Very interesting and in some ways related to problems I've been working on about how hatching processes in eggs of vertebrates produce their results, creating new individuals with both enormously complex physiologies and also useful kinds of knowledge available for use shortly after hatching, without requiring any learning. I wonder whether Deutsch has thought about that and published something I could look at. A different thought triggered by this recording is that all the questioners were male. That worries me -- does it reflect on the current state of education in fundamental physics and how students are motivated to apply, or how they are selected, or ....??
Yes and no may become so close together that it is expressed in enlightenment or is mechanically expressed i1:16:09 how I presently feel about the matter
I will comment stupidly. I study numbers. There is always light at the end of tunnel If you are drawn to it or propelled from it. I am no judge of that. The surrender of it is not voluntary. The measures I do not know.
@@jamesalexander958 David Deutsch didn't invent quantum computing. Feynman did. At least he was historically the first one who talked about it as far as I know. Not only that but Deutsch lost his mind. MWI is trivially false. If you read Everett's dissertation, then you can find the mistake in the second sentence. Everything that follows after that is absolute nonsense.
@@VoloBonja What about "A five year old child knows what time is." did you not understand just now? This ain't rocket science. This is people who think of themselves as intelligent not remembering trivial definitions.
@@schmetterling4477 your definition and the definition scientists are trying to expain are two different things. Time in physics and 5 yo time are different right?