want to see a new interpretation from an already well known story.

I think it has something to do with the sequel... remember the new IT they Blended other elements from the series to get you ready for IT part 2 coming out. Pet Sematary 2 had a bunch of kids in it so it might be a tie in. Idk

Pet Sematary 2 had nothing to do with the book so I doubt it has anything to do with the original Pet Sematary 2 it could just be something from the book I'm not sure I haven't read it yet

It's probably Halloween. This one is supposed to be more faithful to the book

Seems like a re-imagining of a scene from the book where a group of kids go to bury a pet. I think they're really planning on playing up the Wendigo from the book. The original movie used the Wendigo way too subtly.

Diana Dobson yes it was. I’ll never forget that book!

Diana, I think his scariest books were The shining, or Salem's Lot.....when I was reading The shining, I was so f*ckin' scared, that I could not even sleep if the book was in the same room ...or Salem's Lot 's dead kids, staring inside from the window at night.....brrrr, I still don't look out on my windows, if it's too dark outside (though I read them nearly 20 years ago) Stephen King knows how to scare the s*it out from the readers, but he is the best!

I totally agree! I just finished the book today!

Was my first Stephen King book that I read at the age of 13, was terrified all the way through. This looks pretty accurate to how I imagined it, especially the cat.

Yes I think this will be a very good scary movie. 🐈❤

Haha classic. We had an awful good time, Now I wanna play with youuuuuu!!

that is exactly what people said about It, so we will see.

That's what most people said about IT and the haunting of hill house, but guess what? both of these did better than the old ones.

@LifeIMO94 thank you

@LifeIMO94 no

Oh hope ur OK 💞

garrick wally "You dont want ta go down that rawd!"

Now i suggest you to watch the trailer of Darren Arofnosky's 'Mother' again

I found it annoying.

Was it?

It was?

Remake of IT was better, and I believe this will be too!

@@adamCarter20 Yep

tripjet999 are never better more like it

V for Vegan um no ,remake was cheesy af and no scary at all

Book Snake agreed

OMG INTELLECTUAL #TOP4LIFE!

Lmao

||-\\

Am I the only one I know....

Haha, I scrolled down to see if someone said this

What crime isn't against people? Honest question.

The are crimes against people and crimes against property

Strawbérry Milk it was always right in front of the house in the original

The field or front lawn was much bigger in the original movie...I remember the Dad running and running and still not catching Gage.

it's a gay version..you know millenials are so stupid and dumb

Maybe it's a nod to the Wicker Man? I dunno.

@@RareHarmony Well it makes no sense it looks like it might be a ok movie but the original was awesome.

@@jufro19 Oml fuck off.

The original was shit compared to the book. This one looks more like the story.

im assuming (i can only hope) theyre saving zelda completely for the screen as THOSE are some pretty big fuckin shoes to fill , i just see no realistic way they can capture that horror again

I just feel like Zelda was such a huge part of the story amd theyre gonna leave that out for some reason?? I dunno.

G Jones I’m a native born and raised Mainer and I can tell you Fred Gwynn’s accent is about as close to dead on as any actor has ever got.

Fred Gwynn was irreplaceable. But the rest of the movie, including the cast, was downright disposable. Any new treatment of this book will be an improvement imo.

Zelda will be in it, but they are going with the book version of her. They said that they think Rachel just seeing all the hospital equipment in the room and that her sister is suffering is enough of a scare for a little kid. Um, NO!!! They are going to f*** up the Zelda character in this remake! It's going to be a disaster. And John Lithgow as Jud? Please. He is no Fred Gwynne!!!

Hahahha lol

same lol

Did you leave?

Dont dig up your son and bury him in that indian burial ground. Idk it was something like that

Mr. Stotch? His name is Louis Creed

@@chloedassler6156 it's from south park

@@chloedassler6156 They dont have the dad's name wrong. They are referencing a brilliant South Park episode riffing on the movie Pet Cemetery! I don't remember the name, maybe Marjorine?? Anyone remember the name? God, I laughed so hard each time the old farmer showed up!

😅😆

Lmao classic

South park??

Fred Gwynn was PERFECT as Jud.

Couldnt agree more, I like Lithgow alot but there is no replacing Fred Gwynne as Jud. I first saw the original movie when i was about 6 and Jud saying "it's your cat now, Louis" always creeped me the hell out. that and "what you bury there aint what comes back"

Lol

I feel this way too, and these actors (don't get me wrong, lithgow is amazing in his own right) are all completely wrong. The original had so much grit and fits perfectly with todays retro lovefest. Idk why anyone would need this over the original, like what audience is this pandering to exactly?

