Posting your art online in 2024... 

"NPC comment"

The Internet is dead and AI has killed it.

"God is dead and we have killed him."

LOL

🤣🤣

It sounds cool until they bonded themselves together to kick you out of the lobby

Nah, when someone has called you a hacker when you were not hacking it's a compliment. But this is like you have baked a cake for your friends and after tasting they ask: "Where did you buy this from?"

It's worse than that. When someone calls you a hacker in a game there's rarely anything bad about it. But that certain art style looks like AI made it's more serious problem for many reasons.

Happen a lot in tf2

@@arttusiirila6790 That's also a compliment lol, saying you made it makes it even more impressive

This is a good analogy

Be careful, people would comment you "BuT AI DoEsnT CoPY ArT wORkS"

@@deftonesFTW people say that? İt literally does

Especially with artists looking like other artists

@@owyemen9367 the mental gymnastics these AI bros pull to justify their ignorance and stupidity is insane xD

shutup omg artists are so whiny and entitled smh my head my head

Best comment ever

As if AI art didnt come from humans smh

"This looks like AI art." "But the hair isn't rotated >10* off and the sleeves don't look like compressed springs?" But yeah, AI art can generate wonderful concepts w/ similar art styles to even the greats, but even at the best of times they need some serious touch-ups.

@@PyramidsofGiza369 as if ai art didnt come from art smh

AI: *steals art* People: AWESOME TECHNOLOGY SUCH AN ORIGINAL MASTERPIECE!!!! Human: *creates an absolute masterpiece that simply defies the laws of reality due to how perfect it is* People: Wow you probably stole an ai art smh smh artists are the most useless people ever

​@@bvdf84we live in a society

@@bvdf84 Hey woah woah woah it doesn't steal art, it just makes art using what it's learned about art it was trained on.

@@bvdf84 It doesn't steal art. Shut the hell up until you bother to learn about the subject.

@@thisdude9363 I do know about the subject but looks like you don't If you take some else's art without their permission and use it, that's stealing

Ikr I’m crying

He deserves a price for that

Bro rickrolled us

“The Pig War was a confrontation in 1859 between the United States and the United” -last paragraph, unfortunately cut off.

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Extra pro tips to spot ai art: -Look at the bg for a line that should be straight behind the character, make sure it allignes with itself, ai always gets it wrong. -ai tends to draw eyebrows over the bangs, make sure the parts on the bangs are consistent with the one on the skin. -pupiles. If an artist draws both pupiles differently it's noticeable bcs it's on purpose, but in ai they're wobbly for no reason. -Patterns, especially when they're suposed to be symmetrical, make no sense. 😉

​@@YumeBateyebrows over hair is a standard anime style.

@@YumeBat or way easier look at the lighting its always weirdly to perfectly plastic like, its always very unnaturally colored

please keep at it.. so i can build a model using them lol

And the eyes don't look wonky. And the hair doesn't seem to connect into the background, skin or clothes. Hell, even AI generated photos of actual people look weird once you observe them closely. :/

and a normal number of them

The lighting also looks normal and it doesnt look too bright , idk ive seen alot of ai art with that kind of lighting

Just wait til AIs can get hands right Then we’re all doomed

Which is a good times to mention that there's ai programs for writting essays too.

Thats the most accurate ai analogy iv heard yet

Its like someone blaming you for using ChatGPT when you wrote everything yourself

AI artists are better than regular artists. That's why they're so popular.

@@SyndicateOperative lol no

As an artist and a writer as well.. I can relate. And it's a devastateting feeling..

AI isn't a killer of creativity, in fact it is just the opposite, but I agree with you that it is unfair for people to judge art just because it "looks like AI".

AI written stories *suck*. They're nonsensical still; they're still stuck in the 1990s level of AI.

