Тёмный
No video :(

Quantum Physics Becomes Intuitive with this Theorem | Ehrenfest's Theorem EXPLAINED 

Parth G
Подписаться 238 тыс.
Просмотров 43 тыс.
50% 1

The first 1000 people who click the link will get 2 free months of Skillshare Premium: skl.sh/parthg0820
This theorem helps us understand quantum mechanics in an intuitive way, and even to visualise it like we can visualise classical physics!
Hey everyone! I'm back with Part 2 of this mini-series on the Ehrenfest theorem! In this video, we learn about what expectation values are, as well as how important they are in the mathematics of quantum physics. We then take everything we learnt about operators and commutators in Part 1 (check it out here: • Ever heard of Quantum ... ) as well as our newly-understood expectation values, and apply all this knowledge to Ehrenfest's theorem.
Firstly, expectation values are useful because they are essentially the weighted average of a probability distribution. For example, the wave function of a quantum system is directly related to the probability distribution of finding particles in that system at different points in space. This is the probability distribution when a measurement is made using the position operator. The expectation value is simply the weighted average (the mean) of this distribution. It's not necessarily the position at which we're most likely to find the particle(s), which is the modal position. But if that's the case, then why do we even care about the expectation value?
Well, for a couple of reasons really. Firstly, the expectation value can act as a nice (but primitive) indicator of how the probability distribution is behaving. It's exactly like using an average value as some sort of representative of the entire data set. For example, we might say that the mean height of a class full of students is 5 feet 6 inches (or 1.68 m). This gives us some information (though not as much as knowing the height of each student in the class) because we can use this mean to compare to the mean student height of other classes. In the same way, we can find the expectation value of an electron's position in a system.
The second (more compelling) reason to use expectation values is because they often behave in a rather surprisingly classical way. Although quantum mechanics is probabilistic and difficult to comprehend, the expectation values of certain probability distributions can behave like their classical counterparts. We see this through Ehrenfest's theorem. When we substitute the position operator into Ehrenfest's theorem, we find that the mass of our particle multiplied by the rate of change of the expectation value of the position is equal to the expectation value of the particle's momentum. This might be difficult to understand in text form, but basically this is almost identical to the classical physics definition of momentum! The mass of a classical object, multiplied by its rate of change of position (i.e. its velocity) is equal to its momentum.
And this tells us something interesting. Quantum systems behave in a specific way so that their probability distributions change with time, in a way that their expectation values behave surprisingly classically.
We can even substitute the momentum operator into Ehrenfest's theorem, and follow the mathematics through. This one's a bit more fiddly and needs a few more assumptions, but under the right conditions the expectation value of the momentum of a system has a relationship very similar to Newton's Second Law of Motion - the fundamental classical relationship! We find that the rate of change of the expectation value of the momentum of the system is equal to (the equivalent) of the force exerted on the system. And Newton's Second Law says that the rate of change of a classical object's momentum is equal to the force exerted on it. Pretty cool right?
Ehrenfest's theorem of course has lots of operators in it, as well as a commutator and an expectation value. For this reason, it was important to split this particular explanation up into two. I hope you enjoyed both these videos, because I really enjoyed making them. I really like breaking down a complex looking equation into small bits and explaining them to you guys. Thanks so much for watching my ramblings lol.
Again, thanks for all your support, and big thanks to SkillShare for sponsoring this video! I have a second channel, Parth G's Shenanigans here on RU-vid, where I post my own original music. I also have an Instagram @parthvlogs. Feel free to follow me on there, and subscribe here for more fun physics content! I'll see you really soon :)

Опубликовано:

 

2 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 158   
@nyahanderton4912
@nyahanderton4912 2 года назад
I do a physics degree and these videos are making it so much easier for me, the lecturers tend to over complicate everything
@romishcraft
@romishcraft 4 года назад
Thank you so much Parth. I was really tired of watching philosophical or theoretical physics. I thought there is no RU-vid channel who gets into the equation, but I am glad that I found your channel now. People like you makes RU-vid an amazing place. Thanks again.
