whats wrong with admiring artists? Without art and beauty there would not be a life worth living. Einstein once said “Life without playing music is inconceivable for me.” “I live my daydreams in music, I see my life in terms of music.” “If I were not a physicist I would probably be a musician.”
@@al23438 There's nothing wrong with how people admire artist. It's just people can't admire scientist as what they deserve, the knowledge they've been paving is immeasurable. If people admired scientists like how they admire artists, more and more people will have the desire to be a part in the search and development of knowledge.. and that's what matters.
Conversely, if humanity highly valued scientists and under valued artists, the world would be a horribly boring place. But yes, science is currently undervalued.
So being complete imbecile that doesn't understand shit but takes a job as interviewer for one of most intelligent people? That's how more people should be like?
Right she is so lucky to talk to brian greene but u know universe can and will come from nothing there is no need of creater but its ur believe if u want to believe in god btw i think u intrested im space
@@jjthomsan4111 I think God is actually the little filament found in quarks ( according to string theory ) who creates vibration that created our Universe 😅 think about God in this way
but before string theory some belive that this is god but now u believe god is in string theory suppose for sake of talk if there is god then who created the god then who created this god this all will go in infint regresion unfortunately 😅we all give our own meaning to life there is no meaning of life we all are here by chance and now we are homo sapnience
But galelio had already proven his first theorem,so basically newton made the idea more presentable as he had an equation,to me galelio newton and einstein are epic as they had to change the entire idea of how people look at the world
I think the multiverse is created by each person on earth, I’m a multiverse, your a multiverse, personally I think the universe is the Gods mind. To have it make sense what ant man and the wasp, then watch the avengers endgame.
Mohammad Hamid If you want to see a dummy look in the mirror. When did he say you can change the future? What he’s saying is time runs slower next to a black hole than it does on earth. So every 10 years on earth might be just 1 year next to a black hole. Therefore if you park next to a black hole for 10 years, by the time you go back to earth, 100 years will have gone by. How is that changing the future?
DEFINITELY!! It was easy to understand (unlike the sucky PBS Ausi guy who looks like Peter Dinklage Who obviously thinks he's lecturing high-level PhD students instead of RU-vid laymen ) AND entertaining!!
@Mohammad Hamid A day is like a thousand yrs and a thousand yrs is like a day is from the bible….but I think you got it mixed up. Traveling close to light speed or near a black hole slows the traveler’s time down. Time on earth remains constant.
@@nadeemshaikh7863 I totally agree. She is an actress. Brian is a physicist but could be a good actor. It looks so obvious that he prepared all of the questions.
He’s my second favorite current day scientist, a very close second to Brian Cox. They both have the ability to make the most complex theories and ideas sound like child’s play to us mere mortals. Love them both!
I love that she's genuinely interested in the subject. It really shows through in the great questions she's asking and the spontaneous-ness of the interview. Great job!
The video was scripted and rehearsed to cover the topic fluidly. Very well done to look spontaneous. I Loved the final product. Bravo! P.S. I still don't really have a good grasp of space-time , gravity, reality, or .....?
@@sagarsolanki7514 yeah, it freaks me out. If time and space are mingled into one, so every dot has a specific time and space, but waht if yo stay somewhere? That means your space is the same but time is passing, it's so nogiin slapping
Fantastic interviewer! She asked scripted questions but immediately requested clarification of anything she didnt quite get, never wasting time with self deprecation or low brow jokes. And she stayed energetic and cheery throughout. So rare in these pop science interviews. Great job!
Thank you Faith for your humble reporting, giving more recognition to the interviewee than yourself while at the same time addressing the thoughts and doubts of the general public while maintaining professionalism and humor. It takes a wise reporter to convey a story worthy of attention to those who may not understand its importance.
Faith does a great job here asking questions. I know I am four years late to this but I really hope she has found success. This cannot have been an easy interview and she deserves credit for doing it so well.
Great to see the interviewer knows the questions to ask and how to ask them. And the way Brian Green at 15:10 deals with the question of belief is just awesome. Love watching to smart people having a discussion.
Brian Greene is a truly unique human being. How fortunate for humanity to have such a mind seving us. I am personally a christian and I'm not sure about what mr Greene would think about aspects of my experience of existence. Though he does invoke a spiritual and intellectual admiration. Brian Green's dedication to string theory and contributing to a unified theory is humbling and awe inspiring. Not to mention conveying complex physical consepts to the mainstream.
im glad teenagers (at least my friends and i) are ultra interested and we influence others to get interested in this and we talk about physics and math more than movies or tv shows, and honestly i think one must naturally adapt to develop an interest in this fascinating subject.
Great interview on the part of both participants. Brian Greene has such an engaging way of explaining very complex phenomena that he is a joy to listen to.
This is such an amazing interview. The host is so candid and honest with her reactions and questions, while Brian doing a brilliant job enunciating his ideas with such finesse. Enjoyed every second of it.