@@Tsukshiro probably the millinieals and under who have never seen the original... all Hollywood seems to have left in the tank are remakes, reboots and sequels

Tsuki Shiro & Richard Grace Are you guys gonna check it out when it comes out too?

STFU

If it includes more from the book then I believe it'll be better.

Undead zombie go suck a Brain

It's the unfortunate Stranger Things font for the text.

Undead zombie wow. Whats with the attitude tough guy? Someone got your wife pregnant? How's that for a like👍

Irving Rodriguez he screamed gay when the truck drove by.

I thought it was 💀😅

Who says its supposed to be "better"?

I mean, IT 2018 managed to be a great remake.

@@RedEzelt I agree 😊 about the 2018 It movie. However I still enjoyed Tim Curry's original performance as the clown. The actors and the cat in the original Pet Sematary did a phenomenal job. Also the makeup of the original spirit that tried to help the family with his head split wide open, was one of the creepiest things I ever saw at that time.

Lol I remember watching the original when I was 6

You can't judge it if you haven't seen it yet you idiot.

Yep....wonder who or IF they pricked anyone to play Judd

It looks like John Lithgow is playing Jud.

No comparison.

Plus the first little boy. He was so adorable.

Ahh yep!

That unsettling feeling is almost impossible to recreate. I hope the remake can do it, but I highly doubt it. That's why this movie shouldn't have been remade. This is the only horror movie that I have ever seen that still creeps me out to this day. That cannot be duplicated!

I know!!!!!!

Gwynne was that type and face just looks and acts like Crandall in the book, the only good actor in the old movie

@@deniskleinert when I read the book that's who I pictured in my mind. He nailed the character.

Yes it can. The original is dated and revisiting it as an adult the acting was horrible. And it did not follow the book in many ways

that's because stephen king books make horrible movies. you have to change some things in order to make work as a movie.

Best Judd Crandall will always be Fred Gwynne I do look forward to seeing this but I truly hope John Lithgow does the character justice

Christina Mcdonald they did say the same thing that no one could beat tim curry as penny wise but bill skarsgard did one hell of a performance. Same way with heath ledger as the joker when compared to jack Nicholson

Have you read the book? They left out many of the best scenes. This looks terrible though.

RAAAACHEL!!

You aint kidding!! 😱😱

actually it can. Zelda in the book is more scary. If they make zelda like how its in the book it will do just fine.

Nothing will top 80s 10 years old Zelda played by 21 years old guy ? Yeah right. This time they hired real 10 years old girl.

21 YO will be much scarier than a 10 YO girl '-'

Wow, I didn't know the movie was out already and you seen it. I can't believe none of this is in there.

Oh fuck yeh, Zelda. I'd forgot about her....

@@kafkatrap6812 Yep..

Do they actually have Zelda in the book?

@@FARYCC yes, they do, same amount as the Movie...

@@billyray5232 I really want to read the book now after reading all the comments about it!

Lithgow could have done the accent. I think they changed it because that accent is not easily understood and some modern day audiences wouldn't understand it well.

@@wadewillson4144 I am from Turkey and I watched the movie in original sounds with Turkish subtitles. I think the New England accent is much clearer and understandable than today's accent.

I haven't read the book, but my first thought on hearing Lithgow's lines is that he probably wanted to avoid comparison to the very famous accent from the original film. It's like if you do a cover of an Elvis song...if you try to sound like Elvis, you'll just sound like a silly and worse version of Elvis. You have to do it a different way, or people will just think you're creating an inferior knockoff. Lithgow's take might not be as popular as the original one, but at least it's his take.

There's so many differences in the trailer alone, I can't imagine how many more will be in the movie. Besides the lines being changed and the lack of accent the kids didn't fear the pet semetary since they didn't know the ground beyond it brought the dead back to life. They actually tended to it. Only a few towns people knew. I'll probably wait until it comes on tv before I see it.

@@wayniac917 the ragman told Judd about the burial ground for his dog and then they buried a person up there and Judd thought to bury Ellie's cat there again I am so fucking pissed at they're making this movie it saddens me a lot I have a prequel idea that I wanted to pitch to Stephen King cuz I live kind of near him I think a prequel would have been great you would have had a young Jud Crandall talk to the ragman and he can explain why the ground went sour and them changing those fucking words to the ground went bad pisses me off beyond belief like I said in my first post this broke my fucking heart these people are stupid they don't know what the fuck they're doing they should have made a prequel I could make a perfect prequel to this I know being five years old is probably too young to be watching movies like this but I've been a horror fan since I was a child I knew fiction from nonfiction yeah I watch a lot of Nightmare on Elm Street I've talked to Robert Englund himself and he loved my idea for Freddy versus Jason 2 but he wanted me to write up something different for just a sequel to A Nightmare on Elm Street which that wasn't 2013 but I was going through a really bad time of drugs but I'm so pissed about this it hurts I never thought that something like a Movie remake would actually hurt like my heart I know people are going to be like all you're just a fucking pussy great movie why do they have to remake all these great movies there's a few I would remake Soylent Green being one because no one knows what the fuck Soylent Green is also wore party with Kevin Dillon and Young Guns 1 and 2 only cuz of the dream that I had but I could have took it in different way I still have. Go down in a blaze of glory though one of the best scenes of Young Guns 2 spoiler alert sorry

