Please Watch This Game. 

Literally america’s strategy during WWII

Literally americas strategy during WWI

literally amercas' strategy in afganistan

Literally americas strategy in Iraq war

Literally america's strategy in-- Wait, THAT'S A STRATEGY! THEY COULD GUESS THE STRATEGY!

yup

Fr

Mmm see what u did there

Just gotta watch out for GM Kowalski

Yesssss.

For me, a fellow 1.5k player...., it suks xD

I'm 200

I’m a 500 as well and if I was white and played all those moves I would have felt like the biggest mega genius for taking all of black’s pieces.

I...dont...understand, my elo hovers around 200 but the last game I played last night had a 81.4 accuracy *HOW* do you get to 600 and play like this? 😭😭😭

as a 180 player, i am in awe at the complexities of the human brain

timestampp?

@@eritlux4393 3:44

F

As a terrible chess player that's never seen nor played an ELO game, I was like, Oh, yeah, that makes sense.

@@kindlin oh thanks god I’m not the only one…actually, as someone who plays chess that might be a bad sign

lol

buy english

Indeed

Hello chess

Lichess is better

Reverse fork really is the best way to put it hahaha

I’m totally adding that term to my Chess glossary.

Lmao that's so random how you noticed that, and so true

prolly microphone crack or glitch idk

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

@@fn_cxrsed2984 why did the guy who created the universe need to kill his son so he could forgive the whole world for not following the rules he made up?

@@themostdiabolicalhater5986 lol good counter-argument

@@themostdiabolicalhater5986 man i really need to re-read the bible

"you take sir" "no you take!" "Oooh my plasure... Take this one then!" "Oh noo you shouldm'y have done that! I'll let you take something better!!!"

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3lUp2C0pS_Y.html Finally it's here YES..

@muhammad koπtol (erectile dysfunction) i have been stuck at 600 for quite a while, and no matter how much i was studying my opening, i couldn't reach the 700. Then I studied a bit the endgame, not a lot, litterally 1 hour of my life studying of king and pawns/king rook and pawns. That was enough to send me to 800. People at 600 start malfunctioning in the endgame (more than they do earlier) and I was able to turn the tables being down a rook and a piece quite constantly

@muhammad koπtol (erectile dysfunction) how does age have nothing to do withn your rating

That literally happened to me yesterday. It was a bullet game, and my knight was "trapped". I spent 15 (!) seconds - literally a quarter of the entire game - trying to find a way to rescue it, and eventually did using tactics (I moved the knight to a square from which it could be captured but then skewered my opponent's pieces). Worst part? My knight wasn't actually trapped - it had a completely free rook in the corner to capture. Not only that, attacking that very rook was LITERALLY the reason my knight moved in there in the first place. But my brain had just assumed my opponent would move the rook, so when my opponent trapped my knight instead I was like "shoot, I missed that move" because I hadn't calculated it, completely forgetting that I hadn't calculated it BECAUSE IT JUST LOSES A ROOK. Actually, that's not even the worst part. The worst part is that I am 2300, and my opponent was 1700. I ended up winning the game eventually, but the dangers of playing lower-rated players sometimes come from the most unexpected of places.

@muhammad koπtol (erectile dysfunction) im 13 and im 1500 or at least 13 yr old should be 4 digits and not play like this

In a REALLY bad sense.

I have mastered the fork of king and rook

France vs moved left side france

@@the1minuterandoms11 what you mastered now in more than a year

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EfPhnt_qP_c.html here you go ;)

that would be a bit hard, because it's impossible to blunder on your first move or so

That's quite a smart concept. Finding the least blunderous move that would of course be a blunder is actually hard.

That would be a brilliant fun-mode!

this is the best comment. and i wish there should be a game like this. like you should win a race in which the slowest guy wins!

🤣

As a fellow 450 player, I think these 2 deserve 400.

@@GameristicForce as a 110 player i think they deserve lowest rank of 100 i can easely take them both

i totally feel this

As a 0 player, I think these guys deserve negative ratings.

It probably would have happened if the other 500 didn't resign. I don't understand why anybody resings at that level, I mean look at this game, why would you assume that there will be no more messing up?

Same

@@smrtfasizmu6161 a bunch of reasons: firstly, its online rating, it doesnt matter in the slightest. if youre down a queen and a bunch of pawns, getting a draw once in 50 games is not worth the time. secondly, people play for fun more so than to improve, especially at lower levels. playing an endgame which you have absolutely no chances is not fun at all. might as well resign and go to the next game where you can have a chance of fun. thirdly, they generally dont know how bad they or their opponents are. to them, they are playing good moves. so while you and i can watch the game and say “wow there were so many blunders, why would they resign when the opponent could blunder more?” they look at it and say “wow, my opponent took all my pieces, theyre so good”

@@brianaiitken Nah, white had 5 pawns, over/under is he ends with 3 queens at which point it's almost impossible for a 500 rated player not to stalemate. Never resign when a 500 rated player has pawns they can promote.

ha ha ha ha ha ...or give advvice to each other in the middle of the game. i remember i told the dude "mate me come on!" i explained how to do it ...i won by flagging lol

What levels are you guys now?

We need an update

i know!

Who's Levi?

@@antorseax9492 levi ackerman

@DontGetBackranked Levi Rosmann

@@antorseax9492 Dont know a Levi Rosmann mate

same

Lmao, I was shocked when he just took that rook with a pawn, like "wtf..."

me neither 💀💀💀

Thats how i feel every game😢

@o m This is literally how I lose my queen all the time and I still don't learn, I just completely forget that pawns take side pieces and not the ones that are in front of them and I'm like... oh wait..

what time control was it? is it bullet?

