Phimai Temple ប្រាសាទភិម៉ាយ/ពិមាយ ខេត្តនគររាជសីម៉ា (ប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រខ្មែរ) 

I am an archaeologist, don't argue. I have studied all my life. Why wouldn't I know about the past of the Thai people during the reign of King Jayavarman who spread influence to lower Cambodia? At that time, there were no Khmer people. The Khmer were a tribe that was just slaves to the Thai-KHOM people. Later, the Thai-KHOM people lost their power, so the Khmer rose up to rule that land. Angkor Wat was built by the ancient Thai-KHOM people. There is evidence of carvings on the walls of Angkor Wat that say Siem Kuk, but the Khmer people and the Khmer government tried to erase the letters on the walls that have a lower slash referring to Siem Kuk from the walls. The model was from Phimai Stone Castle. The Khmer appointed their own kings. The first Khmer king was King Taeng Wan. King Jayavarman was the king of the ancient Thai-KHOM people, not the Khmer king. You have to studied your own history well. Don't be brainwashed by the French colonial powers or by the Hun Sen government. Take what is right as wrong and only remember the wrong things to talk about. You have to bring evidence to argue and use it as historical references. And another thing, let me tell you that the Thais have ruled Cambodia for more than 400 years. Do you know this? Don't tell me you don't know.

អ្នកបុរាណវិទ្យាបរទេសបានបង្ហាញភស្តុតាងនោះ។ វត្ត​ភីម៉ៃ​ត្រូវ​បាន​កសាង​ឡើង​កាលពី​៣០០​ឆ្នាំមុន​វត្ត​អង្គរ។ និងសាងសង់ឡើងដោយជនជាតិថៃក្នុងសម័យនោះ។ គឺព្រះបាទសូរ្យវរ្ម័នទី1 លុះមកដល់រជ្ជកាលព្រះបាទសូរ្យវរ្ម័នទី2 ទ្រង់បានធ្វើចំណាកស្រុកមកកសាងអង្គរវត្តនៅពេលក្រោយ ដោយសារគ្រោះរាំងស្ងួត។ នៅ​ពេល​ដែល​ប្រាសាទ​អង្គរ​ត្រូវ​បាន​គេ​សាងសង់ ជនជាតិ​ដើម​ភាគតិច​នៃ​ប្រទេស​កម្ពុជា​ត្រូវ​បាន​គេ​ប្រើប្រាស់​ជា​កម្មករ។ ប្រាសាទអង្គរមានរហូតដល់រជ្ជកាលព្រះបាទជ័យវរ្ម័នទី9។ មែនហើយ មានជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចម្នាក់ដែលបះបោរ ជននោះគឺជា ព្រះបាទស្រីសុរិយោពណ៌ទី1។ ព្រោះ​គាត់​ជា​ទាសករ​យូរ​មក​ហើយ។ នៅពេល​គេ​បណ្តេញ​ជនជាតិ​ថៃ​ដែល​បាន​សាងសង់​ប្រាសាទអង្គរវត្ត និង​ជា​វណ្ណៈ​គ្រប់គ្រង​ចេញពី​ទឹកដី​។ ដូច្នេះ ព្រះបាទស្រីសុរិយោពណ៌ទី1 បានប្រកាសខ្លួនឯងថាជាស្តេចនៃប្រទេសកម្ពុជា។ នេះ​ហើយ​ជា​មូលហេតុ​ដែល​វត្ត​ភីម៉ៃ​ត្រូវ​បាន​គេ​កសាង​ឡើង​មុន​វត្ត​អង្គរ។

I am an archaeologist, don't argue. I have studied all my life. Why wouldn't I know about the past of the Thai people during the reign of King Jayavarman who spread influence to lower Cambodia? At that time, there were no Khmer people. The Khmer were a tribe that was just slaves to the Thai-KHOM people. Later, the Thai-KHOM people lost their power, so the Khmer rose up to rule that land. Angkor Wat was built by the ancient Thai-KHOM people. There is evidence of carvings on the walls of Angkor Wat that say Siem Kuk, but the Khmer people and the Khmer government tried to erase the letters on the walls that have a lower slash referring to Siem Kuk from the walls. The model was from Phimai Stone Castle. The Khmer appointed their own kings. The first Khmer king was King Taeng Wan. King Jayavarman was the king of the ancient Thai-KHOM people, not the Khmer king. You have to studied your own history well. Don't be brainwashed by the French colonial powers or by the Hun Sen government. Take what is right as wrong and only remember the wrong things to talk about. You have to bring evidence to argue and use it as historical references. And another thing, let me tell you that the Thais have ruled Cambodia for more than 400 years. Do you know this? Don't tell me you don't know.

