Тёмный

"Power Grab": Supreme Court Overturns 4 Decades of Federal Regulatory Control, Hands Power to Courts 

Democracy Now!
Подписаться 2,2 млн
Просмотров 138 тыс.
50% 1

Support our work: democracynow.org/donate/sm-de...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday approved a power grab by corporate interests who want to strip federal agencies of their power to regulate public health, the climate and environment, worker protection and more. In the 6-3 ruling, the court’s conservative majority overturned a precedent known as the Chevron doctrine, which established that judges should defer to federal agencies on interpreting a law if Congress did not specifically address the issue. We speak with Mustafa Ali, former head of the environmental justice program at the Environmental Protection Agency, who describes it as “a very devastating decision,” and to The Nation's justice correspondent, Elie Mystal. “It's taking power out of our hands, out of the democracy’s hands, and putting it in the hands of the court,” says Mystal, who also addresses other recent rulings from the court at the end of its term, including the highly anticipated ruling on presidential immunity.
Democracy Now! is an independent global news hour that airs on over 1,500 TV and radio stations Monday through Friday. Watch our livestream at democracynow.org Mondays to Fridays 8-9 a.m. ET.
Subscribe to our Daily Email Digest: democracynow.org/subscribe

Опубликовано:

 

24 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 2,4 тыс.   
@gacitizen2
@gacitizen2 24 дня назад
There's nothing democratic about unelected agencies regulating our lives. You're defending the oligarchy not the people.
@douglasryle6499
@douglasryle6499 24 дня назад
Yes!
@michellejohnson5217
@michellejohnson5217 24 дня назад
Let’s have corporations regulate themselves that’s a great idea. Better yet let’s have a bunch of councils with untrained and uneducated citizens regulating pollution, product and food safety, aviation, and work place safety.
@kevoreilly6557
@kevoreilly6557 24 дня назад
Well you’re defending the Oligopoly … I wonder which is worse … he says glancing at his Dickens collection
@jalicea1650
@jalicea1650 23 дня назад
That's not how the laws work. The Congress created these agencies with specialists who know how to enact policy like how stupid the Supreme Court Justice was with gas issue. Only legal experts on clean air, clean water, food and health would know how to enact policy to reflect the law's requirements for such clean outcomes. Our Congress would be mired by decades of infighting born of ignorance by people like you. Congress only is able to learn so much about a subject hence why they defer to agencies to enact policies which help people and enforce the regulations born from their laws. What you are arguing for is insanity.
@CarolJamieson
@CarolJamieson 23 дня назад
BESIDES.... WE ARE NOT A DEMOCRACY..... We are a Constitutional Republic.
@evereststevens5408
@evereststevens5408 24 дня назад
As a citizen, i dont feel represented by any of these stupid politicians
@EndDims
@EndDims 23 дня назад
Well you should find who your senators and representative are, and interact with them, and participate in the democratic process. I mean my senators and representative are all a bunch of complete scum, but I still have a voice.
@Sumiya-lp8mm
@Sumiya-lp8mm 22 дня назад
​@@EndDimswe all have a voice, most politicians have no interest in our needs without some sort of incentive.
@bradjones5107
@bradjones5107 22 дня назад
​@@EndDimsOr sue the government to eliminate the Chevron ruling.😂 And No! Her analysis is absurd! The Chevron ruling was abused and used to terrorize companies into compliance. For instance, the Apple farmers were taxed to support the regulation agency that put them out of business. The Apple growers send to Apples to the processors that take their cut and pay the growers what's left. The growers can't increase their prices to offset the tax and go under. This is just one example of the abuse!!!
@grmpEqweer
@grmpEqweer 22 дня назад
​@@bradjones5107 So there was over-regulation. Now there will be no regulation: No regulation of water purity. No regulation of food purity-meaning many customers outside the country will ban at least some of our food products. No regulation of drug safety-medicine becomes a roll of the dice. No pollution regulations- cancer deaths, respiratory illness deaths, and heart attacks will climb. No clean water-in rivers OR our drinking water.
@NanaWilson-px9ij
@NanaWilson-px9ij 21 день назад
BS. Many of the losses you deplore are not affected by this ruling. There IS existing law for each example you site. If you believe more laws are needed, contact your legislative representatives and get the ball rolling. These three letter agencies have NO AUTHORITY to make law.
@ripadipaflipa4672
@ripadipaflipa4672 23 дня назад
It truly is a horror in our country when we have more homeless brothers and sisters and instead of reaching out with help our Supreme Court justices takes more away
@vasagowarlock8460
@vasagowarlock8460 22 дня назад
if this doesn't show that we are living in a fascist state I really do not know what else the people need to get off their asses and take OUR government back.
@grmpEqweer
@grmpEqweer 19 дней назад
@@vasagowarlock8460 A million people, peaceful, but with the means of self-defense, occupying Washington?
@grmpEqweer
@grmpEqweer 19 дней назад
@@vasagowarlock8460 (It would take money and organization. Think of the porta-potty rentals.)
@Asereht6534
@Asereht6534 19 дней назад
When enough ppl become homeless and they are charged by the courts of being homeless then they will open the camps.
@sr2291
@sr2291 17 дней назад
Yeah but the Fascists are also talking about taking their country back.
@cantrecall5633
@cantrecall5633 24 дня назад
As stated, Congress needs to get off their arses and do their jobs as intended by the framers.
@shanemarines4580
@shanemarines4580 24 дня назад
An how do you suppose they do that when Beijing Bidens department of Injustice, I'm sorry scum bag Obama's department of Injustice refuses to follow the constitution and Americans civil rights? Garland is a corrupt traitor to the American people that only does political hit jobs just like the rest of the Democrap socialist party an that being said the rino establishment isn't any better.
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc 24 дня назад
Alphabet Agencies are corrupt. You can research. Starting with Garland, Mayorkas, Schiff, Wray. Blaming Congress is looking at symptoms instead of viruses.
@Juliet475
@Juliet475 24 дня назад
The Republicans are trying , but get blocked by DEMS.
@user-jk9ok7ub9y
@user-jk9ok7ub9y 23 дня назад
Not going to happen unless we get republicans out of office.
@solarflares2547
@solarflares2547 23 дня назад
Any laws they pass can be struck down by conservative lower courts and then struck down by this court next term. That’s the problem. But yes, I agree. Pass legislation immediately.
@bertbaker7067
@bertbaker7067 23 дня назад
Unfun facts. The majority of homeless people in the US have jobs, and nationally, on average, there are 33 empty homes per homeless person. However, there's many more in some states. Mississippi is the worst with 250 vacant homes per homeless person.
@Heathmcdonald
@Heathmcdonald 17 дней назад
That most likely means a low rate of homelessness
@ben-memes1
@ben-memes1 24 дня назад
Of course the supreme Court did the right thing. We do not need unelected bureaucrats making our rules
@roberthicks5454
@roberthicks5454 23 дня назад
IF a law is too ambiguous, it is up to the legislation branch to fix it, not allow unelected bureaucrats to run wild.
@kkjppt5359
@kkjppt5359 23 дня назад
Oh no! How are we going to implement woke policies now??? The Supreme Court has no right to take away power from unelected administrators that make regulations. Arrgggghhhhhhhhh
@michaelccopelandsr7120
@michaelccopelandsr7120 23 дня назад
No, just those willing to bow to an attempted insurrectionist
@roberthicks5454
@roberthicks5454 23 дня назад
@@michaelccopelandsr7120 They did not surrender to the democrats. Evidence has come out that there was fake ballots and such that would have swayed the election the other way, meaning that the ones doing the insurrection was the democrats.
@gan5045
@gan5045 23 дня назад
@@michaelccopelandsr7120 I have bad news. The insurrection happend 61 years ago and their puppets on both the right and left have been running the clown show since.
@geobus3307
@geobus3307 22 дня назад
Gorsuch stating nitrous oxide instead of nitrogen oxide is the epitome of precisely why deference to experts is absolutely necessary and the Chevron doctrine should have been upheld. Judges are not experts in environmental issues!!!
