Pope Arrives at Royal Palace in Brussels to Meet the King of Belgium 

THE LITTLE TROLL APPEARS AGAIN 🚨🚨🚨😂😂😂

🤣🤣😂😂

👍🏼😊​@@Hopefully.2024

Amen.❤🙏

​@@tanya9463 You're such a JOKE, HILLBILLY TANYA TONYA. 🪕🪕🪕

Thank you so much! ❤️❤️

The Belgian Coburg-Gotha's are also to the Windsors related Germans, dear😊

​@@TheHansDekker Your comment made absolutely no sense whatsoever. So nothing new there then?

​@@SelinaBarton-ij5iz But it did, dear😊

@@TheHansDekker Not in our language - the English language.

​@Sandrimoral-Castle-CRIII It is a matter of comprehensive reading, dear😊 Ask Camilla😊

It is perhaps the last hope for the Windsors, dear😊

​@TheHansDekker It's the last hope for most of us dear.

Not sure why this video is on this channel.

​@@TheHansDekkerWilliam will become king.

​@@yvonneplant9434 How do you know, dear😊?

Allah is just as dear to this globalist mock pope, dear😊

Amen ❤🙏

​@@tanya9463 HILLBILLY TANYA TONYA 🪕🪕🪕

This communist globalist pope has abandoned God and turned to Satan, dear😊

​@@ker3917 act your age not your shoe size.!!

United, dear😊?

The 'False Prophet' of Revelation...

Satan lives in the Vatican now, dears😊 ​@@WildwoodCastle

​@@WildwoodCastle A false prophet😊

​​@@WildwoodCastle A false prophet, to say the least, dear😊

​​@@WildwoodCastle It is Satan, dear😊

You probably have just had modern education, dear😊

Amen ❤🙏

​@@tanya9463 Hillbilly 🪕🪕

Besides, this beautiful European country is now regrettably no more than the front lawn of EUSSR and NATO and now also in turmoil and in a state of collaps😊

Is it? Is he Head of State in Belgium? Is Belgium a Kingdom? His kingdom? How is The Monarchy regulated there? What gives it legitimacy and if the people no longer wanted a king, how would that change take place? Not via The State?

@@Sandrimoral-Castle-CRIII Indeed it is. It means he is King by the will of the people when they established their constitution. He is not anointed nor crowned.

​@@edu2003mdq After the Belgian uprising against the Netherlands the British put prince Albert's relative Leopold of Coburg-Gotha on the new throne😊

@@edu2003mdq This is what I am asking though. You didn't answer the other questions because those things mean that one is King by the state as well, the State of or rather Kingdom of ___________. This is also why I asked if the people did not approve of their king and wanted another or to not have a king, how would that be done? The notion of "king by the will of the people" in a modern Kingdom can be irrelevant if it requires the state to regulate the monarchy and do away with their king. Even a constitution governs a state and is not amended by the people through refereundums, but by the appropiate authority(s) stipulated for that state. The Constitutional Monarchy is a State Monarchy legitimised by State law (the constitution), not by the people, except by referendum initiated by The State, at least in our constitutional monarchies, this is how it works. Do the Belgian people make any decisions on who their king will be? Can they amend their own constitution or is that done by those with authority? Even in the days when there was a King of Scots, for example, he ruled over Scotland as well as the Scots, didn't he? So it was his Kingdom (basically his state) He made rules pertaining to the kingdom or was it just for the Scottish people and not the territory of Scotland? Did King James IV not consider Scotland his kingdom? His territory? The difference is with constitutional monarchy that their powers are limited and the monarchy itself is State controlled through Parliament for instance as constitutions are State law governing The State. I don't see how a constitutional monarchy can be of the people when they have no control of it other than to vote it out if The State holds a referendum at their request by majority or by governmental request. This is why I do not see a real difference between King of _______ and King of The _______ within constituional monarchy and even the more absolute ones. The subjects are not asked for their approval of each monarch nor were they around when the constitution was enacted and the laws regarding succession. I don't see the difference between the two titles other than the titles themselves. Our monarch reigns by law. He becomes king automatically, long before his coronation. When he is anointed and crowned, he is already king, theoretically crowned by The State as per law. The Coronation is the religious, ceremonial, and symbolic aspect of his kinghood. I am trying to understand whether or not there is truly a difference in these two titles other than the title today. Charles III reigns by the will of the majority as well because if the opposite were true, the monarchy could be abolished by referendum, but we also do not have to give approval for each monarch as law dictates who will be our monarch as per the Line of Succession regulated by Parliament, not us. Seems like the same thing to me.

Again, dear😮 You seem like a space shuttle, dear😮 Make yourself easy and just buy a one way next time, would you, dear😊?

Really, dear😊?

Blame it on the rain that was fallin', fallin' Blame it on the stars that didn't shine that night Whatever you do, don't put the blame on you

Imagine what he'd be arrested for. England, now the UK, gave The Pope the boot almost 500 years ago. He has no jurisdiction or power in England. Do catch up! Adultery is peanuts compared to the crimes of Papa Francis' Church. Do you live under a rock. Papa Francis just finished apologizing again for and acknowledging some of those crimes.

King Charles 👑 will have one for you too!

Why because the pope will be wearing his best dress?

@@ker3917 You smell Charles’s skirts after he wears them.

@@Вивсівідстій Your sick fascination for King Charles is very disturbing and disgusting.

@@ker3917 Your obsession with the royal family is disturbing. That is why it is disturbing that you smell Charles’s skirts after he wears them.

How sad, dear😊

I think most people haven't. Other monarchies are not popular like the British Royal Family is, partly because of the former British Empire and because of the pomp and pageantry and ancient traditions kept in the UK which attracts a lot of international and media interest.

​@@Sandrimoral-Castle-CRIII No dear😊 It's because of their globalist betrayal to their countries, dear😊

​@@Sandrimoral-Castle-CRIII It is their globalism, dear😊

​@@Sandrimoral-Castle-CRIII 😂😂

Mrs Pope

Her Majesty Queen Mathilde “Queen of the Belgians” consort to the King

@@tobehonest7541 😂

Please take note of the titles of the women who have come before Camilla and held the exact same title and position as her: Just kidding..

​@@therealsophiemaryThere went my coffee ☕. . . .