Тёмный

Power Supply parameters - Loop Response 

FesZ Electronics
Подписаться 61 тыс.
Просмотров 9 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

11 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 28   
@alaricsnellpym
@alaricsnellpym Год назад
Interesting.... When I finalise component choices for my solar battery charger, I'll try this test!
@benatesnaola6001
@benatesnaola6001 Год назад
Very interesting and useful, thank you Fesz!! I Will also try to measure loop response when I get the necessary equipment. Keep working like this!!
@gwc1410
@gwc1410 Год назад
Very good video. Thank you.
@louco2
@louco2 3 месяца назад
Amazing as always! Thank you
@openFrimeTv
@openFrimeTv Год назад
Good job)
@Boen466
@Boen466 Год назад
My favorite SPICE simulator is Microcap 12. It`s freeware since a few years ago. A side from that it has an extra stability simulation which works pretty good. For anyone interested take a look at the reference manual its documentation also is pretty good. By the way great video as always :)
@afonsomanuel1585
@afonsomanuel1585 4 дня назад
I already dowload. Yes, it seems good. Thank you. Best regards from Portugal.
@bansci
@bansci Год назад
Fantastic video, will be following this when I finally get around to designing my own lab PSU (for fun). Where did you get the "good" margins from? I.e. 45/60 degrees and the gain?
@FesZElectronics
@FesZElectronics Год назад
Its found in general in technical literature; People who know way more than me about this subject came up with the values :D In theory even 1degree of phase margin would be enough to prevent the appearance of a permanent oscillation, but the exact values will have various tolerances - like depend on the circuit construction, component values, temperature, load etc. So a value of 45/60 is usually sufficient to validate the design.
@bansci
@bansci Год назад
@@FesZElectronics thanks, the idea of a safety gap makes sense with component tolerances and manufacturing. I have a Agilent PSU 66311b which has a fast and slow control loop mode, I'm guessing it's something to do with this trade-off you stated on margins and speed! Thanks again
@donepearce
@donepearce 8 месяцев назад
I like to implement power supplies with a single integrator. Stability is guaranteed with any load and start-up is clean, with no overshoot.
@pa4tim
@pa4tim Год назад
Great, thank you very much. Very useable info.
@philippejard5310
@philippejard5310 Год назад
There is a "small" problem here. Your reasoning on the open loop is correct but you are doing your measurement in closed loop, i.e you are fighting the regulator that is trying to cancel the error and the transfer function is not the same. On top of that by changing the excitation with frequency you are adding a pole and a zero to the system. So you are not measuring the performance of the original design but a simulated combo system with virtual components. An effect of that is the spike seen in the phase response. You should bias a constant operating point with an auxiliary power source and open the loop, then perhaps add a corrector circuit based on the open loop measurements. BTW, a 30deg phase margin will give an "optimal" speed response with a single bump damped overshoot for a system with 2 dominant complex poles. Nice channel though, continue the effort, I see progress over time, and quite often learn a trick or two.🙂
@sanjikaneki6226
@sanjikaneki6226 Год назад
What IC did you use ? asking since i wander if we can find 100khz in the datasheet since they mist have tested for this , also this may be lowered but the PCB design and part values but it would be interesting to see IRL value vb theoretical datasheet values. Also here is an idea: boost or buck converters on a shared output how to stabilize this .
@FesZElectronics
@FesZElectronics Год назад
The crossover is not usually documented, since it depends on the exact implementation and also the test load; what you might find though is records of an evaluation board being measured under specific conditions;
@TiT8851
@TiT8851 Год назад
Great video. Is this method related to the philosophy behind the new .fra directive in LTspice 17.1?
@FesZElectronics
@FesZElectronics Год назад
I think so, yes; although I did not really get a chance to check it out yet
@josefsarg3224
@josefsarg3224 Год назад
Nice Video❤
@jackwalton1975
@jackwalton1975 Год назад
It's easier if you measure the output impedance and group delay of the DUT. See the white paper at Omicron Labs "Non Invasive Measurement of Power Supply Stability"
@LászlóTarjányi-f7e
@LászlóTarjányi-f7e Год назад
Hi! Some questions... 1. What are those 2 gaps in the phase shift plot on lower frequencies? Aren't those mean also stability problem? 2. Output seems to oscillate even before applying the load step (even before ringing starts), or do I see wrong? 3. How these measurements show exactly the bandwidth of the power supply? What bandwidth of supply really mean? Thanks!
@FesZElectronics
@FesZElectronics Год назад
Hello. Good Questions! 1. The phase is close to 180deg; here the measurement equipment jumps between +180 and -180 since it only outputs the 180to-180 range; so +181 is expressed as -179. 2. I'm not sure what to say here, it might be a setup issue, or it might be that the supply has such a low phase margin its inherently unstable, and any small environmental perturbation causes it to oscillate; 3. By bandwidth here I am referring to reaction speed - if an external perturbation is applied, how fast can the circuit react. At any frequency below the crossover the supply can react, but not above since it has no gain above.
@tomasbergh
@tomasbergh Год назад
Thanks for an interesting video. Can you please mention something about the transformer itself? How can a transformer be suitable for such a wide frequency span, wont the magnetisation current run away for low frequencies? What about the flatness of the transformer characteristics? /Tomas
@braveheart9275
@braveheart9275 Год назад
Thanks.
@mkaras98
@mkaras98 Год назад
Which transformer was used to inject noise?
@FesZElectronics
@FesZElectronics Год назад
I used a DIY transformer; I don't have a proper description of it.
@horacepoon7044
@horacepoon7044 Год назад
​​​​@@FesZElectronicsCan you provide instrcutions to diy the transformer? What should be taken care when making it? Will the ouput impedance (50 ohm?) of the connected signal generator affects the test device's loop response?
@ikbendusan
@ikbendusan Год назад
this is a measurement that can also be done on a digital power supply, correct?
@FesZElectronics
@FesZElectronics Год назад
Yes, the type of supply should not matter. The measurement can be done as long as you have access to the feedback loop - so for example you cannot perform it on a part like 78xx where everything is integrated.
Далее
How to measure Buck converter loop gain and phase
24:17
Power Supply parameters - Output Noise
16:12
Просмотров 10 тыс.
Bench Power Supply Repair (TTi CPX400A)
32:23
Просмотров 156 тыс.
Flawless PCB design: RF rules of thumb - Part 1
15:45
Power Supply parameters - Dynamic Accuracy
16:41
Просмотров 7 тыс.
7 awesome applications of transistors in circuits
27:12
Electronic Switches - SMPS and snubbers (2/2)
19:41
Просмотров 9 тыс.