@nmize7623
@nmize7623 19 дней назад
He probably has fond memories from his drunken frat boy days, inhaling nitrous inbetween beers; He figures "no big deal."
@chrism1719
@chrism1719 19 дней назад
No regulations are for the powerful keeping the small small, The political doners don't follow the rules, they just have their lawyers settle it where we get screwed. Not to mention low IQ, the problem with this country right now is the administrative bureaucracy.
@Foundry_made
@Foundry_made 24 дня назад
Removing federal overreach has always been the constitutional mandate of the Supreme Court. The executive branch has NEVER had constitutional authority to rule by fiat ("rules"), established law ever since "Marbury vs Madison".
@wingman416
@wingman416 23 дня назад
That's why tRumps fiat tax cut for the wealthiest .1% of Americans went through, they are so thoughtful and non corrupt!
@Elvengem
@Elvengem 21 день назад
executive branch now has almost free reign they said.
@outoftheforest7652
@outoftheforest7652 21 день назад
Conservatives always complained that the Democrats did that.. yet .. ... here we are. and they are not saying peep.
@sr2291
@sr2291 17 дней назад
​@@ElvengemNope.
@Elvengem
@Elvengem 16 дней назад
@@sr2291 thats all you have to say?
@Relikson
@Relikson 24 дня назад
Legislative branch creates law, judicial branch interprets law, executive branch enforces law. Corporations captured the regulatory agencies decades ago and use their corporate capture and chevron doctrine to create interpretations of law favorable to them. This HURTS corporations not helps them.
@thebull3206
@thebull3206 24 дня назад
YES the regulations hurt smaller business where the corporations can absorb the costs and put their smaller competitors out of business.
@AutitsicDysexlia
@AutitsicDysexlia 24 дня назад
This "news" outlet is a mouthpiece for Techno-Fascism... they love corporations and regulatory capture- so they won't comprehend this at all. Of course, their darling corporations would never hurt a fly. 😂
@stephaniehampton3525
@stephaniehampton3525 24 дня назад
This ruling will get rid of all beaurocratic rules not voted on by Congress and that is the workings of a representative Republic!!! God bless SCOTUS!!
@craigb8228
@craigb8228 24 дня назад
The 3 parties of government have to be independent which won't happen under Project2025. We are being set up for dictatorship.
@bettyverge9448
@bettyverge9448 24 дня назад
They will find a way to use this to their benefit. Don't worry. They always do. As long as the government and big business have their hands in each other's pockets, they always will
@LouisMorganxb3
@LouisMorganxb3 23 дня назад
Our economy is afflicted by uncertainty, housing troubles, foreclosures, global shifts, and the aftermath of the epidemic, all of which contribute to instability. To restore stability and drive growth, all sectors must urgently address rising inflation, slowing GDP, and trade disruptions.
@AlexClarkcompany
@AlexClarkcompany 23 дня назад
The US dollar is losing value due to inflation, while other currencies are gaining strength, creating uncertainty. Nonetheless, many people remain confident in the Dollar's perceived safety. I'm concerned that my 420K retirement funds may lose value, therefore I'm looking for other financial stability.
@OscarOwenn
@OscarOwenn 23 дня назад
With my stressful career, I don't have time for investment analysis. For seven years, a fiduciary has managed my portfolio, responding to market situations, ensuring for effective navigation and informed decisions. Consider taking a similar plan of action.
@LouisMorganxb3
@LouisMorganxb3 23 дня назад
Do you mind if I ask you to recommend the coach you employed? It seems you've figured it all out.
@OscarOwenn
@OscarOwenn 23 дня назад
My CFA, 'Leah Foster Alderman', is a well known figure in her field. I recommend looking into her qualifications further. She has extensive knowledge and is a treasure trove for anyone seeking to manage the financial markets.
@LouisMorganxb3
@LouisMorganxb3 23 дня назад
her handler was simple to locate and appears to be extremely capable and adaptable. We scheduled a phone conversation.
@victorianantiquities
@victorianantiquities 24 дня назад
What actually happened with the strike down of Chevron is that Congress makes law, not agencies. If they want a law they go to congress. Simple as that. Unelected employees of government agencies should not make laws (regulations).
@yessum15
@yessum15 23 дня назад
Congress doesn't have the time, staff, or expertise to do that. That's why they delegate. It's kind of like when a dad says follow the babysitter's rules. It would be impractical to run things any other way.
@onlyinamerica4916
@onlyinamerica4916 23 дня назад
​@yessum15 That's literally their job and that's what scotus recognized..If you want agencies making laws you should advocate for a constitutional amendment
@yessum15
@yessum15 23 дня назад
@@onlyinamerica4916 There's a difference between a law and a regulation. I want legislators writing laws and regulators writing regulations.
@druseyfirecaster3675
@druseyfirecaster3675 23 дня назад
Next up let's sue the government for term limits and age limits for all politicians.
@ProfessorChaos1349
@ProfessorChaos1349 23 дня назад
You have people in Congress, who are complete idiots, but are popular in their own state. They do not have the interest of the country at heart, and they do not have the expertise to regulate on the matters that have been delegated to the EPA.
@tonysaponara3923
@tonysaponara3923 24 дня назад
Explain to me how putting the regulations back into the hands of legislature is a power grab!
@angelalejzerowicz9670
@angelalejzerowicz9670 23 дня назад
It doesn’t follow THEIR narrative
@tjewett1967
@tjewett1967 23 дня назад
Because you can't let the wolf watch the henhouse. Next time a train rolls over and dumps 100,000 gallons of toxic waste into your water, do you want the EPA in charge of the clean up or some local judge that got a new motor home to rule in the railroads favor.
@jenniferslatten6705
@jenniferslatten6705 23 дня назад
@@tjewett1967how is East Palestine working out? Oh, yeah, utter disaster. The federal government shouldn’t be involved in any of this! Defund all of these agencies. Anyone who supports any federal agency after COVID has brain damage beyond repair
@dr9gonkid20
@dr9gonkid20 23 дня назад
They really did not think this one through
@kevinchester6721
@kevinchester6721 23 дня назад
@@tjewett1967because the EPA did so well in Ohio, right. Lol
@DS-nw4eq
@DS-nw4eq 24 дня назад
Uh, the regulations of agencies shouldn’t be off limits to constitutional scrutiny. Congress would just write vague laws intentionally to prevent judicial review of federal agencies.
@Easy-Eight
@Easy-Eight 24 дня назад
You're talking sense to a leftist. They are beyond redemption.
@yessum15
@yessum15 24 дня назад
Chevron never prevented judicial review of regulatory agencies. It simply allowed the agencies built for the express purpose of translating legislation into action the first crack at interpreting the legislation. The judiciary still operated as the ultimate backstop under Chevron. This decision simply says that things will continue to operate in the same way, but the Judiciary should deprioritize the regulatory agency's expertise relative to the opinion of private interests and the judge's own gut feeling.
@Thurnishaley6969
@Thurnishaley6969 24 дня назад
Just like how judges can interpret the law, in fields they have no knowledge of, in any way they want
@Americafirst45
@Americafirst45 24 дня назад
It's time to go back to America first without the interference of unelected beurocrats and criminals after jan20 2025 alot of them will mysteriously self delete because they know too much 🙄check Hillarys phone pings after jan20 2025 😂🇺🇸
@Serai3
@Serai3 24 дня назад
Uh, Congress is filled with people who have NO education in science, technology, or medicine. They have NO ability to make informed decisions on policy regarding those subjects. THINK next time before you spout nonsensical propaganda.
@codyharney2997
@codyharney2997 24 дня назад
😂😂😂 these people, "taking the power away from the people" by empowering the citizens to be part of the laws congress passes? Those "unelected judges" are millions of time better than "unelected bureaucrats in agencies without authority to legislate"
@kelcritcarroll
@kelcritcarroll 23 дня назад
Not when they are controlled by a maga whacko who is soley driven by a profit mindset and thats all…..however, this just shows how all democrats must vote out all right wing conservatives down the ballot for years and years……president Biden must enlarge the supreme court and because of the ruling that a president has amunity for all acts done in office thanks to this same supreme court, Biden should give seal team six a call later on this afternoon so they can take care of a problem or two.
