Python Data Classes Are AMAZING! Here's Why 

hey tim is this in the course?

@@MrRocka12 yes!

It's not gonna built-in because code generated by this is not cached

Just do it ffs

go to stack overflow to get beat up and demeaned with a RTFM reply

Try a different name other than main and see if it works

Get out of here you're scaring the children

Try reinstalling java dependencies as well as check it in some other IDE just so you know there is not some IDE kind of error.

just hit alt-F4

Python flask will help! Render index.html static js and static css

I had the same thought. I noticed the mistake as well.

So you can just create fields like: class Point() x y Can you?

It’s VSCode

I ❤ it's weirdness. 😊

What's the better option and why? In terms that a beginner like me would understand.

@@goodlookinouthomie1757 are you asking why it is used?

@@GiannakYT Well just generally what is the alternative to OOP. And yes i suppose why you would use that.

@@goodlookinouthomie1757 Functional programming is an alternative.

​@@goodlookinouthomie1757 in reality it depends on the scope of your programming. Need a quick and simple script that youre not gonna change just write global variables and operations. What you will find quickly enough is that some steps are repeated and you can write those steps as a function. Then you would use a mix of global and functional programming. If you continue scaling your project is that some variables are used in a section and not used any more, so it makes sense to separate those steps in to bigger functions, to save memory, also you would gain more flexibility as you would know which variables are used in each function and changing it once changes it for the whole script. If you continue scaling your project you may find some functions are called many times and each of those times something little changes, so you create a class that calls those functions and may change it. Another option is you want your script to have individual features and features that are a mix of the others, so a class could group those features (functions) as one and you can call them individually or in a group as your new function. So mainly you sacrifice more work to implement functions and or classes but gain flexibility or save lines of code for repetitions. Note this are examples and theres more pros and cons for using each paradigm.

Huh ?

I liked your code comment, but I don't understand it...

@@simonmasters3295 If you put the first two functions into a class, these ones are called if you want a string representation for the class instance object. The class__repr function is used to list all parameters assigned to this instance. This is very handy, if you want to know what data an instance owns.

@@simonmasters3295 If you look at the code at 0:24, there is a static __repr__ method. If you add another instance property you would have to extend the method. The approach I am using is generic, you can use it on every class and it happily list all the properties recursively.

@@simonmasters3295 trying to answer the third time ...

@@simonmasters3295 Please look at pos 0:24 in the video, the __repr__ function is static, if you extend the class, you have to extend the f-string. My solution is generic, it works for all classes. You can put the class__repr function in your own library, it lists all properties for an object using the classes __dict__ dictionary.