@@ifrimvictor theyre 600. Its probably 30+30

@@ifrimvictor I wish... it was a 10 min rapid game

@@luitmeinen1902 ouch! initially tought it was bullet, with our knowledge about openings and such time pressure, all we do is move pieces to survive when playing bullet. Got beaten by 400-500 elo on bullet even though on daily time control i play something in the range of 1200. :)

This game gave me brain damage tbh, what were you thinking when playing? Like your reasoning for doing these moves?

You are a genius.

Pro Tip: just be better

Learn to play an opening and don't outplay yourself, boom, 1200.

If u are 600, stop doing drugs

@@ElHal04 I'm 707 but I ain't that bad Edit: I'm 1200 now

Parallel world high level chess

Minus carlsen

No until u know force check mate by getting check

It makes me sad that I'm rated 300

Minos

yeah i honestly don't understand how they're as high as they are

@@traviswilkins-kd6jx i guess you can let it slide by saying that playing chess puts you in a state where its harder to see these moves than when you're watching but not to this lvl ofcourse

@@raymindgg4874 yeah i think about that a lot, but it's just not the case with things that are this obvious

I’m below 300 and still I can still spot good moves 😂

I think this is my favorite comment on this video. Thank you for your honesty. I would’ve made some of the moves myself.

just play e4

I don't believe someone can play worse than that, but if it's true... maybe you could give checkers a try?

@@Velerium I‘m trying my best though T-T

@@Velerium are you even aware of what you're saying there?

Ohh wow.. I read your comment clicked the time link and thought.. "What's wrong with rookE4??" Those pawns man!!! Every time!!

i swear it's the confidence black and levi made that move with, it just doesn't occur to you that he placed his most valuable piece where a pawn can take it right after for free

Ya man he distracted us so effectively

There I would take the c6 pawn with my queen. Then take the rook with the queen forking the bishops

I'm a 700, I did not see that Rook was hanging. I think alot of these stuff happens in my games too. It's as simply as we don't see it. All our moves does not have to have a plan, I can't think that far or Idon't know what creates a good attack. I'm trying to just not hang my pieces, then I end up in a fork, or bad trade and lose the game. Especially forks is hard as they are not natural for us 700 to spot.

omg hello zero two

@@zerotwoisreal Hi!!

Omg I'm also scared of playing real ppl bc every time I play I lose😢

Qxc6+ is fine, because let's say black play Bf7 to block, you can play Qxe4+ and winning and additional Bishop on e1.

Winning 6 points instead of five. Nicely done.

Same

*Bd7

It's not that that's a bad move. It's just that black paid no mind to the pawn at all.

You are going to be CONTENT

😂😂😂😂 u must be proud for what good that will be mentioned

I'm rated low 900 and this is still a fear of mine. lmao

I’m 800 and my bf is 1600 and we always laugh that some of my games def should end up at Gotham chess channel and he says he’ll be happy to submit them 🤣

Im an 1850 and one of my games at this range should be featured. I hung a queen for 6 moves, went from completely winning to a draw, to my opponent moving to the only square where he could get forked. I'm not sure if i won also. Can't make this up.

I was about 800 against a 1400 who got 2 pawns promoted without close attention to where they were ... immediate stalemate.

Not really. I am 500 player and this shit is horrendous. I have never encountered a 500 player playing that bad . Not even ones in 400s. Been a 350 player and even i was not this stupid

As a rating 300 something i would never play this badly in a chess game ever, even on my first round i feel like both of the 600 are kids who just started playing chess with looking at 0 resources

When i used to be 600, i..... looked like a hacker because i always won in 4 moves

Ngl every 300 person I’ve played has been playing really well for 300 like there is not as many bad moves as you might think there would be

Yeah it's like they just played against 100 players to get a lot of elo but they play terribly

then howd you go for a walk

@@MrDrBass lol

When

Same

and people say that chess is boring and only for nerds :)

@@valep2796 the chess is boring and only for nerds lmao

@@alextorres7295 Then dont watch chess?

​@@alextorres7295 😂

Same I'm like 650, were not that bad cmon givin us a bad rep :(

@@Joe_rogan.Experience I have a feeling this was a bullet game. I'm a 400, even I'm not this bad if I have 30 minutes to think and plan ahead while boring the hell out of my opponent😭

@@larsswig912 Levy said at one point during the video that a person (i forgot black or white) had 7 minutes on the clock

Agreed completely

I think it's more impressive to me that this game is so bad... it feels fake. But, I've seen low elo chess... so it's definitely not.

This game makes my 850 elo battles look like genius chess games.

@@descendency It's nothing compared to 100 elo play, it's actually insane how they play, just random moves with 0 logic, never able to checkmate btw. I've tried to teach a 100 elo player how to ladder mate (he's 9 y.o so it's not too bad). I set up a board with just a king vs 2 rooks, and he was drawing by 50 move rule every time even after i showed him how to do it lmao

@@ironeagle4274 just got to 800 elo and can definitely agree with this

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3lUp2C0pS_Y.html Finally it's here YES..

The brilliant move is f3 because white is attacking Black's rook

​@@pogcow4178is bro dumb

Wow, i wonder why?

@@PecsaV beacuse they are frozen

HEART OF SHAME

Strongly agree

I don't like the clickbait, I just don't like the tournament recaps either. I'm not on RU-vid to study, I'm here to get some entertainment while I rest from working.

@@impishlyit9780 Good for you

@@rootbeerfloathaspop3301 Get out of here with that bullshit, I'm explaining a stat.

That's by far the best roast I've ever seen

What does it mean though ?

@@Lucifer_movies Brain wrinkles give it more surface area In simple words, and without explaining how, that translates into more intelligence Koala has no brain wrinkles, smooth, perfectly shiny, yummy eukalyptus, sheer focus and happiness achieved

@@agentj3627 thanks for explaining

Emotional damage

ELO