@Lucian0410
@Lucian0410 23 дня назад
Tf are u talking ab. This didn't give US any say in this, all it did was strip the EXPERTS from being included in the discussion. There is a reason why we have a federal and state government, people are stupid af.
@HM-rz8nv
@HM-rz8nv 18 дней назад
If you think "congress" and "people power" belong in the same sentence, you're delusional.
@TheBLACKISHKRACKER
@TheBLACKISHKRACKER 24 дня назад
Oh yeah these people really care about us while they're cutting children apart
@joycehaines2055
@joycehaines2055 21 день назад
When we find the kidnapped children in political camps then you can complain about the lot of children. Abortion and sex servitude should be absolutely aberrant to all citizens that are not perverted.
@janea4777
@janea4777 21 день назад
No one’s cutting kids up, weirdo.
@IAmNumber4000
@IAmNumber4000 19 дней назад
why u need to make up stuff when they are openly bombing children in the middle east?
@nancypeterson3645
@nancypeterson3645 24 дня назад
FINALLY!! POWER RETURNED TO THE PEOPLE!! ABOUT TIME We will vote on what we want representatives positions to be!! NOT LOBBYIST!! Agencies cannot speak for the people, but rather WORK FOR US, by.informing us, and letting us vote on any regulatory mandates!! Power must be given back to the people with full total transparency!!!
@cutback443
@cutback443 24 дня назад
did you listen to the f.cking story? or ar you a
@yessum15
@yessum15 23 дня назад
If you intend on voting for every regulatory mandate necessary to run the country you would spend your entire day voting and doing nothing else. Do you really have an informed opinion on the proper protocol for strength of sonar broadcast during urgent but non-critical vessel movement in commercial ships engaged in intrafirm trade for domestic entities carrying second country manufactured products operated by third country staff between 10 and 12 nautical miles from shore?
@gregoryleewalker
@gregoryleewalker 23 дня назад
Power is not in your hands. They took power from you and gave it all to corporations. And are you so naive to think business will have the public good in mind, or the quarterly stock dividends?
@violetlavender9504
@violetlavender9504 23 дня назад
This is power returned to corporations you fool. It's playing into the hands of the billionaires that paid off the court.
@havenbastion
@havenbastion 24 дня назад
The role of the courts is explicitly to interpret the law.
@chocomalk
@chocomalk 24 дня назад
That's what they did.
@samstewart9249
@samstewart9249 24 дня назад
No what they did is legislate from the bench. Some are just clueless about how laws were designed to work. This Court isn't clueless, just corrupted. ​@@chocomalk
@emichaelny336
@emichaelny336 24 дня назад
@@samstewart9249 So when SCOTUS agrees with you, it's a good thing, when it disagrees with you, it's a bad thing. Got it.
@jeremiahdillard9201
@jeremiahdillard9201 24 дня назад
@@samstewart9249 It stopped regulatory agencies from creating law by fiat.
@jamiediamond420
@jamiediamond420 24 дня назад
Wrong! Ever heard of case law?
@allanfranklin9615
@allanfranklin9615 24 дня назад
40 years of agencies regulating American businesses, farmers, small business owners, ordinary citizen. I cannot fathom the amount of money spent and lost due to those regulations. 40 years, almost my entire adult life, of unconstitutional regulations years have affected almost every American. These agencies should have never had this power. The country will survive. The EPA should not control the life of Americans.
@jasonbull5961
@jasonbull5961 23 дня назад
Not to mention the ATF turning law abiding citizens into felons overnight and the IRS making new unfair tax rules and STEALING from citizens.
@gregoryleewalker
@gregoryleewalker 23 дня назад
Many of those regulations you hate impact people's health and safety. Without them corporations would still be killing us because they won't regulate themselves. So watch what happens now. Workplace safety? Fuck you. Drug safety? Fuck you. Food safety? Fuck you.
@shd_khan
@shd_khan 23 дня назад
Completely unworkable, the judiciary is going to be log-jammed with rule challenges and Congress will be completely unable to legislate
@cohippiehiker
@cohippiehiker 24 дня назад
WE are the PEOPLE WE are waiting for.
@MyLoganTreks
@MyLoganTreks 24 дня назад
WATCHING & WAITING TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER
@user-lb3xg2jf1x
@user-lb3xg2jf1x 24 дня назад
Can't wait to VOTE in November!!!!!!! 0:54
@Serai3
@Serai3 24 дня назад
Nice sentiment. What exactly do you propose we do about the Supreme Court? I'm getting tired of people spouting vague platitudes with no idea how to actually DO anything.
@wingman416
@wingman416 24 дня назад
@@Serai3 Bidens second term will start with an expansion of the court, along with term limits, if we can get Mike "johnson" out of the way. He is like a puppet, sitting on donnies lap, waiting to have his string pulled so he can go confess his arousal to his son.
@JustWanderingBy
@JustWanderingBy 24 дня назад
@@Serai3There is nothing we can do aside from voting while we still can - unless we find some billionaires that can outspend corporate and religious interests. Sadly, I don’t think any exist.
@jamesjusick1462
@jamesjusick1462 24 дня назад
This takes power from unaccountable bloated agencies and returns it to the people or Congress. how is this a bad thing?
@Rhythmicons
@Rhythmicons 24 дня назад
It takes power from the federal government to regulate and sells it to business oligarchs.
@forfun6273
@forfun6273 24 дня назад
@@Rhythmiconswrong. What this decision does is restore the checks and balances that were intended in the formation of our government. Prior to it the executive branch had jurisdiction over agencies that had the ability to be the legislative branch and the judicial branch. By reversing this decision the agencies now only have the power to enforce the law. Congress has to write the laws and the judicial branch has to interpret the laws. It’s separating power and if anything it makes it harder for bureaucrats to corrupt the system. Because they would be required to corrupt all 3 branches and not simply the president or someone at one of these agencies.
@Kahless_the_Unforgettable
@Kahless_the_Unforgettable 24 дня назад
​@@Rhythmicons So, it takes it away from oligarchs and gives it to different oligarchs. Except the new oligarchs are the ones we voted for to do this job. Oh noes! What a disaster! Reeeeeee!
@Barrager69
@Barrager69 23 дня назад
It's only bad if you're a corrupt establishment politician.
@Rhythmicons
@Rhythmicons 23 дня назад
@@Kahless_the_Unforgettable the real Kahless would understand.
@IbnGreenberg
@IbnGreenberg 23 дня назад
This is sad! The unraveling of every aspect of the government that I thought would be safeguarded by law, i.e. voting rights, environmental rights, rights that should be left up to the liberty of the individual, whatever that may be, be “gutted”. It’s crazy.
@melkel2010
@melkel2010 20 дней назад
Those agencies dictated over your individual liberties. Did you have a water puddle in your lawn one year? The EPA declared your property a wetland and you weren't allowed to drain it. Now if anyone tries to stop you, you can litigate for your rights. Yes, making up laws on the fly by a beurocracy was a lot faster and easier, but it never landed on the side of your personal liberties. Wow, maybe our property doesn't have to be surrendered to hiking trails anymore. Nothing worse than waking up one morning with a bunch of e-bikes tooling through your backyard and suing you, the property owner, if they got hurt because some beaurocrat decided you should allow people to trample your petunias for their useless nature trail program. Now you can argue for your right to private property in court. And yes there are going to be some bad actors taking advantage, but we do have local and state legislation, not just Congress for legal remedies.
@mollywillo
@mollywillo 23 дня назад
funny he was talking about laughing gas, i wish i fucking had that right now to take my mind off this fascist hellscape
@serahkonner
@serahkonner 20 дней назад
Buy some whipped cream its just as yummy but in the can always in the can.
