Problems With Range Analysis? Try This One Simple Trick! 

Hope he reviews your hands in a video

How do you remember all of that while you playing. I mean the solver actions 🥲?

same here, insta-click with a newly rolled joint to better comprehend haha massive content, appreciated!

when youre value betting you isually dont care if they call of fold

@@OGRE_HATES_NERDS This statement was a bit of an eye opener for me, thanks.

@@hunterbursey im no expert, just my two cents

What I personally do is a two step process - first I set my bet ceiling based on whether I have a nut advantage. Then, I choose the actual size up to that ceiling based on what I think my bluffs want to do. So I bet just enough to cause a significant portion of my opponent's range to fold. If I think he has a lot of trash that will fold, I bet small. If I think he doesn't have much trash, I bet larger (up to the ceiling). If I think villain has both a bunch of trash and middling hands, I may split, but personally I usually just choose one size. The reason I focus on bluffs is because in the moment, it can be hard to think of both value/protection and bluffs, and between the two, you know that no matter what, your bluffs must use an appropriate size to cause folds. Value bets generate EV no matter what - so even nutted hands will often bet small.

Disconnected paired boards have very high check-raise frequencies, so yes he would be check-raising without diamonds often. Basically any pair can check-raise that board for thin value and equity denial from overcards. This means that he’ll have a ton of pairs that want to continue betting on the turn but have to bet small. Steffen mentions this in the clip.

he filtered the no made hand range, so top of the range doesn't show.