@hafsashabbir7842
@hafsashabbir7842 10 месяцев назад
You are my favourite. Physics is not fiddly and subtle. Just need a best teacher to explain it and u are:)
@arhenresleff4748
@arhenresleff4748 4 года назад
Hey, my name is Arhen and Im striving to major in quantum physics/mechanics and for a PhD in Astrophysics and astronomy. I've heard of ehrenfest theorem before however this was an excellent explanation! I found it very helpful and ive been working through your other videos as well, can't wait for the one on entropy! Thanks Parth 😀
@FD-rt3rv
@FD-rt3rv Год назад
this video evokes two strong feelings: the first is that i love you and your videos, the second is that I deeply detest my smart-cookie-expensive-profs who cannot do their job properly and explain such concepts nearly 1% as clear as you do
@markusantonious8192
@markusantonious8192 2 года назад
As a teacher (emeritus) myself....I can tell you - though I rather doubt you need convincing - that Parth is an absolutely superb communicator and teacher.
@tobydunbar1153
@tobydunbar1153 4 года назад
You are an EXCELLENT TEACHER!!! Thank you for all the amazing videos!!! Your long hair looks lovely, by the way!!!
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Thanks so much Toby :) I appreciate the kind words
@lewisleslie2821
@lewisleslie2821 4 года назад
Ohhhhhh that makes so much sense!! This was a good refresher on commutation too! Looking forward to that entropy video :))
@anjalibhattacharyya4940
@anjalibhattacharyya4940 4 года назад
Sir isn't h bar = h/2π(where h is Planck's const.) ..... excellent explanation btw and please make a video on special theory of relativity.
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
You're totally right, that's my mistake! Good spot :)
@pranjaltiwari1663
@pranjaltiwari1663 3 года назад
Reduced Plank Constant
@SMc-1235
@SMc-1235 Год назад
So this is the use of Ehrenfest's theorem. Thanks for the lucid explanation ❤️.
@ec6093
@ec6093 4 года назад
This is so cool!!! You did make the process look simpler, thanks!
@kunalverma6940
@kunalverma6940 4 года назад
Apart from the awesome explanation of Ehrenfest theorem, you gave an equally amazing statistics lesson for the difference in averages and most probable values, lmao. Also, could you delve deeper into the topic about why Quantum Mechanics inherently uses complex numbers and complex functions?
@xjuhox
@xjuhox 4 года назад
Complex numbers are two dimensional numbers that can incorporate real variables X and P. The crusial Fourier transformation is a complex transformation between two basis variables, i.e. X and P. And, of course, the Fourier transformation is equivalent with the Heisenberg's commutation relation [X,P] = ih that is the key to the matrix mechanics.
@marcusrosales3344
@marcusrosales3344 3 года назад
Given Schrodinger's equation this has to be the case! The free particle is just a diffusion equation with a imaginary diffusion constant. It's solution is quite intuitive: a plane wave with a phase relation kx-Et. The factor of i does something special: it makes so a single time derivative can support oscillatory solutions. It makes the plane wave solution possible for a free particle. In any case imaginary numbers are for real! Aerospace engineering has complex drag coefficients for instance.
@robertschlesinger1342
@robertschlesinger1342 3 года назад
Very interesting, informative and worthwhile video. Parth, you are raising the consciousness of the world. Bravo!
@joumanic
@joumanic 3 года назад
Hey! My classmates and I really love your videos!! they saved us so much time and effort. Would you be able to make a video about angular momentum in spherical harmonics and perhaps also the zeeman effect ?
@gowtham5168
@gowtham5168 4 года назад
Love u brother ... u make it elegant and importantly u make us appreciate the concepts
@kartikmessner2868
@kartikmessner2868 3 года назад
Beauttiful.. : ) made the picture much more clear compared to when I read the text first.👍🏻👍🏻
@tzaidi2349
@tzaidi2349 2 года назад
Love this material and presentation style. Subscribed!
@ronaktiwari7041
@ronaktiwari7041 4 года назад
How could I have missed subscribing a wonderful wonderful physics Channel like this....!
@abdulrahmanalhamali1707
@abdulrahmanalhamali1707 3 года назад
Great content, thanks!
