Watch Full Video Here • Video Bare Britain Audits website barebritainaud... To support the channel via PayPal please choose friends & family option thankyou for your support 🐻💙www.paypal.me/...
i dont get why you feel the need to be intentionally awkward and hard to deal with, when all the officers are doing is their job, they havent gone to the location for no reason they have been called there, treat them like a normal person because if you are awkward to them they will be awkward to you. simple
What don't you get?! The reason - the one and only reasons. Is to provoke confrontation to make better content - which makes more views - which makes more money. Forget his behaviour it's basically interactive theatre. Money is the motive.
So, you refuse to leave private property when asked by the representative of the land owner (yes a tenant counts). They are then entitled to use reasonable force to escort you from their land. That does not constitute assault.
They do 100 hours training, and then get paid about the same as a newly qualified nurse after 3yrs at degree level then 1 year of mentoring, seems fair?
The best punishment for a Scientologist is being a Scientologist. Being one of those screwballs is a terrible fate and an expensive fate as well, they deserve it.
What about he batty eyelashes never mind the law !!! These cops must obey the law and enforce the law not their feelings and discretion !!! This cult organisation must obey the laws just as everybody else has to !!!
Arrogance? Maybe. But nobody did anything wrong here They can ask him to leave and use minimal/reasonable force to remove him You know that right? I can criticise their attitude with you all day. But there just wasn't anything wrong done here today. There's no assault it was perfectly legal
@@davepegington9066 The cult members should have called the coppers to remove their victims. Putting hands on and claiming you are doing it because this is your property is still an assault. Security guards are to observe and report, only.
@@adcolt54 no it isn't. You can keep howling it all night That doesn't make it so You can legally remove someone using reasonable force. The legal criteria for assault isn't met That's the bottom line of it whether you like it or not is irrelevant But personally I'm happy with the law. Because it means I get to use reasonable force to remove a trespasser too. (and I have) But it's quite clear you're not interested in the law. You just want to claim the police are always wrong regardless of facts and your team. (Whoever they happen to be) are always right regardless of facts Don't be such a d1ck. Use your critical thinking skills and make judgements based on facts and logic instead of emotions. Like a child I repeat again. Auditor was asked to leave Refused Reasonable force was used There's no argument here whatsoever. Just petulant childish whining
APPEARS TO BE CRAWLING WARFARE OF A JEWISH POLICE GULAG HUMAN TRAFFICKING STATE. REMBER POLICE ARE BI-POLAR DISSORDER.COMMUNIST JEWISH/SIRIA STATE STARTING 70S TO NOW AS SANGUINARY MASS BIPOLAR FOSTER CHILDREN. PATHOLOGICAL LIES IS TIP OF ICE BERG WITHESE SANGUINE PEOPLES OF ANY COLOR OF THEM. AS SOVIET UNION WAS/IS 1937-85 AS MASS MIGRANTS INFLUX 73 ONWARDS.FOSTER TOWNS CITIES OF THESE SANGUINARY ADULTS CHILDREN IN AUTHORITY.
Of course it has. You're not going to get an intelligent person to do your dirty work, are you? The only qualification needed these days is to be gullible.
It has. Genuinely. It went out with height and fitness requirements. This is how you end up with tattooed thugs with massive holes in their ears bullying people around, and 5 foot snidey women pretending to be law enforcement when in reality they're revenue collectors who don't GAF about British values.
APPEARS TO BE CRAWLING WARFARE OF A JEWISH POLICE GULAG HUMAN TRAFFICKING STATE. REMBER POLICE ARE BI-POLAR DISSORDER.COMMUNIST JEWISH/SIRIA STATE STARTING 70S TO NOW AS SANGUINARY MASS BIPOLAR FOSTER CHILDREN. PATHOLOGICAL LIES IS TIP OF ICE BERG WITHESE SANGUINE PEOPLES OF ANY COLOR OF THEM. AS SOVIET UNION WAS/IS 1937-85 AS MASS MIGRANTS INFLUX 73 ONWARDS.FOSTER TOWNS CITIES OF THESE SANGUINARY ADULTS CHILDREN IN AUTHORITY.