I never hat. My channel is about stop racist. But ppl of your side always make me headache. Doesn’t stop like what am doing. Still looking forward ppl understand like you

@@Rickkhcambodia Yes bro Thailand many people love khmer many people know him have khmer blood me too my mom laos isaan my father khmer surin

Honestly khmer and thai are all related. As time past history is lost, add war and hate. More things are forgotten or erased. Evolution of humanity. Only if the temple, and land can talk. All we can do is learn from our past and make peace for the future.

អ្នកបុរាណវិទ្យាបរទេសបានបង្ហាញភស្តុតាងនោះ។ វត្ត​ភីម៉ៃ​ត្រូវ​បាន​កសាង​ឡើង​កាលពី​៣០០​ឆ្នាំមុន​វត្ត​អង្គរ។ និងសាងសង់ឡើងដោយជនជាតិថៃក្នុងសម័យនោះ។ គឺព្រះបាទសូរ្យវរ្ម័នទី1 លុះមកដល់រជ្ជកាលព្រះបាទសូរ្យវរ្ម័នទី2 ទ្រង់បានធ្វើចំណាកស្រុកមកកសាងអង្គរវត្តនៅពេលក្រោយ ដោយសារគ្រោះរាំងស្ងួត។ នៅ​ពេល​ដែល​ប្រាសាទ​អង្គរ​ត្រូវ​បាន​គេ​សាងសង់ ជនជាតិ​ដើម​ភាគតិច​នៃ​ប្រទេស​កម្ពុជា​ត្រូវ​បាន​គេ​ប្រើប្រាស់​ជា​កម្មករ។ ប្រាសាទអង្គរមានរហូតដល់រជ្ជកាលព្រះបាទជ័យវរ្ម័នទី9។ មែនហើយ មានជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចម្នាក់ដែលបះបោរ ជននោះគឺជា ព្រះបាទស្រីសុរិយោពណ៌ទី1។ ព្រោះ​គាត់​ជា​ទាសករ​យូរ​មក​ហើយ។ នៅពេល​គេ​បណ្តេញ​ជនជាតិ​ថៃ​ដែល​បាន​សាងសង់​ប្រាសាទអង្គរវត្ត និង​ជា​វណ្ណៈ​គ្រប់គ្រង​ចេញពី​ទឹកដី​។ ដូច្នេះ ព្រះបាទស្រីសុរិយោពណ៌ទី1 បានប្រកាសខ្លួនឯងថាជាស្តេចនៃប្រទេសកម្ពុជា។ នេះ​ហើយ​ជា​មូលហេតុ​ដែល​វត្ត​ភីម៉ៃ​ត្រូវ​បាន​គេ​កសាង​ឡើង​មុន​វត្ត​អង្គរ។

I am an archaeologist, don't argue. I have studied all my life. Why wouldn't I know about the past of the Thai people during the reign of King Jayavarman who spread influence to lower Cambodia? At that time, there were no Khmer people. The Khmer were a tribe that was just slaves to the Thai-KHOM people. Later, the Thai-KHOM people lost their power, so the Khmer rose up to rule that land. Angkor Wat was built by the ancient Thai-KHOM people. There is evidence of carvings on the walls of Angkor Wat that say Siem Kuk, but the Khmer people and the Khmer government tried to erase the letters on the walls that have a lower slash referring to Siem Kuk from the walls. The model was from Phimai Stone Castle. The Khmer appointed their own kings. The first Khmer king was King Taeng Wan. King Jayavarman was the king of the ancient Thai-KHOM people, not the Khmer king. You have to studied your own history well. Don't be brainwashed by the French colonial powers or by the Hun Sen government. Take what is right as wrong and only remember the wrong things to talk about. You have to bring evidence to argue and use it as historical references. And another thing, let me tell you that the Thais have ruled Cambodia for more than 400 years. Do you know this? Don't tell me you don't know.

You try carefully going back and reading. Nothing mentions Khmer at all. Read carefully the Prasat Hin Phimai. All around area are surrounded by ancient building date back to 11th or 12th century and in presumption this place ws built by one of Khmer's king his name is Jayavarman I. So, King Jayavarman not Khmer but he is the ancient Thai-KHOM king. Not a Khmer king. Historian that studied about Phimai historical site said that these buildings are the same architecture technique as Angkor Wat in Cambodia. Of course, because the Phimai stone temple was the prototype of the later Angkor Wat, only 900 years old. But Prasat Hin Phimai is more than 1000 years old. Prasat Hin Phimai is a grand palace that center this historical site. It's one of the ancient palace that still in perfect condition compare to the other palace from the same era. Unlike the other palace from the same era that was built to face Finally, he concluded about the Khmer art. Because Khmer art has its roots from ancient Thai-KHOM art original.

ខមសាង ខមអ្នកកសាងប្រាសាទ