@nandanshettigar873
@nandanshettigar873 4 года назад
Excited for the entropy video
@asukayanami7159
@asukayanami7159 2 года назад
best explanation video ever watched! thanks a lot
@nileshkulkarni6196
@nileshkulkarni6196 4 года назад
Your videos are awesome 👏 .......love from 🇮🇳....
@quahntasy
@quahntasy 4 года назад
Very informative video. Thanks for this. Loved the way you connected quantum and classical mechanics
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Thanks so much :)
@nileshkulkarni6196
@nileshkulkarni6196 4 года назад
Quahntasy-Animating Universe I have seen you before in some other comment section (maybe Kurzgesagt or Teded ? ).....and you are from IIT Kanpur Can u give me some tips for studying to score more in JEE I love how a lot of youths from India 🇮🇳 are following some gr8 channels like Parth G , Kurzgesagt , Ted-ed ,etc. And I see you too animate some good educational videos...... keep it up👍
@kandasamymarimuthu6640
@kandasamymarimuthu6640 2 года назад
Excellent video on quantum operator. I actually started pick on quantum mech. During covid lock down in Malaysia starting march 18,2020 just to keep my mind active and so interesting the way you capture the topic and your English to easy to catch phonetically due to Indian flair.thnx
@ahmedsaeed7158
@ahmedsaeed7158 4 года назад
Keep rising up ♥️
@EarlWallaceNYC
@EarlWallaceNYC 3 года назад
very insightful. Thanks
@lakshthaker6379
@lakshthaker6379 4 года назад
best videos made by you. fav youtuber
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Thank you so much :D
@nabhoneelchatterjee2692
@nabhoneelchatterjee2692 4 года назад
very simple and clear explanation sir..💙
@ankitaacharjee3283
@ankitaacharjee3283 2 года назад
Very effective explanation .thank you making physics interesting
@tadeletekeba13
@tadeletekeba13 4 года назад
Thank you so much for beautiful explanation
@georgearrington5766
@georgearrington5766 3 года назад
Another good one!
@ratnabesra8959
@ratnabesra8959 3 года назад
Great explanation
@rijuwanahaque8054
@rijuwanahaque8054 4 года назад
Just found this channel. Now addicted to it.💙 I am also a Physics Student working on Material Physics !!! But interested in QM and CM🙏🇮🇳
@aritrakundu1464
@aritrakundu1464 2 года назад
I am a first year UG student at IIT Kgp and here I am studying Quantum mechanics for the first time, just 3 hours before the test....Pray for me
@sdsa007
@sdsa007 2 года назад
Thanks very challenging topic!
@selin4393
@selin4393 6 месяцев назад
saved my life, thank you
@xjuhox
@xjuhox 4 года назад
You could mention that the Schrödinger equation can be derived from the Ehrenfest's Theorem if we assume the "fundamental transformation" between position and momentum.
@DanielL143
@DanielL143 3 года назад
Excellent.
@harshbhogal4439
@harshbhogal4439 4 года назад
loved every single second
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Thanks so much Harsh :)
@user-gl2eq2ly4g
@user-gl2eq2ly4g 4 года назад
Love it ...... Thank you
@sergiolucas38
@sergiolucas38 2 года назад
very good video, thanks :)
@pritivarshney2128
@pritivarshney2128 4 года назад
Excellent video! Now I really understood the relation between Quantum Mechanics and Classical Mechanics. Can you do a General Relativity video Please?
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Thanks! Yeah I want to make some GR videos for sure :)
@sarniva
@sarniva 4 года назад
Excellent video ❤️❤️
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Thank you so much!
@sarniva
@sarniva 4 года назад
@@ParthGChannel 🥰🥰
@divyadeepsingh9062
@divyadeepsingh9062 4 года назад
Hey Parth are you planning to make a video on decoherence ?? That could be a topic
@satyanarayanajoshi3239
@satyanarayanajoshi3239 4 года назад
Hi i am getting more curious in physics by watching your videos Thank you very much 😊😊
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Thanks so much for watching!
