Poilievre kicked out of parliament for calling Trudeau a “wacko” 

Total projection by Poilievre. He's the wacko! The guy seriously thinks that electricians capture electricity from lightening! He is totally unfit to be PM!

Trudy is betraying Canadians left and right... now immigrants get fast-traced government mortgages, while Canadian students are wlft suffering in debt unable to find decent paying jobs.

Using this ableist language is pre twentieth century.

@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrrwhat

@@nmacesic1 what don’t you understand that you can’t clear up with an ai service?

The other 10% just don't think at all.

I was thinking a few things far worse than 'wacko.'

Not so fast there billy-ray 😂😂😂

Only in your delusions. Maybe 40-50% think that.

no he is not! 90% of Canadians have controll of name calling you wako!

I agree ☝️

That's a solid and overlooked point. Given the bottom-dwelling quality of turdeau's character, "wacko " as it was used, was quite complementary. Thanks for the perspective.

most Canadians don't talk like HIll Billys

@@judynagy8612 most Canadians don’t support incompetence and corruption either, yet here you are.

That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.

Still unvaccinated, still alive. Sadly however my friend is not alive: died at the age of 27 of a brain aneurysm a few weeks after getting vaccinated and boosted (she had refused to be jabbed throughout most of the pandemic but had to be vaccinated and boosted for a job)

Come on!!

I died 4 times during the winters of severe illness an death. 😂

What name ???

never forget, never forgive

No, he's definitely not at fault here. Perhaps a bit of research into parliamentary procedures, member conduct, and permissible behaviour would shed some light on the matter for you.

@@cleopatrasnile Nice try! He didn’t use those same rules on Trudeau! You’re obviously a Liberal supporter!

Don't be racist Bob​@@bobskaftfeld5611

​​​@@cleopatrasnile he withdrew the term wacko and replaced it with extremist yet Fergus insists he ONLY withdraws. This is extremely biased because there alot of parliamentary words that you can use so that the statement becomes parliamentary

Poilievre could have simply withdrawn the comment. There are rules in the house and Poilievre must follow them while in the house. Simple.

And what about Poilievre acting like a child?

What Global doesn't show is Trudeau labelling Pierre extremist in his previous comment, which is why Pierre changed it to "Extremist" to make a point, of the bias this SPeaker was showing.....SINCE WHEN, can you call names like Extremist in parliament.....ONLY SINCE A LIBERAL APPOINTED SPEAKER has taken that seat has no CLUE what unbiased is, obviously. They also don't show the full conservative party get up and leave, costing Canadians HOW MUCH MONEY FOR THAT DAY, and conveniently didn't report on that either, or get a financial count on how much money it cost and how much time was left on question-answer period that his bias has cost us all with his Liberal Egomaniac Outburst. This guy's days are numbered for sure, as he doesn't seem to get much except how to sit and grin like a hog at the trough, that Pierre is trying to rectify. Wacko, I can assure you isn't the word the rest of us Canadians are using for Trudeau..... When he can Label truckers Extremist Nazis in one sentence, in Parliament, then in his next show he invites a Nazi and applauds him from the Ukraine, there is a bit of a bias right there. That alone should have gotten us a vote, if it was 20 to 30 years ago it may have gotten us an execution for treason. If it was in France they would have brought back the Guillotine, as the last guy in 1979 who was executed on it, likely did far less to deserve it than Trudeau has done to this nation.

@@thedevil4981 Strange, the name calling went both ways - wouldn't that make them both childish and both, should have been removed...

The Speaker is responsible for maintaining order in the Chamber by ensuring that the House’s rules and practices are respected. Which they clearly were not by Pierre Poilievre! The Speaker’s disciplinary powers are intended to ensure that the debate remains focused. The right to speak is tempered by the written rules of the House which, in general, impose limitations on what may be said and when, by whom and for how long. The proceedings of the House are based on a long-standing tradition of respect for the integrity of all Members. Pierre Poilievre consistently overlooks the importance of civility and respectful discourse, opting instead for vitriolic and disrespectful remarks. The use of offensive, provocative or threatening language in the House is strictly forbidden. Personal attacks, insults, and obscenities are not in order. The rules of the House are based on the idea that elected officials should work to maintain a sense of respect for all members of Parliament. The Speaker, along with the other presiding officers, is responsible for enforcing these long-standing rules.

