@@kindabananas do not think people hate her, most thought she was terrific at first, everyone agrees she is beautiful.....just wish she could find happiness in a quiet and private life instead of trying to hang on to the Royalty gig.
@@kindabananas So…the reason the imaginary children are never seen is because their “parents,” the two biggest camera hogging and fame hungry liars, grifters, and opportunists ever to exist, are concerned about their “privacy and security” and are “protecting” them from nonexistent threats? Are the sugars also of the belief that normal people are as gullible as they are?
@@tishapratt9139Hang on to the royal gig?? She is in fact married into the royal family. When you dis her, you are dissing the whole royal family, including Princess Diana, who even though has passed, is Meghan's mother in law.
There is no consistent or reliable evidence that "Lilibet" - as their biological daughter - even exists. Why are they not posting new pictures with full frontal imagery of their children's faces? Where are the children?
That's a silly attempt to bait them into the limelight. If y'all weren't calling her an attention seeker every time she pops her head out to say hello, maybe we'd have tons of updated photos by now.
There’s no consistent and reliable evidence that anybody is anyone’s children unless there’s some type of DNA test. Why is it different for Harry and Meghan? The Royal family and the royal family channel has all admitted that this child exist and y’all still over here acting dumb.
MO - Harry is blood! What are you talking about about? Just because he lives in California does not mean he is not the grandson of the Queen...... he is royal blood, regardless of the azzhole that he is.
Because Harry and Meghan get views. End of story. Stopping engaging if it bothers you so bad. Everyone knows there’s an algorithm and if you’re consistently watching videos about Harry and Meghan, you’re gonna see more videos about Harry and Meghan.
If you don’t care then, why do you watch the video and leave a comment? Actions speak, louder than words and your actions are giving obsessed. Maybe get a hobby?
@@maryjones8554 Of course! And also because they are so envious and copycats. They put her own daughter in an uncomfortable position with regard her cousin.
@@erikacrews1338it was a photo of a legit child when it was taken, over two years ago, and before it was photoshopped. A legit child that isn’t Harry and Meghan’s.
Seriously why do you cover Rachel Meghan Markle and her children(?), she left the Royal Family after hurting staff and the Queen and Prince Phillip????? Endgame the book even accused the King and Princess of Wales of racism!!!!
Because Megan gets views. Obviously, cause you’re here, leaving comments lol. don’t engage if you hate it so much. Actions speak louder than words and your actions are giving obsessed.
@@erikacrews1338 I expressed my opinion that Prince Harry and Rachel Meghan Markle have left the Royal Family and shouldn't be a topic of a channel covering the Royal Family. I also firmly believe that Rachel Meghan Markle has proven through her actions towards the Royal Family and her own Family that she should be held accountable for her actions and not swept under the rug.
Guess it's to "Shine a light " on the tangled Web Hairy wrapped himself in ,regardless of the wise advise his lifelong mates tried to assist him with. At least he gets chance to wear his medals occasionally, the 3 attendancy medals his "commander in Chief presented him with . 3 medals for attending 3 Jubilees ,now that's really thriving ,bless him
This child, who has never been to the United Kingdom, can not be a princess no matter the bureaucracy. Shame on the awful couple to have stained Her late Majesty's name like that.
@@melody.rose. @erikacrews1338 said there was literal proof of Invisibilily visiting the UK, she then went on to say "Do some research". Which is a typical response when someone can't find any proof.
Yes we do! Either stay out of the spotlight altogether OR show us a few pictures! It's ridiculous to only have one picture of Lilibet from 2 years ago and NOTHING ELSE! 🤷♀
She was not named after the queen because the Queen's name is not Lilibet. Princess Beatrice's child is named after Queen Elizabeth, so is Zara's and Peter's. And of course there's Princess Charlotte. In fact Zara's name is Zara Anne Elizabeth. Harry and Meghan made a joke out of the entire process.
Non of your business rented or not paid for or not excist or not. NON OF YOUR BUSINESS. You are not a stakeholder of their lives. The ones who are being invested in are the three in london. They HAVE! to be SHOWCASED every year a few times. Those are the ones that you are paying for
There WAS no child born at that "boutique" Santa Barbara hospital. The college-aged surrogate gave birth at UCLA Medical Center to a female named Diana Mary, and upon discharge, the birth mother fled with the child to Colorado, where Harry had absolutely ZERO chance of enforcing a surrogacy agreement, since he has NO biological ties to the child!