@satyanarayanajoshi3239
@satyanarayanajoshi3239 4 года назад
@@ParthGChannel Thanks for reply 🙂🙂🙂🙂
@eldestisland4520
@eldestisland4520 2 года назад
Thanks for writing out all the math at 10:30 🙏
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Hi friends! The first 1000 people who click the link will get 2 free months of Skillshare Premium: skl.sh/parthg0820
@unrealreality5419
@unrealreality5419 Год назад
Amazing teaching! You have a rare talent!
@sreedevipv8749
@sreedevipv8749 4 года назад
Sir...can you can make a video on quantum engineering....love your videos!!!
@qubex
@qubex 2 года назад
10:32 I scanned through the commentator algebra and saw the end result so I said to myself “heh, momentum’s expected value divided by mass, that’s basically velocity, so when observing location your expectations follow the expected velocity, yeah that makes sense”.
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 2 года назад
I would suggest that you look up the physical requirements for velocity measurements and then compare with what can and can not be done in quantum mechanics.
@masteryodaa69
@masteryodaa69 4 года назад
would totally love to watch ur videos on GR & SR.
@ChiDraconis
@ChiDraconis 3 года назад
I concur; I am working on Quantum Chirping-at a sufficiently small scale Fraunhofer lines become Baryons which implies a "3 Vector tensor" ( three quarks ) which is distinguished from mesons which I must assume due to limits of my knowledge since EM is "Light" and light is em then since a "pulse" of light arbitrarily simple because of clarity wont stand still ( remain in one place ) where "hard matter" ( nucleons ) will
@sudhanshusharma5497
@sudhanshusharma5497 4 года назад
Man...you are very cool!!!
@user-vg7zv5us5r
@user-vg7zv5us5r Год назад
7:37 There is not particular time unit since dt is infinitesimally small quantity. Check out Leibniz's Law of Continuity.
@ehosseinnn
@ehosseinnn 2 года назад
This is excellent but I think you have a big mistake that could confuse many: The vertical axis is NOT probability but pdf instead(area under the curve is probability..)
@vishank7
@vishank7 4 года назад
Loved this mini series Parth, keep up the good work! I have a little doubt. I see operators as a mathematical equivalent to functions, like x(psi) and f(psi), which ends up being a normal scalar valued function "f" giving us the position of our particle. So, it is kinda weird to think about commutators defined like xH-Hx. It is like defining a quantity f•g-g•f which has no meaning.🤷‍♂️
@xjuhox
@xjuhox 4 года назад
Those terms are like matrices that are linear transformations that, in general, do not commute, i.e. AB is not BA.
@vishank7
@vishank7 4 года назад
@@xjuhox That actually clears things up. Thank you!😄
@angelmendez-rivera351
@angelmendez-rivera351 3 года назад
Actually, if you study functional analysis, you will realize that the expression f•g - g•f makes perfect and is well-defined. Functions are mathematical objects just like any other, so we can treat them like mathematical objects and define operations as we like. Things in mathematics have meaning as long as mathematicians want it to have meaning, because meaning is not an inherent property of objects. So in fact, it is not even necessary for you to think of H or x as matrices - in some contexts, this interpretation of operators is not even possible, which is why wave mechanics ends up forming part of the basis for higher level quantum theory.
@blueTwl
@blueTwl 3 года назад
can anyone tell me what is this program that Parth is using? I think it's a really nice way to present the mathematics and would like to use it
@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885
Basil J. Hiley has proven that to have conservation of energy of the wave function there has to be a quantum potential that is nonlocal and noncommutative.
@DickHoskins
@DickHoskins Год назад
Really excellent lectures.
@HeroSanjA
@HeroSanjA 4 года назад
Hey how do you draw in your videos? :)
@traruhsynred3475
@traruhsynred3475 Год назад
I don't get why you say is equivalent to doing a measurement. x|psi> doe not result in a new wave function confined to a single point. That would be impossible anyway as it would take infinite momenta to specify. Indeed all you get is wave-function multiplied by x and that is not even a normalized wave function nor does it pick out a particular value. which involves an integral of x does calculate 'expected' value, but again does not pick out any particular value. Doing a measurement always involves a n interaction with something and can't be done by applying an operator to single particle wave function. Typically it involves some kind of irreversible event such as a charged track ionizing an atom that seeds the formulation of a bubble. The precision of the measurement rarely (if ever) probes anything near the Heisenberg limit.