Because police uphold common law. Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition. “If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
I have seen it before but WPC eyelashes is ok isint she ohhhhhhhhh MATRON lol x it is just one rule for the force positions of power souless organizations and or souless establishments and another for us Good Human Beings isint it x
So not having got his own way, he should have then launched into more affronted verbage? Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition. “If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
@Audit-The-Auditors People in the building told them to leave the premises, which they did. The land owner did not tell them to leave the land. It is not trespass if you leave when asked. It is only trespass if you refuse to leave when asked. And Trespass is a civil matter not criminal.
@@bigbadcameraauditsuk5627 Force was used because he didn't leave. The land owner doesn't have to even be there: ' To justify the expulsion of a trespasser, the person who uses force must be in possession or acting under the authority of the person in possession.' No-one said it was criminal. Yes, a civil matter dealt with by common law.
@Audit-The-Auditors Common Law (R v Griffiths 1988) If you have an honestly held belief that you or another, are in imminent danger, then you may use such force as is reasonable and necessary to avert that danger. That was not the situation here.
Looks like Barbie and Ken in a Police vertion of Baywatch. You have got to love the little hand crafted map it's definitely worth a Blue Peter Badge🤡 🤣
So they can use tazers and gas plus a button to protect themselves , however we the public have to wait for them to turn up and protect us. We should have the legal right to defend ourselves when out in public with legally allowed items.
Sorry but this doesn't apply The auditor was asked to leave and didn't Reasonable force was used. Well within the law. Other comments remark on police attitude. That may be so. But there just wasn't anything unlawful done here. Auditor trespassing told to leave and wouldn't. Minimal and legal force used Why would you want that to be in any way different, when it means you wouldn't be able to use reasonable force to remove a trespasser from your own house who refused to leave?? Be reasonable here
Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition. “If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
@wiccanwarrior9 none wear hats anymore....they just look like a load of tramps....gadgets strapped all over them...disgraceful uniform. Seen some cops, filthy shoes crumpled trousers...dirty vests. How can you take these battered action toys seriously. ?
Just looked it up.. A Public Place is . Any highway and any other premises or place to which at the material time, the public have or permitted to have access, whether on payment or otherwise. Section 33 Criminal Justice Act 1972.
@@BareBritainAudits Yes. I think if you had it on a card or off by heart you'd really call them out. By the way , I'm a retired Policeman, I joined in 1969 and I can remember we had to know about that , we were taught it at Training School.
@@BareBritainAudits And once any implied right of access has been removed, then you become a trespasser. Halsbury’s Laws of England, Paragraph 1400, Volume 45, IVth Edition. “If a trespasser peaceably enters or is on land, the person who is in or entitled to possession may request him to leave, and if he refuses to leave may remove him from the land using no more force than is reasonably necessary."
Here are two candidates for salon worker if they had the intelligence and personal skills to communicate with the public. They would require a further six months training to be able to paint nails at a beauty salon. I’m not sure if they would be capable of it. Just my opinion
They've been taught to automatically hate anybody with a camera with no exceptions! If the Scientology people had opened fire on you with a machine gun, you would still be in the wrong for having a camera.
Good training for those two police officers. How to deal with a petulant child. Despite all the prodding and goading from the so-called auditor they kept calm. That's more than can be said for the auditor.
Civilised citizens uses their intelligence rather then steeping into someone land for conflict! And Civilised citizen will politely say sir you are trespassing the private property maybe by mistake!
Breach of the peace Regina versus Howell also 1982 states a breach of the peace occurs when someone has the fear of being harmed to give someone the fear of being harmed you have to use threatening and or abusive language or hold a threatening and or abusive sign. The wording is very important. It also goes on to say once a breach of the peace has passed there is no breach of the peace IT'S PASSED. The police have no powers to demand a name and address and no powers to detain. Seeing as the corrupt tyrant pigs are there I would say the breach of the peace has passed. No wonder every one loathes these gang members. The tyrant pigs are not here for us the public anymore. They are a corrupt parliamentary army for the ruling elite. DON'T help them in anyway only way they will learn how sick we are sick of them abusing are rights.
