Тёмный

Priya Moorjani | Reconstructing South Asian Population History using Genetic Data 

Подписаться
Просмотров 7 тыс.
% 115

The study of genetic data combined with appropriate analytical tools can provide fine-grained resolution of evolutionary history that can complement evidence from archaeology and paleontology, in order to advance our understanding of human origins and disease. As illustration, I will describe how we can use genetic data from ancient and present-day South Asian populations to uncover population migration events impacting the Indian subcontinent in the past 10,000 years. These studies highlight that most contemporary Indian groups descent from a mixture of two highly divergent populations: Ancestral North Indians (ANI) related to Middle Easterners, Central Asians, and Europeans; and Ancestral South Indians (ASI) not closely related to groups outside the subcontinent. The mixture is pervasive and impacts nearly every group in India, including upper and lower caste traditional groups, as well as isolated tribal groups. Using a novel method that leverages genomic patterns of population mixture, we estimate that the ANI-ASI mixture occurred 1,900 to 4,200 years ago. In many upper caste and northern groups, we find evidence for multiple pulses of mixture. In a subset of isolated tribal groups, 100% of the mixture is consistent with having occurred during this period. These results demonstrate that India experienced a demographic and cultural transformation in the last few thousand years, changing from a region in which major population mixture was common to one in which mixture even between closely related groups became rare because of a shift to endogamy. Beyond the cultural importance, this transformation is also medically relevant as it has led to strong founder events in many Indian groups, more extreme than those in Ashkenazi Jews and Finns, both of which have high rates of recessive disease due to founder events. This highlights an under-appreciated opportunity for reducing disease burden in India, through the discovery and testing of recessive disease mutations.
Speaker Bio
Priya Moorjani is Assistant Professor in the Department of Molecular & Cell Biology at UC Berkeley. She is interested in using genetic data from present-day and ancient genomes to study human population history and evolution. Prof. Moorjani's lab focuses on using statistical and computational approaches to study questions in human genetics and evolutionary biology. A central aim in the lab is to understand the impact of evolutionary history on genetic variation and to apply this knowledge to understand human evolution, demographic history and disease. To this end, they use genetic data from ancient specimens and present-day individuals to learn about: (1) how different evolutionary processes such as mutation rate evolve across species, (2) when key events (such as introgression and adaptations) occurred in human history, and (3) how these patterns can be leveraged to identify genetic variants related to human adaptation and disease. The research in the lab involves both development of new methods and large-scale genomic data analysis.

Опубликовано:

 

