What's your favorite ending? Какая ваша любимая концовка? if you like alternate endings, you can watch my Ukraine superevents - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LHLBBt_flxw.html
I'm Argentinian and of course is terrible! I mean, do you imagine half of South America ruled by Peron and his followers? It would be like Congo but with thrice the thirdworldism
The idea of world peace is beautiful, everyone drinking beers together, laughing, sharing, and leaving their difference behind to reach even further beyond.
No, it's not beautiful. It's stupid and ugly. It's our differences that make the world a beautiful place. If the world becomes one place all the cultures will die out and everyone will be the same. That kind of world is boring and trash and no one wants to live in that kind of world.
We have arrived, and it is now that we perform our charge. In fealty to the God-Emperor, our undying Lord, and by the grace of the Golden Throne, I declare Exterminatus upon the Imperial world of Earth. I hereby sign the death warrant of an entire world, and consign a billion souls to oblivion. May Imperial Justice account in all balance. The Emperor Protects.
@@CornaGaymink Damn, mate, first we learn it takes a long time to find you, then we learn you can shut down respiratory systems, then learn you can affect sight, hearing, and taste, and now you can time travel?
@@guilhermeroyama8842 Yeah, but when the covenant got to the earth we were already close to extinction, a lot of planets were annihilated by the covenant and the war in earth didn't came so well eaither. We had one step in hell at that moment
This was supper accurate. Also I love the attention to detail when you depicted the Mediterranean Sea being drained in the "Terrible end" because WWII nerds like me know that that was exactly what the Axis powers would have done if they won the war. I do think you could've added another ending, however, called "Endless wars" where it is set in the not-too distant future and countries (in the Middle East especially) fight for resources like fresh water because of global scarcity and climate change. Or maybe it would make more sense to just have another ending and call it "Climate change" because of the current climate crisis and depict the world with higher sea levels.
Wanting to drain the Mediterranean and actually doing it are 2 very different things. It would take like 100 years to do if we used all man power we had and it would be a stupid idea at the end of the day
@@cobaren5883 when think about that again…. Yea it would be the worse one possible Should change the ending from chill to smart ending. where everyone is pretty much well educated and karen, anti-vaccine, and other idiots were just didn’t exist
That's... Half of what has happened. Most people just vibing at home watching the news and gaming, and then seeing people protest and riot during covid.
Glorious ending: there is no such a thing, like death anymore and people live peacefully, there are no evil people, God is taking care of everyone, so people don't need to work, everybody celebrates and life is good for everyone.
Its from my homecountry,Argentina The lyrics go a little like this "Coronavirus,Coronavirus, Do not touch your face or You'll catch the cold Coronavirus,Coronavirus Its really bad,Its really effective"
Ядерное оружие это так, показуха. Все говорят про уничтожение жизни на земле и всё такое, но никто не хочет кнопку нажимать, и даже при вторжении на территорию ядерной державы скорее страну сдадут, чем геноцид устроят. Так что я бы боялся не ядерного апокалипсиса, а медленного экономического, социального и геополитического удушения. Сейчас открытое вторжение устроить трудно и непродуктивно, а вовлечь в экономическую сферу влияния и выбить опору из-под ног это любо дело. Китай в Центральной Азии, США в Южной Америке, Россия так же бы людям жизнь портила где-нибудь если бы могла. Вот чего бояться надо
@@matheussanthiago9685 Hey man that’s kinda what happened with the Mongolian empire (and the Roman Empire)- but I’m sure we’d find SOME way to make it work
Best Ending: Through endless wars, Earth states have become hyper-militarized, and are able to repel an alien invasion though sheer force of combined will and firepower. They scavenge alien technology, and use it to become a space-faring Imperialist empire that conquer vast swathes of the galaxy in the name of the Earthly Empire, bringing glory and honor to all of mankind.
0:01 *Good ending 0:07 *Bad ending 0:15 Poor ending 0:30 Unrealistic ending x1 0:44 Unrealistic ending x2 (as in there is no way they would've conquered that much/) 0:55 Mediocre ending 1:04 Whatever ending
@@japanpanda2179 I want an ending where communities can forge their own destinies, where the world isn't dominated by a few regions, and where people can easily relocate toward a region that reasonably aligns with their views. North America, or at least Canada, is a massive swath of land with fairly similar laws. While the neutral ending is far from dystopic, the power a few hold over tens or even hundreds of millions of people seems to grow every day.