@@thedevil4981 From the CBC: "Before Poilievre's removal, Fergus had Conservative MP Rachael Thomas removed from the chamber after she shouted at him and called him "a disgrace" for not immediately demanding that Trudeau withdraw his comment about Poilievre being "spineless." "

Seems like Pierre Poilievre's track record speaks louder than his words. From combative exchanges with reporters to cozying up to far-right groups, his behaviour reeks of extremism. With a departure from Canadian norms of decency and democracy, it's no wonder some fear a 'neo-Mulroney' era under his leadership. His populist rhetoric and divisive antics paint a clear picture: Pierre Poilievre embodies the very definition of 'wacko' and 'extremist'.

My thoughts exactly 😂

Said the extremist Con.

you are wrong wako

Trudeau isnt a wacko hes an absolute nutcase and an extremist, defending him now indicates he is not alone on those matters.

it's semantically wrong : whether or not a person is « wacko » (or any similar label) cannot be established by experience… at best, one can says that a person has an history of behaving in a manner that they, or other people, deem is « wacko, » but even that doesn't imply that each and every action they have ever taken, and/or that they will take in the future, can de facto be deemed « wacko »… and that's the whole point : the problem is never the person themselves, but what they do/don't do or what they say/don't say… and thus the problem here is not whether or not PM Trudeau « is wacko, » the problem, at least according to MP Poilievre, is that the policy « is wacko »… so, for his criticism to be legitimate, MP Poilievre should target the policy, and not the person of the PM, but he doesn't… he rather insists, even after being offered several opportunities to withdraw the personal attacks, and repeats the offense using different labels… moreover, personal attacks, such as name calling, are a well-known logical fallacy that consists in trying to discredit the person rather than properly refuting their points, or in the present instance, policies… and obviously that is fallacious because it doesn't actually address the points themselves… and ultimately that amounts to fooling oneself, as the points haven't been properly refuted, and thus the problem, and the burden of addressing it, remain whole… also, that a person resorts to such fallacious methods suggests that they don't really have any sort of substantial argument to support their criticism… if they did, they would simply have to present those arguments, and thus properly refute the points of the other person, and that would be the end of the story… truth needs no artifice… why all of this is important has to do with order, and how order is related to personal well-being… basically, allowing falsehood into one's mind is courting internal trouble, and thus upholding truth is a requirement of the physiology of human consciousness… « To conceive order, to return to order, to realize order in oneself, around oneself, by means of oneself, this is aesthetic and moral beauty, it is well-being, it is what ought to be. » ― Henri-Frédéric Amiel that being said, personally i typically lean towards the left, but as you pointed out, PM Trudeau has also made similar mistakes in the past, for instance during the last federal campaign when he quite spectacularly insulted people who were refusing vaccination… it would be nice if the people who want to govern a country would wake up to their duty of leading by example, and at the very least apologize for committing such unjustifiable missteps…

The Canadian parliamentary rules outline conduct guidelines for speaking members: Members must be in their designated place, stand to be recognized, and address the Chair when speaking. Attire expectations include jackets, shirts, and ties for male Members. Freedom of speech is a crucial privilege, but it must be exercised with respect and within the rules. Members are expected to maintain order and decorum, respecting others' viewpoints and avoiding offensive behaviour or language. The Speaker plays a vital role in maintaining order and enforcing rules. These rules are intended to foster respectful and orderly debate within the House-an aspect that seems lost on Pierre Poilievre and his internet trolls.

@@cleopatrasnile calling them « internet trolls » misses the mark though… there's no need to debase oneself in going there… stating the rules would have been sufficient… ✌

@@cleopatrasnile You have any self awareness whatsoever? Now do Trudeau smearing everyone. Seriously, this is the liberal voter on full display. Zero self awareness.

That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.

The house speaker is a liberal

Democracy is mob rule. Its how quebec has been in control since at least 1967.