Well said, we all need to stand up to these pig's and not allow them to abuse their powers to oppress and stifle our human and civil rights, unfortunately the sheeple will blindly follow directions and do as they're told, whilst the minority like ourselves will continue to stand up for ourselves.
Some of the comments on here :-) I would suggest that 90% of the people commenting on this forum wouldn't have the courage to do what these 2 officers are doing on a daily basis. It really does show a low level of intelligence when you attack how someone looks i.e. "Her false eyelashes". Lets be honest for a lot of you the most dangerous thing you possible do on a daily basis is get out of bed and think. I presume those officers can go home and at least say to their partners and, or families that they've tried their hardest to make a difference to those in need. Honest question, apart from sitting behind the safety of your keyboard. What difference have you made today to peoples lifes? what courage have you shown. My guess is very little to what these new officers are doing on a daily basis.
there is a lot of stigma against police officers in general especially in western countries, most of the people who watch these "auditing" channels are anarchists who have that "all cops are bad" mentality and wanna see them defunded or they think they are all corrupt. I have seen so much criticism in this comment section that it is actually embarrassing, people seem to neglect the fact that you need to have actual qualifications to get into the force and i absolutely doubt that most people commenting hate against these 2 have more than basic GCSEs and maybe a shitty college degree, since the type of people who go out of their way to find these videos arent usually the smart type. They're like a hivemind tunnel visioned on hating the police for the sake of it, and viewing all these other comments form braindead people alike reinforces their agenda that cops in this country are doing nothing useful now im not saying that having lots of qualifications automatically makes you good at the job, but the "children in uniform" and "zero qualifications" claims ive seen commented are nothing but thoughtless bias against the police done with no research in mind
The owner or 'their authorised agent' is the usual legal term - I'm a council tenant, not a land/property owner, but if I tell you to get out of my flat and you don't, you're trespassing. Same in a supermarket, for instance - the guy that collects the trolleys wouldn't be able to tell me shit, but managers and supervisors could bar me for whatever reason. I'd imagine a similar structure exists within the 'church' of scientology, but as they're notoriously tight lipped about what happens behind closed doors in the cult, it's hard to say.
Coppers just out of play school should by law be required to wear a arm band letting the public know they are learning how to do the job just as a learner driver And they get to drive a noddy car as well bless them
is this what jayne torvill and christopher dean are doing now wow should get there skates on and do one well handled they was a disgrace not following the law
The woman is ignorant, the man told her making a video about Scientology and she said “regarding”. When she was caught out as making a stupid statement she started getting arsey.
Neighbour had her garage broken into, phoned the police, guess what they turn up. But if you trespass which is a civil matter you know that thy turn up
So many are auditing these days that I think the UK laws will be changed. if this happens, people who really need to film the baddies may not be allowed. and I will miss AB's "Auditing Britain." He is at least very funny.
I would love to see an ‘auditors abroad’ episode (a spin off from idiot abroad but dumber). Viewers could fund you to travel to Russia, China, North Korea, Middle East and even Western European countries like France… just so we can see how the police there deal with your behaviour and then make a comparison to our own authorities. It might broaden your knowledge about your human rights and civil liberties here in the UK. Please please can we start a go fund me???? 😁🙏
State of the eye lashes - how unprofessional is that looks so pathetic - they look like just come out of 6th form - dear dear me how can you respect kids who have seen nothing in life. Why are they putting immature kid sin these situations. Why crime and violence is rife and all these kids focus on is tweets and non hate crime - the state of the police is a real concern.
I mean it's really not that hard to understand... you were on private property without permission, they wanted you off , you refused and got assaulted in the process then they were called to see what's going on. It seems to me you've been recording for quite a while if you were assaulted you could've showed them the footage, or like you said it's a civil matter should've left and pressed charges. The pictures of you that they took was also on private property that they own the rights for so any photography that doesn't breach your right to privacy isn't any legal issue, and it cannot be since you were outside in public 🤷🏻♀️ I do agree it could've been handled much better, though, she did come at you with attitude, and it did get progressively worse however you refusing to answer any questions didn't really help either though
