Pico Neo 3 Link & Neo 3 Pro Custom Display Port Drivers Collection 2024- Link in Description 

My pleasure!

The Quest fanboys will disagree.

@@HDRGamingHub They can disagree all they like, Quest 3 for standalone can't be beat, but for PCVR it's still a compromise. I had a quest 3 (in fact I had 3 and each had dead pixels) and I also use a Quest pro (I still have the Quest pro as the Q3 isn't that much better), and neither of them are as good as the PN3L when used for PCVR, admittedly the pancake lenses are good but you still lose visual clarity from compression. Quest 3 is £479 and the Pico is currently £171, so quest fans can whistle 😉

😆 thanks!

Please see the replies to 'just posteds' comment. TLDR, is driver forces a render scale ontop of distortion profile, netting sharper results than steam vr which has it's own scaling to keep within original viewport size. You can test this by changing driver to 1.0 render scale, (1832 x 1920) and then crank the steam vr slider, you won't even get it close to the same visuals you get by default driver settings (1.5 render scale)

Starting, change steam vr video settings to manual 100% not auto The new step 2 will change the 100% value to steam vr ( if using anything other than 1.5) but that doesn't mean it gives the same image as simply raising the steam slider to similar values, the driver gets a better image, at no performance difference. So say you set 2.0, beat saber runs fine and looks great, but then you want to do fallout 4 or msfs, that stupidly high resolution will be a bad time 😂 You can either be lazy like me and just use the steam vr per game video settings to lower to whatever Res is actually doable ( 50% slider say ) and it will only change that one game, leaving you to still benefit from 2.0 everywhere else. Or, you can use different preset, but you need to restart steam vr to see that new 100% global resolution value and that's changing everything, including any percentage per app settings you done. Leros tool is essentially a way to edit the values without looking at desktop or reaching for keyboard. Any changes you make to the ini file through either manually doing it yourself, transfer of preset step 2 or through Leros overlay, you will need to make save changes, exit steam vr and start steam vr again. Leros tool just has a handy kill process and boot button you can click, as otherwise even if you were using steam vr desktop view to do the desktop stuff, when you exit you will be blind ( black screen ) and need to go to pc and open steam vr again Once you find a good render scale value for the games you mostly play on library, then it's not really something you need to change again. If you do feel that you have alot of headroom spare ( use steam vr frametiming tool ) then instead of raising steam vr slider above 100 to say, 150 or over, just use a higher preset, or just use Leros tool to edit the render scale of rvrplugin to a higher value and click the button in the tool to restart steamvr

Some games don't react real time to steam vr slider changes, both global and per app, so you'll need to exit game and launch again to see Annoying, but that's why I only ever adjust down, if it's running like crap, I knock it back to what the standard resolution per eye would be in per app, instead of changing all games by adjusting the global Res

To clear up last bit, global Res 100% is the resolution figure per application video settings will see So let's say you had 80% global giving hypothetical 2300, then if you went into per app video settings it will say you are at 100%, but it's 2300. Meaning the % value is taken from global, not actually represented as the true 100% Which is why I just recommended finding that sweet spot for whatever the global 100% will be and adjusting per game, you know how much it is actually knocking off then

@@virtuallyreal So if i go from 2748x2880 to 70% using steamVR slider it will be 2300x2408 and to match it in config I should use RenderScale=1.1979166666666 and it will have the same resolution but with better, cleaner image? What about FOV settings? I see on my original RVRplugin it is 101 vs 94 here, does it impact resolution somehow? Also there is new line HeadToEyeDepthMeters - on your configs is always 0.0 exept "DEFAULT settings (unlocked) - Not needed" folder where it has value 0,038? I don't see that command in original ini Is it mean that original (default one) is 0.038? Sorry for so many questions :)

@@juu226 @juu226 render scale you want to keep a single decimal as this value now applies to the 1920x1832 in distortion.dll, both height and width together, you've already noticed steam vr doesn't give same numbers even if you go 150% slider on after setting render scale to 1.0, it won't match the default values of 1.5 render scale, but you'll find you can get close enough number match, and if spending the time doing comparisons will certainly feel the better edge to edge clarity from doing it higher in driver compared to steam vr Fov setting is actually 93.4 for display port, the 101 is for the wireless (the driver is tapping into it's in file for easier changes). Both have different distortion and viewport sizes, while you are free to increase Fov it will break the image, the slight correction to fov and the head to eye distance corrects some of the barrel distortion/ background shift when looking side to side at something like overlays, cheap hack really to avoid very lengthy changes in distortion.ini (I spent months messing with those- it's hard to do without proper calibration machines) All of the values inside ini file you would get in a fresh install of Pico link aren't for the DP mode at all, it never reads anything from that file, I needed to change those values even for default when the driver starts reading that same file, which is why I warn the image in wireless will get messed up, as it will still read that file in wireless mode only now the values are completely wrong for it. If you want to change separate height and width resolutions, do not use render scale as instructions say, get recommended target will let you set individual per eye numbers But, you have to factor in that anything not a perfect scale will cause softness in image as you create a difference to the original viewport ratio. (Why the exact pimax crystal resolution looks like crap for it's resolution) The more resolution you push in driver, the further out the clarity gets. The unlocked drivers won't offer something like oculus debug tools where you can change fov for performance saving or squashing for supersampling, that is already a thing within steam vr per application video settings, you will need to restart some games for fov cull to actually reduce the render load, as something like HLA will actually increase GPU load when reducing fov as it supersamples,l (looks incredible with something like 2.0 profile and 50% letterbox fov) .... until game is restarted of course, then it applies the lower resolution for fov cull

im doing it through wireless it wont let me do wired

ACC is a bit of a mess in VR Could be shader compilation stutter from unreal engine. If lowering all settings down low, resolution to potato and no cars on track still does it, then it's definitely shader complication, nothing you can do unfortunately. Don't run anything like fpsvr, instead use steam vrs Frame timing tool, you'll likely see a red line from drop.

@@virtuallyreal thank you very much. i'll give that a go.

Disable the Steam VR Home. It was causing stutter in most games to me.

Headset placement here really matters as the lenses don't blur Iike others but will distort, doesn't help the supplied faceplate puts you very far from lenses increasing risk of not fitting correctly. Rather than tweak distortion values try get closer to lenses if you can and have a reference to look at while adjusting headset up or down, for me both picos sit quite far down on my face compared to my oculus headsets.

@@virtuallyreal Thanks for the response. I have noticed that these lenses seem better than my last HMD, so it makes sense that there would be a con. I have looked into making a custom faceplate and buying all the other parts, but the cost was building up. For now I have ordered a relacement official facial for this HMD from Ali, which I plan on cutting up to about half the depth and for it to mould to my face better. It was around a tenner and should be here at the end of the month or early July. If it works then I may look into making something better or just settle with it. Either way, its a good little HMD for ~£200. Again, thanks for your time and all the work you have done.

@@user-po7uk1wj4b Did this fix your distortion issue?