This is an excellent presentation and I'd like to thank you very much. However, I do have a very small point of disagreement in the way you identify our last common ancestor with the chimp branch. Sahelanthropus tchadensis cannot be our last common ancestor because it has already diverged from being ape like, in the number of ways you state. Because it is already showing the divergent characteristics to being human, then it is very close to being a common ancestor but, you have to take a step slightly further back in time to find a creature that has not departed from either the chimp nor human line. If that is ever found and the timeline is apparently correct, then that can be classified as being the ancestor of both lines of evolution.
clear, concise, organized. thanks. Is there another theory (other than the surfing monkey theory) to explain the spread of monkeys across vast stretches of ocean? While possible it doesn't seem probable to me that the animals would have migrated successfully in sufficiently large breeding populations to become established in that fashion.
Well iron is carbonised therefore carbon life brings atit athmisphete to defect rays therefore ballanced temp sha life can be but why run now that is far to long when the phones ring unneeded now will
