It's not funny if you know what he means, duh. He's refering to the CASE when you don't want the condom. But if you want to laugh about anything, it's a FREE country.
Yes because we all know that when the founding fathers were drafting the constitution the first thing they worried about was protecting the "constitutional rights" of the porn industry and its "artistic vision" lol 😂😂😂
@@Strega222 idk what other dems do nor do I care, but I’m "espousing" facts and those can’t be politicized. and yes I’m going to "espouse" originalist interpretations when they are true and this is one of those instances, and it shouldn’t matter if I’m a dem or a repub all that matters is that I’m stating something true. I’m a dem socialist as I’m sure you can tell by my profile pic lol but you have to admit what he said was damn stupid and made no sense just read a lot of these other commenters comments 😂
@@ac-130fan how do my comments not make any sense their pretty point blank and to the point, his comments were dumb and laughable and apparently a good amount of people agree with me by the amount of likes, so apparently you have no reading comprehension so no your the one who looks like a damn fool by literally posting your stupidity and unintentionally admitting in your comment that you don’t understand basic comments lol 😂 why don’t you try to hide your admiration for porn a little bit better apparently it’s your favorite past time and I guess you truly admire his ARTISTIC VISION! Lol 😂 so stupid
Even if barebacking were a Constitutional right, it would be irrelevant since the porn industry isn't bound by the rules that the U.S. government has to follow.
I think it's a choice that needs to be made between those involved in the sex act. If both people involved are ok with not using a condom (especially if they have been tested and agree to not use one) then that is their right. If they want to use one, that is also their right. It should never be REQUIRED though.
+Kasatka Tilikum (Partywaffles) It will never be required, it will ruin the sales. People want sex without the condom, its a fact people will never admit
I don't have a moral problem with porn stars, etc. Most of them are pretty hot and probably nice people. Porn however, does have negative effects on men's brain chemistry, especially young men and is VERY addictive. Any man with an internet connection is lured in at least once a week, much more if weaker. Porn harms.
Not really. Most may seem "Easy on the eyes," but they are damaged inside due to past trauma. Also, they get treated like meat, being rented around, studio to studio without any rest. And that is without the stigma they have to face when going back into the real world.
@@nothingmysterious76 I completely forgot about this. Been over two years. 76? Well sir or madam it looks like the new generation of humor is in good hands .😊
"What if I wanna make a movie about a famous knife killer? What, I can't use real knives and stab someone? What, I have to use fake knives and fake stab!?!" His reasoning is so of the rails....I used to like him.
James Deen is DEFINITELY a Right Winger........he doesn't like Government regulations or Government interference at all. He wants the Government to stay out of people's lives as much as possible.
Yeah because there is a huge demand for porn about a couple trying to have a baby. In any industry, construction, working out, sports, you need to be protected. That includes porn. Sorry buddy, would you buy someone saying he doesn't need to wear a seat belt while driving a car really fast because it takes away "artistic vision?" I've become very disillusioned with this guy.
No one should have to be subjected to terrible diseases for the sake of your job. My freedom of choice is to give a shit. I think YOU need to learn what that means. And learn some proper grammar and how to convey your thoughts without swearing.
So if in a movie a reckless driver comes along, that does not want to wear his seatbelt, or simply is a straight up bad ass, you would make him wear his seatbelt according to the law??? What about all the criminals portraid in movies, wanna make scenes like that illegal, just because the law says? Even if all is done under supervision and with professionals etc? You could cancel like every goddamn movie project then...
That is not true. For one, no you wouldn't need to cancel every movie project. Not all movies contain cars, or people driving them without seatbelt. And you do realized in a hollywood setting, they're not actually driving in the close up shots, but the external shots of a car going fast, it's done using a double, who is in fact, wearing a seatbelt. Let's not detract from the issue though. Seatbelts, condoms, helmets, all are required for certain industry careers. It's very real and it's something you should think through a bit more before making such a ridiculous argument in an attempt to poke holes in my logic.