@joeyrufo
@joeyrufo 3 месяца назад
I feel like it has to be important what you have to go to a pair of electrons to get them into an "entangled space"!
@lakshthaker6379
@lakshthaker6379 4 года назад
Sir please make a video on Copenhagen interpretation
@abhasoodan7982
@abhasoodan7982 4 года назад
i have a question, in the last term of RHS of this theorem, why do we need to write it down if its going to be zero? are there cases where its not 0?
@ocean7371
@ocean7371 4 года назад
Wow 64k , following you since 1k
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Thank you so much for your continued support :D
@MosheTarko
@MosheTarko 4 года назад
Could you please do a few examples (with numbers) after you explain the formulas?
@ffhashimi
@ffhashimi 4 года назад
Yes it would be great.
@ffhashimi
@ffhashimi 4 года назад
Great!; I suggest and hopeyou talk about a real example of simple measurement system and it's calculation; in other world a simple real example of what physicists do when they make a measurement and calculate its result; this would make things sink in; thanks
@muhammadjawadkhan6407
@muhammadjawadkhan6407 2 года назад
Sir in quantum physics and classical physics there is difference of h bar ?
@abhishekrai1204
@abhishekrai1204 4 года назад
Sir plz make video of classical mechincs imotant topics as lagrangian mechincs phycial mean etc
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
I definitely want to do that :)
@sandeepgodiyal5686
@sandeepgodiyal5686 2 года назад
Hi Parth, I have one question... In the expression of Ehrenfest Theorem, the third term represents the expectation of rate of change of operator. As you were telling the measment changes with time but the process of making measument (operator) doesn't change with time, so essentially this term becomes zero. If it is zero only, then why this term is included in Ehrenfest Theorem?
@xepho8205
@xepho8205 Год назад
The X operator is time independent. But there might be cases in which an operator A does depend on time so the last term must be included in the general formulation ...
@vijaysinghchauhan7079
@vijaysinghchauhan7079 3 года назад
At 4:05 there are no resources for mean and expectation values in the description.
@spyrex3988
@spyrex3988 4 года назад
Yoooo the new hairstyle is sick
@rc5989
@rc5989 4 года назад
Is this related to momentum and velocity being treated separately and equally by Hamiltonian operators, instead of Newtonian mechanics which treats momentum as derived by position and velocity?
@xjuhox
@xjuhox 4 года назад
In QM the momentum P is an operator that takes the X derivative. That is, in QM the momentum and position are indeed related.
@TheHumanHades
@TheHumanHades 3 года назад
Sir, if expectation value of rate of change of a operator is always zero then why is it even there in the equation. Is there a case when it is not zero? Amazing video though 😀
@xepho8205
@xepho8205 Год назад
The X operator is time independent. There might be cases though in which an operator A does depend on time so the last term must be included in the general formulation ... The Hamiltonian for instance (the H operator) may be time dependent when there is interaction between light and matter, then the electric and magnetic fields of light contribute a time-dependent part to the potential energy experienced by the atom ...
@tamiltamilan2208
@tamiltamilan2208 4 года назад
Hello sir your videos are superb and good and however I think that you will be really satisfied if you refer previous year NEET and AIIMS question papers. Well the are the medical entrance exams of India and there are myths that are spreading that the physics questions in these exams are extremely tough. Well so feel free to check it out and make a special video reviewing them. Please Note: It's just my recommendation
@tamiltamilan2208
@tamiltamilan2208 4 года назад
Sir if you do that it would be helpful. Pls sir
@rajaradi802
@rajaradi802 4 года назад
Parth what does it mean for something raised to the power e or e raised to power of ih or something
@xjuhox
@xjuhox 4 года назад
Just check the power series representation, baby. If the shit converges (in a norm) and is unique, then it makes mathematical sense.