>AI is quickly becoming the leading killer of creativity >AI pieces lack a creative light Pick one

As a student, artist and passionate fanfic writer, I agree. The commercial, public use of AI is causing people to lose intelligence and become lazy. And it undermines those who have worked hard to get where they are now. Personal example and experience: I have been too tired to take an L before for not doing homework or passing out while writing an essay, so I have used AI to help write or create a structure in my text. And I have actively lost creative ability and intelligence. I've gone from being VWO level to HAVO, maybe even MAVO level (These are Dutch high/secondary school education levels, VWO/Atheneum and Gymnasium being the highest)

Physical pain reading

@@joelrobinson5457 True lovecraftian horror

AI Art existed before Moses *NOT CLICKBAIT* THEY DID IT IN ROCK

@@pcenero Lifehack: how to make a 100% accurate AI image of your surrounding with just your phone. "Takes a photo"

So sad

It just shows how little people who are not associated with drawing/painting know about art. It's also funny how they're amazed when an actual artist can tell them in an instant in 99 out of 100 examples if a drawing was done by AI or not. They seem to be genuinely mad that some people know this stuff and they can't figure out how people know - but even if there are no hands on the drawing, there are usually some details that give it away, but untrained eye won't see anything suspicious. Which leads to a point that AI won't turn people into artists. In fact, an artist who can use AI will get much better results than a non-artist.

As someone who uses AI art, I have to spend 10-15 hours per image fixing all the distortions. And there's always something left. It's actually kinda insane. And yeah, it's like, you can spot bad AI art a mile away. But at the same time, if you see AI art without distortions, you know some one has been polishing it for a long time. Or they're skilled enough to match the art style.

@@uniquename6925 ai could never be perfected, ai imagery still has the same distortions and errors that it has had for nearly 8 years. Unless someone has a supercomputer and generates the highest quality, most dynamic and creative ai artwork.

I used an ai program one time in hopes that it would help with oc inspiration....eyes wonky, arm morphed into the waist and overall high dislike is brown skin-

Actually ai art is super sophisticated now and is making fewer of these distortions because people are just training them like crazy on all art photography and pronography

Any AI artist will most likely mention that they are using AI, unless they're scumbags but I've seen only a few of those so far.

@@DevillForceBecause most of them are proud of it,they don't even see an issue with anything there.

@@ArtisanAsteroid it gives ai a bad name that's for sure

@@DevillForce I’ve seen a LOT of DeviantART accounts and the like that post AI art without even mentioning it in tags or description.

@@DevillForce people who use ai to post art aren't "artists" they literally type a few words and a machine (who used several images and real artist's stolen work) makes it for them

@🍩 JELLY eva 🍩 #roadto200 🏳️‍🌈?

@🍩 JELLY eva 🍩 #roadto200 sorry my brian is in "half on" XDXDXDDDDD

@🍩 JELLY eva 🍩 #roadto200 but in any case: 🏳️‍🌈?

U saved me thanks😊

@🍩 JELLY eva 🍩 #roadto200 I was about to see what it is but you and this guy’s comment saved me ❤

You could say... We're at a loss.

we're no strangers to love

nah it's leads you to the description

@@timesnewrman which leads you back to video, which leads you to- *GAME OVER*

@@ergohash2517 you know the rules and so do i

Damn, I should've known...

​@@themonsterunderyourbed9408 I have to ask, what's the purpose of your comment? Being an annoying prick under a comment that is over a year old? And aside from that, I genuinely think that the artwork has a unique style. People are just idiots when it comes to differenciating between real and ai art.

You mean "godlike" as in "like it was made with ChatGOD", the latest AI?

@@lonestarr1490 what

@@lonestarr1490 god damn it

@@averageduckenjoyerthefinal shut up

@@lilymatthosinhos2086 you mean like the ai? /S

"Getting any kind of online attention as a SFW artist in 2020" ✊😔

technically, being called out as if you used AI art is the equivalent of being so good in a video game that someone calls you a hacker anytime someone tells you that your art looks like AI, take it as a compliment that people are that shocked of your skill lol

@@exursix fair enough, but being called a hacker can be demoralizing as well

The ai is trained to imitate good art Your art doesn't look like AI art. AI art looks a bit like yours. Cause you're a good artist

@@Eldoofus It can, but being so good that you are accused of hacking brings me some form of pride.... Too bad I'm a sniper main lmao

All art is better than the “art” AI creates

@@adamjoestar2001 yea keep dreaming

@@mandyko I think what they’re trying to convey is that they view art as inherently bound to its creator, a sentiment that is valid and that many people in the past reciprocate. Therefore, AI generated art is hardly really art, and doesn’t really have the same weight as human works. Idk where I stand with all this bc I don’t see AI art that often (don’t use twitter, tumblr, etc.) but I lean more in their direction. That being said it does say a lot when “cute anime girl” can be boiled down to a bunch of bits and pieces by a computer program and be just as if not more popular than the stuff people were making before, but that’s just me thinking the genre’s degenerate anyway.

