Especially as a laymen. I’m glad he’s asking questions from the perspective of the common man like me and not a fellow physicist or something. It lets Sean break down and simplify his answers better.
we all reside in God's greenhouse , a flat and motionless plane surrounded by a vault. It says in the bible that Earth is God's footstool. Jesus is the truth, the light, and the life ... everything will be revealed to us on the day of judgement. Don't worry about misleading scientism, go do your own investigative research & find out the what they're hiding.
Imodium Adhere to information written in a book thousands of years ago over modern scientific research that is constantly updating itself with provable information. Scientists are trying to move humanity forward and your mentality slows us down.
I hope this man knows his hard work to understand and share this information is such a motivation to be a more knowledgeable person. I respect learned people and hold them high in my eyes.
Speaking as a creative, working with visual art, with music, with poetry, I love discussions like these. A lot of my output is "abstract", and intuitive. On any given day I will select the materials I'm going to use with little thought, or plan. A canvas, something to make marks with, a manner to adopt, or something accidental happens, and make a gesture, select another colour and so on. In music I might sit at the keyboard of a synthesiser or piano, and pick out a random melody, or tap the keys on a drum machine, pick random strings on a guitar and play. A poem usually begins with a rational thought, or idea, and I can then introduce and play with words in any way I want. To think that all this is governed by scientifically proven or theoretical outcomes is simply fascinating, and inspiring... Thankyou for this 😎
It's like "take a penny, leave a penny." So when you do take an electron, make sure to leave a free one somewhere else. Also, I recommend vodka to wash down that electron when you're taking it.
There are plenty of geniuses out there, but Sean Carrol’s bravery and ability to be open minded about something as mind bending as parallel universes, is truly unique and is a gift.
But why do they have to be parallel Universes? I think a parallel 'Universe' is possible but unlikely. I think its far more likely there are something more like parallel 'spaces' & I think its far more likely these parallel 'spaces' can either occur or constantly co-exist along-side each other. I also think its more likely that parallel 'spaces' are able to move within another parallel 'space' adjacent to our own. Parallel Universes are just to expected & obvious to actually exist. What do we see in our own Universe>? Its made up of 'Spaces.' I think this is far more likely & I think its far more likely that there is a hierarchy of 'Spaces' & our physical Universe is towards the middle to lower part of a Pyramidal hierarchy with the vastest spaces being at the bottom & the more narrow spaces & least populated spaces at the top. All sounds a bit weird, I know. But thats also why I thinks it more likely than something as predictable as entire Universes that parallel each other. That is even particularly interesting.
Well, it doesn't take a genius to understand physics, but I can not, and thankfully acknowledge that many intelligent individuals can. Everyone has a talent for things that others do not. That makes life frustrating but interesting. I'm 77 years old and still searching for my talent, and I feel that soon I will be privy to what the ability was if I do not discover it first before my last breath:)
@@thetruthchannel349brother i think first you need to study more science and understand what parallel universe means. It literally means another space and time that doesn’t interact with our universe even though it could literally be sitting right next to our universe. So the “parallel spaces” term you were using means exactly what a parallel universe is and technically you were contradicting your own claim with your own theory. But Please tell me on what basis are you making these conclusions that possibility of parallel universes is unlikely ?
@@Jgill99911 *parallel spaces do not require parallel Universes & they can interact with our space-time. We see that with UFOs or 'UAPs.' Technically, if you can bend or warp space-time you are creating a Parallel space. What I find odd is why no one asks 'On what basis are the conclusions of Parallel Universes likely?' Do all these Universes expand at the same rate both Universally & Locally? Will they collapse at the same moment? What makes Universes want to BE parallel? The fact they are parallel denotes interaction. What facilitates such an interaction? If they don't interact they are not parallel.They are something else IF they exist.*
In the 1 universe that Joe Rogan didn’t smoke DMT, is the one where YOU are doing this podcast and Joe is watching. And commented “Even with unlimited parallel universes, there isn’t 1 SteelersGoingFor 7 who hasn’t done dmt.”
