Politics of Deconstruction: Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and Oscar Guardiola-Rivera in conversation

Подписаться 24 тыс.

Просмотров 47 тыс.

50% 1

On the Politics of Deconstruction. UK launch of the 40th anniversary re-translation of Jacques Derrida’s Of Grammatology.
A conversation between Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and Oscar Guardiola-Rivera, talking about questions of education, deconstruction and postcolonialism to launch the 40th anniversary re-translation of Jacques Derrida’s Of Grammatology.
For more information:
Birkbeck Law School - www.bbk.ac.uk/law/
Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities - www.bbk.ac.uk/bih/
Birkbeck Institute for the Moving Image (BIMI) - www.bbk.ac.uk/arts/research/bi...
Sepentine Gallery - www.serpentinegalleries.org/
.

Опубликовано:

5 июн 2016

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 80

@tillbrainman6049 8 лет назад

best video and speech by prof. Spivak i have ever seen. at times her facial expressions even resemble Jacques Derrida. having read her english translation of "of grammatology" and joining her journey in trying to articulate the indescribable, this video speaks to a hard fought knowledge i have gained in unraveling the conventional structures of experience or real life. reality. i will never be the same. love it.

@jb8839 Год назад

Very useful and informative. Prof Spivak's experience and understanding are a sight to behold. Thank you.

@utsabiswas5893 Год назад

Fascinating speech. Truly extraordinary.

@SEXANDTHECITYCLIPS Год назад

Thank you for so much as fact-dropping the "𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓬𝔂" of language over the self, ma'am Spivak. 🙏.

@SEXANDTHECITYCLIPS Год назад

🙏

@rajasingadurai Год назад

A wonderful, brilliant, energetic interactive session ....

@architectonic99 3 года назад

Brilliant, insightful, necessarily elliptical but rewarding.

@gordanaginamihajlovska6125 Год назад

The commentary is very insightful. It tells us how little capacity there us in the West for intellectual thinking and how easy it is just to drink a deadly can of coke

@prasadkrupakarr.angadi8574 Год назад

Excellent speech we came to know plenty of ideas regarding Derrida Of gramatology and subaltern Studies

@shivampathak3545 Год назад

Loved it when she said, and I quote "Saturday Morning". This is an allusion for audience that on a Saturday Morning they could afford to digest a little story along with her explanation of Derrida. I think it is much for the audience's delight and less for her's intellectual appetite.😊😊

@dr.syednasrullabakhtiary6416 Год назад

The conversation reveals far deeper truths and realities related to certain important topics like education, politics, the role of language, marxist's ideology and after all Derridean philosophy. It also sheds light on the role if various races, cultures, religions and civilizations. Suffice is to say that the dialogues create avenues for understanding many intellectual concepts in a deconstruction way.

@ImpinderjeetKaur-nd4lb Год назад

Thought provoking talk on deconstruction and Derrida.

@azazshaikh9174 Год назад

Excellent 👍

@azazshaikh9174 Год назад

Excellent

@njeyaraj63 Год назад

Valuable topic

@edwardwhittaker5728 3 года назад

It is a bit rambling but still very good. In OG, the pages 69-73 in my view, are particularly brilliant, but they also reveal an immanent anti-anglophone 'tendency'. Was this the reason why all those 'Oxford and Cambridge' philosophers did not want Derrida to get his honorary Doctorate? OG is actually more relevant now than ever.

@nilanjanaghosh3432 3 года назад

Perhaps one, who is inspired by thinkers like Derrida,prefers to be rambling than (logically)sequential😃

@edwardwhittaker5728 3 года назад

@@nilanjanaghosh3432 That is a very good point. To an extent maybe, Gayatri does ramble i.e. to make intuitive connections and diversions- it comes with her memory. Logical sequencing was not really appropriate to her memory, but it does come into the very structure of language via enunciation and syntax, precisely the logo-centrist structure that Derrida wanted to 'deconstruct'. Thanks for the reply, by the way.

@AishwaryaPratimRabha Год назад

solidarity with gayatri spivak

@thepostmodernman1355 6 лет назад

This comment section is shameful indeed. People have no respect for perhaps one of the best minds at work in the West at the moment. Instead look at these idiots bashing her for her background and origins, and overlooking her achievements.

@MrCritiqueish 5 лет назад

most of their comments are addressed in the lecture. If only they had watched.

@neelimagchaudhari5434 Год назад

👍

@patriciatinajero410 5 лет назад

So sad that corruption captured the imagination and its possibilities, shall we think of corruption as a dialectic too?

@rocantenrocanten4150 2 года назад

зачем это... читайте дерриду

@sacredsoma 5 лет назад

One way to drink Schwepps

@user-gn7bh4zs8j 2 года назад

@dr.surendraparmar2336 Год назад

Excellent discussion by Gayatri Spivak

@Cyberphunkisms 3 года назад

I want a session with sadhguru and spivak.

@kakistocracyusa Год назад

Let's put a fine point on it. Derrida was an absolute fad amongst the "cool" literary-analysis crowd in the 80's and 90's (particularly those trying to get laid). It provided free-license to speak elliptically around age-old philosophical questions as though they were something new, while saying nothing particularly original. There will always be a demand for this license.

@Grappapappa 2 года назад

Don't you have dogs in Kalkuta?!

@brandgardner211 6 лет назад

agent of tavistock and MI6

@user-uy3vu1pk9y 4 года назад

Why postcolonialism is an empty word??!?

@siddharthb2633 Год назад

Imagine crapping on Capitalism and being associated with Harvard and Columbia.

@vvviiixxx8745 7 месяцев назад

is that all you took away from this? ahahaha.

@kemwittalltree9650 7 лет назад

This nonsense is becoming passe so fast.

@infinitewisdom6065 5 лет назад

What nonsense. I think you are a duffer and did not understand any of it. I would have been more sympathetic to your criticism if there was any substance to it.

@shrutih3153 3 года назад

Uncouth dimwit

@brandgardner211 6 лет назад

rubbish

@infinitewisdom6065 5 лет назад

You are sick writing idiotic comments three times.

@Mai-Gninwod 4 года назад

Lol the way she speaks is just aimless and strange and vague

@siddharthb2633 Год назад

U must deconstruct it.

@veerswami7175 Год назад

@@siddharthb2633 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@czarquetzal8344 2 года назад

Spivak is not a stimulating speaker. She better focus on teaching in the graduate school and in writing scholarly research.

@Altruismisreal27 Год назад

She is answering the questions brilliantly. It doesn’t sound like you should be listening to her. Why spend time on something that you can’t follow...