@davemi00
@davemi00 24 дня назад
Awesome news. Agencies have Not a Drop of Constitutionality to Create Law. Make our Congress drop campaigning to carry out their Constitutional Duties.
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc 24 дня назад
Alphabet Agencies are currently in “Contempt of Congress” Garland, Mayorkas, Schiff, Wray
@tjewett1967
@tjewett1967 23 дня назад
Awesome news until a rail car dumps 80,000 gallons of toxic waste in your yard.
@VeteranWayne
@VeteranWayne 23 дня назад
Please explain how you will get Congress to stop campaigning and start making actual needed legislation?
@bluegrasstooth4026
@bluegrasstooth4026 24 дня назад
"Federal Agencies" do not pass legislation. This type of activity is intended for the people to decide through our representatives in Congress. If our nation feels that an issue warrants federal regulation, the PEOPLE need to decide, not 'experts' at three letter agencies. Our government has become too large, with too much power, and we need to get back to limited government with accountability. This is not a partisan issue.
@Bebe777333
@Bebe777333 24 дня назад
Well said
@Barrager69
@Barrager69 23 дня назад
Bingo.
@polkunus
@polkunus 23 дня назад
You need people, technocrats, that know what theyre talking about instead of policies determined by the smoke and mirrors of political bureaucracy. Policy makers and especially the megaphone that speaks to the masses do not understand the technical nuance of very specific issues.
@Barrager69
@Barrager69 23 дня назад
@@polkunus That's the role of advisors, staff, and lobbyist to work with our representatives and legislatures for technical understandings. Separations of powers are a thing for a reason and alphabet agencies having all three with no accountability to congress was bs.
@user-sk3pi1me2f
@user-sk3pi1me2f 23 дня назад
@@polkunus To have genuine authority in an area the best approach is to bring in "laymen", people who work in that field/industry. Instead our government brings in "experts" provided by lobbyists, NGOs and big corporations and our bureaucrats sit in offices and read papers written by the same "experts" or by people with degrees who have little experience in the field but are receiving kickbacks, grants and paychecks from the same special interests. The politicians get paid by the lobbyists and the bureaucrats retire from .Gov to go work at cushy overpaid jobs for the same companies they used to police. Then people blame anything but the broken, incompetent, corrupt systems and claim that what we need is MORE instead of reform... When was the last time you saw someone in Washington, DC bring in a poor dirty farmer or rancher to ask them what government could do to make their life better (or quit interfering with their productivity)? It doesn't happen because their intent isn't to make things better and once you understand that everything else becomes apparent.
@hcwcars1
@hcwcars1 24 дня назад
Awesome, it's about time to strip the power from unelected bureaucrats.
@diontury7585
@diontury7585 24 дня назад
Couldn't agree with you more Maria! Thank God the tables are finally turning. So sick of the twisted gestapo left . Nevertheless , I disagree that homeless people should not be allowed to be able to sleep on the street.
@ronniefurbs
@ronniefurbs 21 день назад
Did you even listen to what was said? Omg
@Stumme-40203
@Stumme-40203 24 дня назад
I don’t see taking power away from the 3 letter agencies as that bad.
@janegerard5604
@janegerard5604 24 дня назад
No, this keeps unelected administrative people from setting law. Congress needs to pass laws that are more specific about the powers they are giving agencies.
@Rhythmicons
@Rhythmicons 24 дня назад
The ruling protects unelected oligarchs from accountability from abuses in the workplace and of the environment.
@Thurnishaley6969
@Thurnishaley6969 24 дня назад
Who elected these judges? Nobody lmaooo. Id rather have specialized agencies make laws for the subjects they intimately know instead of activist judges who do whatever corporate interests want. No shit corporate interests can infiltrate fed agencies but acting like the judiciary is someone exempt from that influence is hillarious. Nobody is coming to help you
@craigb8228
@craigb8228 24 дня назад
Sounds like you're on board with Project2025. Led by the rightwing Heritage Foundation, the project showcases a federal government that cracks down intensely on immigration, vanquishes LGBTQ+ and abortion rights, diminishes environmental protections, overhauls financial policy.
@DoSe420
@DoSe420 24 дня назад
​@@Thurnishaley6969id rather the country work as intended. Where the house and Senate makes laws, the court interprets laws, and the president signs laws. No unconstitutional laws being made by unelected unauthorized agencies.
@letsRegulateSociopaths
@letsRegulateSociopaths 24 дня назад
​@@Rhythmiconswhen the ultimate arbiter is the supreme Court HOW ARE THEY ELECTED?
@pudgieayer9052
@pudgieayer9052 24 дня назад
So now those federal agencies have been reined in and congress members will have to do their job as the constitution deems!!!
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc 24 дня назад
Now Congress CAN do their jobs ! Heads of Alphabet Agencies are currently IN Contempt of Congress, ignoring Subpoenas.
@lpk6372
@lpk6372 23 дня назад
​@@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7scyou mean the Republican representatives that refuse to answer subpoenas
@tarwingrill4531
@tarwingrill4531 24 дня назад
Isn't it because when politicians decide matters involving money and cost, it is like an open path to corruption?
@NickLujan
@NickLujan 24 дня назад
Being a modern politician is selling the people that you care about them while being a self interested as you can get away with.
@chocomalk
@chocomalk 24 дня назад
Now people can actually hold federal agencies accountable, wow can you imagine my shock that DN thinks this is bad.
@StephanosBlack
@StephanosBlack 24 дня назад
It should be called: "Democracy" Now 😂
@krashkwads4688
@krashkwads4688 24 дня назад
not for the people they are for "mob" rule
@codyharney2997
@codyharney2997 24 дня назад
​@@StephanosBlack 😂 perfect.
@rmpj13
@rmpj13 22 дня назад
Unelected bureaucrats have no right to make regulations for me. The constitution states that is the job of congress alone.
@theMosen
@theMosen 21 день назад
It was congress who gave them that right in the first place. Because stuff is complicated and often requires actual experts and congresspeople are too busy calling donors anyway. In other words, now nothing will get done, which is exactly what corporations want. Now they can find new ways to pollute rivers and screw over consumers while congress does the only thing they're good at: squabble and blame each other for getting nothing passed.
@james-pierre7634
@james-pierre7634 19 дней назад
Unelected bureaucrats, lobbyists and members of the President’s Cabinet make regulations, rules, mandates and assist in passing laws all the time. Look at the Food and Drug Administration, FEMA and the CDC. The infamous CDC lead the charge to mandatory masks during it’s equally hyped COVID pandemic. You were lead down the garden path without any objection by dubious claims of scientific evidence by unelected bureaucrats. Did I hear you question or object to those people? Nope!
@tinameschko
@tinameschko 24 дня назад
Great decision from the Supreme Court. Agencies and bureaucrats should not be making the laws. We saw how well that went during Covid. Things got tyrannical pretty quickly.
@CP-bf6wx
@CP-bf6wx 23 дня назад
Okay. I already did consumer' action after reading. My second time. My first passed for bank fees, help.
@toddswinscoe1007
@toddswinscoe1007 24 дня назад
Congress and congress only, makes law. The judicial branch is the body who tries the law. That's it! Democracy does not allow for agencies to run the country.
@joannbaumann4028
@joannbaumann4028 24 дня назад
thank you!
@dustinpeters6092
@dustinpeters6092 24 дня назад
We are not a democracy.
@hisnameisiam808
@hisnameisiam808 24 дня назад
We are not a democracy. We are a constitutional representative republic.
@Kahless_the_Unforgettable
@Kahless_the_Unforgettable 24 дня назад
​@@hisnameisiam808 Cool story bro. Can you please explain how that changes anything he said? If you switch out the word "Democracy", and replace it with "Republic", does any other fact change? Basically, can you say something relevant?
@douglasryle6499
@douglasryle6499 24 дня назад
True!
@jamessims5043
@jamessims5043 24 дня назад
The court is upholding the constitution. Agencies never should have had power to make policy. That's congress's domain. Agencies are the enforcement, not the policy makers.