Believe me, many physics teachers teaching the subject for years still saying they walked into they wrong class every time they start talking about QM 😂
In the summer of 2012 I was building fence, and the outside temp was 115 in the shade. I witnessed a lighter explode inside my truck. It happened so fast, but I saw a ring of energy pulse out from the lighter which was encompassed in a perfect sphere. Immediately followed by a fireball. It was magnificent!
One day I had a dream that was so realistic it freaked me out. I was going up the stairs in some building and , suddenly , I was separated into two people and they went into different worlds. First world was a regular world and the other one was a world of suffering where death did not exist. I stopped being a human in the other world. I became separate body parts that lived on their own. Some of the body parts were still connected. It was terrible and very dark in there. The version of me that was in the other world still had the phone and could call someone. She called the friend, but she couldn’t say anything because the body parts did not work the same way. It was terrible. Sometimes, I wonder if it wasn’t a dream. but it would crazy to even consider it was real. If it was real, I glad I live in this universe
He lost me a little, because I'm just learning about quantum mechanics, but it reminded me that it takes different 'versions' of ourselves when we evolve and grow to different levels. Also, our consciousness may be beyond our understanding, pertaining to the sophistication of our brain. Anything is possible, look where we are in the universe. I look forward to reading his books. Excellent interview, Joe. 💜
This is why Joe Rogan is so cool. One day he'll have Joey Diaz on talking about shitting his pants, the next time he has world renowned academics on and is equally comfortable with all of them. Good for you Joe.
joe rogan is the man! haha he also brings light on the benifits of psycadelics and the power they have to change lives. psilocybin showed me my drinking for what is was and brought the truth to me (though uncomfortable) and gave me the strength to fight back. 77 days off alcohol now
And he's good at interviewing, and I love his devil's advocate and constant looking up stuff while he's talking to his interviewees. Then all the other stuff works too: he has a good voice and he's interesting himself, and while he's politically outspoken, he's open to everyone and everyone regardless of politics or other like him. He's created a very open cunning persona that let whoever he's interviewing come out and say hi! LOL!
I was a math major in college. We were asked many times if we thought math was invented or discovered. I was always on the invented side. I really appreciate hearing someone like Sean Carroll constantly using the word invented when regarding math and pioneering mathematicians.
I'm leaning on the discovered side .. because it's the same anywhere in the universe. If we invented something it wouldn't exist in the exact same way anywhere else.
I'm more impressed with Joe that he can actually conduct this podcast with continued fluency...my mind is fried and I can definitely absorb most subjects on many levels but thus is totally beyond me
@@needlessoptions so it should be Elon’s goal to develop fun and rewarding job positions for you and everyone else? What do you do to make people’s lives better or do you not hold those standards up against yourself because your not a billionaire and thus you feel only “certain ppl” owe?
@@marks8432 nah, anyone with a good high school physics education can understand the premise. anyone with an undergraduate education physics education can follow the math. people who claim that modern physics is nonsense, conveniently ignores the fact that modern computer chips rely on that knowledge that an appreciable percentage of the population have the capacity to evaluate independently.
For me it would have been easier to understand if he described observation using entanglement earlier....the slit experiment shows the measurement vs observation difference perfectly. His explanation of many universes was excellent. Although i will say I think I agree w Penrose when he said Schroedinger was actually making fun of people when he used his Cat example. I still have a hard time rationizing how observing smething can actually change it, I still dont quite get the particle vs wave function stuff. Help me makes sense of it.
Me at work seeing the wire-rope descend from the overhead crane, I know its lowering but it looks as if its ascending due to the cable wrap pattern. One of my universal selves is going to successfully land the load and one is just wrong lol.
tipping on acid made me have this quantum experience where I was looking at this grand piece of architecture, & when I observed it I saw it from every point of view. as if every possible way for me to experience viewing that object was culminated into one singular moment really put into perspective the many ways to experience life.