19 мар 2019

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 37   
@RightstoFreedomArticle19India
@RightstoFreedomArticle19India 3 месяца назад
Thanks Prof Priya Moorjani
@kraut1982
@kraut1982 3 года назад
Did I miss out on genetics of Indian Northeast states? Is it part of another video? Also I noticed Maharashtra and Odhisha samples are also not present, are there none available or they are excluded?
@anselmdanker9519
@anselmdanker9519 3 года назад
Thank you for a very interesting presentation.
@RightstoFreedomArticle19India
@RightstoFreedomArticle19India 3 месяца назад
Great reasearch
@sudhakarreddy1453
@sudhakarreddy1453 3 года назад
Can you please elaborate more upon the differences of Iranian hunter gatherer and Iranian farmer genetics-- is it that Iranian farmers have the genetic mix of Anatolian farmer also ? Can someone clarify ?
@vanderdole02
@vanderdole02 4 года назад
This data fits the data we have from history…, very nice…, and the higher the cast , and the more to the north west, the later the mixing…, logically..
@kapilgyawali4758
@kapilgyawali4758 3 года назад
Karnali of Nepal have lot of secrets dna research should be done there . One interesting thing is that people of karnali follow ahuro mazda in a different name
@extratropicalcyclone8567
@extratropicalcyclone8567 3 года назад
No one in nepal worships ahura mazda,
@kapilgyawali4758
@kapilgyawali4758 3 года назад
@@extratropicalcyclone8567 in tingri form
@extratropicalcyclone8567
@extratropicalcyclone8567 3 года назад
@@kapilgyawali4758 what tingri form
@saheellodhia270
@saheellodhia270 4 года назад
In terms of language couldn't you see the whole thing the opposite way and say instead of Iranian farmers bringing the language, they learned the native ANI languages and then spread it across their own land? I mean what is the evidence that the diffusion happened either way. Both are equally possible due to trade. Also would be interesting to know when the first settlers came from and who made up the first ANI and ASI.
@Jemelly
@Jemelly 4 года назад
No because the languages are also found in Western Europe
@saheellodhia270
@saheellodhia270 4 года назад
@@Jemelly that's still no evidence for diffusion of the language and the logical chronology of the spread.
@LS-ql4wp
@LS-ql4wp 3 года назад
What u r saying is essentially a correct point.
@ragas93
@ragas93 3 года назад
Yes, this is what baffles me about the conclusions drawn. Why the assumption that it came into south asia? Why not out of south asia? What is the role of trade (everyone says Harappans were traders)?
@RahulYadav-uv8fz
@RahulYadav-uv8fz 5 лет назад
This was a very good talk. Geographical and Astronomical evidence very strongly indicates that Rigveda can be dated to 3000-4000BC so the spread of Language from the Steppes people is highly unlikely. What is the possibility that it spread through the farmer population.
@vanderdole02
@vanderdole02 4 года назад
the laNGUAGE came from the russian steps that much is proven...the languages of north india and Europe are clearly related, as is Persian etc..
@LS-ql4wp
@LS-ql4wp 3 года назад
Somehow there are too many presumptions. Let us presume iranian and indian ancestors are common based on identical sounds of classic sanskrit and ancient avestan. How does this fit here?. ANI is supposed not a real ancestory. What about greek conquest in central asia... Hvnt they admixed with us? Kalash claim greek ancestory. It seems like fitting the question to solutions.
@tamashbeen6610
@tamashbeen6610 5 лет назад
Is there a reputable geneticist who is not getting sponsored by Reich lab?
@rafayashary6346
@rafayashary6346 4 года назад
Genetics is an enormous field, so I assume you mean specifically archaeogenetics, and in that case while I am sure that there are such archaeogeneticists (archaeogenetics not being a field with which I am any more than passingly acquainted), it must be noted that Reich lab has for some time been at the very cutting edge of archaeogenetic practice, assembling and implementing techniques at a breakneck pace of which even a decade ago few could have so much as dreamed. In a sense, your question is remarkably akin to interrogating the paucity of prominent experts in (physical) relativity not named Albert Einstein in the year 1905. In any case, if the tacit implication is that Reich lab is in the thrall of some sort of explicit, institutionalized anti-dharmic agenda, then I should ask who of the following is the more credible: 1. The world-renowned and exceptionally well-acclaimed archaeogenetics lab which by any metric stands little to gain (bearing no apparent connection to the Indian sub continent beyond its work) and a good lot to lose in falsifying or otherwise mischaracterizing results in the context of the subcontinent, or 2. The rabble of sporadic loons, so rarely qualified in a field even tangentially related to genetics, and possessing so clear a conflict of interest in the plain, fundamental contradiction between their core political, religious, and auto-genic beliefs in stark opposition to the rapidly converging, practically pandisciplinary consensus (spanning linguistics, history, now archaeogenetics and more) as to the formation of human populations in South Asia, whose word is at any rate in the general case so minimally valued by any remotely reputable scientific establishment as to be but hardly damaged if found mendacious.
@sudhakarreddy1453
@sudhakarreddy1453 3 года назад
Yes , vested interests especially that of political nature can not tolerate scientific evidence
@suseeln
@suseeln 3 года назад
Yes Mostly on BJP payroll.
@suseeln
@suseeln Год назад
@Los Blancos I have always understood. It was about you.
@suseeln
@suseeln Год назад
@Los Blancos I do not have any confusion. Ancestral North Indians (ANI) related to Central Asians, Middle Easterners, Caucasians, and Europeans; and Ancestral South Indians (ASI) not closely related to groups outside the subcontinent.
@vanderdole02
@vanderdole02 4 года назад
7 minutes of intro blaHBLAH
@kapilgyawali4758
@kapilgyawali4758 3 года назад
It seems like steppe pastoralists were the creator of veda
@DS-ux9ld
@DS-ux9ld 3 года назад
The Vedas refers to the saraswati so clearly was written by people from that area. Don't make stupid, generic statements without any context
@kapilgyawali4758
@kapilgyawali4758 3 года назад
@@DS-ux9ld your history was written by British so it means they were from india
@shivamsinghrawat9910
@shivamsinghrawat9910 Год назад
🤣🤣 moron
@kapilgyawali4758
@kapilgyawali4758 3 года назад
They have completely failed to test indigenous people who are related to tibeto burman han and mongloid ancestry and I can guarantee that they have thousands of years of history
@aniruddhbahuguna5462
@aniruddhbahuguna5462 3 года назад
How much old Ahura mazda
@infinitewisdom6065
@infinitewisdom6065 3 года назад
Very confusing. It seems that North Indians have some common genes with Iranians and a little from Russian Steppe. How do you determine the direction of the movement? You just assume a westward migration? Based on what? The whole ANI and ASI classification is nonsense. It is obvious that the South Indians will have less DNA from west of North India. I suspect it is a continuum rather than two distinct groups. As to the political issue, it has nothing to do with gene mixing because any idiot can see that India has a lot of mixing. The political issue is whether the foreigners who came to India (and they came from all over) brought the Hindu religion and the Sanskrit language. The genes cannot tell you that.