@@annhenry7948 Definitely not Cottage hospital, since my cousin knows a nurse who works in the NICU at that hospital, who said that Snarkle ABSOLUTELY DID NOT GIVE BIRTH THERE! Now channel creator Paula M. allegedly found a birth record at UCLA Medical Center for a child born on or about "Markle's" due date, and given the birth name of "Diana Mary," alleged to be the child born to the SECOND SURROGATE. That birth mother is alleged to have fled to Colorado, where Harry had LESS THAN ZERO RIGHTS, because he has ZERO BIOLOGICAL TIES to EITHER this "Are chee" or "Lill ee."
Same old pic of Rentibet! Please stop giving those people or their supposed offspring any type of acknowledgment on your channel. They haven’t earned your respect or forgiveness. They also haven’t earned the respect or forgiveness of the good people of the UK either.
@@celissolarte Veo que el inglés no es lo tuyo… Yo dije que “no es real”, o sea que no existe! (porque todo el mundo sabe que son muñecos/photoshop y/o niños prestados para las fotos). No dije que no fuera una “royal”. “Royal” ≠ “Real”
Where does it say that you can’t be in princess unless you were born in the UK? Not you making up lies just to be mad about something that doesn’t even affect you. You really think the royal family and the royal family channel would acknowledge a child that doesn’t exist? Are you that dense?
@@erikacrews1338prove a birth certificate than ! According to British law there needs to be proof of birth to be in the line of succession to the throne !
@@txkitkat1307 yeah and the only people that need that proof is the royal family, which is why Harry and Meghan’s kids are on the royal family website. You can go check or I guess you can keep being delusional if you want.
3 yr olds love intimate parties. What they don’t like is inviting all their friends from playgroup with their Mums, hiring a bouncy castle and a clown, then running round like tornados for 2 hours in a massive group sugar high!
The child was named as a slam to Queen Elizabeth! That name was never supposed to be used again after Prince Phillip passed away! Totally disrespectful of both Meghan and Harry!
Get off the slow bus because the author stated QEII was very delighted having a great granddaughter named Lilibet after her and that the UK media misconstrued what he stated in the book.
@shonnie8361 No she was delighted for them to name her great grandchild Elizabeth after her. Just like the other 30 grandkids and great grandkids. You should know this by common sense because her name is not Lilibet.
There is only one Lilibet and she is Queen Elizabeth lll ! Team Catherine, Princess of Wales 🏴 Prayers for Catherine and King Charles as they continue to recover from cancer.
You think you’re the only person with the name Missy? Your mom recycled your name but Meghan Markle giving her kid a name that already exist is stealing? It’s givingracist.
I just can't stand that Harry and Meghan have not released any pictures of Lilibet. We just have this one picture of her at about one year of age plus some baby photos. We do not know what she looks like at age 3! ☹
You have bigger things to worry about if you're so bothered about a child who isn't even yours. Why do you feel so entitled to photos of a 3 year old little girl, you're such a creep
An intemate family party ,what family ?,one grandmother no grandfather no grandmother no great uncles no great aunts no aunts ,uncles,cousins, second cousins god parents nursery friends neighbours my my what a gathering that must be.
Why are you posting about a child that has not ever been seen by any of our beloved RF and very likely is not born of M body. First of all proof and DNI
Why is it you don’t hold H&M accountable for what they do and don’t do? What the point? No one believes a word that they say and no one believes what their mouth pieces say either. Someone needs to tell the truth.
Are you seriously on a podium speaking for everyone? saying ' no one believes a word' 'no one believes what their mouth pieces say either" You are accountable for your delirium.
THIS PICTURE OF A SMALL CHILD IS NOT LILIBET….IT IS THE PHOTO OF A CHILD MODEL..THIS CHILD WAS POSING FOR PICTURES BEFORE LILIBET WAS BORN IF THERE EVEN IS A CHILD NAMED LILIBET…
@@erikacrews1338this isn’t the royal family’s channel. This is a fake “royal family” propaganda channel, run by itn. There is no acknowledgment from the royal family about this imaginary kid’s “third birthday.” How many times do you need to be told that? 😆🤡
An intimate party to celebrate the birthday of a child who is a ghost. There must be a reason why the children are hidden. I believe they simply don't exist. Use borrowed photos to show ghosts.
