Тёмный

Prof. Peter Harrison - Science, Religion and Modernity 

The University of Edinburgh
Подписаться 159 тыс.
Просмотров 8 тыс.
50% 1

Professor Peter Harrison gives his sixth Gifford lecture, entitled Science, Religion and Modernity.
The last few decades have witnessed a growing public disillusionment with a scientific enterprise that for much of the twentieth century had enjoyed unparalleled prestige. The narrative of progress without limit now also looks a little threadbare.
This final lecture considers whether the new 'flight from science' represents a regrettable defection from reason and 'Enlightenment values', or whether it presents an opportunity to reconnect the study of nature with the kinds of moral and religious values that once played a prominent role in its genesis and development.
Recorded on 24 February 2011 at the University of Edinburgh's St Cecilia's Hall.

Опубликовано:

 

6 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 8   
@turbopro10
@turbopro10 11 лет назад
@41:25 "about the rejection of evolutionary thinking by fundamentalist Christians ... a key issue in their rejection is that the values that they believe, rightly or wrongly, to be incipient in evolutionary thinking, arguably this question of values is far more important than whether evolution squares with the literal truth of genesis ..." so, perhaps we should ignore what is obvious because we believe otherwise.
@martinalvarez3515
@martinalvarez3515 2 года назад
La ciencia y la biblia concuerdan en que el universo tuvo principio, entre otras muchas cosas.
@tokotokotoko3
@tokotokotoko3 13 лет назад
I dunno, he lost me a bit in this one - although I liked the other lectures. I think there is a scientific method (of course it's not a static thing), and the method gave us answers to questions religion just cant. For me discussions like that are just too abstract sometimes - religions make quite specific claims, and they base those on talking to god or similar things. The difference is quite apparent... even if it has grown out of a complex history.
@damienpace7350
@damienpace7350 Месяц назад
He just dismisses the Clash of Civilisations thesis without giving reasons. Poor.
@subcitizen2012
@subcitizen2012 2 года назад
With a decade in hindsight, this just seems to be a struggling with the then-popularity if the new atheists. It's a simplistic answer or criticism of a cherry picked simplistic argument (against religion on the part of Hitchens and others). Obviously, Steven Weinberg sounds like a physicist when he speaks about there being meaning. Ask a philosopher, or a psychologist, or someone else in the humanities and soft sciences, you're going to get a different answer. Wouldn't it be better if we have a humanism attached to the cold and calculated hard edges of science? The answer is simply being multidisciplinary, but that's a difficult thing to ask of specialists. The core of Hitchens criticism, and many others over an eon, is that with all it's grand claims, "religion," especially Christianity, says it can make you a better person when clearly all the valid examples Hitchens lists and many many many more are examples of it not holding a candle to those claims. I'm glad scientifically illiterate people can get warm feelings about their afterlife and such, but those warm feelings are probably more part of being human than they are strictly religious, and you don't have to be tempted to go through the motions of a faith to justify the touching of children or reading the spectres of violent nationalism, which are themselves examples of human problems, something that religion doesn't appear capable of interpreting,vaddressing, or remedying except with more warm fuzzy feelings and helplessness. The nihilism that can be felt is in a way a byproduct of religions failures; not science's achievements.
@JS-ln4ns
@JS-ln4ns 7 месяцев назад
Looking back, it’s surprising that the new atheism had such little staying power. I read all the representative books by Hitchens, Dawkins, Dennet and Harris. In fact those guys pushed me into majoring in philosophy and theology to see if there was anything I was missing. The sort of obtuse simplicity in their arguments, I mistook for cutting-edge arguments. They are essentially pale reflections of Bertrand Russell and Nietzsche. Atheism hasn’t really ‘advanced’ beyond those two.
Далее
Gordon Brown - The Future of Jobs and Justice
1:18:26
Просмотров 23 тыс.
ЛЮБИТЕ ШКОЛУ?😁​⁠​⁠@osssadchiy
00:20
Prof Dame Mary Beard - Tyranny and democracy
1:16:07
Просмотров 42 тыс.
Diana Eck - Globalization & Religious Pluralism
1:22:02
Prof. Peter Harrison - The Disenchantment of the World
1:05:04
Dr. Peter Berger on Religion & Modernity
10:04
Просмотров 38 тыс.
Charles Taylor Lecture: Master Narratives of Modernity
1:31:44
Marvin Minsky
1:33:35
Просмотров 844 тыс.