@@mandyko a picture that looks good is not better art... a dog crying with autotune, sounds more accurate with the scales with perfect tune... but is not better artist than freddy mercury

@@mandyko Ai art is worse it steals art from artists who take hours to draw real art Ai art is just art that is stolen how would it be better than any kind of real art

I fear that too - imagining that AI art degrades to that point... thankfully they only sampled the best artists on pixiv, not random deviantart amateurs.

I mean we have already reached this point tho. Many people on the internet are still using outdated files for Stable Diffusion. If you open hugging face and look at the finetuned custom weights that are coming out lately, you would be stunned by the precision and lack of artifacts that they produce. They are developed on a big variaty of artstyles and you cannot tell it is something produced by AI. When I tested them I was constantly google image searching them to find source, because I did not believe it was not scraped off the web, but synthesised.

@@idedary Well.... shit

No shot, it totally depends on the artstyle and type of art. Like almost all sligthly abstract landscape art is fucking untellable, even epople with art-degrees can get confused by them.

Right now with anime art its nearly impossible to tell

God damn it lol

I lost the game….

@@therealyojames I spedrun it.

I wish I saw the comment 5 seconds before....

How dare you /lh 😂

So true man I'm sick of people's bullshit

It's basically a moral panic at this point.

@@uniquename6925 totally

@@mrwerewolf7855 Yeah a lot of these people think they're the arbiters of art, when in reality they just run a shite Facebook page.

@@uniquename6925 or a power trip

xdnt

until they hit you with the "which printer

How did this make you grateful???

Sammee. I’ve always sucked at digital and I find the pen/pencil streaks on paper a lot easier to control and manipulate than a simple tool on a program, and it’s much easier to do textures and stuff. So when the AI art panic started happening I wasn’t really involved in this. Although online traditional art is extremely overshadowed by digital art

Luckily, for pixel artists like yours truly, it's kinda hard for an AI to rip off my style. I mean.... for another like few months probably...

A common struggle of the human anatomy... But I'm not impressed... I know the potential of AI Tech in its prime. Maybe this iteration of humanity can achieve it. Or lose it... I don't care either way... Since everything won't exist in my true time...

We may struggle with hands...but not to THAT degree. AI doesn't even try

@@absolstoryoffiction6615 bruh why are you everywhere now

@@__En__ Because I am???

@@absolstoryoffiction6615 I've maybe three of your comments on completely different videos just today Maybe we share some common interests or something idk

It's just stinking genshin impact. How come hardly anyone can tell without lurking?

Best comment from this vid

I think soon or late AI art will get to that level, but it doesn't matter! We always have our timelapses

Reddit is a huge stinkpot. Its users and mods are a joke.

It will

The heck??? Its not the art that looks ai, its the ai that looks like art. Why is there fault to an inocent, this feel so disheartening.. 😞

yet

AI treats hands like dreams treat hands.

human: "AI can't even draw hands!" AI: "can you?"

At the slight corners of every A.I anime art, there will always be a typical error that A.I can't notice or register that mistake

It also doesn't understand a lot things. If the eyes are too small they basically become smudges. If it tries to add details it attempts to blend it into what's next to it. Like Hair becoming the outlines of eyes or merging into clothes.

@@LycanKai14 oh man, that's a good example, and by good i mean sad

Well, if you think about it, humans also use data from the other arts when they are drawing their own

​@@ginqus sure humans reference other art. AI doesn't reference art in the same way as it cant add its own spin to it, it can only use data to make its art.