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc 24 дня назад
The 4th Branch of Government just got it’s death sentence.
@kickinghorse2405
@kickinghorse2405 18 дней назад
For Supreme Court Justices: -12-year term limits -Voted on by the people (not the president and congress) every 4 years. - Ethics Oversight administered by the circuit court justices in conjuction with the national bar association. (Or, someone/organization that has no attachment to the outcome of cases . . . Not sure who this might be, but congress had utterly failed - can't be them.) - Addition of 4 Justices to the Supreme Court to total 13 to bring parity with the number of circuit courts.
@carolinelack4500
@carolinelack4500 24 дня назад
Government bureaucrats should not be making laws regulations that affect everyday citizens and make our lives miserable. Good for the court
@PlantManPodcast
@PlantManPodcast 24 дня назад
So glad for this ruling. And OSHA can be held liable for forcing people to get the shot. What an amazing ruling!
@MyLoganTreks
@MyLoganTreks 24 дня назад
Measles, Polio and all the other preventable transmissible diseases will be on the rise. Ideologies over Intelligence
@iv-leagueblu2487
@iv-leagueblu2487 24 дня назад
Bet the will hold no responsibility to such.
@themcguy1
@themcguy1 24 дня назад
Nobody was forced to get a shot lololol
@mikespector2
@mikespector2 24 дня назад
What a stupid comment! SMH
@FahQue1984
@FahQue1984 24 дня назад
​@themcguy1 Many were forced or lose their jobs and not be able to enter stores. Did you get ur 17th boosta shot yet?
@user-ec1qz1zn3u
@user-ec1qz1zn3u 24 дня назад
The Court took power away from buricrates.
@tinalschmidt-banks3415
@tinalschmidt-banks3415 21 день назад
It's about time. This should have happened along time ago. Finally they are giving power back to the people
@janetprice85
@janetprice85 24 дня назад
Bull! Federal agencies have been assuming regulatory powers not granted them by the federal legislature.It's called regulatory" creep".
@user-jk9ok7ub9y
@user-jk9ok7ub9y 23 дня назад
Agencies fall under congressional control. Not judicial. Judges do not 16:03 administer laws. They interpret when cases are brought in front of them. This will cause court cases to pile up, delaying processing those breaking regulations so that by the time a case gets to the Supreme Court, companies can have made their profits, done their damage, and dissolved with the executives laughing all the way to the bank and no recourses for people left in company slime
@shadowmann9
@shadowmann9 24 дня назад
This is exactly what was needed decades ago. I am glad that it came to a head and has now been decided. We The People, not Them the Bureaus.
@cindypyle7047
@cindypyle7047 23 дня назад
Tell that to the families of those who die in train accidents because they have no regulations
@shadowmann9
@shadowmann9 23 дня назад
@@cindypyle7047 Regulations are fine, when they are PROPERLY placed by AUTHORIZED authorities. This ruling fixes the holes. Only the Carte Blanche ability to do stuff like lockdowns is gone.
@user-ec1qz1zn3u
@user-ec1qz1zn3u 24 дня назад
He's lying. The supreme court said these departments can't make up rules and regulations that Congress has not voted on.
@davidspringham3962
@davidspringham3962 24 дня назад
One of the best rulings the SCOTUS has ever made. The 3 letter agencies are very political and change the rules in the middle of the game. The legislative branch makes the laws according to the Constitution, not the 3 letter agencies under the executive branch
@FrankGallagherr
@FrankGallagherr 24 дня назад
$525 billion to Ukraine and $750 billion to illegals and $700 to Maui people that’s your president America
@eddiearmijo6635
@eddiearmijo6635 24 дня назад
Let's not forget the Two Billion in Saudi Money Given Too Jarod Kussner.
@Thurnishaley6969
@Thurnishaley6969 24 дня назад
If they gave money to Hawaii youd call it communism too because your ass didnt get shit
@luisdavidllense2293
@luisdavidllense2293 24 дня назад
OK. But you somehow left out the billions given to Israel. Intentional?
@DonMarzzoni
@DonMarzzoni 24 дня назад
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 you're a clown 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@shanemarines4580
@shanemarines4580 24 дня назад
Don't 4get 33 billion for illegal housing an only 13 Million for veterans housing. The Beijing Biden regime an Democrap socialist party r outright treasonous trash that deserves a short drop an a sudden stop how bout it. TRUMP 2024 SAVE AMERICA 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@spk07csl57
@spk07csl57 24 дня назад
Chevron deference handed governmental powers to non-elected bureaucrats who have zero accountability. Chevron deference being removed is the greatest return of power to the people they could have done.
@detinator5
@detinator5 24 дня назад
And that's exactly why the government, run by non-elected bureaucrats mainly, are commanding "Democracy Now!" propaganda outlets to call it a "Power Grab" and complain about it. The establishment order does not like to see the strangulation stop until we're fully dead. The establishment order is upset at the people because of a slight reigning in of their power. It's not like they don't have 15 back channel ways to do the same thing they've always done to us, they just hate that anyone stands in their way.
@lynnegackstetter2779
@lynnegackstetter2779 24 дня назад
It gave power to Specialist who knows more than the majority of people. That took power away from voters to elect people to talk with the Specialists and keep our water,air and land clean. The Supreme Court is not a Specialist and not a legislative body. Right now it is not recommended to have pregnant mothers or children to eat fish caught in the lakes of Minnesota. The lake's have too much mercury in them. Once clean lakes in my State are becoming swamp's because of run off of fertilizer. They were beginning to make progress by going after the polluters but the Supreme Court by overturning Chevron gave polluters the right to pollute. I wouldn't eat fish out of any Minnesota lake.😢
@eman67rp
@eman67rp 19 дней назад
For profit prisons are licking their chops, after this ruling on the homeless. They can profit from this.
@user-jk9ok7ub9y
@user-jk9ok7ub9y 23 дня назад
This decision has confirmed that the majority on this court doesn't care at all about the health and wellbeing of our citizens
@targgthewise2892
@targgthewise2892 24 дня назад
Hahahahahaha watching the communist left rage is hilarious!
@jnywd8450
@jnywd8450 20 дней назад
It is sorta fun to troll them.
@HM-rz8nv
@HM-rz8nv 18 дней назад
Will you laugh when you get a preventable disease due to breathing dirty air or consuming a product that was deregulated because powerful corporate lobbyist influenced judges and politicians?
@sr2291
@sr2291 17 дней назад
Oh please. There is no real left anymore in the US.
@jduncan2145
@jduncan2145 24 дня назад
Constitutional republic get it straight
@samstewart9249
@samstewart9249 24 дня назад
That's just semantics! Got it straight?
@gan5045
@gan5045 24 дня назад
🍌 republic
@Rhythmicons
@Rhythmicons 24 дня назад
Our republic is a representative democracy. Get it straight.
@craigb8228
@craigb8228 24 дня назад
Definitely not Federalist.
@luisdavidllense2293
@luisdavidllense2293 24 дня назад
@@Rhythmicons And representatives in said constitutional republic are elected through a democratic process. Got it.
@cg4646
@cg4646 5 дней назад
If it wasn’t for the agency staff being unreasonable and micromanaging policy’s that go far beyond intent of rules.. this would not have happened
@dshakeryan
@dshakeryan 23 дня назад
Cancer Alley, also known as “Chemical Corridor,” is an 85-mile stretch of land along the Mississippi River between Baton Rouge and New Orleans in Louisiana. It’s home to over 200 petrochemical plants and refineries, accounting for a quarter of the petrochemical production in the United States. Unfortunately, this region has earned its ominous nickname due to serious environmental concerns. Residents in Cancer Alley face disproportionately high rates of cancer, miscarriages, and respiratory ailments. The air pollution caused by these industrial facilities exceeds federal limits of acceptable risk, making it a challenging place to live…. 🕊️
@melkel2010
@melkel2010 20 дней назад
40 years under Chevron did nothing to stop it. Corperations are known to hack into the Federal Agancies, get key positions on staff and deregulate anything they need to do things like dump toxic chemicals into rivers, oceans, waste treatment facilities, or directly apply on forests. There were too many vulnerabitlites for the doctrine to work as it was supposed to. We are at liberty to try to get this cleaned up and make them stop polluting. It could go the other way also. We do have to go to work now.