It's not. It's Canada’s Dictatorship under the Liberal Regime.

That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.

When you look at it closer it's communism.

and for standing his ground, even if it meant he would be removed for the day! That's a guy who won't be intimidated and the kind of leader we need now that the country is in the toilet.

He was speaking like a child and he was kicked out of the house.

​@@northgoneCan you elaborate what you're saying? 😅 Your comment doesn't even make sense.

Insulting someone in order to prove your point, isn’t professional in a debate setting. Period. Not that hard to understand.

@@oliviadutta7991It does. Children speak with emotions. Adults speak with rational since they understand the repercussions of their words.

That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.

@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr Justin calls Pierre "Shameful" and "spineless" Justin then calls Pierre a "white supremacist" Fergus does nothing. Pierre says Trudeau's Canadian killing drug policy is "wacko" Fergus throws Pierre out. You can't have different rules for both sides of the house. (another YTer)

@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr There is nothing casual about accuratly describing Trudeau as wacko.

@@EyesRed I agree that all of them need an update re decorum, and I think it’s a distraction to think these are partisan issues. The problem tends to flow from discriminatory insurance and judicial environments….thats the “leaky roof” here. Pp and CO’s energy is better spent holding big pharma accountable for drug crises, targeting humane and constructive solutions. Dehumanizing rhetoric indicates a detachment from this reality that we should all be outraged about, I think.

@@jeffspicolli593 there is an ongoing horror that you or any leader feels entitled to throw around ableist rhetoric that dehumanizes people more, rather than getting to the root of a major drug crisis by holding big pharma accountable. That you and “most Canadians “ seem to leap on this discourse as a reason to ignore these facts seems to be where the deficiencies lie, no matter what side you tell yourself you’re on.

He’s a cad and a coward for not recognizing such a malicious error. That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.

The man with integrity would never allow himself to be removed from the house over a childish taunt. Your admiration is misplaced.

@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrrhuh? Sarcasm?

@@poomanjones4853 this issue is about people dying.

@@northgone there’s no integrity in behaving like children over issues as serious as a full blown health crisis. This sort of distorted sense of entitlement is a very serious problem in Canada.

WAHHHHH! THE RULES APPLY TO PP!

Stop with that. I support Pierre poliviere but the speaker needs to be respected. That’s normal and certainly not bias

I don’t want my fellow Canadians to act with emotions just like the usa.

Bias is crystal clear. Fraudeau wasn't asked to withdraw his statement for calling him spineless.

No one is above the rules of parliament. No special treatment.

You're either not Canadian or don't understand how our system works. Poilievre was WAY over the line. You don't argue with the speaker.

That's true but the call itself was absurd ​@@Caesar316

Another hated “man” in power over us!

@@Caesar316 You want to talk about Canada ? Tell me about the De Facto Government and Little Child Act Of 1990 Big Mouth

@@Caesar316 The speaker is a liberal and not neutral! Poilievre was no where close to the line that Trudeau set for setting the bar of "name calling" in the house and he never was told to leave. I would say you do not know how the system works or are aloof to how it works or are corrupt and play said system for what it is like Trudeau does

I did my taxes yesterday and have to pay $2k back by today otherwise they immediately place a 5% interest on top. I dread to think of the people having to may more. Bunch of thieves.

@@gingeroconnell4634 Well said! 👏 🙌

@@gingeroconnell4634 The raise they give to themselves by approving it themselves while Canadians struggle financially. Even a small corporation will look at your track record and evaluate, if and how much, you are worth a raise. By the lowest standards also, really no one in this parliament should be getting a raise.

Poilievre/Conservatives will have no social health care at all, it will all become pay as you go. Canada is ranked #25 out of 172 countries in the list of highest-taxed countries in the world. Pay your taxes on time and you won't get dinged for interest.

I, concerned you may be a bit misled into thinking this has anything to do with partisanship, and not ableism. Lots of tools to help clarify this for you.

He wasn't kicked out because he call JT an extremist, "wacko" was the final straw. PP would not denounce a white supremacist group that he has been courting.