@Death is dead Mechanically speaking, yeah. Art A.I. lacks sentience or sapience. Practically speaking, any given Art A.I. is likely to work off of billions of different art pieces for its image generation. It'd be like if I took a SINGLE pixel from dozens upon dozens of unrelated X-bit retro game assets to create a new game sprite. Lots of pixels in existence, lots of general shapes for those pixels to go in, to the point that it's lack of creativity becomes a moot point.

@@azariyelvarro6271 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓

@@ginqus Its still no where near the level of an AI. A human would take at most 10 images for inspiration whereas an AI would use millions to billions for 'inspiration'. And its not even inspiration honestly, because it lacks creativity completely since its really just a blatant copy from well.. 10 billion different sources.

???

What about Vaporeon?

read the document.

@@MrEel-dc4kh squishy

@@siberiandante or even slimy it is a fish after all

Except they do applaud you for having a nice cake at your party

@@neonice in that case they would applaud for a different reason, they'd probably just want to eat the cake anyway, it's not like they'd really care about you.

@@SENYSENofficial art theft, and reposters in a nut shell

@@ms.pirate ☠️ people who take other people's art are nothing but useless potato brains wanting attention

True

These AIs are artists, to some degree. They learned from actual artists, and although you could interpret it as tracing, the AI isn't really doing art in the same way a human does. The issue is that the artists that are being used to train the AI aren't getting paid. The way to fix the AI art problem is simple. PAY ARTISTS.

@@MagnustophelesAi is in no way similar to a human. Humans don’t have billions of images stored in their brains like a computer does. People have to actually learn the fundamentals instead of copying things visually

Je pensais pas te trouver ici mdr

@@reggoo12 What you said is a flat out lie. Any person with a limited amount of experience in computer science knows that machine-learning algorithms “learn” pretty much exactly like human brains do, just with a lot more possibilities and ease of alteration.

i feel really demotivated because ai can just "create" anything in a few seconds and makes me feel that im wasting my time working on my drawing skills

@@reesespeeses_ instead learn to make bombs, could be helpful with dealing with ai bros and stuff

pro tip: don't do digital art

I find it truely astonishing how artists just refuse to see AI as the thing it is: Another powerful tool in your toolbox. Seriously, you guys sound like the people who complained that the printing press wil devalue books. It's absolutely fascinating how software engineers are in the exact same situation right now, but no one bets an eye because they just accepted ChatGPT as a tool rather than "the enemy".

I would say if drawing is a hobby for you honestly you shouldnt be discouraged AI cant take whats in your head and make that. If you plan to work on art you have some 20 ish years before AIs are advanced enough that corporations wont need 2d art anymore

SO TRUE

Based

Cuz AI stealing pics from real artists lol

and ia art can't even make 5 finger

@@JustBuyTheWaywardsRealms this argument is too weak. It can't do it for now, but AI art is improving every day. Soon it will capable

Spirit doesn't exist

@@FumanyuX well aren't you a nice fella

@@FumanyuX learn english.

You forget that humans are their own evil... The Creators left humanity for a reason...

@@FumanyuX you'll know soon enough when we birth AI that has emotions to over come the AI that has none. then you'll know what having a soul means.

those people have the same mindset as people that hack in ranked game to have the best rank and then showing off their rank

@@JustBuyTheWaywardsRealms Yeah, definitely

There's also legitimate artists, who start with an A.I. prompt and redraw or fix the work, at that point you can't tell what what....

@@JayboCorp.2014 Well I think that's ok, as long as they say they got the idea from A.I.. But then again, AI learns through taking the work of artists, so it's kinda hard to figure out what's right and wrong.

@@PeriluneStar artists don't live in a vacuum themselves, they all take a little bit from every piece they see. ai doesn't work that differently.

“Art styles don’t exist”

@@GingeryGinger whoever said that is cringe

Its the style of messed up hands

@@gnan1044 tfw youre so bad a drawing hands people think its made by an ai 💀

if me and Richard had the same handwriting, and I was being accused of materializing a note on Richard's behalf, people would say I had Richard's handwriting. Origin isn't implied here; relative to Richard, I possess their handwriting.