Great Brazilian ending: The Brazilian Empire doesn’t fall, and the rest of the world wants to be united under the Flag of Freedom! Long live the Brazilian Empire! 🔰
Imperial Byzantine ending: the Byzantine empire never deteriorated, with Venice and Ravenna playing crucial roles, obtained complete hegemony over the Mediterranean, took over the Hanseatic League through conquering The Netherlands, thus expanded all over the world until all was united under the Imperial banner. Imperial Inca ending: (read Civilisations by Laurent Binet) and make it even better.
The common peace of humanity will never be achieved until we have to fight against something much stronger than ourselves. The common enemy that forces us to become friends
Isn't the Red End also the Good End, since the image alludes that 'being the dominant power' means having control over the world as one big government, and it being the 'End' alludes to there being no significant change thereafter, so no major wars and likely a transition into space travel. The Red End equals the Good End, though the Good End doesn't mean the Red End; All Ships are Boats but not All Boats are Ships. Also, why is uniting under one government the Good End? Surely the Good End is all peoples and cultures maintain their independence and self-governance while being a part of various unions (EU, States, NATO, United Celtic Republic) that benefit those involved and incentivize them against conflict. No One World Government, but instead a coalition of beneficial unions that disincentives conflict, or rather more direct conflict tackling the issues as nonviolently as possible, so every country is represented and independent, maintaining their culture and sovereignty while also a part of a bigger whole, but wherein no single union is the dominant power, avoiding institutions of direct global domination. If we're all one country, we suffer from over-inclusivity, wherein our individual cultures, our former national heritage, our people and histories, may be unfairly lumped together. And if it's a centralized government, to what extent would the same laws influence us. The traditions of one group may be disliked by another group across the globe, and whomever is in charge dictates it all for everyone. Representation only goes so far, your town has one representative amongst many advising your regional rep amongst many advising your grand regional rep advising your national rep advising continental rep advising your hemispherical rep, at some point your issue will be lost along the way. The devolution of power is necessary for a democracy that serves the people. Each former country would need its own parliament or senate to discuss local issues, and yet they're still subservient to the one true higher power of government, and so fundamental change may be impossible from a local level. If the higher ups decide to make Algeria a toxic waste dump, what power would the people there have to stop them, especially if all the other regions agree to it, sometimes democracy fails, and then there are no other unions to turn to for aid, there is the one union and it's unstoppable, there is no way to leave the union for a more mutually beneficial one, and even violent conflict against this oppression would be difficult, not because they've peacefully ended wars, but because war is impossible as the one world government can devastate any insurgents, the only freedom is a mass revolution. In this system, 'the wants of the many outweighs the needs of the few' is King, and the few can be any minority group, any group lesser than 50% of the world, which includes all contemporary minorities as well as all people of any former country (no country makes up 50% of the world). Systemic issues would become devastatingly prevalent. It would be much better for the Good End to be independent countries collaborating through a variety of optional unions employing governmental and economic systems that deter corruption. It won't be perfect, and war will still exist, but the capability of conflict can be necessary in some cases, and humans nor systems are ever perfect, but this will at least have far more effective conflict resolutions and more holistic representation. It is 5 AM and I just wrote a bloody dissertation in response to a 1:17 video because I have opinions and want everyone to hear them all the time, desperately craving validation and vindication. Welcome to the RU-vid Comment Section, we're all just shouting into the void.
yes it is the same thing. The fact that the video creator liked both comments promoting "good ending" and red ending proves he thinks so too and is a communist
Dagor Dagorath Ending: At the end of the times, Morgoth returns to Earth, former Arda, he recalls Sauron to life and take control of the world. The Valar break throug the Wall of Night from Aman, and this lead to the final battle for the fate of Eä.
+Yoda Eterno The 40K future has 20,000 years of unchecked technological development, with all of humanity united into a single Federation, with cooperation with various alien polities for the betterment of all.
@@newwaveinfantry8362 so you wanted to be a slave in a axis controlled world you know the germans and the japanese will never hesitate to send you to a death camp
@@myDickbiG I think the world may have been much better off had the Aixs powers won, because they would have pushed back the USSR and overthrown the communists. History is written by the winners and Hitler has become the face of evil in movies and modern culture. Some of the negative traits assign to him are accurate, while others are completely false. Some people legitimately think the axis winning would mean every country on earth is annexed by the axis powers, which is obviously impossible to implement. I generally strongly oppose authoritarian regimes, but there isn't enough reasoning to believe that such a world would be more authoritarian than the one we live in today, since the socialist regimes in the East woud have collapsed and the domino effect wouldn't have persued. This means there also wouldn't have been a cold war, which means more than thirty proxy wars either wouldn't have happened at all, or would be in much smaller scale. Similarly, even Germany would eventually liberalize, similar to how former socialist republics did.