The funny thing is that when we observe photons we think that the relationship is between the observed & the observer. The universe is the Third observer. Because we have no point for where the universe begins or ends, we have no point of reference for what is truly down or up. So when we measure these photons as going "down" or "up," do we take into account the amount of time it has shifted within its relativity to the universe? What if it is truly moving slower than we are, but we have a higher frame of reference that places adverse pressure on the object & causes us to see the item as zipping & zooming around when it is really just trying to dissipate into a perfect sphere?
I had to get on my Jamie shit n Google it n still can't understand it🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤦🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️🤷🏾♂️ but I think it's something about nature, energy and openings plus unbelievable shit that's reality
In another Universe what are the odds we would even exist unless our ancestors made the same exact decisions? Either everything has to be exactly the same or everything would be totally different.
There is a universe where Joe Rogan is President of USA, another world where Joe Rogan is a physicist explaining quantum mechanics to a popular podcast host and MMA fighter; however, *all 17 trillion versions of Joe Rogan smoke DMT.*
Brainbuster that is 111% accurate and to go a step further there is a unique energetic vibration in each one of these dimensions that defines the energy density level of any particular probability/dimension. In this reality we are currently moving into fourth density from third density
If you observe a particle's position, you can't observe its' velocity. If you measure its' velocity, you can't observe its' position. To measure velocity, you have to measure the time it takes to go from point A to point B meaning it's in motion. And if you observe it's current location, you're only measuring it at a single point in time. That was an explanation I had heard quantum mechanics described. I don't remember where I heard that from. I just remember it
I was put into an induced coma and was in the multi-verse. There are countless versions of your life running right now. When you take a nap When you feel that jolt you’re slipping into a parallel plane with an improved condition.
Quantum gravity is by far the most interesting aspect of QM. I might have been in 9th grade when I asked my PS teacher if gravity could possibly be a quantum interaction occurring here & somewhere else at the same time. She did not appreciate the question. Not at all. Course, I never had a great many pleasant interactions with teachers or professors. Few & far between.
First of all, your question doesn’t make sense because what do you mean by gravity is a quantum interaction occurring here & somewhere else maybe explain that question with more detail. You can’t just throw around those terms first you have to learn what they mean and I’m not trying to make fun of you just saying that you need to learn more science and quantum mechanics then you would understand why your question doesn’t make sense😅
@@Jgill99911 *Actually QUANTUM GRAVITY is current thought on what Gravity is. You're not trying to not make fun of me. You CANNOT make fun of me. You're the one that looks stupid here. Not me* )-
no again youre wrong but then pls explain what is quantum gravity without copy pasting from google @@thetruthchannel349 cause i been studying science for years and from i learned from sean carroll actually that we're still trying to make a working quantum theory of gravity but you're claiming that you already know or have a working theory of quantum gravity. so pls do you mind explaining that theory of yours ? cause you will win a nobel prize if you already have worked out the quantum theory of gravity.
For anyone who's confused: -The scientists are trying to predict the behavior of electrons(it has a 50/50 chance of going up or down) -They're unable to predict its behavior because it is actually going both up and down -Except when the scientists observe it, it becomes fixed in one position -The scientists are actually observing both positions, but in different universes -In one universe they'll see it going up, and in another they'll see it going down -This way the molecule is in both positions at once
I think the scientists are missing that a photon is information and you can only "get" information as fast as it gets to your eyeball or measuring device and that is the bottleneck in this equation
@@ololusername There are things that are faster than the speed of light so the information gathering using light is useless. When they discovered the neutrino it became more obvious that we have no idea whats going on
They can also literally go back in time and change its state, look up the double split experiment. Therefore it suggests that consciousness actually affects the particle themselves. So does consciousness create reality or vice Versa. If you Figure out the double split experiment it’s a guaranteed noble prize in it for you.
the key point in trying to understand quantum mechanics is to first make clear which interpretation u are trying to learn and not try to mix till u understand them independently.
