QD-OLED vs OLED TV: The Clear Choice 

Portland, JAMAICA in the Building !!

Samsung's liers sponsoring say the best tv of the year BIG LIE, still LG OLED is the best, look at this burning screan Samsung's qd-ooed ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-N6vPHC7L150.html

In the UK the S95B 55 is significantly less expensive than even the LG B2

exactly. Looking forward to getting a C2 at 83 inch on black friday. that 65 inch QD oled is TINY lmao.

@@henrywinters9496 No it's not lmao... 55 S95B is more expensive than 55 inch C2/G2

@@sammy10001 C2 is mediocre when it comes to brightness tho, it's worse than C1 according to reviews, get a 77/83 inch G2 instead, B and C series has been LGs mid-end line for a few years now, A series is entry level but G series is the high-end consumer line which gets all the cool stuff first... G1 vs C1 = G1 got evo panel ... G2 vs C2 = G2 got heatsink, if you can't afford G2 in 77/83 then you can't afford to go big anyway. Big and cheap is not the way to go unless you don't care about image quality. QD-OLED has WAY BETTER COLOR BRIGHTNESS than WOLED. 3-4 times higher. Most of WOLEDs brightness comes from the WHITE LEDs which means colors gets washed out when brightness is high, not on QD-OLED. Watch the video he explains it... Get a G2 or A90J if you go WOLED all the rest is pretty much mid-end at this point... Don't buy A, B or C series unless HEAVILY discounted. QD-OLED gets 77 inch size next year and LGs solution to QD-OLED is to shoot even MORE white lights into their RGB array = more washes out colors in bright scenes.. LG has pretty much maxed out WOLED with G2 model, it's 10 years old tech at this point, after all. QD-OLED is 1st gen and stomps on WOLED already.

@@Dr.WhetFarts I think you let the marketing terms really get the best of you. G2 at 83 is not an evo ex panel. There is no point in paying the premium for the 83 version of the G2. Id rather get the C2, or the a90j at 83, true. 77 G2 is a different story, that is the EVO EX, and is very good. but 83 > 77.

burn in issues ?? im a gamer and i play lots of hrs in a day

@@xxprouaexx non whatsoever not even worried about it. Still on factory firmware 1098

I watch everything on my tablet, it's true 😅

@@FROSTB4NE me too

They became mobileholic

I think I might be in your family

Yeah. I would just use it for gaming

You see the difference in color vibrance on the QD oled

Well, enjoy what you are happy with. Personally, though, I just find WRGB OLEDs, like my LG CX, to be deficient in color reproduction. I find my Pioneer Kuro 101FD plasma has noticeably better color reproduction (and motion). So, I'm hoping that QD-OLED has colors more similar to plasma TVs. They certainly seem to.

what about burn in in oled?

@@JosephKarthic hey Joesph I don't worry about burn in too much because I vary me content. And I don't go to sleep with the TV on all night. So far after 18 months I have no burn in or image retention.

@@michaelwyckoff7593 I see, I wanted to use my TV as a monitor as well, So I should look for other TV tech right?

accepted

glad I waited for QD-OLED before finally upgrading my Pioneer Kuro TV, my 65" A95K is def better, it's just as bright, and the colors are better, 4K is incredible, my only complaint is that Dolby Vision is available with only 2 HDMI ports, and the Ethernet port is only 100 Mbps and not 1 Gbps

Hes not good for gaming Monitors at all. Optimum Tech would be that, or Hardware Unboxed/Monitors Unboxed. Or a few other tech sites if you like Text based stuff.

Hdtv showed why. He played a scene on loop and after a minute the Samsung started dimming and kept dimming until it was barely visible. The Sony on the other hand kept going without any dimming (or minimal, can’t remember exactly)

@@medz3398 That's odd, because I saw a video on another channel that demonstrated just the opposite. The white highlights on the Samsung stayed bright for like 4 minutes or so and the Sony dimmed down almost immediately. Go figure...

@@drugemp1 Samsung nerfed the brightness with the patch,they just used the previous brightness level to bait buyers.

​@@ShadowLady1 it's the brightest oled period

​@@medz3398 Paused images or a constant loop of the same thing to protect the panel and can be turned off.

Good like the editing on this video?

@@jon4lakers No. Because your editing is better 😉 Keep it up! I love your videos

The ppi is not good enough for me . It's like 1440p . I am used to a very crisp imagine

@@x32i77 there's a reason it's low, so you can drive the panel with a high refresh rate. If you're going to create a 4K ultrawide with 240hz with example, good luck trying to drive that in 2022 because I'm sure that's gonna be a £7,000 PC.

@@thegixlad27I have no problem with that 🙂

QNED is a failure, it's on IPS panel which pales in native contrast when compared to traditional Mini LED TVs made by Samsung on VA Panels. The mini LEDs on IPS is not enough to overcome the native contrast enabled by VA panels. It comes down to IPS vs VA contrast differences, just like VA which is still backlit still cannot match self emissive tech like OLED in contrast.

It's failed tech don't get the brightness on store the loss of contrast is something that you're not going to pass eventually you will notice and be bothered

How's the TV so far ?

Did you buy it?

I just got the s95b for 1700 through my employer, deal seems impossible to beat

@@ChrisKingFTW2000 $1,700 for the S95B is hands down the best deal on any OLED right now.

@@ChrisKingFTW2000 Just got it for 1400 through my employer :)

Samsung doesnt have Dolby Vision though

And its ips pannel right?

It is sad they no longer care about 3d contents.

I have a samsung plasma lol but its time to upgrade. tech has gotten lot better

Nope. Never this one.

Which do you like more?

Exactly! Plus the white reproduction of qd oleds is inferior and with Samsung’s antiglare tech the blacks are nerfed so they don’t quite appear as inky black as LG oleds

You do know that QD-OLED can absolutely suffer burn-in, right ?

glossy screen is a real problem

@@cristianalexander4634 qoled is essentially an oled to me. Im talking about qled lcd

LCD is still just fine

I get a little chuckle every time a presenter pretends to know a technology but clearly doesnt

But… $$$

There’s nothing out that’s filmed in 8k yet though, your in stream or watching anything in 8 k is slim to none at least for now until they start making more 8k content, unless your gaming in 8k it’s not worth it

But the quality of Samsungs suck right now. Especially with all the bent screens.

@@jtopdawg6 my s95b works perfectly so far, not sure what you believe sucks quality wise from them - if you’re that worried about a bent screen then go buy one from Best Buy and check if it’s bent before leaving + I have Best Buy Total Tech coverage

Sony doesn’t even make the panels - they get them from Samsung

@@antonykeane5586 good for you!

@@Zorathan Samsung get them from Samsung display same as LG get their panels from LG display different companies so don’t really see your point.

It is definitely good for you. It wouldn't be good for people who prefer oled tv's

@@Frank_Pods by Otis Mcdonald? Nah, that ain't it.

@@Frank_Pods nope.

brighter oleds use a heatsink which allows the brightness to be turned higher. qd-oled works differently alltogether, allowing for a higher color brightness.

@@notsorandumusername How many Oled tv builded heatsink to prevent the burning? What happen to the Oled TVs without the heatsink? Burning right? lol same thing thing will happen with QD Oled tv!

@@romeotrinh6415 if you know everything already, why do you ask?

vizios are much better at 1/2 the price

@@turner02 last time I looked, the only companies that make QD OLED or Samsung and Sony and Samsung's QD OLED are very well priced

@@turner02 😂

@@turner02 yeah keep telling yourself that

the most obvious samsung shills

So why is he comparing the Sony to Q-OLed to Woled LG (G2)