You'll be real happy simon, when Catherine's 👻shows up for Halloween. Must be a reason she's hidden & no live sightings. AI, actors, photoshopped old mom day pics are the only thing out there. Non existing? btw, Where's Charlotte and Louis? talk about ghosts.
@theres...Are you claiming you've seen the birth certificates of George, Charlotte, Louis or/& you've seen their DNA profile forms to prove their bloodline. But, I get it. You only have a hatefilled soul for H&M. You're an embarrassment to Canada.
Actually the birth certificates of George, Charlotte, and Louis are online. I believe that Archie's is also online, but it seems to keep changing every few months.@@zoidmo3388
Outside the spotlight? Weird, when you know that all Sparry and Megaliar want is being in the spotlight. No current or recent photos of either child suggests they do not exist… IMO
Harry and Meghan are not in the spotlight as much as you think. The British media can’t stop talking about them because they’re obsessed making it seem like they’re always doing something and they’re not.
@@txkitkat1307 The First Lady of Nigeria made a statement that she never said anything about what Megan was wearing. Not you showing me that you believe the toxic media and didn’t actually do your own research before speaking on some thing you know nothing about.
@@erikacrews1338 the Brit media are paid NOT to print stories regarding 'Where's Kate/Catherine?' 'where's Charlotte and Louis' It's why they put fake sightings of them. The media have to feed the gullible monarchist🐑 lies about H&M..bullying their children by untruths as if it's a right. Crazy hatefilled souls.
@zoidmo3388 Why aren't you asking where George is? The answer to your question is during the day they are at school which started back up on Monday. Why are you stalking children?
NO new picture at all. I almost forgot that MM was suppose to have kids, I still have my doubts that she carried them in her tummy. I agree that she is not named after the late queen at all, she does however have Lady Di name at least. I feel sorry for those kids. Would like to see DNA results as well.
I’d truly appreciate not seeing anything related to the California grifter’s here. I want to hear and see the real royals and what they’re doing. Don’t pander to them please!
@@Ker-mk3bf You don't run this channel and nothing they said goes against RU-vid guidelines. You just made baseless claim yourself. People have the right to their own opinions and that is allowed on RU-vid.
You haven't seen Charlotte or Louis and please spell his name correctly but other people have including their entire school so why are you being a perv?@@erikacrews1338
you must be sorry for George, Charlotte, Louis bec they have a mom being represented by an actor @ the market and an AI park bench vid and sinks lower by photoshopping ultered mother's day pic of them with the missing Catherine. So much hypocritical sheep here commenting.
Zoidmo When you get the subpoena that you're being sued for defamation of character and slander you will have proof of every single thing you wrote here correct? Because otherwise you're going to lose everything you've ever worked for.
@dazzy...You obviously do care by commenting. I know what you mean though. We've been shown fake Kate/Catherine constantly for 6 MONTHS and she herself admitted she photoshopped/ultered her very own YRS PAST mom's day pic with her kids. That is a new level of low. Where is she anyway?
@@Ker-mk3bf so the royal family and the royal family channel acknowledging the existence of this child and you don’t think she’s real? How dense are you?
@zoidmo3388 Why aren't you asking where George is? The answer to your question is during the day they are at school which started back up on Monday. Why are you stalking children?
I didn’t even want to click on this but I had to see it to believe it. This is THE SAME RECYCLED PHOTO we have seen over and over!! Who are they kidding? I also can’t believe this wonderful channel is putting out this garbage.
This isn’t a “wonderful channel.” It’s a fake “royal family channel,” run by itn. It’s mostly Harry and Meghan propaganda. The _actual_ royal family channel is just called “The Royal Family.”
@zoidmo3388 Why aren't you asking where George is? The answer to your question is during the day they are at school which started back up on Monday. Why are you stalking children?
No new pictures. Sick of seeing the old ones over and over. Can’t your photographer take new photos or are the children in someone else’s care? Also the name Lilibet was The Queen’s precious nickname. You stole it without permission.