I bet your afraid of rainbows

@@user-cr6rg6nl7j I bet you're afraid of rainbows.

@@WittyUsernamehere when you see them on cars etc

@@WittyUsernamehere you think our rainbows will convert you

Super. The less authoritarianism and corporate puppets, the better.

@@raynwolfsbane2084 Yet, you champion the liberals who have made the rich uber rich. Keep ha

Good. I’d be happy if they stayed out.

​@MrsRubens they will be the majority government next election

​@@MrsRubensfar left wacko 😅

Pee Pee is the joke!

Perhaps a crash course in parliamentary decorum and acceptable conduct might illuminate the path to enlightenment for you. Engage in a little literary exploration for the collective benefit of humanity, won't you?

@@cleopatrasnile "Literary Exploration"? It's obvious that you are trying so very hard to sound intelligent, but I suggest that you put aside the thesaurus.

@@karentoffan7027 What they said is indeed 100% accurate and makes complete sense. I do think a literary exploration would benefit you and most other conservatives these days, because if you think elegant words are an attempt to "sound intelligent", well that's honestly more of a self report than anything. People can be intelligent without TRYING to be, that often comes with the territory of knowledge.

Need a tissue?

@@Fenthule I used to teach English literature at at the university level, so please, I don't need the "benefit of literary exploration."

Was he arrested?

@@raynwolfsbane2084 Did anyone say they were arrested? Does one need to be arrested for censorship to occur?

@@raynwolfsbane2084 No. He was censored.

That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.

As a Canadian, I don't

Elections will be a fraud

He really did have that paper all ready to go, I said the same thing

your description is counterfactual : for one, replacing is not withdrawing… replacing a derogatory label with another doesn't really change the gist of the comment : it remains a personal attack… so then MP Poilievre was asked to withdraw the attack, but he refused to comply, and did so on several occasions… that he was kicked out for this is consistent with the rules of the House… that being said, if the Speaker doesn't apply those rules equally to everyone, including PM Trudeau, as has been suggested elsewhere in this comment section, then there's indeed of problem of bias… also, MP Poilievre should have directed his criticism towards the policy only… in targeting the person of the PM, he merely shot himself in the foot, as the whole debate was derailed, and the opportunity to show which aspects of the policy are inappropriate has been lost…

@@christopher.stewart So, how about “lying” is that consistent with house rules? Right after Pierre leaves the house Trudeau accuses him of visiting a Diagalon encampment when in fact it was a carbon tax protest. You can quibble over the precious house rules, but any reasonable Canadian knows Trudeau brakes them all the time in the most egregious ways.

​@@christopher.stewartdoes anyone even take these debates seriously? They never answer the question, go off on some unrelated tangent with a few insults thrown in and then everyone claps like idiots. This isn't how a meeting gets done in real life. You never see a corporate boardroom act like that. It's all theatre and nothing more.

​@@bentooreo9849 you raise some interesting points… though personally, i'd say i don't watch enough of such debates to conclude something like « It's all theatre and nothing more »… but based on those i've seen in the last few years, it seems to occur quite frequently that questions are essentially dodged and never really duly answered, in quite a mechanical manner, as if it were a normal and expected part of the culture… and indeed it often seems that the exercise has become primarily about partisanship, often through making petty personal remarks, than actually trying to find a common ground, which is supposed to be the whole point of these talks… regardless of which side of the aisle they're on, when elected officials act in such a manner, i find it quite hard to see how they actually serve the people, the ideals of democracy, and at times even their own aims, which they should be able to explain and justify without having to resort to such avoidance strategies… this is clearly not the example i want to be led by, and i doubt that many people do…

@@bentooreo9849 sadly, yes. Some people do take this seriously (some of Canadians)

That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now. Why not temper your belief with some fact finding and throw your energy into the root of the issues, rather than the runoff?

@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr if saying that people should not be allowed to shoot themselves with heroin in libraries or public transits is an ableist trope, then I am guilty.

@@Ralph-id3xg ignoring he root of the issues and refusing to think about preventable solutions , demonizing the run off from serious social issues rather than the source and worse - seeming proud of it all - is quite a legacy for you to stand so strongly on. What makes you feel this entitled?