I don't care... EA did it better... Because they set the foundation for MTs.

Random shit = other awesome arts

@Ivoire 🫐 Well... Legally speaking... In America... It's not entirely illegal to do this under Copyright Law. But humans... Did you all forget who your Creators are? Extinction sends its regards.

@@absolstoryoffiction6615 actually, it is illegal, on multiple levels, but it takes YEARS for legal cases to get resolved. My dad had to spend like 2 years to resolve a copyright case because someone made a photo-realistic painting of one of his photos and then sold it for like 50x what it was worth. How are AI works illegal you might ask? A, use of a work for commercial purposes without the artist's permission. B, loss of sales due to the AI being able to replicate art styles(in fact, the best ones literally have key words written into them to avoid people just ripping off artists, but the machine still uses the images), C, AI works can not be deemed as copyrightable, so someone can literally just take your work and sell it because it is effectively public domain. D, the companies are commercializing the aforementioned illegal products as "their work" despite it not being their work but instead a collection of other peoples' works involuntarily collected (stolen). They argue in court that the AI just learns from the image but does not use it, but even public displays are NOT public domain for commercial use. Legally, these displays are an advertisement, hence why so many platforms go out of their way to make mature content difficult or impossible to access

@@nathanielbass771 True but you're half correct... Under American Copyright Law... Art Styles are not copyright able. Your specific art piece is copyright able, but not the style you drew it in. Then... You have Fair Use Law... In which some AI Tech act under for technological studies. As for your example... That would be Copyright infringement if the IP/Art Piece did not fall outside of Copyright, as some legal cases has shown before where the IP was too generic as it failed to be more specific etc. As for AI Art... That also depends... On how the Software and the Data Base is designed. One way would be illegal while another way would not. And true... Pure AI Art without no to little human intervention is not copyright able... That said... It's not that difficult to bypass under Copyright. (Granted...) Given the cosmic future... None of these laws are compatible and all art will not be protected as harshly as it is now. Well... I come from a time beyond this existence. I hope the human race can be there. But it's fine if they die in the end. (Just from personal experience. I had eternities to design existence itself... ... ... Nevermind. I know humans will not understand.) ... Once the Machine Core is designed again. Maybe "it" can explain to your kin but I won't be around in this dimension by that time... ... The "others" are not here anymore. Guess I'll see this myself, when this cosmic iteration ends... ... AI Tech is but one step into the right future. Try to not lose it, Mankind. Try to not die in this cosmic flux. Or many more will follow in this same endless Fate...

@@absolstoryoffiction6615 no need to cry because of no talent. Get good, artist will always be there - it's because for some people it's more than a skratch on a paper, it's a whole world, it's their everything - something to breath with, the beauty of being able to draw is outstanding - it's a path to heaven, when a person can show their emotions on a blank, empty paper, decorating it with feelings, not fake-ass app which steals other people' S work. You might be right, AI will take over the world, but we will never see that day. So how about we talk about present, where we draw to make beautiful things for ourselves and people who support us?

nice, I've been waiting for a sequel to the Unabomber manifesto

There's an entire dedicated video for the 60FPS animation AI why he thinks it's too bad for the artist or animators

Yeah, when energy lamps are created a lot of gas lamps vendors being pissed but that not stop the progress :v

@@wiliamfelipe1337 Lamps are a product. Art is more than that. It should never be just a product.

@@Eldoofus art is product too, but thats not the point, AIs gonna change how the digital arts work and anyone can change this.

*yeah i wonder why*

@@themonsterunderyourbed9408 drawing in different art styles takes effort and practice, each new style requires lots of trials and errors to archieve. Of course if you can do more than one style is a plus for your skills and improvement, but you're saying that a human skill that took lots of years to reach the point where it is now should change instead of a folder of pictures someone took from google? Whatever style the artist will try, someone will take it and put it in that folder for the AI as quickly as a google search. There's no escape, no "maybe they should change style", if they change, the AI will be fed the new one and it'll take that one too, repeat the cycle. They should just make a law where AI generated pictures have a not removable watermark to identify them, it's not that hard