The audio book, read by Michael C. Hall, is by far the creepiest version out there. Almost had to stop listening at times because it's that fucking scary. Hall's different voices for the characters is beyond amazing.

Backyard Pix, I agree bro. I LOVED the audiobook. Although by the end I was so damn tired of hearing "Oz, the gweat and tewibble". Lol! But it was a fantastic reading. I didn't think I was going to like Hall as a narrator at first but he grew on my until I started liking him. Personally when it comes to King audiobooks I prefer Will Patton.

As much as I oppose remakes, THIS one looks "pretty good!"

This remake was not good .

C'mon!

I just finished it a year later and it was about 3:30am when I finished 😂 scary

​@@welintonrosario697😨😨

unpolarize The scene where she appears in Rachel's dream still gives me goosebumps: "I'm coming for you RAY-CHULLLL!" And this time, I'll get you. Gage and I will get you for letting us die, (evil cackling laugh)!"

We in our 40’s are still terrified as well.👍

I'm not quite 30 but the original film scared the shit out of me lol

The first Pet Sematary film is not "original" because it's based on a novel dumbass.

Sergeant Kek wow thanks for clearing that up I wouldn’t want to look like a dumbass. Oh wait

Nick Uplands yea where the fuck is the accent haha that should've been a must for John Lithgow

Nick Uplands it remake was shit, not even scary, cheesy af but not scary at all

IT wasn't that good --- are you smokin' meth ??

The it remake was good because it was truer to the source material/book. I believe they’ll do the same with this reboot and that’s why I’m excited for this film, it was a lot more interesting things and characters in the novel that were left out of the 90’s version movie.

I think a remake of maximum overdrive could be awesome if they can keep Emilio Estavez and AC/DC.

I know right? People are stupid.

I agree.

kpfingaz Ikr? Thank you! My god ppl sometimes -.-“, I mean, I think some can admit to have watched the new IT movie with no problem and it was fine :0. Of course the original was good in it’s time but the remake was pretty terrifying too. I think this remake of Pet Sematary will be fine, I mean the kids in the animals masks gave me the slight creeps lol,

Tbh the so called “classic” isn’t very good. It’s a semi decent movie that is blown of the water by the book. Same goes for the original version of IT

The classic wasn't even that good. idk how it could be ruined lol.

i love both version of the movies Even thought i like the Remake a little more

How can reading words scare you? I've never understood this about horror novels.

Alexandra Luca Starzacher I agree, read it as a teenager and never picked up another scary book.

That’s why I think this remake is a good idea, the older version left out a lot of great things that this reboot can explore.

Alexandra Luca Starzacher reading it now

@Spike Spiegel you need to read more often.

Miranda Kathrein the ground is sour?

@@hugecake4178 - Yes indeedy do! ☺

Yes !!! Wtf ? It sounds stupid...Sour is the word !

@@hugecake4178 yes, the original uses the word Sour...as the book did.

John Lithgow is one of my favourites but maybe a slight mis-casting for this one. the role needs a creepier old man type. he's just too loveable.

:::slow clap::: Nice

Awwwwwwww, damn!

3rd rock from the sun

Well put 😄

Fred? As in Fred Figglehorn!?

agreed.....The Munsters....😼

I'm 12 right now. Love this movie

12 years old, lol, me too when I first watched it. What is it with all those super scary movies from the 70s and 80s having children watch them :)

I‘m going to turn 16 in a month and I‘ve watched it some days ago😂 I think it‘ll haut me like forever

fuck yeah, thats mandatory by now

totally agree

Was looking for this comment

Also the driver was under the influence of the wendigo and so was gage.

I wish the Wendigo would stop hollywood from doing all these remakes.

Lol, EXACTLY my thought! That was such a huge part of the book and Fred Gwynne did it perfectly in the first movie.

Yes!

You're Welcome your av, haven’t thought of that meme in so long ❤️

You're Welcome and yeah I agree, looks like they’re putting a spin on this version of Judd - gonna be a tacit loner type versus the amiable folksy and slightly creepy old codger :/

The Jud in the original was the perfect casting. He had the accent