@rajaradi802
@rajaradi802 4 года назад
@@xjuhox Iam not a baby
@nikkikumari3268
@nikkikumari3268 3 года назад
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@mahboobhossain3301
@mahboobhossain3301 3 года назад
The time dependent Schrodinger's eqn. doesn't involve probability then how probability entered into QM when all means are too deterministic???🤔🤔
@Jehannum2000
@Jehannum2000 3 года назад
Your English is not very clear. It's hard to understand what you are asking.
@reemibrahim4847
@reemibrahim4847 4 года назад
Hey💜
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Hi :D
@carlthorellstein53
@carlthorellstein53 3 года назад
Wait hollup; if we can do the exact same experiment twice, at different times, and get different results, does that not mean that one of the conservation laws in Noether's theorem is violated? Or rather, that one of the conservation laws do not hold when looking at quantum systems? Or is that because I'm tied to the idea of particles having definite positions always, rather than viewing them as wave functions first and foremost?
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 2 года назад
Neither. All conserved quantities in quantum mechanics are conserved in every repetition of the experiment. The actual problem you are running into is that the theoretical description is not self-consistent. The potential in the Schroedinger equation acts on "the particle" but the particle does not act back on the source of the potential, hence you are automatically violating conservation in the math, even if the physical systems are not. That's just one of the reasons why one should not take the Schroedinger equation too seriously. It's a toy quantization procedure that teaches very little about the actual structure of the world.
@user-vg7zv5us5r
@user-vg7zv5us5r Год назад
11:20 Don't you mean that Ehrenfest's theorem nullifies Heisenberg's uncertainty principle since we can now determine position (coordinate) and the momentum (impulse) even though approximately?
@voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang885
no because of the actual quantum measurement problem being noncommutative - he explained that in part one. He just didn't say it was noncommutative even though it is! thanks
@tadeletekeba13
@tadeletekeba13 3 года назад
Thank you so much Parth G (Tadele __ Ethiopia)
@sonugeorgealex
@sonugeorgealex 3 года назад
Detailed explanation of those 'p' substitution would have been nice or atleast should have mentioned the steps 😉
@abhinavsrivastava8457
@abhinavsrivastava8457 4 года назад
Hawking radiation does also link classical mechanics and quantum mechanics
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Very true, it uses principles from both relativity and QM
@Dismythed
@Dismythed 2 года назад
I'm curious why the theory uses absolute time (dee-tee) instead of relative time (dee-tau) since we're dealing with objects in motion? (Or maybe even plugging in the dilation equation?) When scaled up in either velocity or length, there will be time dilation and length contraction, won't there? Or does that come later down the line? Solution found in my comment below.
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 2 года назад
Non-relativistic quantum mechanics doesn't care about the difference. It doesn't have to. It can't describe systems of multiple particles correctly to begin with and the multiple observer problem can't even occur because each measurement in quantum mechanics is a monad (it can only occur once). Relativistic quantum field theory, on the other hand, is Lorentz invariant by design.
@Dismythed
@Dismythed 2 года назад
@@schmetterling4477 I believe what you're referring to in regard to Lorentz invariance is Loop Quantum Gravity. This, on the other hand, is Ehrenenfest Theorem. I just read the Wiki page on it and now I understand that it uses absolute time because it is relying on classical mechanics for the operations and letting Poisson's bracket and the Hamiltonian do all the heavy lifting. The expectation values, as Parth explained, which are the purpose of the equation, allow the link between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics. Basically, it's a mathematical lingual translation between Newton and Hamilton. At 8:54, I missed that he explained that "the process of measuring itself does not change with time." In other words, the measurer and the object measured do not have significant changes in position with relation to each other so that they do not significantly impact the result. I feel kind of foolish now for having missed that and the direct reference to classical mechanics.
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 2 года назад
@@Dismythed I don't know how you came to these strange beliefs. LQG is nothing more than a hypothesis at this point. QFT is well established theory. Quantum mechanical measurement is irreversible energy transfer, hence it relies on energy, which does not exist without a classical time concept.