@neailbabson4494
@neailbabson4494 24 дня назад
The job of the Supreme Court is not to make laws but to interpret them to the letter of the law
@tonymccoy5032
@tonymccoy5032 24 дня назад
Is it federal agencies job to interpret the law? Kind of a weird argument.
@ladyliberty1492
@ladyliberty1492 24 дня назад
That's exactly what they did!
@SuperOdyss
@SuperOdyss 24 дня назад
The constitution says Congress makes law, not unnamed, faceless unelected bureaucrats.
@doug9905
@doug9905 24 дня назад
@@tonymccoy5032Only a libtard would refer to the Supreme Court as an agency.
@RobertCWarwick
@RobertCWarwick 24 дня назад
Great job by our supreme Court. Lock up Garland the true criminal.
@cindypyle7047
@cindypyle7047 24 дня назад
Are you serious pity the uneducated
@jeffreya.greene6999
@jeffreya.greene6999 24 дня назад
​@@cindypyle7047Only Pity the Fool like You & Your Kind!!!
@gdssolutions
@gdssolutions 24 дня назад
​@cindypyle7047 hmm. Careful you're entering into a battle of wit, and you are unarmed.
@jeffreya.greene6999
@jeffreya.greene6999 24 дня назад
Only Pity the Fool that's Ignorant!!!
@jeffreya.greene6999
@jeffreya.greene6999 24 дня назад
Only Pity the Lil people that AIN'T able to Know the Difference!!! JUST LIKE YOU & YOUR KIND!!!
@turtletruth
@turtletruth 22 дня назад
50 years ago was my (3rd) third Non-Violent/Victimless DUI ... (Pullover arrests) All three offenses were VOID OF VICTIM, INCIDENT, ACCIDENT, and DAMAGED PARTY. After serving (6) years as a front-line Marine during the Iranian crisis (1979), (Before having a wife, children, and grandchildren) returning to civilian life (Honorable Discharge) was difficult... After 50 years as a prohibited person can the Bruen decision help this 67-year-old Marine regain his gun right for family and home protection? When DUI arrests have NO victim, NO incident, NO accident, and NO damaged party, the 2nd Amendment "Right/Privilege" should never be "eternally abrogated"! - USMC (Semper Fidelis) SGT E-5 (5811)
@melkel2010
@melkel2010 20 дней назад
Thank you for your service, sir. And that is absurd. These precendents won't be rolled back by this overturning, but perhaps there can be reversals by courts or lawmakers.
@rodgerwoods4971
@rodgerwoods4971 24 дня назад
About time the power was returned back to the people..... They've over stepped their power for for to long and without the best interest of the people...
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc 24 дня назад
Power is back with House Reps and Senators. REVIEW Voting Records of YOUR House Representatives & Senators online in a few minutes BEFORE you VOTE.
@cd5642
@cd5642 24 дня назад
Oh no! The Supreme Court decided that the Constitution says there are separation of powers! How dare they agree with the Constitution?
@Thurnishaley6969
@Thurnishaley6969 24 дня назад
The Supreme court decided that they are the sole power lmao
@craigb8228
@craigb8228 24 дня назад
As part of multiple minorities I worry Project2025 will win. "Led by the rightwing Heritage Foundation, the project showcases a federal government that cracks down intensely on immigration, vanquishes LGBTQ+ and abortion rights, diminishes environmental protections, overhauls financial policy"
@cd5642
@cd5642 24 дня назад
@@Thurnishaley6969 no, the Executive Branch thinks that they are the sole power. The Constitution is plainly against that thought. The court ruled per the Constitution. They did exactly what was supposed to happen in our Constitutional Republic. Why do you want an unelected and unaccountable government running everything? Why don’t you agree that We the People are supposed to control our government. Anyone who disagrees with this ruling is an authoritarian
@gdssolutions
@gdssolutions 24 дня назад
​@Thurnishaley6969 you watch too much msdnc. The ruling from the SCOTUS literally said the chevron doctrine circumvents congress by allowing the executive branch to reinterpret laws in order to change them. Government bureaucrats have been twisting themselves in pretzels to create new laws and regulations by "reinterpretation" of existing laws. Sure seems funny that the side of the political isle that's accusing the other of fascism sure do get upset when fascist policies are shut down.
@forfun6273
@forfun6273 24 дня назад
@@Thurnishaley6969wrong. They don’t have the power to write the laws or enforce the laws. They simply have the power to interpret the laws and make sure they’re constitutional. Prior to the ruling the agencies legit had the power to write laws, enforce laws, and decide how they were interpreted. They had the power of every branch of government and they were under the jurisdiction of the branch of government that is the easiest to be corrupted, the executive branch. A president could direct and agency to purposely misinterpret a law to achieve his own goals or get a fat check from someone. Then the courts are forced to listen to that agency on how the law is interpreted. Like that’s so unconstitutional. The founding fathers separated the government into 3 branches for a reason. So they all had checks and balances on each other. Like rock paper scissors. But they decided that a pebble counts as rock but can be paper and scissors if it wants to.
@kalifornistan9166
@kalifornistan9166 23 дня назад
Not a power grab. Power should rest with elected officials, NOT a bunch of UN-elected bureaucrats responsible to no one.
@22lilacsky
@22lilacsky 23 дня назад
THIS!!! 💯 It's too late,they own everyone now
@user-sk3pi1me2f
@user-sk3pi1me2f 23 дня назад
Actually.... the power should rest solely with the people, the elected officials simply represent us. That's why the 10th Amendment is so awesome.
@Videomorgue
@Videomorgue 23 дня назад
You just described the SCOTUS.
@mollywillo
@mollywillo 23 дня назад
hey hi what the fuck do you think the unelected judges who serve life terms are
@final1fantasy
@final1fantasy 23 дня назад
The supreme court judges are un-elected
@SubieRow
@SubieRow 15 дней назад
This is an absolute win for the people! Freedom to do what you want to your vehicle! No more force to buy electric only! More freedom for our 2nd amendment! Less regulation on public lands! Yes you can ride your dirtbikes on blm forest service land. So many more strike downs on regulations that we dont realize right now!
@j.j.1064
@j.j.1064 20 дней назад
That's not the only one on a long list of vexatious rulings. The latest ruling on homelessness. Here's my opinion. 1. **Ignoring Established Precedents**: - Overturning a lower court's decision that aligns with established interpretations of the Eighth Amendment (prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment) can be seen as ignoring legal precedents set by previous cases. 2. **Disregard for Human Rights**: - By upholding measures that may be seen as cruel and unusual punishment for homelessness, the decision could be interpreted as disregarding fundamental human rights, which is generally seen as an unreasonable stance in modern jurisprudence. 3. **Appeal to Legal Formalism**: - Relying heavily on technical legal arguments to justify overturning the lower court's decision, without considering the broader social and humanitarian implications, can be seen as vexatious. This approach prioritizes form over substance. 4. **Selective Interpretation**: - The decision may involve selectively interpreting laws or the Constitution to fit a specific ideological agenda, rather than applying a consistent legal standard. This selective interpretation can undermine the principle of impartial justice. 5. **Dismissal of Contextual Realities**: - Failing to consider the socio-economic context of homelessness and the real-world impact of the decision on vulnerable populations can be seen as a sign of vexatious reasoning. A decision that ignores the lived realities of affected individuals lacks compassion and practical wisdom. 6. **Conflict with Moral and Ethical Standards**: - Upholding what is widely regarded as cruel and unusual punishment contradicts contemporary moral and ethical standards, suggesting the decision is more about exerting ideological control than about fair legal judgment. 7. **Inconsistent Application of Judicial Review**: - If the Supreme Court majority frequently overturns lower court decisions that protect vulnerable populations, but not other types of cases, it indicates a potentially vexatious pattern of behavior targeting specific outcomes. 8. **Political Motivations**: - The decision may be perceived as being driven by political motivations rather than impartial legal reasoning. If the justices' political affiliations correlate strongly with their decisions, it raises questions about the objectivity of the ruling. By identifying these points, we can critically assess the logical foundations (or lack thereof) behind the Supreme Court's right-wing majority decision, illustrating why it might be perceived as vexatious.