@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr 10 years of living in Vancouver, watching the issue exponentially expending and having to deal with the economic, sanitary and safety consequences of it. What about you?

@@Ralph-id3xg I’m tired of seeing even one year go by without addressing the root issues such as the role big pharma, insurers lawyers and adjudicators play in prevention the horrible human outcome. To me it’s like watching people get upset at the people and wildlife affected by any sort of pollution. You think ableist name calling is a pragmatic next step, or maybe asking pharma for some humane less stigmatizing solutions ? I see the latter as a more responsible approach than calling one another, out of date names and tropes in this over entitled inefficient system of ours. I don’t see any of this as partisan as much as cultural. We can do better. We do in fact have the tools and the resources. What messes with our system is this sort of display of hubris and theatre - no matter who threw the first insult. All of this on our dime with juicy retirement medical etc benefits. Yep. Something is wrong if we haven’t changed trajectory in ten years. You think dehumanizing people is part of the solution?

And they love him

And yet. This comment remains

Obviously you are wrong, again.

And YOU have no idea what the Israel / Palestine conflict is all about.

@@DjWellDressedMan Would YOU explain it in 20 words or less?

Which fact?

Trudeau and his campaign of media control... they closed most media outlets over the past decade, and now guess who runs the ones left? Government. Now it seems like the actual court of Canada can't handle honest truth... seems a little censor-driven in this scenario.

Trumplite PP speaking truth? Not a chance. Maybe invest some time in honing your 'Keyboard Warrior' skills on Google before unleashing your troll-like comments on the internet.

@@cleopatrasnile And what exactly kind of information should he be looking for?

@@cleopatrasnile If Pierre is "Trumplite" he's definitely got my support. I love good leaders. Canada and the US are a complete mess under their current incompetent fools as their leaders.

That’s fantastic

Awesome

...and WJT

Get Trudy out of there.

For ableism. There’s some truth in comments about problems with eugenics based ideologies in Canada, as demonstrated by these public servants.

Definitely not funny.

They are supposed to be. This guy is not

We have one. Blaming House Speaker Greg Fergus for Pierre Poilievre's inability to follow parliamentary rules is absurd!

​@@cleopatrasnile are you the Sturmabteilung?

Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?

Fascist probably...I don't think nazi suits him just yet. He will always support big business before working class people.

I'm in Edmonton myself, really sorry to hear you went through that. Edmonton unfortunately has gone downhill extremely fast

@@adamfroggatt7091 thanks fellow Edmontonian ☺️ yeah it has really gone down. Downtown has been bad since I came in 2013 but it’s just filled with crack heads now/meth heads.

That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.

Trump lite ..no thanks. pp is secretive about stance on abortion. Fascism on the way.

No, there needs to be an update to the insurance entitle,emits for all these public servants. If we want to take these ableism and drug crisis issues seriously. This theatre is a distraction that roils up ableism (hatred of the mentally ill) - not solutions…like holding big pharma accountable for drug crises.

Pierre pollivere had years to stop Tru dope

@@AnneDeo-uu9nb don’t be fooled into thinking these are partisan issues, or lured into ableism.

Yes ! New flags need to be made

That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.

Ableism isn’t acceptable anywhere. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?

That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.

@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr Lighten up Francis.

@@hebber1961 there’s nothing funny about ableism or eugenics. We don’t have those entitlements. What had you thinking otherwise

@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrr When you're triggered it's hilarious. But sock boy making policy that un-lives people, that's not funny. His policies...un-live people and make people's lives harder. You love that. Sad.

@@hebber1961 your confused, ableist name calling does do anyone any good. That you seem to find these views as an entitlement, suitable for any workplace is what’s truly sad. Do you know how many people are needlessly hurt when you assert dehumanizing views? The data and reporting certainly is in our lexicon, like the mental health commission of Canadas 2008 report that breaks down these issues. Looks like no one in our public workplace’s have read it? Yikes. Willful ignorance is not an entitlement, it’s a deficiency.

