For those of you who don't understand how he got s^2. You see acceleration = velocity / time while velocity is equal to displacement / time that's how he got s^2
There are few things I don’t agree with. The symbol for kilo is small letter k, not capital. And 4000 is not the same as 4.000x10^3 but just 4x10^3 if you consider significant numbers. Let me know if those are mistakes
Thanks for you good explanation finally I understand significant figures I have a question in 19:09 Can we say 3.25+-0.25 If we can is there is a different between this and 3+-0.5 And which one is better and why?
can you explain how do we plug into calculators please? I tried some of the problems like the 117.8097245 into M and I got a complete different answers which maybe I'm plugging it in wrong
@@physicssumo774 CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Consider WHAT IS E=MC2, as c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. The fourth dimension IS consistent with TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. ACCORDINGLY, ON BALANCE, a given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
Thanks for asking! It's 0.3048m / 1ft, and it basically comes from the fact that there is 0.3048 meter in 1 foot. You can find the number on Google. Let me know if that makes sense
Let's think about this. Precision is relevant when a scientist makes many measurements. If those measurements agree with one another, than we can say that the measurements are precise. However, that does not necessarily mean they are accurate! Accuracy is defined as how close a measurement is to the true value. With that being said, I would tend to say that the number of significant figures tells us about the precision of a measurement, since we do not yet know whether it is close to the true value. If we did know that it was close to the true value, then we would also argue that the measurement is accurate! Let me know if this helps :))
@@muhammadargungu1801 CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Consider WHAT IS E=MC2, as c squared CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. INDEED, consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. The fourth dimension IS consistent with TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. ACCORDINGLY, ON BALANCE, a given PLANET (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME. c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