@maragon1
@maragon1 24 дня назад
Bye to all the 3 letter agencies & defer to the states. 10th amendment style 😂🔥⚔️⚖️🇺🇸
@TheEraLad
@TheEraLad 24 дня назад
And they wonder why young people aren’t having children 🙄
@DoSe420
@DoSe420 24 дня назад
Because young people have been on social media their entire life and have become nothing but attention whores and narcissists. Everything is "me me me"
@CapNFapNFYP
@CapNFapNFYP 24 дня назад
Chevron SHOULD have been gone along time ago
@dinadaughtry8993
@dinadaughtry8993 24 дня назад
Should never have been in the first place
@SamyYoung-sq6hm
@SamyYoung-sq6hm 22 дня назад
This is awesome, no more unilateral "law changes" based on the feelings of those who have been appointed.
@marksykes3817
@marksykes3817 20 дней назад
CORPORATIONS, FREE FROM REGULATIONS AND CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT WILL RUN WILD .
@bubbles.stu26
@bubbles.stu26 24 дня назад
🔥🔥🔥Bless the truth tellers.
@heidiaeschlimann2244
@heidiaeschlimann2244 24 дня назад
ture .
@JamesSCavenaugh
@JamesSCavenaugh 24 дня назад
This is not one of Democracy Now's better posts.
@codyharney2997
@codyharney2997 24 дня назад
Its definitely the most honest they've been. Shows their true feelings.
@earlputnal9124
@earlputnal9124 23 дня назад
Until our manufacturing and infrastructure improvements change for more clean air solutions? We're stuck with what we have? And bigger government puts a big strain on those agendas and policies to make the necessary changes to our energy products to get to that clean air and other cleansing of our essential products?
@waltermckinney606
@waltermckinney606 22 дня назад
Political influence not science made 90% of the rulings just like the jab.
@mele1617
@mele1617 24 дня назад
I dont need the EPA to take my freedoms....
@samstewart9249
@samstewart9249 24 дня назад
Dare you to come pour your used oil in the creek behind my house. After dealing with me and my neighbors, you will wish it were the EPA. We'll insure your freedoms don't trounce on ours. Okay?
@donnavorce8856
@donnavorce8856 24 дня назад
​@@samstewart9249💯
@mele1617
@mele1617 24 дня назад
@samstewart9249 I live in the oil capital of the USA..the shoes you wear the phone or device you used to post the electri electricity is all powered by natural gas...so stop...The epa should be dissolved and you should take your power back from these special interests institutions
@DoSe420
@DoSe420 24 дня назад
​@@samstewart9249followed by you and your neighbors going straight to jail. Because unlike unelected agencies, Congress made assault a crime backed with an actual law
@dinadaughtry8993
@dinadaughtry8993 24 дня назад
​@@samstewart9249that is the point, the ATF wants to take your ability to defend yourself and property while the EPA has also stepped way out of its authority by telling people what to drive and what they can do on their own property, Congress and local authorities have already passed laws against pouring dangerous chemicals into the land and water so EPA overreach is not necessary,i like my muscle cars and that's my right to have and drive one but I don't have the right to do doughnuts on someone else's property our constitution protects our rights granted by our Creator and laws that are passed by Congress and Senate signed by the president keep people from violating another person's rights but the three letter agencies only make rules that serve themselves
@earlminer1596
@earlminer1596 24 дня назад
Its about time the court put the bureaucratic state in their pkace.
@dalekrenegade2596
@dalekrenegade2596 24 дня назад
Yay more dirty water. That's you.
@paulmoss7940
@paulmoss7940 24 дня назад
TRUTH
@dancingferret6654
@dancingferret6654 24 дня назад
@@dalekrenegade2596 It's up to the people, through their elected representatives, to determine what regulations on water quality are appropriate. Anything else is undemocratic. Do you oppose democracy?
@targgthewise2892
@targgthewise2892 24 дня назад
@@dalekrenegade2596leftists are low intellect
@rhetorical1488
@rhetorical1488 24 дня назад
@@dancingferret6654 lmao what democracy. The entire process is bought and sold by corporations which have status as an individual and their only mandate is profit.
@mattl6300
@mattl6300 24 дня назад
If these leftists are throwing a hissy fit over these rulings, then I'm happy with them.
@22lilacsky
@22lilacsky 23 дня назад
Divide and conquer... 🐏
@ronrimmer6753
@ronrimmer6753 24 дня назад
Only four decades we were able to catch this"Chevron" thing rather quickly for a Republic 😊
@paulcooper9675
@paulcooper9675 24 дня назад
And that was a horrible decision back in 1984. Federal regulations coming from Federal agencies that act as law is stupid. Congress makes law, not agencies. What part of the Constitution do you not understand in that matter? Unless, your real fear is that the age of overreach is done.
@samstewart9249
@samstewart9249 24 дня назад
Not this Congress! Hell, they can't even tie their penny loafers.
@samstewart9249
@samstewart9249 24 дня назад
Oh, left out, Happy Bannon Incarceration Day! Fireworks later this week in celebration!
@craigb8228
@craigb8228 24 дня назад
Same can be said for Gambling.
@robertallen7025
@robertallen7025 24 дня назад
Ashley, while a minor, showered with sniffy the pedo. Top that.
@Kahless_the_Unforgettable
@Kahless_the_Unforgettable 24 дня назад
​@@samstewart9249 Then vote for different people!!! Stop thinking, "My guy isn't the problem". Yes he is! If it's not getting done, get someone else in there that will actually do the job! Jeez! It's not that freaking difficult! I'm a Republican, but I vote against worthless Republicans all the time. I can recognize when "My guy" is the problem. Wake up.
@annettebaynes3839
@annettebaynes3839 24 дня назад
Power is the key word here. I’ve heard you say the word power too much! Narcissists accuse others of what they are doing.
@wynettegreer3812
@wynettegreer3812 24 дня назад
Good Lord, who are these tree huggers, love our SC. They are GREAT !!
@polkunus
@polkunus 23 дня назад
The SC is made up of detached boomers
@user-io7kz4kv3z
@user-io7kz4kv3z 20 дней назад
Corporations over Human Beings do Not good policies make
@Truthseekerjaxsonville
@Truthseekerjaxsonville 24 дня назад
It takes the power from these corrupt government and agencies and puts the power back in the hands of the people. The federal government agencies overreached and this is a great ruling
@margaretjohnson6259
@margaretjohnson6259 20 дней назад
only if you want workers abused and put in danger. only if you want drugs, food, water, medical care to be unreliable. do you want to question every glass of water you drink because no one is ensuring its safety? do you want industry dumping toxic waste into the land, air and water? well, that's what you have now. enjoy.
@Chloe-nh6oj
@Chloe-nh6oj 24 дня назад
Power grab? For nearly 200 years the federal courts interpreted federal statutes. How is returning to that practice a power grab?
@luedog8385
@luedog8385 24 дня назад
power grab? or returning power back to the people
@themcguy1
@themcguy1 24 дня назад
Explain how it's not a power grab plz
@luedog8385
@luedog8385 24 дня назад
@@themcguy1 bureaucrats have no business making laws that affect the freedom of Americans that's not how the government supposed to work.
@GlimmerOG
@GlimmerOG 24 дня назад
​@themcguy1 it returns the power seized by the federal government to the states, which are much more accountable to the people.
