Thank you sir .... Maine 4-5 baar dekha lecture but hamesha kch naya ki sikha..... Your lecture never bored me ❤ thankyou so much ... you tube par itna perfect or deep understandable .. Lecture abhi tak toh ni paya ...... Thankyou 😊
Thank you so much for making the videos in hindi since in mostly du college's teaching mode of language is in English and students have difficulty in understanding the concept. Not only hindi medium but also many English medium students also would like to watch your videos in bilingual language. This the best channel for them to clear their concept. Please keep doing your awesome efforts for the students. Great channel Thank you so much once again:)
Sir aapki lecture Hindi me bahut achha samajh aata hai please aap Hindi me hi padhaya kare sir aur aapke lecture hamare liye bahut helpful hai thank so much sir..🙏🙏🙏
Yes; both r already uploaded Rousseau watch here ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rT45XPIxgSg.html Locke : ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gqTmwPWBDOA.html
Yes correct; Hobbes was supporter of absolute, omnipotent, indivisible and unalienable sovereignty; for him the sovereign may be a monarch or a group like oligarchy or some other form of government; hence he was not for absolute monarchy but for absolute sovereignty
Apnai ismai social contract pr.. anything on which law is silent ..Kai brye m btaya h!!!!how is it right of citizen if it is so it means people apnai ap hi sb kuch krdengai jo low nhi bolega sovereign honai kai bd bhi toh war against all ki situation aa skti h
Sir! if man takes away the life of other person in the name of preservation of his own life , then in this way what is the difference between state of nature and being in social contract ??? If there was social contract to choose a representative does it means elections were held at that time also to choose a right person ? Hope Sir u understand what I want to ask and will reply 🙏
After social contract, the sovereign has been endowed upon with the powers to protect the life of it's subjects so if the sovereign carries out its duties then there will not be anyone taking other's life and if the sovereign fails to deliver it's duties and protect the lives of its citizens then in that situation Hobbes provides the right to violate the contract. So the difference I guess is that after the social contract there shouldn't be any such cases at least according to Hobbes.
dont tk 'father of this/that' as any objective truth but only denoting great contribution of someone to some thoughts/tradition...Locke's thoughts influenced Liberalism to great extent, but Hobbes was first to give state based on social contract, individualism, natural laws traditions, negative rights and above all individual basis of social order ( individualism)...his contribution is also significant; if u r happy, and many other, with Locke being father, call Hobbes the grandfather...but again dont try to find on google that whether Hobbes is father or grandfather...
Sir I have a doubt please do clear it Kya Hobbes ne procedure for removal of king btaya h ? Qki may be the king came in power through social contract is not the right person
good point...Hobbes seems to suggest that people may resist the sovereign if it threatened their lives...will come back after doing a mini research on this...