This was the best interview I've EVER seen between a physicist and non-physicist. Huge credit to the interviewer for asking all the right questions, understanding the answers, not repeating questions, and asking great logical follow up questions. It takes a lot of smarts to be able to do that.
She actually listens. Then ask appropriately intelligent questions. He responds in the layman's term possible. She follows up and give feedback. He expounds, validates and clarifies her observations. She verbalized her understanding at which point they move on to the next topic. This is the the unified theory of good conversation.
I wonder how many lives I've inadvertently taken, or saved through the butterfly effect.. Stopping at a junction to allow a car to pass, that type of thing..
The Butterfly effect is always in effect. Try to picture this: You want to meet with a friend of yours. In the last minute your friend tells you over the telephone that the meeting is canceled. Now you stay at home for lunch, instead going out and eat somewhere on the fly. And because you eat at home, instead somewhere else, you use up your food a tiny bit faster as you would have otherwise. As a result you go shopping on monday morning, instead maybe on monday noon. And because you go in the morning you encounter different people in the supermarket. In the casshier line you have a lot more people as if you would have had on noon, so you wait longer there and maybe hold of some other guy for 5 minutes. That other guy now hits the road 5 minutes later and influences the traffic for someone else in a complete different way. You could spin this into endless outcomes, until you realize: You always change the whole of everything no matter what you do. If you sit silently in a cave for 30 years you effect the world just as much as if you would travel from place to place.
I really enjoyed the question she asked also Brain's answer on Newton and Einstein. To me in order 1 Newton 2 Eisenstein and 3 Richard Feynman. I wish Brain would give up the String Theory because I don't think it will ever unify General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics because of there is no concise understanding of gravity on Quantum Physics, I think.
Came here after watching the netflix show dark. This is one of the most fascinating conversations I’ve ever heard 🤯. The “chronology projection conjecture” is like the whole plot of the show.
great great host. She asks the questions we have because she understands the question enough to ask the correct question of someone not in understanding the some way someone not understanding would ask it, if they understood… very nice
When I was young about 8 or 9 I remember sitting on my headboard on my bed and talking to my future self and others in the future. I knew that they could hear me and I remember explaining my life and my ideas. This was in the 1950s way before people talked about anything like that. I believed that my voice would be out there in the universe where it could be accessed in the future or maybe the past.
Actually that thing was same to me but in a different way that Brian told that the past is the time in which everything happened even if I go backwards that would have happened already ... This was my idea when I was young and I am not joking I was never a science guy at thet time I don't used to watch sci fi and stuff but this thing was in my mind and it you know it's mind blowing now... Omg my brain is popping out after hearing the interview
Gone time has been spent.. yet to come time isn't here yet. We ought to focus on 'moving forward' in the present (time on hand). And only God knows best.
What is Time? 1. Assume the three dimensional Universe is inside a three dimensional photo Frame. Everything in this universe is dynamic and changing in relative to other things and itself. Entropy is changing also. 2. The whole Universe inside the frame marked as Now Moment is separated from previous Now Moment by shortest possible separator Plunk-time. 3. Last Now Moments are Record, History, Memory or Information. Next Now Moments are next changed states of the Universe inside Frame. 4. Only Now Moment Exist. Past and Future do not exist. 5. Conscious Mind can make predictions of next Moments from experience and can plan events for next Moments. 6. Every Plunk-Volume’s “Now” of the Universe including space and stuffs in it is always in the same Now Moment Frame of the Universe. Relative Clock ticking, fast or slow, at different points for different conditions does not shift anything to previous or next Moment Frames of the Universe. All points Now remain in the Now Moment Frame of the Universe. That is why twins of paradox can meet at any ones Now though relatively they are backward or forward in respect of amount of time elapsed. Time travel is not possible. Our invented Clocks and Calendars are misleading us about time 7. Moment is repeating at Plunk-Time separation, even if nothing is changing, something is changing or all things are changing in the Universe. Flow of Time forward or backward does not exist. No arrow of time. It is arrow of Change. Only Moment is ticking repeatedly at Plunk-Time interval with a 3D-Photo of the Universe. Many clocks are under one Universal clock. Some clocks ticking different than universal clock. Reference frames and Clocks are there at every Plunk-Volume’s.
Md. Fazlul Karim Completely agree to that. It’s exactly what I had in mind. There is one way to travel to the future, it’s going somewhere where effects on our metabolism is slower. We would age slower, then going back to the original place, we would be younger that we should have been, like we traveled in time. Our meat and milk in the fridge is traveling time, because submitted to different conditions, by the metabolism being slowed down. Travel to the past as an observer means going faster than light. We’re already seeing everything from the past. I mean, when we see something, it means it happened a fraction ago, time for light which bounced on that object to reach our eyes and information being processed by our brain. It seems simultaneous because light travel fast, but it’s physically not. When observing a far distanced object, like a faraway star, we see the light bouncing at it minutes, hours or even years ago. So if we can travel faster than light, go to a faraway place and observe earth, we would see earth at the point it was minutes, hours ou years before we left it, feeling we traveled back in time. But it can be only as an observer, of that light. Am I missing something ?