@@piotr5261 I don't. There's dreams I won't remember until I am reliving the moment and I literally feel like I just woke up again, or like I realized that I was in a dream, and suddenly I was back in reality, if you will, thinking "I dreamed about this once, but I don't remember when". I'll never forget the first day I ever remember perceiving the world though lol. I... Realized, I guess, that I was sitting in a shopping cart, and was looking at donuts through the glass. I ended up looking over at my grandparents and asked them who they were, what grandparents were, and what a store and shopping carts were, even though I felt like I somehow knew deep down what they were, but like it was connecting for the first time. After that, it just seemed to me that I was acting strange to everyone else, so I never put much thought to it and began living afterwards without a second thought. It wasn't until years later that I realized that I did not have a single memory, or anything to recall, before that exact day, yet I remember years worth of knowledge and events after that specific day. I genuinely couldn't comprehend the objects and terms around me in that store, and wasn't even sure what communication even was or how I was even able to speak. It wasn't until years later that I've realized that was the day I began to truly be conscious.
Bones It’s because we’re reliving our lives. Everytime we die, there’s infinite versions of you that died, but there’s also infinite versions of where you survived. You get transported to another reality where you survived, but it’s a reality closest to the one you died in.
I struggled to wrap my brain around quantum theory for a long time. One night I thought it finally clicked for me, and something Sean said confirms it...maybe it will work for you. I was laying in bed one night looking at Sirius, and tripping out on how or why the light traveled all this way just for me to see it, and that's where it ends. I thought about how a star functions, and like Sean said "The wave function of an electron goes off in a spherical wave", and I realized that the light was'nt there for me to see...I'm just an observer of one point of its spherical wave that's going out in all directions. " Its not going out in a straight line, but when you look at it, you see a straight line" "How we describe it is different than how we look at it" Think about the fusion that makes our sun work, and radiate its energy in ALL directions, but as an observer, we see it as a single point of light in the sky.
What if we are part of the sun.. something like an outer core... we are in a constant state of velocity rotating outside of the sun like a satellite protecting it. We are trapped in a layer of the Star's magnetic field
@@itsJDarts I not trying to come up with anything... because when you look at it, we are trapped in a layer of the Star's magnetic field and we are rotating around the star .... am I incorrect???
The sun doesn't stop shining in all directions except ours when we observe it though - the point of Sean's explanation is that the electron as a particle could be anywhere in the spherical wave until you observe where, and that in another world it's somewhere else in the spherical wave when your other world self observes it. The sun's rays are also loads of photons, not just one.
The act of observation brings a momentary focus or directional polarization to local wave function. Observed electrons are being electromagnetic squeezed into a optical focus and the entanglement mirror returns the signal in a polarized rather than spatial state for measurement.
Speaking about universal mirrors, if you don't believe that given the same planetary initial conditions with organic organization and various choices via universal awareness capacity that other worlds similar and identical copy of ourselves don't exist while understanding the universal constant of the electron created by the forces that be, then you need to read more on quantum mechanics.
Even with an infinite number of realities, there is not one where Joe Rogan has never tried DMT. That is one of the limitations of the theory we yet have to solve -The Joe Rogan Paradoxon.
Is there anything in the equations to suggest that those other worlds are still active? I can accept that splitting is going on and the wave function can exist. However what if those other possible worlds are in some sort of stasis? Clearly we will never be able to interact with them, so why should we assume that they are themselves experiencing continuum?
I BELIEVE the probability of finding any electron (particle) either Up Down /left Right ! Totally depends on the axis of rotation & if it is clockwise or anti clockwise ! If anti clock wise it probability is more on left ( assuming axis of oration at 0 deg. Up)! Or right if clockwise ! One could reason at it would take more energy to drift right if particle is rotating anti clockwise or vice Vera !