@Dismythed
@Dismythed 2 года назад
@@schmetterling4477 Please don't paint me as a nutjob. Not everyone has the same level of knowledge. My bad on the Lorentz invariance. I haven't gotten that far into physics yet and looked up an article that was a specific application of Lorentz "invariance" rather than its general application. But the rest of what I said is accurate. I now understand that Lorentz symmetry is the source of the idea that physics is the same for all observers. I'm just not familiar with the math yet, though I absolutely believe the principle. I just never made the connection to its name. The "invariance" (correctly "covariance") is the claim that the symmetry is hard-baked into the backround of the universe (QFT), not just natural to the math. If I understand that correctly, then I'm not sure how relativistic QFT answers my original question. I kind of feel like your original reply was to the left of what I was originally asking for. I was asking why, not asking for an opinion of what view is correct. I'm not being aggressive, just honest. If you want someone to learn, you need to give them the facts and leave it up to them to develop their own opinions.
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 2 года назад
@@Dismythed I gave you the answer. Non-relativistic quantum mechanics is a toy theory that doesn't care about these things. It's not correct and it can't be made correct with "small" changes. The correct theory is quantum field theory, but that correctness comes at an incredible level of mathematical complexity. I can't change that for you. The reason why we don't get people started on QFT is simple: it is too hard for all but the most gifted students. I am an experimental high energy physicist but I can't do a single line of QFT calculations myself. I can measure what the theory predicts, but I can't use it myself. I have to rely on the theoretical guys who can to do it for me.
@saradhicheruvu7585
@saradhicheruvu7585 4 года назад
Just curious. Since expectation value is loosely tied to average value, for a given distribution why would an expectation value change with time?
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Great question! Because the distribution itself evolves with time. For example, the Schrodinger equation determines how the wave function changes over time, and this means the probability distribution of the system changes with time too. Therefore, the expectation value does the same.
@saradhicheruvu7585
@saradhicheruvu7585 4 года назад
@@ParthGChannel Thank you very much. It is very clear now. I learnt a lot from your videos than reading books on QM. You made a complex subject easy to understand. Now I am really enjoying QM. Wish I had a teacher like you when I was in school.
@xjuhox
@xjuhox 4 года назад
The expectations values evolve in time (the Schrödinger equation) and for every fixed time, the wave function Psi(x,t) gives an expectation value for any physical operator O as an integral .
@muhammadjawadkhan6407
@muhammadjawadkhan6407 2 года назад
Why we only study angular momentum in q.mechanics
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 2 года назад
We don't. We study energy and momentum and charges and their spectra and scattering amplitudes. Angular momentum simply happens to be one of the quantized quantities.
@sitaramar13
@sitaramar13 2 года назад
If we toss a coin also , before experiment, we have only a probability. After experiment , we have a definite result. What's difference between this and behaviour of electron ? Why do we call collapse of wave function ?
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 2 года назад
If you are a rational physicist, then you will not use the "collapse of the wave function" terminology. A wave function is not a physical property of the individual system. It is a the description of the free dynamic of the quantum mechanical ensemble (i.e. of infinite repetitions of the same experiment). Unfortunately there is no physical meaning in that ensemble description all by itself. The physical meaning only exists if we also describe the preparation (emission) and measurement (absorption) conditions of the system. Only if all three elements (how we put energy into the system, how the system evolves and how we take the energy back out, again) are completely specified, can we make an actual physical prediction.
@sitaramar13
@sitaramar13 2 года назад
@@schmetterling4477 thanks sir
@sumapanattu117
@sumapanattu117 3 года назад
dude i wish you could reply to this comment i always have the anxiety that i will not understand the concept before studying the concept itself the really problem i have is that i always think that i will never reach an expert level understanding of physics i actually have reasonable intelligence but still i have anxiety can you help me with this
@daanvanijcken4288
@daanvanijcken4288 3 года назад
Shouldn't it be rather than ?
@Jehannum2000
@Jehannum2000 3 года назад
No, you don't need the asterisk in Dirac notation. The bra is already defined as the complex conjugate of the ket, and their labels are just labels.