@webportal6659
@webportal6659 24 дня назад
​@themcguy1 Because it simply takes away the power for these agencies to create sub agencies to enforce stuff illegally. Now they have to go through congress like they legally have to.
@Thurnishaley6969
@Thurnishaley6969 24 дня назад
How exactly does this give power to the people? People elect judges?
@jnywd8450
@jnywd8450 20 дней назад
The Chevron Deferrance was terribly abused, most notably the ATF. That was one of the major reasons why it was removed. The murder of Mike Malinowski brought this to national attention. And surely there are more reasons that I'm not aware of.
@tonymccoy5032
@tonymccoy5032 24 дня назад
Absolutely wonderful no agency should be allowed to make up laws like medical mandates or whatever political topics is being pushed at the moment good for the supreme court for standing up for what’s right. Jeopardizing clean air and clean water such lies and propaganda this is a very good thing ✌️
@DoSe420
@DoSe420 24 дня назад
If we needed clean air and water policies, I'm sure the elected politicians at the state and federal level would make laws for it. Since it is after all, their job to make laws as law makers
@dalekrenegade2596
@dalekrenegade2596 24 дня назад
​@@DoSe420 Wow, good thing special interest don't bribed Congress people.😂 Iman the people for this decision are just a bunch of privileged rich types.
@dalekrenegade2596
@dalekrenegade2596 24 дня назад
Wow you definitely lost your shit when it was merely suggested to wear a mask during a plague.
@tonymccoy5032
@tonymccoy5032 24 дня назад
@@dalekrenegade2596 plague that’s hilarious
@tonymccoy5032
@tonymccoy5032 24 дня назад
@@DoSe420 then make new laws you don’t get to interpret existing laws
@bluzmahn66
@bluzmahn66 24 дня назад
We the people....not......we the government
@heidiaeschlimann2244
@heidiaeschlimann2244 24 дня назад
ture .
@71suns
@71suns 24 дня назад
@@bluzmahn66 WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT.
@71suns
@71suns 24 дня назад
@@heidiaeschlimann2244 Ture? 😂
@patrickscottanner6212
@patrickscottanner6212 24 дня назад
So, do you want good government? Or corrupt government?
@dinadaughtry8993
@dinadaughtry8993 24 дня назад
How about LESS government
@fredbare5093
@fredbare5093 24 дня назад
Our Federal Govt. does not own us! A big win for 'we the people'
@craigb8228
@craigb8228 24 дня назад
Present government want to regulate your body so you don't notice your personal freedoms are given to Corporations.
@kathyd1010
@kathyd1010 24 дня назад
Waw waw waw.. liberal tears ….
@MF-ty2zn
@MF-ty2zn 21 день назад
You do know it's about legalizing atrocities. It means YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS. Gone. Poof. The US CONSTITUTION is now toilet paper. The government can now legally seize property, seize money, kidnap, torture, execute anyone they don't like including the person in your mirror staring back at you. I say the government not just POTUS, because POTUS gets to pardon his henchmen - no matter which party it is.
@iamjuice101
@iamjuice101 20 дней назад
If you weep for the regulatory agencies, you're missing the point of living in a constitutional society.
@karldeweese8501
@karldeweese8501 24 дня назад
Remember the "scientists" even after reviewing the data still believed the Alaska pipeline would decimate the Caribou, when the reality was the herds were increased by a third.
@domone1201
@domone1201 24 дня назад
😭 liberal tears.
@rogereazar
@rogereazar 24 дня назад
Oh these people are not liberals, they are leftists, Marxists, and call the Stasi on you Communists.
@johnharris6655
@johnharris6655 24 дня назад
Since when is over turning bad law a bad thing, or do some of the people here think Plessy V Ferguson should still be law.
@greggpurviance7252
@greggpurviance7252 23 дня назад
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. Regulatory overreach returned to the people's representatives. Sounds like "democracy" to me
@HM-rz8nv
@HM-rz8nv 18 дней назад
if you think congress in any way represents or reflects the interest of the people, you're delusional. This hands power over towards people who represent corporate interest who have neither the interest or expertise to make sound regulations.
@greggpurviance7252
@greggpurviance7252 18 дней назад
@@HM-rz8nv and a regulatory elite does? That is a joke. Is it perfect, no. But that is the way it is set up, congress makes law, not the executive branch
@esmysyield2023
@esmysyield2023 24 дня назад
This is false. Agencies have overstepped for the last 40 years. This reigns them in.
@mikehigh3120
@mikehigh3120 24 дня назад
Don't kill babies
@KristinaDisney777
@KristinaDisney777 24 дня назад
❤❤❤
@polkunus
@polkunus 23 дня назад
I had an abortion and it was the best decision of my life
@MF-ty2zn
@MF-ty2zn 21 день назад
All pregnancies terminate around 9 months. It's called birth. No one's killing a birthed baby. That's in China. Pro Choice means the PATIENT makes the medical decisions not the government regardless as to which way they choose. Wanted pregnancies go wrong and options are needed. Terminal birth defects, fetus attached inside the falopian tube instead of the uterus, miscarriages that won't purge, stillbirths, preeclampsia, sepsis, etc can cause death / loss of reproductive organs. That's why doctors need to be able to do their jobs. The BIBLE states life begins when a baby takes its first breath.
@navajojohn9448
@navajojohn9448 21 день назад
Domocracy Now likes big government control.
@tupperlake100
@tupperlake100 20 дней назад
If politicians find the SCOTUS so disfunctional, why don't they do something ? The dominant party, Democrat or Republic, will not support change. The SCOTUS term for a member should be no longer than 5 years. Governmental actions are affected by private interests, both commericial and social.
@gypsy3171
@gypsy3171 24 дня назад
Well knowing yhe power has been taken away from the liberals is quite comforting
@craigb8228
@craigb8228 24 дня назад
So you've heard about how Project2025 is going to take away Democracy for Dictatorship.
@DS-nw4eq
@DS-nw4eq 24 дня назад
Regarding the delay on Jan 6 matters… Captain Jack took his time with the case about the incident from Jan 2020… maybe because they want to make sure it messes with the election.
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc
@ShirleyAnnPetrillo-oj7sc 24 дня назад
No doubt about it
@22lilacsky
@22lilacsky 23 дня назад
People actually believe that wasn't planned.... 😂 We in trouble
@mostlyanchors168
@mostlyanchors168 22 дня назад
The only problem is that it took 40 years to make this happen. The agencies should never have had that kind of power without Congress.
@RatTerminator
@RatTerminator 23 дня назад
God bless SCOTUS 🇺🇸
@tonyrod4388
@tonyrod4388 24 дня назад
Times change, and with time so do people; and as people change, the behavior of the individual and society ALSO change... but the forms of govt are kept the same. Why would be a govt needed if not to curve the misbehavior of the constituents of society? Wouldn't this imply that forms of govt should be adaptable in order to cope with the behavioral changes brought on by the change of time? What is worst yet, is that the malice acquired by certain elements of the financial power structure of society, use their MEAN$ to SUBVERT key individuals within the branches of govt, to turn or interpret laws in favor of their own personal and financial interest or those of their share holders. SO MANY new technology that exist, yet our forms of govt are as archaic and crude as they were back in the Roman times. As traditional values, such as morality, self-restaint, respect, etc., are being debased, what USED TO ONCE deter people, now either means nothing or is being validated by en mass action; meaning that what was once illegal now is being PUSHED to be legalized by the coercion exercised by the influence of those who have something to gain. We need more drastic deterrents, or those whose behavior the government was intended to regulate will ultimately end up FULLY regulating govt... not for the good of the people, but for the good of themselves.
@thruntroll2983
@thruntroll2983 24 дня назад
Well said
Далее
Top U.S. & World Headlines - July 25, 2024
9:13
Просмотров 106 тыс.
This Stop Motion is Insane
00:39
Просмотров 3,4 млн
МЕГА ФОКУС С КАЛЬКУЛЯТОРОМ
00:33
From 2016: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg speaks
10:06
Просмотров 218 тыс.