The association of the main numbers in the field of mathematics with each other, reflects numerical sequences that correspond to the dimensions of the Earth, the Moon, and the Sun in the unit of measurement in meters, which is: 1' (second) / 299792458 m/s (speed of light in a vacuum). Ramanujan number: 1,729 Earth's equatorial radius: 6,378 km. Golden ratio: 1.61803... • (1,729 x 6,378 x (10^-3)) ^1.61803 x (10^-3) = 3,474.18 Moon's diameter: 3,474 km. Ramanujan number: 1,729 Speed of light: 299,792,458 m/s Earth's Equatorial Diameter: 12,756 km. Earth's Equatorial Radius: 6,378 km. • (1,729 x 299,792,458) / 12,756 / 6,378) = 6,371 Earth's average radius: 6,371 km. The Cubit The cubit = Pi - phi^2 = 0.5236 Lunar distance: 384,400 km. (0.5236 x (10^6) - 384,400) x 10 = 1,392,000 Sun´s diameter: 1,392,000 km. Higgs Boson: 125.35 (GeV) Golden ratio: 1.61803... (125.35 x (10^-1) - 1.61803) x (10^3) = 10,916.97 Circumference of the Moon: 10,916 km. Golden ratio: 1.618 Golden Angle: 137.5 Earth's equatorial radius: 6,378 Universal Gravitation G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N.m^2/kg^2. (((1.618 ^137.5) / 6,378) / 6.67) x (10^-20) = 12,756.62 Earth’s equatorial diameter: 12,756 km. The Euler Number is approximately: 2.71828... Newton’s law of gravitation: G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N.m^2/kg^2. Golden ratio: 1.618ɸ (2.71828 ^ 6.67) x 1.618 x 10 = 12,756.23 Earth’s equatorial diameter: 12,756 km. Planck’s constant: 6.63 × 10-34 m2 kg. Circumference of the Moon: 10,916. Golden ratio: 1.618 ɸ (((6.63 ^ (10,916 x 10^-4 )) x 1.618 x (10^3) = 12,756.82 Earth’s equatorial diameter: 12,756 km. Planck's temperature: 1.41679 x 10^32 Kelvin. Newton’s law of gravitation: G = 6.67 x 10^-11 N.m^2/kg^2. Speed of Sound: 340.29 m/s (1.41679 ^ 6.67) x 340.29 - 1 = 3,474.81 Moon's diameter:: 3,474 km. Cosmic microwave background radiation 2.725 kelvins ,160.4 GHz, Pi: 3.14 Earth's polar radius: 6,357 km. ((2.725 x 160.4) / 3.14 x (10^4) - (6,357 x 10^-3) = 1,392,000 The diameter of the Sun: 1,392,000 km. Numbers 3, 6 & 9 - Nikola Tesla One Parsec = 206265 AU = 3.26 light-years = 3.086 × 10^13 km. The Numbers: 3, 6 and 9 ((3^6) x 9) - (3.086 x (10^3)) -1 = 3,474 The Moon's diameter: 3,474 km. Now we will use the diameter of the Moon. Moon's diameter: 3,474 km. (3.474 + 369 + 1) x (10^2) = 384,400 The term L.D (Lunar Distance) refers to the average distance between the Earth and the Moon, which is 384,400 km. Moon's diameter: 3,474 km. ((3+6+9) x 3 x 6 x 9) - 9 - 3 + 3,474 = 6,378 Earth's equatorial radius: 6,378 km. By Gustavo Muniz
It looks straight because of perspective. The prisms of the solution...ie..water does not allow us to see but one perspective. I would think, viewing with different spectrums of light may show the perspective needed to view.
In IT, a function let say, may be inactive until à flag or à trigger is watching the one function above. So we are the variable or the trigger activated the function? It is blowing my mind and in same time make me thinking about what is so interesting to build understanding on it !
Another odd idea is "Quantum Jumping". A self-titled "American monk", named Bert Goldman, says he is able to enter an Alpha brainwave state, contemplate a skill he wants to learn, imagine he is walking down a hallway, enters a door and jumps through it to find his Doppelganger (who has his desired skillset). His current self absorbs the wisdom; then he snaps out of meditation (with an enhanced ability to rapidly learn said skill). Imagine being able to learn in such a way. Our educational-career would only last a few months.
*1 reason for the 'missing knowledge' is more likely than not to be related to the missing mass or missing matter problem. About 90% of all Matter that we should be able to observe we cannot find. Option A - It simply isn't there (Bad Option). Option B - It's hidden (Better Option). So theres more going on than isn't & that more is beyond our ability to observe which means particles/waves could be interacting or being influenced by other 'stuff' we can't see.*