You actually say, what I mean. Lets compare a driving scene, with a hardcore sex scene. In the driving scene, you see a villan close up, in a fast driving car, wearing no seatbelt, the truth is, it's all green screen cgi bullshit, so the actor is never really in danger. If it comes to an outside shot, you said it, it's a professional stuntdriver, wearing seatbelts and helmet, and the car is going to be caged inside as well, so as much safety as possible. So the scene looks really dangerous when cut together. Now to the porn scene, it's about a couple trying to make a baby, he's not wearing a condom to make the scene look real, what you don't see are the fucking tests they make, the pills they take for birth control, that they clean themselves, that the whole enviroment is much more save than you'd think. The actors are well protectet, same as the stuntman, but both still take a little risk. no condom=driving fast You can tell the stuntman to drive slowly, the scene would suck, but hey, at least he's save right? Slow speed highway chase... That's a movie you would enjoy...
You've missed the point entirely! You can not draw a parallel between a high speed chase and not wearing a condom as being the same in terms of excitement. Do you lose excitement when you see a condom? Then cut the film together to where you can't see it! It's not impossible. And you're only half right on the tests. They are tested regularly, but only every 30 days. You know how many scenes they could have performed and had sex with people that aren't tested? That's a huge window to invite risk. And as for cleaning up between scenes, numerous porn stars will tell you that there is little to no clean up between scenes on the set. That's not safe, it isn't even sanitary. Lastly, do you realize how ridiculous this guy sounds? People use porn to make a baby? That's what it's for? Are you shitting me? I'm not saying that SOME people don't use it for that, but do you honestly think if you asked someone that watched porn why they watched porn, they'd respond with "oh because I want to conceive a child."?
Sarah Gregory like he was saying porn stars are CONSTANTLY being tested for STI's and if girls don't have their own contraception, then they shouldn't be in porn if they choose to use condoms then thats fine.. but it should not be an obligation
You may not like to wear condoms but you do realize if more condoms were used, less guys would be mentally addicted to porn. Porn fcks with peoples minds. Would you rather watch a porn video with condoms involved or a without condoms involved? I think you’ll find out easily so what I’m saying is if they used condoms more then there would be a decline in porn views and tv ratings
Jeez I'm old enough to be his Momma but he's really attractive and well spoken (and you know...the other things lol) and what he stated does make sense.Tho protecting human life does trump artistic endeavors.Slippery slope for sure
His talk makes sense. Every one has bad as well as good side of his/her character. See even in the beginning of the video he's showing respect for the people who like to use condom, inspite of not like to use condom for himself. His these thoughts are not deserved to be called as bad at all. Accept what is useful.
Hey huff post member stop inviting these moralless person on your show otherwise your show will become ultimatly become flop.they dont care about society ,moral,relation ,they just want to earn money by making people addicted by their poor video .stop inviting them stop them .other wise .
So this title sucks lmao but he's 100% right in his point. If he wants to make a movie where the pornstar don't wear condoms and it has to do with the film, and both sides are for it and do all the testing, the govt can't say those 2 people have to wear condoms. Especially if the system porn stars have in place works
@@deboraorton3170 lol as you are very touchy about being ugly and being unloved, someone in your dayli life must be always reminding you that youre hideous and that youre also worthless😹 don’t tell others what it has been told to you 🤮
Cosmic86x he is tested before doing a fucking sex scene, meaning he doesn't have an std or an hiv. not to mention, the women give consent to him to be slapped and gagged during sex as it is a fetish of theirs.
Haha, I agree... And no I am proud to say that I am not American!!! I am Canadian!!!!! "Ahh" *smiles* I agree with you on those girly Jersey guys who are so worried about their girly figure and tan too much who only play 'game' but don't have any charm whatsoever. They are just girly US citizens so worried and insecure about their figure. They just like to broadcast their insecurity to everybody by working so incredibly hard on how they look to other people. I dunno. James seems reasonably int