TurDo!😂 Hadn't heard that before...thanks!

That is so childish.

That you or “most Canadians “ feel entitled to casually throw around ableist tropes is exactly the problem here. Time to grow up. It’s the twenty first century now.

@@MrsRubens TurdO 💩

100 %

Poilievre is totally unqualified & unfit to be PM.

Ableism does not make for reliability. Means there’s some entitlement possibly some delusion in the mix. Might want a rethink. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?

Yes we have a very serious problem with entitlement and ableism. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?

Check the real estate prices.

Bc is run by commies like California

Ableism is a problem that cannot be overstated.

Pierre Poilievre as Prime Minister? Perish the thought! The man's track record speaks for itself, and it's not exactly a shining beacon of excellence. Comparing him to Andrew Scheer? Well, let's just say it's not a competition for the title of "Worst." LOLLLLLLL

@@cleopatrasnileI would like for you to show me examples. I’ll appreciate it (or you can just tell me to go to Wikipedia)

Ableism isn’t truth,it’s hatred.

Whacko is pre twentieth century ableist trope, intended to dehumanize and demonize people, effectively roiling up hatred and ignorance to divert from the root of something as serious as a major drug crisis. Why not put the energy into holding insurers and pharma and our judiciary more accountable?

Well said.

Because they’re afraid of talking mean about their prince!

Pierre pollivere is controlled false opposition unfortunately

You’re confused and wreckless to think one form of ignorance justifies another. This is a problem of entitlement we Canadians burden one another with. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?

Ableism isn’t truth, it’s hatred.

Perhaps Trudeau should be charged with crimes against humanity as he is refusing to end the 3 year experiment...which in itself a crime.

We Canadians have a problem with our entitlement. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?

💯00 % The Goat 🐐 ❤️

Good Catch....i missed that....I did catch alot of it today, especially the parts the media isn't showing in this clip that i outlined in the reply to the first comment you should take a look at.......but I'm sure it was probably just another Liberal Back Bencher....wonder if it was my riding.....hopefully I get a chance to vote her out. It was definitely a female voice saying it.

They’re all far too over entitled, and unaccountable for their very serious errors. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?

I’m wondering how your comments meet community guidelines…ableism is hatred. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?

Canada has a very serious discrimination and entitlement problem. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?

Insert Trudeau's house comments about Trucker Labels being Nazis, and Extremists, against his own lawfully protesting citizens that he orders the arrest of them with his right hand Christina Freeland who was issuing orders diretly to CSIS of what her office wanted to be conducted, that they fail to report on unbiased news reporting. They failed to report today how much the speaker costed us at Global of course and just conveniently failed to show the Conservative Party all walking out of Parliament in support of Pierre, how much did that speaker cost us in that move today. Failed to show Trudeau labelling Pierre "Extremist" just the few statements before which is why he changed his statement to "Extremist" showing some significant bias on Parliamentary house terms......This speaker has no business being in his position as he can't remain un-biased and of course he was a Liberal Appointed Speaker.......yet again more corruption......more bias media.....more failure to tell the WHOLE STORY to the public.......just what they WANT you to see.....this is TRUDEAU'S Canuckistan and you'll LIKE HIM, or you'll be SUBJECTED to more CHINESE INTERVENTION....the CSIS agent that ratted on that is GUARANTEED out of his career by now thanks to Liberal Corruption too.....but Media is hush hush on that one too.....

You work for your ward news?

Yes they are all over entitled and that’s making them wreck less with these issues, ie name calling rather than holding big pharma accountable for drug crises.

​@@BearbearbearbearbearbearRarrrrTrudeau is responsible...fully responsible for every overdose death for refusing to reverse the decriminalization of hard drugs as Eby has requested....it is a 3 year experiment....how many more will die in the next 2 years?

I’m wondering if you wrote the n word like that, if your comments would be removed. Because there are obviously unresolved issues with eugenics based ideologies, when a prime minister in waiting, is blissfully unaware of how dehumanizing his comments and perspectives are….perpetually at the run off of a number of preventable problems, rather than the root. Why not put this much energy into holding big pharma accountable for drug crises?