Its interesting that the juvenile raptors actually stay with their parents rather then just moving out. Its clear they used harris hawks as a basis for their behavior and social structure here.
The babies are still obviously precocial and able to hunt; the family structure is therefore much closer to crocodiles, which provide parental care (sometimes very extensive parental care) to superprecocial offspring.
OMG the baby Velociraptors are so adorable. 😍 They're the cutest things I've ever seen, and compared to the baby rexes, the baby raptors take cuteness to a whole new level. I like when one of them tried to run, it falls over, if that ain't a whole new level of cuteness idk what is
Why do the hard work when you can just kick someone in the face and let gravity do the rest? Not that far fetched considering eagles will pull prey off cliffs to do the same thing.
@@titanrahlgaming I want to know why you think this is highly unlikely. Because we know velociraptors were intelligent and probably social. So using team work and tactics to hunt isn't that unlikely.
Well they were far from the most dangerous, at least they wouldn't be to humans. They were about the size of large chickens ! Of course hunting in a pack they'd probably have been able to take out a lone, unarmed human if they really had to, but it's unlikely they'd even try taking down something so much bigger than them
I suspect a problem would be filming locations. Jurassic vegetation was much more different to our own than late cretaceous. A jurassic version of the show will probably need to either be entirely computer animated or look wrong. Perhaps an ocean based season in the devonian or earlier would be more feasible.
@@_MaZTeR_ I have and I know they did their best, but I'm not sure the approach would work for Prehistoric Planet. With WWD they limited themselves to mostly barren landscapes for the Jurassic/Triassic, which was the right call, but I don't think it accurately portrayed those periods.
Don't bother with the online AppleTV service if you don't have the Apple streaming devices or whatever physical is required. The show is locked at 480p there.
Apparently these dromeosaurids are supposed to be Adasaurus they are closely related to Velociraptors but they are the ones that lived with Tarbosaurus, Velociraptor and Protoceratops lived earlier
@@alisonlaw The source is that they accidentally misplaced velociraptor in the wrong time so its being called adasaurus but because they cant just change it to adasaurus instead of velociraptor in season 2 because people will be confused, they left it.
@@alisonlaw No, but velociraptor was from before the late cretaceous, so it is in the wrong time and should be/is supposed to be adasaurus since its the closest thing that lived in the late cretaceous similar to velociraptor in asia
@@tonybusch8771 Actually velociraptors would be like land eagles, since theres no proof of pack hunting, and because they hunted small prey like insects and prenocephale, but where mostly solitary or in family groups, and had the intelligence of basically an eagle, so they are like land eagles.
@@revampedrenegotiate Jurassic Park's "glorified lizards" are what palaeontologists thought they looked like at the time. Keep in mind the first feathered non-avian dinosaur was described 3 years after Jurassic Park came out. And even if feathered dinosaurs were suspected to be true at the time, I doubt ILM was going to try rendering feathers if the film's palaeontological advisors weren't adamant about it, as CGI was still relatively new in the 90s and the feathers would probably look pretty bad. Hell, they had to make a new feather system for Dominion's dinosaurs. World's raptors don't get the same good will. They're both inaccurate to the real animal and vastly inferior to the Park versions. And before you say the size is wrong and it's in North America instead of Asia, yes, I'm aware it's actually Deinonychus, or as Gregory Paul called it, "Velociraptor antirrhopus."
@@Bagelgeuse The reasons your providing are not suitable for this argument due to the fact that I am not criticising their features for any other topic, rather the topic of which design of the species is more pleasing to the eyes. Yes, those factors are why the design is inaccurate, but it doesn’t excuse the fact that this topic’s core isn’t about inaccuracy.
I should create a science and nature-reference book similar to The World of Dinosaurs: An Illustrated Tour and Mesozoic Art: Dinosaurs and Other Ancient Animals in Art and inspired by Prehistoric Planet (2022) and Prehistoric Planet 2 (2023) about the different Tyrannosaurs, Dromaeosaurs, Oviraptorosaurs, Ornithominds, Therizinosaurs, Ceratopisans, Pachycephalosaurs, Anklyosaurs, pterosaurs and early mammals that lived in Mongolia and China in the Late Cretaceous like Tarbosaurus, Yutyrannus, Oviraptor, Citipati, Corythoraptor, Qianzhosaurus, Velociraptor, Monokyus, Nemgtosaurus, Mongolian titanosaurs, Protoceratops, Saurolophus, Barsboldia, Prenocephale, Tarchia, Gobi Azhdarchids, Nemgtabaatar, Repenomamus, Eomaia, Microraptor and Sirornithosaurus and their paleontology, natural history, how they breed and the traits they had in common with modern birds and the paleontologists who discovered them in the present day.
This is literally all the evidence to support the fact and prove that Velociraptors lived and hunted in coordinated, cooperative family packs. So, there’s simply no denying now, this time.
Theres literally no proof and their estimated intelligence is around that of an eagle, so still smart, but not pack hunters, as they probably hunted small creatures, insects, and the weak/juveniles or even eggs.