@vnana2991
@vnana2991 4 года назад
Kingg
@jaybhambure5969
@jaybhambure5969 4 года назад
Nice video! A tiny but important correction at 11:30-11:40 all the probability graphs are incorrect, at the nodes. Your graphs are non-differentiable at the nodes. Make sure that all graphs are differentiable at all points in order to use Ehrenfest theorem. A counter example is the bound state of a 1 dimensional Dirac delta potential, whose solution does not follow Ehrenfest theorem, since the solution is not differentiable at the location of Dirac delta. Hence we use an alternative interpretation for the same. The interpretation being that the delta potential is only a quantum phenomenon and has no classical analogue.
@angelmendez-rivera351
@angelmendez-rivera351 3 года назад
This correction isn't actually very important, since this video isn't meant to be a rigorous proof or explanation of Ehrenfest's theorem. Instead, it's meant to provide an intuitive guide for understanding the theorem with a level of knowledge that a high schooler would have. And you can trust me when I say most high schoolers won't've any idea of what "differentiability" means. It's entirely outside the scope of the video, and such tiny details aren't relevant to the intuitive explanation, which is something that was literally clarified in the previous video on the topic. You can't judge the execution of a video by the standards of what it wasn't meant to do. That's logically fallacious.
@johnpaulbounce3708
@johnpaulbounce3708 4 года назад
High school level math? Parallel universe is real. Lol Nice vid.
@nawafalnahdi3108
@nawafalnahdi3108 4 года назад
Hi
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Hiya :D
@harish6787
@harish6787 4 года назад
Hundredt h view
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Thanks for watching :D
@vishnurahul3378
@vishnurahul3378 4 года назад
Hiiii
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Hey :D
@vedantchimmalgi463
@vedantchimmalgi463 4 года назад
hi
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Hi :D
@vedantchimmalgi463
@vedantchimmalgi463 4 года назад
​@@ParthGChannel if possible(only if) can you make an a levels playlist for physics? it would really be helpful. you are the best physics teacher ive got!!
@quahntasy
@quahntasy 4 года назад
Om Vedant Chimmalgi hi
@danipent3550
@danipent3550 3 года назад
02:38 mcdonalds
@tidtechnologyindepth6337
@tidtechnologyindepth6337 4 года назад
first here🥺
@ParthGChannel
@ParthGChannel 4 года назад
Hey :D
@tidtechnologyindepth6337
@tidtechnologyindepth6337 4 года назад
@@ParthGChannel 😍
@br3nto
@br3nto 3 года назад
Everyone keeps saying that quantum mechanics is unintuitive and difficult compared to classical mechanics... the more I learn the less this seems true. The problem is that we aren’t taught classical models first and get all these false models first, then we learn the quantum models. Schools should just skip the classical stuff and teach the quantum stuff.
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 2 года назад
Classical models aren't false. They simply don't tell you about the structure of matter. They only tell you how large chunks of matter move.
@JayYadawa
@JayYadawa 2 года назад
Hi Parth, Per this paper, even if we take the expectation value, quantum physics doesn't quite match classical physics. www.reed.edu/physics/faculty/wheeler/documents/Quantum%20Mechanics/Miscellaneous%20Essays/Ehrenfest's%20Theorem.pdf . Can you please comment why will not obey Newton's second law? Thx.
@schmetterling4477
@schmetterling4477 2 года назад
Newton's law is simply the definition of classical force. That's a non-relativistic approximation and absolutely nothing in the universe moves like that. The real problem, however, is the completely unfounded assumption that classical physics is just the expectation value of quantum mechanics. That is simply not the case. How classical behavior emerges from quantum mechanical systems has been known since roughly 1927-1929. Heisenberg gave an example of the behavior of Rydberg atoms under repeated measurement and Mott worked out the case for alpha particles in a cloud chamber or similar track detector. Most people never read those papers and so there is still a lot of completely unnecessary guessing going on.
Далее
How Feynman did quantum mechanics (and you should too)
26:29
ЮТУБ ТОЧНО ВСЕ!
11:23
Просмотров 786 тыс.
The things you'll find in higher dimensions
23:16
Просмотров 7 млн
The REAL Three Body Problem in Physics
16:20
Просмотров 473 тыс.
The Quantum Hype Bubble Is About To Burst
20:00
Просмотров 865 тыс.
Parallel Worlds Probably Exist. Here’s Why
20:00
Просмотров 23 млн